American general believes that Russia can use nuclear weapons against Poland

8

In order to deter further NATO advance to the east, the Russian authorities may order the use of tactical nuclear weapons. This point of view was expressed by the former commander of the joint forces of the North Atlantic Alliance in Europe, General Wesley Clark.


At the same time, Clarke believes that in this case Moscow will strike not at Ukraine, as many believe, but at Poland.

If Putin really wants to contain NATO, if he believes he can destroy the alliance, he can use tactical nuclear weapons. Where will he use it? Perhaps not in Ukraine, but somewhere in Poland

- the general emphasized in an interview with CNN.

Thus, military hysteria in the West is acquiring ever new forms and scales, much more dangerous than before. Talk about nuclear war, which is being conducted both in the expert community of Western countries and in their governments, is provocative in nature and can hardly bring stability to the world.


Earlier, the head of the defense committee, Rhode Island Senator Jack Reid, told The New York Times that if weapons of mass destruction were used, Russia would face certain consequences, as radiation contamination would spread to nearby territories. So far, the US intelligence services do not observe any preparations on the part of the Russian Federation to use such a powerful weapon.
Reporterin Yandex News
Reporterin Yandex Zen
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) 25 March 2022 12: 39
    +4
    By decision-making centers yes
    Sitting behind a puddle will not work No.
  2. sgrabik Offline sgrabik
    sgrabik (Sergei) 25 March 2022 12: 46
    +4
    This says only one thing, Poland should not provoke Russia and get into our own affairs, we in Ukraine will figure it out ourselves, but no one called them there and is not going to call them, but if, despite the warnings, the Poles still climb, they will get according to the full program, it certainly won’t seem enough !!!
  3. Plumber Sun Offline Plumber Sun
    Plumber Sun (San San) 25 March 2022 13: 39
    +1
    It looks like this "general" is already doing it for himself.
  4. AND Offline AND
    AND 25 March 2022 14: 08
    +3
    How to stop NATO, if they go of course. Only one (1) Sarmat-(Satan-2) to Poland with 10 nuclear heads, the territory will be contaminated. Who will go towards the Russian Federation to fight on the infected territory? In addition to Ukrainian, Polish refugees will flood the EU, it will be a complete collapse. In which direction will Ukrainians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians have to turn economically...? In the direction of the Russian Federation, of course. The most economical war for Russia, only one Sarmat and then euro-silence. The euro-NATO will have a lot of its own concerns (concerns). Only a cold calculation, everything is as they like in Europe. France, Germany, Britain have long wanted to deal with Russia's hands to deal with Poland, which has broken off the Euro-chain.
  5. instrument Offline instrument
    instrument (xxx) 25 March 2022 14: 11
    +1
    the Americans are already openly telling the Poles what can happen to them if they do not calm down.
  6. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 25 March 2022 14: 42
    +3
    While the Americans are scaring the Poles with a Russian bomb, they themselves can quietly prepare a chemical provocation in Kyiv in order to blame Russia later. Maybe Hollywood has already made a movie about it?
  7. gorskova.ir Offline gorskova.ir
    gorskova.ir (Irina Gorskova) 25 March 2022 18: 16
    +1
    Again twenty-five and a test tube. Why hit Poland with nuclear weapons? For her, clean, non-polluting will suffice. Or are Americans judging by themselves? I remembered Yugoslavia .... Only this general should be remembered. Putin does what he says: giving orders to the centers. And Poland is "tobacco".
  8. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 March 2022 09: 38
    0
    Let's argue.
    In theory, now it is we who should threaten the United States with nuclear weapons, as "pinned to the wall", especially since it is our nuclear weapons that they are truly afraid of.
    Moreover, historically, for 60-70 years, it was the nuclear weapons of the USSR that were "a factor of peace on the planet."
    Moreover, it was the determination of the USSR to use nuclear weapons that "broke" the Americans back in 1962.
    However, we are "modestly" silent after our recent joint statement as part of the "nuclear five" about the non-admission of nuclear war by its countries.
    This may, indirectly, tell the States about our unpreparedness for the use of nuclear weapons, about our lack of determination to use it in conditions of "mutual suicide."
    Now they are talking about it more and more often. This can be regarded as a timid sounding - a test of the "hypothesis" described above. They need to know for sure