Kyiv invited several countries to declare war on Russia at once

21

Ukraine cannot stand against Russia, even with the West behind it. All the efforts of the Kiev regime are now aimed at maintaining regional tensions and hostilities, as well as ensuring that interest in Ukraine in the world does not fade away. But time does its job against the backdrop of its own economicpolitical problems, the population of the West (the EU and the USA) is less and less likely to remember former favorites.

Kyiv predicts that in a few months Ukraine will be completely forgotten and this will be the beginning of the end. Therefore, the hasty search for "solutions" to save the overall strategy ended with a completely absurd proposal to seek a kind of "help" from other countries. The task of the heads of the allied states, as seen in Ukraine, is to simultaneously declare war on Russia in several directions at once, by several countries.



According to the plan, the main thing is that they all seize the opportunity and present territorial demands to the Russian Federation, following the example of those that it allegedly makes to its neighbors. Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, speaks openly about this. In his opinion, the criterion in this case should be the assumption that the state that made the claim considers the required lands to be its own and wants to get "back".

Danilov focused on Nagorno-Karabakh, the need for Japan to intensify its demands on the Kuril Islands (or better to hold military exercises there). The Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council did not forget about the problem of Transnistria and Russian peacekeepers, as well as South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and, of course, remembered Kaliningrad, having learned about the history of the "historical territorial claims" of one Polish general.

In this desperate absurd step, the real agony of the Ukrainian authorities is read, the realization that Western sanctions have not worked is clear. The expected "collapse" of the neighboring country did not follow. Also, the bet on revolutions and uprisings within Russia itself did not work, as the initiators hoped for. economic restrictions - the Western masters of Ukraine.

Now time is on the side of the Russian Federation, because Ukraine will not survive a long war. In order to achieve its modest goals of survival, Kyiv does not even shy away from fomenting the prospect of a world war, trying to provoke the stretching of Russia's flanks and thereby alleviate its fate. However, in the end, it only makes things worse, aggravating the situation, bringing the sad denouement of 30 years of independent “floating” closer.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    28 March 2022 09: 29
    is to simultaneously declare war on Russia

    Ukraine itself is already at war with Russia?
    1. +1
      28 March 2022 21: 37
      Exactly! They kept quiet about themselves! There were such petty provocateurs in the 90s - they bullied passers-by, and when they began to punish them, bulls crawled out from behind the gateway and started nesting on the victim! So this Banderstadt is the same - a non-country, non-political nation ... it’s difficult to call such people - animals don’t revel in bullying their relatives anyway. Geeks, in a word!
  2. +1
    28 March 2022 09: 44
    All the efforts of the Kiev regime are now aimed at maintaining regional tensions and hostilities, as well as ensuring that interest in Ukraine in the world does not fade away.

    So that the interest in Ukraine in the world does not fade away, it is necessary to start spring sowing right now. Without grain and oil, everyone will definitely forget about Ukraine. Nobody needs beggars.
  3. +1
    28 March 2022 10: 11
    These words are inscribed in Zelensky's piece of paper by the United States. The talking doll voices the threats of our main enemy. The goal is to suppress and break us psychologically even before the fight. They do have such plans, but if we save and they don't have to take risks, they don't mind.
    In parallel, observing our reaction to the "random" statements of various characters, they probe our readiness for a retaliatory strike against a NATO country, and our determination to use nuclear weapons.
    This last, apparently, is the key issue in their plans.
    Unlike previous years, now we are already at war, which has a compressed time jackal.
    All these actions of the enemy have a specific and close practical goal.
    If we want to prevent an attack, we need to respond with a real threat to every attack.
    1. 0
      28 March 2022 21: 39
      The GDP has already said that it will not think about using a strategic deterrent if NATO JUST TRYS TO START.
      1. 0
        28 March 2022 21: 44
        Let's say you once warned your neighbor not to drill after 22-00. After a while he started again. If you do not warn him again, he will become insolent.
        All states of the world do not hesitate to warn and threaten again and again, raising the degree of threats, in matters in which they are vitally interested.
        If someone, having warned once, keeps silent, everyone else will consider this not a sense of their own dignity, but an inability to defend their ban.
        Here the situation is extreme, and everyone understands that it is really not easy for us to decide on SUCH. Therefore, we need to work and convince the enemy of our determination.
        Otherwise, what good will our nuclear weapons do for us?
        1. +1
          April 6 2022 14: 15
          Constantly flailing your tongue, threatening, leads to only one thing - you will no longer believe that you are capable of something. Former The Ukrainian SSR warned GDP ONCE. These polydypkN thought that the Russian Federation was bluffing and continued to jump on the rake ... The result is known. And therefore there is nothing to threaten constantly - once is enough. And then just smack. To be taken seriously.
          You are either a serious participant, or an idler.
          1. 0
            April 6 2022 14: 53
            Right. Words need to be backed up with actions.
            In 1962, Nikita Sergeevich reinforced. He placed rockets on the Cup and fired a warning shot with a nuclear weapon. The Americans "took it seriously." And they removed the missiles from Turkey and Italy. I sincerely wish us the same efficiency
            1. 0
              April 7 2022 22: 21
              So WOW???
              1. 0
                April 8 2022 01: 09
                Nikita managed not to gasp. Nevertheless, he was successful.
                Because he convinced the Americans of their determination to use nuclear weapons.
                Without this determination, it, like a threat, does not work.
                I am sure that we did not convince them of our determination. This is to put it mildly. Take, for example, our participation in the recent joint statement of the nuclear five on the prevention of nuclear war by its countries. This is a sign, and he tells the enemy directly about the opposite.
                Therefore, for now, as a weapon of threat, our nuclear weapons are unreliable, and are only suitable as a weapon of revenge. Of course, the enemy will repent that he did not believe in our threat, but we will not have enough pleasure in this.
                Like this
                1. 0
                  April 14 2022 13: 35
                  That's just the point, that they BELIEVE! Otherwise, they would have climbed into 404 with arms and legs, introducing their "expeditionary forces". As it was in 1918-20.
  4. 0
    28 March 2022 10: 44
    It is also not bad to OBJECTIVELY remove all doubts from them on the main issue. All the rest can fall away by themselves.
    It is very strange to me that we are delaying this.
    It is probably FOR THIS REASON that they roll their lip more and more.
    Is that what we need from them?
  5. 0
    28 March 2022 11: 16
    but did the Russian Federation declare "war" on Ukraine?
    1. +1
      April 6 2022 14: 16
      Call it what you want, but this is war. How it is done is another question. Moreover, you can call it whatever you like - a "military operation" is also possible.
  6. +1
    28 March 2022 11: 46
    Well, which of the listed countries will agree to this "flattering" proposal?)))
  7. +1
    28 March 2022 12: 28
    And did Ukraine itself declare war on us? :))))
  8. +1
    28 March 2022 16: 44
    When joining NATO, one of the conditions is the absence of territorial disputes with neighboring states. None of the NATO states that declared war on Russia because of territorial claims will receive ANY help from the bloc. So Zeleny simply exposes the Balto-Polish half-wits to Russian strikes.
    1. +1
      28 March 2022 21: 42
      Here the psheks were also told: if you climb into the territory of the non-country, you will get snot, and the dimentor warned that there would be no support for the psheks from Nata in this case!
  9. +1
    28 March 2022 20: 12
    Miserable dregs of society who have gained power ... not mind, not fantasy ..
  10. 0
    28 March 2022 21: 03
    If they themselves are weak in mind, then they think that they are the same everywhere ..., all adequate people remember that Russia has enough funds to destroy anything and even more. than the states...let them try.... There is one half-wit who would support this clown, but the trouble is, he is sitting on a leash in Georgia ... Miho also dreamed about it very much ...
  11. 0
    29 March 2022 10: 04
    Well, if these countries start a war against the Russian Federation, then only with the aim of creating the USSR2 ....