Rogozin: In a nuclear war, Russia will destroy NATO in half an hour

8 May 2022 26

Ukraine is not an independent state, but a means of Western pressure on the Russian Federation. Therefore, if the "peace-loving" NATO bloc continues its encroachments towards Russia, then it may run into a nuclear response. The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, wrote about this on May 8 in his Telegram channel, accompanying his story with a video from an interview dedicated, among other things, to his vision of the Russian special operation on Ukrainian territory, which he gave the day before.

The functionary noted that even before the coup d'etat in Kyiv in 2014, officials from various departments of Ukraine were "faithful satraps" of the Alliance and literally kowtowed before it.

We are not fighting the Nazis in Ukraine. We liberate Ukraine from NATO occupation and push the worst enemy away from our Western borders

- he considers.

Rogozin stressed that the very existence of Ukraine separately from Russia would inevitably turn it into Anti-Russia and a springboard for the Western world for further aggression.

That is why what we call a special military operation goes far beyond its original meaning and geography. This is a war for truth and the right of the Russian Federation to exist as a single and independent state

- he added.

The head of the state corporation is sure that the Alliance is waging war against the Russian Federation. The collective West has not officially announced it, but this does not fundamentally change anything and is obvious to all sane people. In his opinion, the national battalions and the Armed Forces of Ukraine are consumables, cannon fodder are local operators of NATO and its allies' weapons systems trained by Western instructors.

In a nuclear war, NATO countries will be destroyed by us in half an hour. But we must not allow it, because the consequences of the exchange of nuclear strikes will affect the state of our Earth.

- he specified.

Rogozin is convinced that Russia will have to defeat the more powerful enemy in all respects, which is the West, with conventional weapons systems. He summed up that victory in such a war can be achieved under certain conditions: with the complete solidarity of the population with the RF Armed Forces, with the mobilization economics, with the immediate and rapid transfer of the military-industrial complex and related industries to a military footing.

Note that Moscow has repeatedly stated that it is not going to use nuclear weapons on the territory of Ukraine, as this is contrary to the tasks of the NMD.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alexey Davydov

0

8 May 2022 19: 31

Ukraine is not an independent state, but a means of Western pressure on the Russian Federation. Therefore, if the “peace-loving” NATO bloc continues its encroachments towards Russia, then it may run into a nuclear response. The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, wrote about this on May 8 in his Telegram channel.

doesn't fit with this:

Rogozin is convinced that Russia will have to defeat a more powerful enemy in all respects, which is the West, with conventional armed systems. He summed up that victory in such a war can be achieved under certain conditions: with the full solidarity of the population with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with the mobilization of the economy, with the immediate and rapid transfer of the military-industrial complex and related industries to a military footing.

Let us recall the actions of the USSR in 1962, which prevented a "decapitation" strike by American missiles from Turkey and Italy and a nuclear war. This experience showed that in order to prevent nuclear war, it is necessary to use strategic nuclear weapons as a threat with a readiness for real use. Operates effectively.
Our renunciation of the threat of using strategic nuclear weapons against the United States leads to the deliberate weakness of our position in the face of territorial ambitions from all sides. Conventional weapons and human resources in a world war for several fronts will not be enough for us.
This is what attracts its potential participants to the third world war now, bringing it closer and making it inevitable.
1. Michael L.
  
  +2
  
  8 May 2022 20: 39
  
  What is "SIA"?
  What kind of denial of the possibility of using nuclear weapons can we talk about if the Supreme Commander publicly ordered that the nuclear forces of the Russian Federation be put on high alert!
  1. Alexey Davydov
    
    +1
    
    8 May 2022 22: 35
    
    This is not about giving up the possibility of the defensive use of strategic nuclear weapons (SNF), but about giving up the threat of using strategic nuclear weapons and nuclear war on US territory, i.e. offensive use of nuclear weapons. What the USSR did in 1962.
    Now from everywhere there are arguments about the theoretical possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons - tactical nuclear weapons. Naturally - in Europe, not in the States and England.
    Arguments about threats with strategic nuclear weapons are probably forbidden. We assure the States on all platforms that we are against nuclear war.
    The transfer to high alert (quite justified) was accompanied by the assertion that this was not a threat to the States, but our reaction to the danger from their side. Feel the difference. It exists and is significant.
    1. Michael L.
      
      0
      
      9 May 2022 07: 05
      
      Regarding the decoding of the SNF - it's understandable.
      "Sarmat" - which V. Putin threatened the United States - strategic nuclear weapons!
      1. Alexey Davydov
        
        -2
        
        9 May 2022 11: 03
        
        Do you really not understand, or are you pretending?
        Notifying the United States of the presence of nuclear weapons, and threatening to launch a nuclear strike on US territory and start a nuclear war, with the readiness to do so, are two big differences.
        The USSR in 1962 did the second thing with the Americans.
        This is what we are talking about now.
        
        Michael L.
        
        -1
        
        9 May 2022 12: 26
        
        So the public order to put the SNF on alert was not a threat, but a notice?
        
        The sailors have no questions!
        
        Alexey Davydov
        
        -1
        
        9 May 2022 14: 07
        
        A notice that we are fully prepared to respond to their sudden blow. What else?
        
        Alexey Davydov
        
        +1
        
        9 May 2022 16: 06
        
        This is close - not a threat to launch a nuclear strike on the United States first if they do not stop aggression, do not lift sanctions and economic blockade, and do not retreat from our borders
Sergey Latyshev

-9

8 May 2022 20: 01

In general, Rogozin is a well-known PR man.

threw in the idea "the very existence of Ukraine separately from Russia ...", that is, it is necessary to conquer, If they interfere with conquering, then they have a war. And we have a special operation. Not good.

Solidarity, mobilize, voluntarily march in formation, for the sake of high salaries for effective VIP managers like Rogozin ....
ivan2022

+1

8 May 2022 20: 57

In general, against the background of today's reports about the counter-offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Kharkov, it sounds generally strengthening, as well as generally encouraging and generally reassuring at the same time. YES... we will give them!
FGJCNJK

-1

8 May 2022 20: 59

Is it really a pity 4 Sarmatians to use and stop forever this nonsense?
Spatel

-7

8 May 2022 21: 31

Note that people like Putin, Rogozin, Volodin and many other "patriots" from United Russia will not even ask if we want, i.e. people, such a perspective. Want to sit in a bunker?
1. guest
  
  0
  
  8 May 2022 21: 38
  
  The alternative is no better.
  1. Oleg Rambover
    
    -4
    
    8 May 2022 22: 08
    
    Isn't the alternative to death better?
    1. guest
      
      -2
      
      8 May 2022 22: 30
      
      No, not better.
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        -3
        
        8 May 2022 22: 53
        
        Who what. For me personally, death is not an option. Your dreams are sinful in triplets. Firstly, suicides do not go to heaven, secondly, despondency is a sin, and thirdly, your dreams of taking everyone with you contradicts the commandment do not kill.
        
        Why such despondency? According to your RF loses?
        
        guest
        
        -1
        
        8 May 2022 22: 59
        
        Yes, no, he doesn’t lose, but considering the hypothetical possibility, a quick death with grabbing all his enemies is definitely better than a long and painful one.
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -1
        
        9 May 2022 11: 58
        
        I don't understand anything. If the Russian Federation wins, then why commit collective suicide? You are not satisfied with the victory of the Russian Federation? Or is this victory too long and painful?
        In addition to enemies, you will take with you all of humanity.
        
        I do not understand what kind of torment you are afraid of? If you are unlucky and you and your loved ones survive the nuclear attack, you will slowly and painfully die of hunger and radiation sickness. What torment terrifies you, that you prefer death from a nuclear strike or painful death from its consequences. And with all your loved ones.
        
        guest
        
        -2
        
        9 May 2022 12: 22
        
        During such a fierce conflict, and not with Ukraine, but really with the entire collective West, it is necessary to consider all the possibilities, including even defeats, so that this defeat would definitely not happen.
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -2
        
        10 May 2022 00: 05
        
        Yes ... shiz. Russia wins, but one must prepare for suicide if Russia loses. Dear Spatel talks about now, and Ragozin (something he reminds me of Goering) too. The alternative to death is always better. Russia has lost more than once and has always been reborn, why do you want to deprive her of the future this time is not clear. Maybe you are a Russophobe?
2. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich
  
  0
  
  9 May 2022 07: 32
  
  Spasatel, well, let me use nuclear weapons, eh. Well, what are you worth, huh? Well, allow me. Without your permission, well, nowhere ...
Oleg Rambover

-4

8 May 2022 22: 07

The Internet remembers everything. He also remembers the yawning Rogozin with a poster "Whites of all countries unite." Remembers Rogozin at a rally with RNE flags. He remembers how the Rodina party he created was accused of fascism. And now he is a fighter against Nazism. Inscrutable are your ways...

In a nuclear war, NATO countries will be destroyed by us in half an hour. But we must not allow it, because the consequences of the exchange of nuclear strikes will affect the state of our Earth.

I hope he is aware that Russia will also be destroyed in this?
Navigator

0

9 May 2022 01: 12

Rogozin is a bright representative of the new management, which causes great harm to Russia by its actions. There is a saying about him "not for Senka's hat." How can a journalist lead Roscosmos? Makes some funny statements. Pushed his son to a responsible leadership position in aviation, who quickly flunked everything. When will the state impale them all?
1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich
  
  -2
  
  9 May 2022 07: 37
  
  Navigator, and how passionate you want to be present at the same time. You look and you beat yourself up in an orgasm of pleasure and the fulfillment of your righteous ambitions...
Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich

0

9 May 2022 09: 11

It's nice to know that there are smart politicians in our country.
1. Vox Populi
  
  +1
  
  9 May 2022 12: 21
  
  Yeah, and commentators to match them - a dime a dozen ...