THAAD or Aegis Ashore: which American complexes may appear near Kharkov

23

According to the agency TASS, Kiev turned to Washington with a request to deploy elements of the American missile defense system on its territory. Most likely, THAAD complexes will first appear somewhere near Kharkov. What can be said about this?

"Deceived"! That's all I want to say on this occasion, if you use the literary language.



Smart and far-sighted people spoke about the fact that Ukraine will eventually have both a fully combat-ready army and American missile weapons in 2014, in 2015, in 2016, in 2017, in 2018, in 2019, 2021 and early 2022. They spoke, wrote, asked to pay attention to the risks that this would create for our country, called for solving the “Ukrainian problem” without bringing the matter to a big sin. But no, no one listened to them, because it’s better upstairs, there are thousands of professional intelligence officers, high-browed analysts and military advisers, not like any “Internet smarties”, everything is under control there and we have our own plan for any Western feint, but you just have to wait a bit until Ukraine itself falls apart, having previously frozen and impoverished.

The fact that not everyone is under the hood could already be guessed from a number of alarming statements by President Putin:

Anything can be placed under the brand of training centers. As I already said, it was, it was also publicly announced: tomorrow missiles will appear near Kharkov - what should we do about it?

And really, what are we to do with all this after so many years of thoughtful doing nothing?

Imagine that Ukraine is a NATO country and starts these military operations. Should we fight the NATO bloc? Has anyone thought about this? Looks like no.

Maybe they didn't even think about it. Or maybe they just thought very well and decided in such a sophisticated form to respond to "Putin's ultimatum" demanding that the North Atlantic Alliance not expand eastward at the expense of the former Soviet republics. So, let's see what stunning prospects are now looming before us all.

THAAD


THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) is a mobile anti-missile system designed for high-altitude atmospheric interception of medium-range missiles. Naturally, it was created with an eye, first of all, on the Russian and Chinese INF missiles. This is a very serious air defense system, the declared effectiveness of which is much higher than, say, the Patriots. The cost of one, even without the radar, is estimated at $2,3 billion. What can THAAD stationed in Ukraine near Kharkiv bring to the United States?

Judge for yourself. Kharkiv is located 26 kilometers from the Russian border. The range of the American radar is 1000 kilometers. That is, the Pentagon will be able to see deep into our country to such a depth, tracking all possible missile launches. At the same time, the THAAD interception height can reach from 150 to 200 kilometers. American anti-missiles will pose a very real threat to Russian ballistic missiles in the upper stage.
It should also be borne in mind that THAAD is a completely modern, up-to-date anti-aircraft system that is constantly evolving. For it, new, more and more advanced interceptor missiles are being developed, the performance characteristics of which we cannot yet accurately predict in order to take into account.

Someone will say optimistically that, they say, it does not matter. Since THAAD will be 30 kilometers from the Russian border, we will multiply it by zero with the first direct fire, since there is plenty of it.

Oh is it? Do not forget, please, that the Russian military doctrine is of a pronounced defensive nature, so we will most likely not launch any preventive strikes. And who even said that by that time this air defense system would be located exactly near Kharkov?

Aegis Ashore


Most likely, THAAD is just a trial balloon to test the Kremlin's reaction. Why did we suddenly decide that the missile defense of Nezalezhnaya would be limited to this? THAAD is extremely expensive, but its big advantage is mobility. Today it is deployed in Eastern Ukraine, and tomorrow it will be transferred somewhere in Western Ukraine, for example, to the Yavoriv training ground, closer to Poland and the countries of the NATO bloc, from where it will be easier to cover it from attacks by Russian missiles and aircraft.

It is much more likely to place elements of the American Aegis Ashore missile defense system near Kharkov and Zaporozhye, as in Romania and Poland. Recall that their design feature is the ability to replace anti-aircraft anti-missiles with Tomahawk attack cruise missiles capable of carrying a nuclear warhead within a day. These complexes are stationary, you can’t easily relocate them, but in the event of a real conflict, the United States will have a ready-made missile battery in the western border areas of Russia, suitable for a one-time preventive strike on key military infrastructure facilities of the Russian Defense Ministry.

The THAAD system deployed in the Lviv region will conduct reconnaissance and, if necessary, become an additional echelon of missile defense for Ukraine and Eastern Europe.

These are the possible results of the Russian foreign policy regarding the Independent. Come to your senses.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    9 February 2022 15: 49
    These are the possible results of Russian foreign policy towards the Independent. Come to your senses.

    So the Elder already said that if something happens, they won’t even have time to blink, they will begin to remember the 5th article.
    So why worry then?
  2. -4
    9 February 2022 15: 57
    THAAD or Aegis Ashore: which American complexes may appear near Kharkov

    None. This is complete nonsense. Why does America need this? For what?
    1. -2
      9 February 2022 21: 08
      America, then it would be just right and necessary! True, it is not clear what to intercept, they will, for the life of me! But after all, in the MK-41, not only useless SM-3s can be stuffed in, but also Tomogawks! But the main thing is that we understand that this will be a 100% trigger, after which the war will become inevitable! And this may well be even more interesting in some hands!
      1. -4
        9 February 2022 22: 29
        Quote: sH, arK
        America, then it would be just right and necessary! True, it is not clear what to intercept, they will, for the life of me!

        Why do they need it, if it is not clear what to intercept?

        Quote: sH, arK
        But after all, in the MK-41, not only useless SM-3s can be stuffed in, but also Tomogawks!

        Why put Tomahawks in there? What US Navy ships are not satisfied with.

        Quote: sH, arK
        But the main thing is that we understand that this will be a 100% trigger, after which the war will become inevitable! And this may well be even more interesting in some hands!

        They say that when the USSR sent troops to Afghanistan, NATO headquarters began to congratulate each other and drank champagne. I think if the Russian Federation sends troops to Ukraine, NATO will again have a holiday. But I do not think that the United States will deploy the MK41 near Kharkov for this.
        1. -2
          10 February 2022 01: 32
          Yes, the US is quite interested in a critical escalation. The value of Durkaina is much lower than the possible losses from economic problems and the loss of trust of other allies due to significant mistakes made earlier.
          Therefore, the option of a "safe haven" and "defender of democracy" in one person, in their opinion, justifies the loss of an increasingly uncomfortable territory with an incomprehensible prospect. Yes, and it will be more convenient to pour shit on Russia! So you can donate. What they do. Yes, Russia was provoked and will continue to do so! You can, of course, be silent and endure ... But this is also a cost for us! And it’s not a fact that the rupture of relations and / or their sharp aggravation is so contrary to Russia’s interests, if you think about it ... Sanctions already exist, and there is also capital flight and obligations under various agreements that are no longer interesting to us.
          So what's stopping us from making a "knight's move"?! If it is correctly calculated?

          As for the MK-41 on ships, take a look at the map ... Apart from the Black and Baltic Seas, there are no convenient approaches to launch positions, the main centers are far away! But there is also a problem in the Baltic - Kaliningrad interferes - everything is shot through. In the Black Sea, another problem is Montreux. Restrictions on tonnage, term... Yes, and it is also visible through and through from the high Crimean shores! Target designation is absolute! But ground-based - in Romania, Poland - is spared these problems! And if also on Durkaine? With a minimum design time over a dangerous region, a short direct range to Moscow, Rostov, Sevastopol, Novorossiysk is not only time saving, but also the ability to choose a complex, inconspicuous route! So it makes sense, whatever one may say... Well, Russia will start a war - also a good option! This is zuczwang for us!
          1. -5
            10 February 2022 02: 21
            Quote: sH, arK
            Yes, the US is quite interested in a critical escalation. The value of Durkaina is much lower than the possible losses from economic problems and the loss of trust of other allies due to significant mistakes made earlier.

            What is the value? Especially for the US?
            I am more concerned about the mistakes of the leadership of the Russian Federation and the economic problems of the Russian Federation. Putin, with his ultimatum, put the Russian Federation in the position of zugzwang, he will start doing something for the Russian Federation, it’s bad for the Russian Federation (sanctions, expenses, losses), he won’t start, he will show all the “power” of the Russian Federation.
            What is a "knight's move"? Take Kiev by storm? What happened next?

            Quote: sH, arK
            As for the MK-41 on ships - look at the map ...

            Look... a tomahawk from the Mediterranean will fly to St. Petersburg, and from the North to Kazan. Flight range 2400. There are no launchers in Romania. I still don’t understand from your explanation why there are tomahawks in Ukraine, if there is Poland? It flies slower than a passenger plane at a height of 5 meters. Still, it's not far to be found.
            1. -1
              10 February 2022 11: 42
              The Tomahawk will fly... in the imagination, and if the track is drawn on the map with a ruler... In reality, the CR never goes in a straight line! This is precisely its advantage over ballistic! It bends around the terrain and bypasses dangerous zones. Therefore, with a maximum range of 2400, the effective range is at least 30-50% lower! Is it clear now? And given the saturation of air defense systems from the Baltic, and the Western part - and the need to bypass them - then there is a problem and a very significant one!
              Yes, there are Ashore systems in Poland and Romania, which is already bad, of course - but firstly, take a map and a compass and change what falls and what does not, given that the real effective range is 2 times less than the declared one. And yes, these systems are the priority targets of the first strike in the event of any conflict situation! Considering their small size, it’s generally guaranteed to destroy them the easiest way using special warheads!
              Adding to these two points of the guaranteed launch of the CR another third point, or even several on the territory of Durkaina - where until now the air defense lines are only partially equipped - and additional angles and shelling will be added - we definitely need it ?! It is reasonable to solve this problem, if possible, in a different way!

              And the fact that Russia actually put forward ultimatum demands that are completely justified, I think that this was done for a reason - no one expected the US to agree to them, but the recorded refusal will clearly justify any further actions, for example, the creation of a new military bloc with China or some other similar diplomatic actions! For example, the exit from some obligations assumed by the USSR, for example, the non-deployment of weapons in space, the countries of Latin America (Cuba).

              I am sure that it was the refusal to the "ultimatum" that was the 100% expected reaction! At the same time, the demands of the "ultimatum" itself are absolutely fair and there is nothing ultimatum in them!
              1. -5
                11 February 2022 00: 14
                Yes, FIG how it flies, especially since you understand little about this. The main question is, why the hell does the USA need it? That the placement of mythical tomahawks in Poland, and even more mythical ones in Ukraine, fundamentally change? Will the United States be able to strike Russia with impunity? Obviously not, and the damage from a retaliatory strike will be what is called unacceptable. Then why?

                Quote: sH, arK
                Adding to these two points of the guaranteed launch of the CR another third point, or even several on the territory of Durkaina - where until now the air defense lines are only partially equipped - and additional angles and shelling will be added - we definitely need it ?! It is reasonable to solve this problem, if possible, in a different way!

                It is cheaper, and by orders of magnitude, to equip a continuous line of defense along the borders of Ukraine. And echeloned.

                Quote: sH, arK
                but the recorded refusal will clearly justify any further actions, for example, the creation of a new military bloc with China or some other similar diplomatic actions!

                And what prevented the creation of a military bloc with China without an ultimatum? Or take other diplomatic actions?

                Quote: sH, arK
                For example, the exit from some obligations assumed by the USSR, for example, the non-deployment of weapons in space, the countries of Latin America (Cuba).

                Then the United States will place it in space and it seems to me that they will be able to do it much faster and on a larger scale, so what? Did you ask the Cubans? There will never be Russian nuclear weapons in Latin America for the same reasons why there will never be American nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

                Quote: sH, arK
                I am sure that it was the refusal to the "ultimatum" that was the 100% expected reaction! At the same time, the demands of the "ultimatum" itself are absolutely fair and there is nothing ultimatum in them!

                I don't know what you mean by justice, but the demand for a rollback of NATO to 1997 does not seem adequate.
                1. 0
                  11 February 2022 00: 48
                  Amazing nonsense, I don’t even know, do you seriously think so ?! And on all counts ;)

                  It is cheaper, and by orders of magnitude, to equip a continuous line of defense along the borders of Ukraine. And echeloned.

                  I can’t even imagine what can be said to this, however, there is no more adequacy in your other statements;) Well, maybe it’s worth finally understanding that layered air defense defense costs a lot of money! And in fact, in the world it was implemented only in the USSR, and today - in Russia! But implemented on the "outer edge". And it is much easier and cheaper not to build a complex air defense / missile defense system, but simply to dismantle the enemy in advance.

                  Other nonsense of the same order. An agreement with China, even now, is not entirely in the interests of Russia, and it would be foolish to enter into it without serious reasons, without putting all the points. As well as taking any other serious actions, up to cleaning up Durkaina. It is now clear that we are ready to create a retaliatory threat.

                  Withdrawal from the treaty on the non-deployment of weapons in space will certainly open up space for the United States! But it will enable us to strike quickly and irresistibly, drastically reducing missile defense capabilities. But it is better that everyone feels the danger, and not just us! Security is such a thing - if you put a knife to your throat, then it’s not a sin for you to put a gun to the enemy’s head! It can be very comforting in a certain way!
                  There is American nuclear weapons in Europe, so it is logical for us to try to place them in Latin America. Not mines, there are enough MTO points, for example, in the Caribbean Sea. And a dozen quiet, for example, 636 boats, not nuclear, but with hypersonic missiles with nuclear warheads. Very sobering.
                  And there really won’t be nuclear weapons on Durkain, they just won’t have time. They will clean it up earlier, the jokes, alas, are over ....
                  1. -3
                    12 February 2022 01: 35
                    Really stupid!
                    https://www.interfax.ru/russia/373117
                    This is without any occupations, warriors and hellish sanctions. With this money, you can build not two, but ten lines. Or, as the respected one dreams Sergey Marzhetsky, aircraft carriers in the same number as the Americans. Or, as Kuzhugetovich dreams, several million-plus cities in Siberia.

                    Quote: sH, arK
                    An agreement with China, even now, is not entirely in the interests of Russia, and it would be foolish to enter into it without serious grounds, without putting all the dots.

                    Don't you understand that this is nonsense? How an ultimatum can affect this is known only to you. If the treaty is not in the interests of the Russian Federation, then what is the point of it? Or, after the refusal of the ultimatum, there was interest? But this is nonsense.

                    Quote: sH, arK
                    But it will enable us to strike quickly and irresistibly, drastically reducing missile defense capabilities.

                    Well, again, nonsense. And now what, the blow is repellent and not fast? The Americans do not have a missile defense system capable of repelling a Russian strike and will not have it in the foreseeable future.
                    Why do you not like current pistols?

                    Quote: sH, arK
                    Not mines, there are enough MTO points, for example, in the Caribbean Sea. And a dozen quiet, for example, 636 boats, not nuclear, but with hypersonic missiles with nuclear warheads. Very sobering.

                    Anyway, you can explain clearly. Today, the Russian Federation has nuclear weapons capable of destroying the United States. Suppose the incredible and the MTO appeared (which is clearly not enough for Varshavyanka) in the Caribbean Sea, and what does it change? The more likely the leadership of the country in that region will change than the Russian base will appear there.

                    Quote: sH, arK
                    And there really won’t be nuclear weapons on Durkain, they just won’t have time. They will clean it up earlier, the jokes, alas, are over ....

                    And who was going to put it there?
                    1. 0
                      13 February 2022 00: 29
                      Placing nuclear weapons on Durkain is an inevitable option that is not implemented immediately. More recently, it was also possible to declare Psheks and Romanians, but what now, after the appearance of the MK-41 ?! This issue has become 1-2 days.
                      As for weapons in space - of course, there are ground mine, mobile, sea BR and CR, air CR ... But there is a nuance - considering the missile defense system for you, so delivering a massive first strike may turn out that there are not so many remaining warheads ! For sure unacceptable damage only for the USA, delivery of at least 100-150 blocks is necessary, and you can’t forget about the rest! Space deployment is primarily attractive due to the complexity of rapid simultaneous interception. It is the first to make it possible to strike, therefore it is necessary to neutralize it first, and this is already a guaranteed warning of intent.
                      As for any agreements, they must be fulfilled, and Russia, having a colossal advantage over China in strategic weapons and an advantage in conventional weapons, does not make sense, from scratch, to bind itself with agreements that bind us. And it is logical, first to clarify the relationship, so that such a step would be logical and understandable for everyone. It's weird not to accept...
                      1. -3
                        14 February 2022 07: 02
                        Quote: sH, arK
                        Placing nuclear weapons on Durkain is an inevitable option that is not implemented immediately.

                        You already decide:

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        And there really won’t be nuclear weapons on Durkain, they just won’t have time.

                        or the inevitable option.

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        More recently, it was also possible to declare Psheks and Romanians, but what now, after the appearance of the MK-41 ?! This issue has become 1-2 days.

                        And what, there are nuclear weapons?

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        But there is a nuance - considering the missile defense system to you, so delivering a massive first strike may turn out that there are not so many remaining warheads! For sure unacceptable damage only for the USA, delivery of at least 100-150 blocks is necessary, and you can’t forget about the rest!

                        What nonsense. Google "dead hand", "nuclear parity" and "mutually assured destruction".
                        Where are you getting it from? What makes you think that they won't fly? Are these your fantasies? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38651616

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        As for any agreements, they must be fulfilled, and Russia, having a colossal advantage over China in strategic weapons and an advantage in conventional weapons, does not make sense, from scratch, to bind itself with agreements that bind us. And it is logical, first to clarify the relationship, so that such a step would be logical and understandable for everyone.

                        What's with the ultimatum? It is strange to associate an ultimatum and an alliance with China.
                      2. -1
                        14 February 2022 10: 21
                        You argue very strangely and very superficially. The "Ultimatum" was published (although, of course, it is strange to call the usual fair set of demands that way) - which shows that it was needed purely in order to show the further dynamics of decisions. This was not a hint, but a clear indicator of the volume of problems that will have to be solved one way or another - in fact, this is a bifurcation point. And if a compromise on this document is not reached, one of the solutions is, for example, the organization and formalization of allied or close to them relations with China. It is clear that such a relationship can lead to radical changes in the further actions and obligations of all parties.

                        As for the "Perimeter" system, or as it is called in the press "dead hand" - this is just a decision-making system! Those. a guarantee of receiving an order to attack, but a real attack is possible only with the means remaining in the ranks! And after a massive attack, there may be very few of these funds left. One of the main American paradigms of the first attack (even when I served!) Was that a fast, massive attack of the Strategic Missile Forces with significant damage to them, as well as the presence of missile defense on the attacking side, would raise the question before Russia - whether to carry out a counter strike! Those. the surviving leadership will be intimidated and will not dare to retaliate! And perhaps it will be if the Strategic Missile Forces cannot carry out a counter strike! And the remaining assets of the Strategic Missile Forces, and taking into account the capabilities of missile defense, will no longer be enough to deliver a full response, given the fact that then a second, finishing blow from the attacking side will follow.

                        The "Perimeter" system was needed in order to show that the "answer" will arrive in any case, even if it is insufficient, but it will be! Those. they hope that by destroying the decision-makers or intimidating or "agreeing" with them - after the strike, it will not be them who will make decisions about a retaliatory strike! This will happen automatically. All launchers will receive a launch code.

                        As for the MK-41 launchers on land. Again, it is strange not to understand such primitive things! Formally, this is a missile defense system for the defense of Europe. They are not suitable for a catch-up attack by means of the Strategic Missile Forces. Then why are they?! Well, only for stupid things, such as protecting the EU from Iran?! We will check this nonsense ?! That's right - our diplomats think much better than you, that's why we don't believe in such nonsense! The answer is simple. These are means of attack. We do not control and do not know what kind of missiles are installed there now. Moreover, we do not know which ones are in storage. Recharging the entire installation takes several hours. What missiles and with what warheads will be mounted there at any moment or even already there - WE DO NOT KNOW AND CANNOT KNOW!

                        The same situation can happen again with Durkaina! If the base is prepared, then its control during "H" is impossible, and therefore its foundation there is unacceptable! Therefore, the supply of weapons to Durkaina is already Nota Bene and Casus Belli in one bottle! It is strange not to understand and explain such things ...
  3. 0
    9 February 2022 15: 58
    Not until they give it (but for now ...), a helluva lot of expensive stuff.
  4. -1
    9 February 2022 16: 35
    Americans are not and di ots to give air defense and missile defense for 2-5 billion, and place cheap Russian kamikaze UAVs in the affected area
  5. -2
    9 February 2022 17: 12
    Everyone thinks that Putin will not dare to destroy them at the moment of arrival in Boryspil .. or at the time of deployment ..????? but I think that he will destroy .. without even warning .. and that a nuclear war.?. But let them not climb.
  6. -1
    9 February 2022 17: 55
    The cost of one, even without the radar, is estimated at $2,3 billion.

    This topic can be closed. No one will send such expensive weapons to the territory of the former Ukraine. Unless with a division of their troops.
    And the division of the US Armed Forces, together with these weapons on the territory of the former Ukraine, will be immediately (upon establishing the location) destroyed by a nuclear strike. There are no options here.
    And it doesn't matter where the US missiles are located. Even in the center of Kiev.
  7. -1
    9 February 2022 17: 59
    It is much more likely to place elements of the American Aegis Ashore missile defense system near Kharkov and Zaporozhye, as in Romania and Poland.

    A similar case. Nuclear strike. And then a request to Poland and Romania to withdraw these weapons from their territories.
  8. -3
    9 February 2022 18: 40
    smart and visionary people spoke in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021 and early 2022.

    In the period 2014-2016, I repeatedly expressed the opinion on one Internet resource that the issue with the former Ukraine should be resolved. Because the further you go, the worse it gets. Crush the reptile before the infection spreads throughout the country.
    It was not the Kremlin politicians who disagreed with me at all, but the visitors of the resource, ordinary people.
    They were in the majority. They spat in my direction, because I offered cruel, from their point of view, solutions. Then I left that resource. Because I realized the meaninglessness of my proposals.

    Smart politicians always follow the masses.
    And the masses are directed by the media.
    And if the media are broadcasting in unison that Ukraine is about to fall apart. It will fall apart on its own. It is quite clear that there is no need to get into the mud. It's better to wait. To not get dirty.
    And the media are also broadcasting that we will go bankrupt if we undertake to help the Ukrainians. Another blatant lie.

    I think that Putin understands as well as I do that first you need to gain control over the media, and only then take on unpopular decisions. But control over the media in Russia is firmly held by the West with the active complicity of the fifth column. Because the government continues to chew snot.
    The authorities are afraid to go the way of Stalin. Because the authorities, like the townsfolk, are also waiting for everything to resolve itself.
    1. -2
      10 February 2022 12: 44
      Something Stalin did not find a solution to the Khokhlyatsky question. Tatars, Chechens and Volga Germans were deported for less. The captured Germans rebuilt the country and built it well, while the "brothers" of the policemen and Bandera simply served time and even managed to give offspring. Khokhol in search of benefits several times a day can change owners. Catherine the Great dispersed one Zaporizhzhya Sich and then received the Pugachev uprising with the participation of former Cossacks. Few khokhlyatsky flags at rallies, bought by the Americans, "communists", will they pile on other garbage? Few FSB Ukrainians terrorists have already caught? Need more? so that the civilian population was afraid to walk at night for a decade? what if a Svidomo Ukrainian follows and cuts. The NKVD is no more, there is no death penalty. all these geeks will have to be imprisoned, fed, and then released anyway.
    2. -2
      12 February 2022 12: 53
      I think that Putin understands as well as I do that first you need to gain control over the media, and only then take on unpopular decisions. But control over the media in Russia is firmly held by the West with the active complicity of the fifth column. Because the government continues to chew snot.

      Are you serious or what?
      All domestic media under the hood of the state. All key media belong either to Putin's friends or to semi-state Gazprom.
  9. -1
    10 February 2022 06: 17
    Not so long ago, the Danish government announced its readiness to send military assistance to Ukraine - man-portable anti-aircraft missile systems "Stinger" made by the United States. It was about 400 MANPADS "Stinger", decommissioned in the Danish army. The rest of the MANPADS, received from the United States during the presidency of George W. Bush, were sold for a song to Latvia in 2019.

    However, a little more than a week passed after the promise, and Danish Defense Minister Morten Bedskov, speaking on Wednesday, February 9, at a briefing for journalists after a meeting with the commander of the Danish Armed Forces Flemming Lentfer, said that missile systems would not be sent to Ukraine.

    “Four hundred Stinger surface-to-air missiles, which the Danish army has, were acquired in the late 1980s. They are subject to disposal due to their obsolescence. We can't ship these Stingers to Ukraine as the missiles could detonate during transit."

    - explained the Minister of Defense.
    I agree with the Minister and Commander of the Danish Armed Forces Flemming Lentfer.

    “We only have weapons that we ourselves use and that are gradually being adopted by the Danish army. And here I don’t see something that we have to give to others”,

    - the Commander of the Armed Forces is sure.

    On Wednesday, February 9, it became known about another evil - that his country would not provide military assistance to Ukraine, announced directly in Kiev, Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albarez Bueno.

    The Spanish Foreign Minister visited Kiev on Wednesday, where he met with his Ukrainian counterpart Dmitry Kuleba, after the talks they spoke at a joint press briefing.

    Dmitry Kuleba thanked Spain for supporting sanctions against Russia. And Jose Manuel, for his part, expressed concern about the Kremlin's aggression and assured that Spain always supports the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. But military assistance will not be provided.

    Another taunt came on Wednesday from across the ocean, from former United States Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, who announced that NATO membership must be earned, and Kiev has not yet done anything to qualify to join the Alliance.

    “Let me clarify: Ukraine has no right to join NATO. And NATO has no obligation to admit Ukraine into its ranks. NATO membership must be earned and agreed upon by all NATO member states. That's all",

    McFaul wrote on his Twitter.
  10. 0
    14 February 2022 23: 03
    Politics should be moral... The destruction of the Bandera caudle in 2014 would be both moral and justified in the eyes of the people of Russia, regardless of the consequences...
    The cunning policy towards Ukraine since 2014, when 3 million Russians in the Donbass were taken hostage, has led Russia into a very difficult and uncertain situation... Russia is subject to sanctions to the very "I can't", it has given time to rally the West and put the hegemon under full control...