The return of the city of Nikolaev will give Russia access to unique shipyards

18

The special military operation of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine has demonstrated that the Russian army is able to act effectively even against a highly motivated enemy that is many times larger in number. However, it also made it possible to identify serious problems facing the Russian Navy.

So, despite the absence of an officially declared war, Turkey blocked the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, effectively cutting off Russian warships in the Mediterranean from the naval base in Sevastopol. From the Black Sea area they can now neither leave nor enter. At the same time, Spain and Cyprus denied the Russian Navy the right to use their ports for entry, replenishment with fuel and other supplies. The path to the Baltic and Barents Seas is not close, and de facto our Mediterranean squadron now relies only on a base in Syrian Tartus.



This situation reveals a serious problem with the operational supply of the Russian fleet in the far sea zone. Obviously, without fuel, water and food, no long-distance campaign is simply impossible, and without replenishment with ammunition, active combat operations are impossible. And with this, objectively, everything is not very good with us today. To understand the challenges facing the Russian Navy, it is worth looking at how our potential adversaries solved the problem.

US Navy


The maximum supply problem in the far sea zone manifested itself during the Second World War, when the Americans and the Japanese had to fight among themselves in the vast Pacific Ocean. It turned out that without a clumsy tanker with fuel, a battleship, cruiser or aircraft carrier quickly turns into a useless floating pelvis.
The idea of ​​​​creating a universal high-speed and at the same time armed transport, combining the functions of a tanker, dry cargo carrier and refrigerator, was expressed by Admiral Arleigh Burke, after whom, by the way, a series of destroyers was named.

In 1963, the lead ship of the USS Sacramento series of universal supply ships was launched, and four were built in total, two each for the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. With a length of 242,3 meters and a width of 32,6 meters, each of them has a displacement of 53000 tons. For one flight, the transporter is capable of delivering 22640 tons of fuel, 1210 tons of fresh water, 1000 tons of food, 6000 tons of food and up to 200 personnel. In addition, a camping hospital can be organized on one of its decks. At the same time, supply vessels are not so defenseless, being equipped with launchers for Sea Sparrow missiles and two Vulkan-Phalanx anti-aircraft guns.

Exceptionally useful resupply ships capable of reloading on the move in as little as 4 hours and allowing the US Navy to perform a wide range of missions in the far sea zone.

Navy of the USSR and the Russian Federation


In the 70s of the last century, for the needs of the Soviet Navy, a series of six tankers of Project 1559-B "Sea Space" was built. With a length of 162,4 meters and a width of 21,4 meters, they had a total displacement of 22 tons. They made it possible to transfer fuel, water and a small amount of dry cargo to warships directly on the move in a traverse way: 460 tons of fuel oil, 8250 tons of diesel fuel, 2050 tons of aviation fuel, 1000 tons of drinking water, 1000 tons of boiler water, 450 tons of lubricating oil and 250 tons of food and dry cargo.

This was a very big step forward, expanding the capabilities of the Soviet Navy in operations in the far sea zone. Of the six specialized supply vessels, only three remained in service today - Dniester, Ivan Bubnov and Boris Butoma. The latter, by the way, accompanied the flagship of the Pacific Fleet, the missile cruiser "Varyag" and the BOD "Admiral Tributs" during their transition to the Mediterranean Sea, where they are currently located.

You can also mention the Soviet integrated supply ship (KKS) of project 1833 "Berezina", which was launched in 1977. With a length of 209,6 meters and a width of 25,1 meters, it had a total displacement of 24565 tons. The transporter could transfer 2500 tons of fuel, 1600 tons of water and 900 tons of dry cargo for the needs of the fleet. At the same time, he was also not defenseless, having on board artillery installations, RBU-1000-2 rocket launchers, Osa-M air defense systems and 2 Ka-27 helicopters.

Unfortunately, we are forced to speak of him in the past tense. After the collapse of the USSR, the far sea zone became of no interest to anyone. First it was disarmed, then turned into a floating warehouse. The case ended naturally: in 2002, the Berezina was sent for scrap to China.

In other words, in fact, for the entire Russian Navy, which is distributed over five seas, today there are only three age tankers of Project 1559-B "Sea Space" capable of performing these tasks. And now, because of the special military operation that has begun in Ukraine, our warships have been denied the opportunity to be supplied in foreign ports. Sailed. On the one hand, this situation leads to the conclusion that it is necessary to create our own PMTO network abroad. On the other hand, it is obvious that it is necessary to start building new specialized supply vessels. The Russian Navy will now clearly be forced to operate more actively in the far sea and ocean zones.

But where to build them now, when all Russian shipyards are overwhelmed with orders for years to come?

Tankers of project 1559-B "Sea Space" were once built at the Baltic Shipyard, but the more advanced "Berezina" of project 1833 was built at the Shipbuilding Plant named after 61 Communards, the current Nikolaev Shipbuilding Plant. There, in Nikolaev, the city of shipbuilders, there is also the Zorya-Mashproekt enterprise, which manufactures power plants designed for Russian frigates. In addition, until 2021, the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant existed there, where the largest ships in the USSR were launched - from aircraft-carrying cruisers and dry cargo ships to floating docks and icebreakers.

In a good way, it would be necessary to return the city of Nikolaev, under which Russian troops are now stationed, to the sphere of influence of Moscow and make it work for the needs of the Russian Navy. Now we have a unique opportunity to correct a historical injustice in our favor. At the Nikolaev shipyards, warships can be laid down and built, which so far can only be dreamed of. Not using it would be a big mistake.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    15 March 2022 15: 09
    All Novorossiya should be returned to Russian control, with a hypothetical unification with the DPR and LPR within the framework of new republics or a single region under the protectorate of Russia. These lands from ser. The 18th century was assigned to Russia following the results of centuries-old wars with the Commonwealth and Turkey. It's not even discussed LEGAL the territory of Russia, its western borders, up to the borders with Moldova and Romania. Nikolaev, Krivoy Rog, Kramatorsk, Kherson, Odessa and many other cities and villages - the territory of Russia, period.
    1. +8
      15 March 2022 15: 47
      These territories should be part of the RF regions. These are the historical lands of Russia and it’s time to return them under the flag of the Russian Federation, and we don’t detain everyone in the Russian Federation who has Russia across their throats, the borders are open, a suitcase, a train station, and at least to Canada ...
    2. +1
      16 March 2022 18: 23
      GDP said about decommunization
      And this means that the historical lands of Russia will be returned
  2. +1
    15 March 2022 16: 35
    So far, only the Kherson region is entirely under the control of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
  3. +7
    15 March 2022 17: 08
    That's when Nikolaev becomes a Russian city - then it's worth talking about loading it with Russian orders. For now, we are talking about taking the city, and then the horizon is still foggy. Management speaks. that is not going to take anything away.... Well, my personal opinion is that we don't need half measures. Take - so take. otherwise why shed soldier's blood? Once they came to restore order - so to the very end, to the western borders of the Russian world.
    1. +2
      15 March 2022 17: 55
      to the Atlantic Ocean, including England. For as long as this cloaca exists, it constantly continues to spoil.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 123
    +4
    15 March 2022 18: 06
    It's raining again in the village of Gadyukino laughing

    Turkey blocked the Bosporus and Dardanelles, effectively cutting off Russian warships in the Mediterranean from the naval base in Sevastopol. From the Black Sea area they can now neither leave nor enter.

    It is not clear what was blocked there, the situation is somehow muddy. It looks like a "negotiable", both sides do not aggravate. What this has to do with supply vessels is not entirely clear. After all, if in your opinion the straits are closed, you can build in Nikolaev only for the Black Sea.

    In other words, in fact, for the entire Russian Navy, which is distributed over five seas, today there are only three age tankers of Project 1559-B "Sea Space" capable of performing these tasks. And now, because of the special military operation that has begun in Ukraine, our warships have been denied the opportunity to be supplied in foreign ports. Sailed. On the one hand, this situation leads to the conclusion that it is necessary to create our own PMTO network abroad. On the other hand, it is obvious that it is necessary to start building new specialized supply vessels. The Russian Navy will now clearly be forced to operate more actively in the far sea and ocean zones.

    The fact is that they did not wait for the advice, they began to create bases and build supply ships on their own. Supply ships, tankers, hydrographic vessels, tugboats are already being built. For example:

    Putin signed an order on the creation of a naval support center in Sudan

    https://www.interfax.ru/russia/737364

    The tanker "Akademik Pashin" was handed over to the fleet, there are plans to continue the series of this project.

    Three more medium sea tankers of project 23130 will be built for the Ministry of Defense

    https://sudostroenie.info/novosti/32643.html

    Small sea tanker (MMT) project 03182 In the photo "Vice-Admiral Paromov"


    Project 20360M project weapons sea transports are being built, supply vessels 23120 in the photo "Elbrus"


    Well, it should return the city of Nikolaev, under which Russian troops are now standing, into the sphere of influence of Moscow and make it work for the needs of the Russian Navy. Now we have a unique opportunity to correct a historical injustice in our favor. At the Nikolaev shipyards, warships can be laid down and built, which so far can only be dreamed of. Not using it would be a very big mistake.

    For good, we should probably stop writing nasty things and advise nonsense. Do you understand what you are writing? It smelled like Bandera propaganda sad They say the invaders came, captured and forced to work for their own army. Yes In addition, the "sphere of influence" is abroad, to start building ships for the Navy again (and as I understand it, you write about them, and not just about support ships) is either stupidity or sabotage. Do you need to be reminded of the import substitution program after the factories and shipyards have remained abroad? Just sort of cleared up and here again? Do you offer to dance on a rake again?
    1. -1
      15 March 2022 18: 31
      For good, we should probably stop writing nasty things and advise nonsense. Do you understand what you are writing? It smelled like Bandera propaganda sad sad They say the invaders came, captured and forced them to work for their own army.

      You write nasty and stupid things here.
      Nikolaev, Odessa, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Kyiv and Kharkov are Russian cities.
      And you are a hypocritical and unprincipled opportunist, which we have long established. hi

      In addition, the "sphere of influence" is abroad, to start building ships for the Navy again (and as I understand it, you write about them, and not just about support ships) is either stupidity or sabotage.

      Supply ships also belong to the Navy, if anything.
      Abroad to be Nikolaev or not, just now it is being decided. If he stays abroad, then this decision is wrecking.

      Do you need to be reminded of the import substitution program after the factories and shipyards have remained abroad? Just sort of cleared up and here again? Do you offer to dance on a rake again?

      Yes, tell us how many gas turbines and gearboxes we produce per year. Yes How many ships are waiting for power plants. I would love to hear the details about how everything was cleared up.

      P.S. all the supply ships you listed belong to a completely different class than what was discussed in the article, in terms of displacement and supply capabilities. But such trifles do not bother our "numbers". good
      1. 123
        +1
        15 March 2022 19: 45
        You write nasty and stupid things here.
        Nikolaev, Odessa, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Kyiv and Kharkov are Russian cities.
        And you are a hypocritical and unprincipled opportunist, which we have long established.

        And why do you define Russian cities in the sphere of influence and force them to work?
        Two-faced and hypocritical position. What did you install there (who are we?) It looks like your personal problems hi

        Supply ships also belong to the Navy, if anything.
        Abroad to be Nikolaev or not, just now it is being decided. If he stays abroad, then this decision is wrecking.

        Undoubtedly belong to the Navy. This is how Nikolaev will decide where to be, then, in fact, think about shipbuilding. So far, you consider it only in the "sphere of influence" and offer to build a fleet abroad again.

        Yes, tell us how many gas turbines and gearboxes we produce per year. How many ships are waiting for power plants. I would love to hear the details about how everything was cleared up.

        Are you having trouble finding this information yourself? I won’t say in terms of quantity, we have to look, but definitely more than in 2014 and significantly. I would very much like to hear how you propose to avoid a repetition in the future, offering to dance on a rake with production in the "sphere of influence".

        all the supply ships you listed belong to a completely different class than what was discussed in the article, in terms of displacement and supply capabilities. But such trifles do not bother our "numbers".

        Yes, the ships under construction are smaller, but we also have a smaller fleet, fewer ships of especially large displacement. And the Soviet-built ships are still in service. You write yourself...

        Of the six specialized supply vessels, only three remain in service today.

        Who are you going to supply that you urgently needed so many ships? Why panic? The construction of new ones must be synchronized with the increase in the payroll of the Navy ships, otherwise there is no need for them.
  6. +1
    15 March 2022 19: 39
    The return of the city of Nikolaev will give Russia access to unique shipyards, provided that Ukraine joins the Russian Federation or a union state, but the Russian Federation did not initially declare such a goal.
    Initially, there was an ultimatum - non-expansion, non-deployment, return to the borders of 1997
    Then the demands were reduced to the denazification of Ukraine and the recognition of the DPR, LPR, and Crimea.
    Negotiations in Minsk are ongoing, which means that the final agreement could turn everything upside down.
  7. +1
    15 March 2022 23: 52
    What does it mean we will not take away??? There is a fact that this region belonged to Russia. It was transferred during the Soviet era. In Ukraine, there is a law on decommunization, so follow this law ....
  8. 0
    16 March 2022 04: 19
    The author writes correctly. Nikolaev - a Russian city and its shipyards can bring considerable benefits to the Russian Navy, and residents will receive jobs, prosperity, protection from Bandera and the Nazis.
  9. 0
    16 March 2022 10: 51
    At the Nikolaev shipyards, warships can be laid down and built, which so far can only be dreamed of. Not using it would be a very big mistake.

    But Putin said that Russia will not occupy Ukraine....
    1. 0
      16 March 2022 11: 15
      You never know what Putin said. He does not remember today what he said yesterday. Even about Soviet galoshes, which we only knew how to make ...
    2. 0
      16 March 2022 13: 14
      But Putin said...

      First, when did he say? Currently, the situation in Ukraine is changing daily.
      Secondly, the population of the Nikolaev region, as in the Crimea, will decide whether it will remain part of Bandera Ukraine or not.
    3. -2
      16 March 2022 20: 35
      But Putin said that Russia will not occupy Ukraine....

      It was a long time ago, when the special operation was still presented as a liberation campaign against relatively loyal lands.
      However, the once fraternal people have been greatly reformatted over the past 30 years.
      You won't be able to leave quickly.
  10. 0
    16 March 2022 12: 07
    Only the division of Ukraine. Necessarily - Novorossiya from Kharkov to Odessa. Also Little Russia, Volyn, Galicia. 2 special territories - Carpathian Rus and Bukovina.
  11. Cat
    0
    17 March 2022 18: 05
    But did the Turks block the straits for all ships and vessels of the Russian Federation? It is clear that BNK is temporarily prohibited from leaving the World Cup, but civil tankers and bulk carriers have the right to leave and enter the World Cup. Or not?