The West spoke about the risk of conflict between Russia and Norway over Svalbard

5

The island of Svalbard, located 1 km north of the Norwegian port of Tromso and 1 km northwest of Murmansk, may be of interest to Russia due to its important geostrategic location and natural resources. This point of view is expressed by the Western analytical resource Global Risk Insights.

Russian nuclear submarines are based in Murmansk with free access to the Atlantic Ocean. While the actions of the Baltic Fleet are limited to a certain extent by the Danish Strait, and the Black Sea Fleet by a number of bottlenecks and the Montreux Doctrine, Murmansk is in fact the only Russian port with access to the Atlantic. In this regard, Svalbard, which is under NATO control code, is an obstacle for Russian submarines.



In addition, the Norwegian island also poses a certain military threat to Russia, since this place has a large intelligence potential, which negates the effectiveness of the Russian Nagurskaya airbase as a potential location for missiles - it is located only 260 km from Svalbard.

According to experts, Moscow, in its claims to Svalbard, can also rely on the legal basis, considering the 1920 treaty on the Norwegian ownership of Svalbard and Bear Island to be illegitimate. Russia believes that it was unfairly excluded from this agreement.

In 2007, negotiations began between Norway and the Russian Federation regarding Russian claims in the region. The dispute was settled three years later, when Russia received an area in the Barents Sea that was three times the size of Crimea.

Meanwhile, Jens Stoltenberg's vague statements about the introduction, if necessary, of Article 5 of NATO (that an attack on a separate country of the alliance is considered an attack on the entire organization) and Washington's lack of a clear position on economic Oslo's right to Svalbard leads to a certain split within the Western bloc, which Russia can take advantage of.

The internal split in the alliance provides Russia with an excellent opportunity to force Norway to make concessions or even to present a fait accompli, as was successfully organized in the Crimea.

says Global Risk Insights.

Experts believe that such a development of events is quite possible in the long term. At the moment, the West expects the strengthening of Russian military power in the Barents Sea region.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 February 2022 14: 28
    In 2007, negotiations began between Norway and the Russian Federation regarding Russian claims in the region. The dispute was settled three years later, when Russia received an area in the Barents Sea that was three times the size of Crimea.

    Within the framework of the agreement on borders in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, the transfer of 175 sq. M. Of water area took place. km. This action was the result of a controversy that dates back to the days of the USSR.
    The transfer of this territory to Norway is considered a failed step, since the water area is rich in fish stocks. Three years after the signing of the document, significant hydrocarbon reserves were found there.

    Later I will look in other places what territories Russia has received in the Barents Sea.
  2. -2
    4 February 2022 14: 50
    Do not confuse the Danish Strait and the concept of "Danish (Baltic) Straits". Danish aka Greenland Strait - between the islands of Greenland and Iceland, i.e. it has nothing to do with the Baltic Sea and Europe at all - it is the North Atlantic. Therefore, non-Vikings often in the common people use the concept of the Danish straits, as we are the Black Sea straits, which mean several straits for convenience.
  3. 0
    4 February 2022 15: 00
    Yes, a confusing article is unclear about what.
  4. 0
    4 February 2022 15: 43
    Well, the only fossils there are coal, and even then it is no longer profitable to extract it.
    According to the agreement, troops cannot be placed there. Only joint economic activities in designated sectors. The problem is in the shelf around the island.
  5. -1
    6 February 2022 12: 04
    Take away the islands, drown the Norwegians!