Western media shared scenarios of a possible Odessa amphibious operation

16

After Russia launched a special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine, Western media continue to speculate about the possible Odessa amphibious operation by the Russian fleet. In particular, the HI Sutton publication believes that President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko revealed some plans of the Russian command on this matter during the last meeting of the Security Council of the Republic of Belarus.

The publication notes that the squadron of the Russian fleet with at least six large landing ships is still located in the northwestern part of the Black Sea, but closer to the Crimea, and not to Odessa, as it was before. The Russians are clearly in no hurry to carry out the landing of marines on the coast.




Attention was drawn to five types of coast suitable or inconvenient for landing. The direction of the offensive from the coast towards Transnistria was also noted.


Perhaps the landing force is being kept in case of complications with Transnistria, as insurance, and the Russians want to take Odessa itself, entering by land from the north with large forces. Suddenly Kyiv decides to attack Tiraspol.


The Ukrainian Armed Forces in Odessa still have artillery and anti-ship missiles, which complicates the landing operation. In addition, the city's beaches are littered with mines and studded with anti-tank hedgehogs.

However, there is another scenario of possible development of events. The Russians do not have to storm Odessa from the sea in the forehead. They can land to the right or left of it and move to connect with Transnistria. Access to Transnistria will allow cutting the communications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, replenishing supplies and developing offensive operations.

However, each BDK is just a well-equipped company of Marines with technique. This means that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have much more forces in the region, but they are spread over the area, since they have no idea where exactly the landing force can go. At the same time, moving around Odessa, most likely the Russians will meet less resistance.

Naturally, there are speculations that the map was a deliberate deception. We believe that this is unlikely, since Lukashenka will not pretend to be a storyteller. The map was probably prepared at the time when the landing was supposed to take place, but the operational situation did not allow this.

- summed up the media.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    6 March 2022 17: 34
    each BDK is just a well-equipped company of marines with equipment

    Is it? 300-400 people, and if you fill barrels like herring, then maybe 50 more.
    1. -8
      6 March 2022 19: 08
      Marines are already packed to the maximum on the ship.
      1. 0
        6 March 2022 21: 55
        For a few days, they can make room.
  2. +5
    6 March 2022 17: 49
    Western media shared scenarios...

    a star with a finger in the sky, Mansteins not planed
  3. AND
    +5
    6 March 2022 19: 13
    Quote: gunnerminer
    Marines are already packed to the maximum on the ship.

    Everyone here knows you as the mouthpiece of the euro-cybertroops !!! Go home, Bandera propagandist.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    6 March 2022 19: 52
    The first successful counter-operation of the Soviet troops in the history of the Great Patriotic War was the landing near Odessa. Near the village of Grigorievka (25 km northeast of the city), the 3rd Marine Regiment was landed. Paratroopers were thrown behind enemy lines. On the sector between the Fontanka and Gildendorf, the 421st and 157th rifle divisions went on the offensive. As a result of the counterattack, the 5th Romanian corps was pretty battered, the 13th and 15th divisions were defeated. Soviet troops pushed the enemy back 8-10 km.
    The captain of the 1st rank S.G. Gorshkov (famous, in the future - commander-in-chief of the USSR Navy, who received the rank of rear admiral for this operation), was appointed commander of the landing operation, who carried out the operation in full accordance with the approved plan.
  5. +6
    6 March 2022 21: 18
    Quote: AND
    Quote: gunnerminer
    Marines are already packed to the maximum on the ship.

    Everyone here knows you as the mouthpiece of the euro-cybertroops !!! Go home, Bandera propagandist.

    Horn? It's loud and unfair. The clyster tube is correct.
  6. +1
    6 March 2022 21: 24
    Quote: Dart2027
    each BDK is just a well-equipped company of marines with equipment

    Is it? 300-400 people, and if you fill barrels like herring, then maybe 50 more.

    Something misunderstood. 400 people*6=2400. With full armament and support from the sea with artillery, air defense from ships. As you know, they reached Syria from the Caspian, can't we reach Odessa from the Rostov region? Aviation. Iskanders. And who is against it and how much? All Ukrainians are locked up in the DPR. according to our estimates, from 50 to 70 thousand. Around Kyiv, the same number, apparently. How long is Odessa protected? It is clear that no one will jump onto the berths of Odessa. More modestly, you can jump on the sidelines. And wait for the second flight, it will come in a couple of days, for sure.
  7. +3
    6 March 2022 21: 30
    Attack of Kyiv on Transnistria. Wake up. If only the green itself, having smoked, will go with a horn into the ground. They do not have a fig to send something somewhere. They can be sent, but they can't. They would stand the day and hold out the night. We will cover a couple of echelons from Poland with pieces of iron - they will sit on the train ... and calm down. When the last hope is gone.
    1. 0
      7 March 2022 12: 13
      Attack of Kyiv on Transnistria. Wake up.

      - This is, in fact, an attack on neutral Moldova by Ukraine. But about the "stoned Zely" I would not be so optimistic. There are such creatures on the ground that Zelya is just a clown in comparison. Yes, and they do not smoke light drugs, and sniffing or snorting, they can not only attack Transnistria, they can easily undermine the nuclear reactor in Kharkov.
  8. -1
    7 March 2022 13: 43
    Quote: special correspondent
    Attack of Kyiv on Transnistria. Wake up.

    - This is, in fact, an attack on neutral Moldova by Ukraine. But about the "stoned Zely" I would not be so optimistic. There are such creatures on the ground that Zelya is just a clown in comparison. Yes, and they do not smoke light drugs, and sniffing or snorting, they can not only attack Transnistria, they can easily undermine the nuclear reactor in Kharkov.

    It is not necessary to endow them with the talents of strategists. You see, the second (or already the fifth?) front will help them for something there. It will divert attention from someone and attract to someone who needs it. Crawling into a hole is inherent in any animal, including those with two legs. When there is no way to hit in a big way, they try with pokes. The inevitable loss of control in such cases, when some begin, like Panikovsky and Shurik, to poke - "And who are you?" - just says that the end of their stay there is close. There are less and less forces, they wrote and showed queues at train stations and border crossings, something is already about a million, and this is only in the last five or seven days, plus about 170 thousand in our direction - this is the reserve of the desperate Fuhrer, when they are put under arms and yard dogs. And which will be less and less.
    Understand a simple thing - to quarrel with Russia over Transnistria is one thing. Dependence on Russia is great. But swearing with Ukraine, which is already dying, when only the lazy one does not kick it, from which there are orders of magnitude less dependence, is another matter. There, behind Moldova, Romania stands, and this is NATO.
  9. 0
    7 March 2022 15: 51
    It seems to me that the time of parachute and amphibious assaults has passed, the Germans realized this after the failure of the Crete operation, while ours, with admirable perseverance, continue to develop the theme of parachuting people and equipment in the 21st century. During the Second World War, all landing operations ended in failure and heavy casualties (my grandfather was seriously wounded and miraculously survived after the Dnieper landing operation) and since then in the database we have NEVER used massive landings in Afghanistan, or anywhere in general, we went along the global path airmobile operations by landing method (organization of airborne operations in OKSVA). By the way, the question arises of the need to develop expensive, lightly armored vehicles launched by parachute, in Afghanistan they quickly replaced expensive aluminum infantry fighting vehicles with BMP-2D in the Airborne Forces (to the question: why do Ukraine need the same BMD-2). Means of destruction of such methods of landing (with a limited number of ammunition for the landing, moreover) went far ahead, leaving no chance for the landing.
    If they land in Odessa, then on a bridgehead previously prepared cleared from land.
    Marines are needed in colonial operations, the way the United States uses them.
  10. 0
    8 March 2022 11: 33
    There is another option. Surround Odessa. In the north, reach Transnistria and through it strengthen the grouping from the west, plus a naval blockade, complete encirclement of the Odessa region. And then the time of technology and military skill.
  11. -1
    8 March 2022 22: 35
    Stupid Komsomols! You have Afghanistan!!! Why can't you arrange a landing of NATO troops?