Yakov Kedmi: Russia's failure in negotiations with the United States threatens its existence as a state

February 4 2022 26

In the coming months, events may occur that will change the world order and establish a different balance of power between the United States and its allies on the one hand and Russia on the other. This point of view was expressed by political scientist Yakov Kedmi on the YouTube channel Soloviev-live.

If Russia succeeds in the negotiations, it will be a defeat for the US and a weakening of its influence not only in Europe. In fact, this will mean that Washington no longer determines the rules of the game in geopolitics. If Moscow fails to outplay Washington, this will mean the defeat of Russia in general and Vladimir Putin in particular.

The failure of Russia threatens the existence of the Russian Federation as a state in the long term

- the expert considers.

At the same time, the irreconcilable point of view of Russia in the matter of defending its state interests turned out to be unexpected for the Americans, and the Kremlin is ready to confirm its intentions with real actions.

The words of the President of Russia about military-technical methods of pressure on the United States are real, real intentions, and not just an attempt to scare

Kedmi warns.

Meanwhile, US-driven "bestial" capitalism is not capable of solving world problems. In addition, Russia has achieved internal political и economic stability, as well as strategic superiority over potential adversaries.

Now is precisely the time when Russia can afford to achieve a change in the world order in order to regain both security and the place and influence in the world that a state like the Russian Federation needs. The Russian economy has become, perhaps not the most efficient and most profitable, but certainly the most stable. The development of the military of technologies Moscow has achieved its goal - it has gained absolute superiority in strategic weapons

- concludes Yakov Kedmi.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Sergey Latyshev

+4

4 February 2022 13: 02

Here Kedmi pierced.
he himself provokes, and then "endangers the existence of the Russian Federation as a state,"

There have already been a bunch of articles here about how your GDP works with HPP.
Art Pilot

+6

4 February 2022 13: 53

According to Kedmi, Russia:
- gained absolute superiority in strategic weapons
- and the Russian economy has become the most stable.
And then he declares that the existence of Russia as a state (!) now depends on negotiations with the United States.
It seems to me that the logic here did not spend the night.
1. Pandiurin
  
  -2
  
  4 February 2022 14: 48
  
  Quote: ArtPilot
  According to Kedmi, Russia:
  - gained absolute superiority in strategic weapons
  - and the Russian economy has become the most stable.
  And then he declares that the existence of Russia as a state (!) now depends on negotiations with the United States.
  It seems to me that the logic here did not spend the night.
  
  It's like in a joke about a priest who sat down to play cards with hussars and then was surprised: "I don’t understand how it is, not a single bribe, but I had four aces in my hands ?!"
  And the hussars answer him: "Father, arrangement, arrangement ..."
  
  If there are trump cards on hand, it is not a fact that they will play.
  
  The stakes are high
  It means either a big win or a big loss.
  1. Art Pilot
    
    +5
    
    4 February 2022 15: 16
    
    hint,
    as possible, having
    1) military superiority,
    2) the most sustainable economy and
    3) the country with the highest pain threshold........ lose?
    What will that loss look like? Why would Russia lose its statehood? where do we disappear to?
    Just wondering.
    1. Pandiurin
      
      +1
      
      4 February 2022 15: 57
      
      Quote: ArtPilot
      hint,
      as possible, having
      1) military superiority,
      2) the most sustainable economy and
      3) the country with the highest pain threshold........ lose?
      What will that loss look like? Why would Russia lose its statehood? where do we disappear to?
      Just wondering.
      
      To the third question: remember the collapse of the USSR, the fifth column is larger.
      
      To the second question: economic rules do not always work. For example, we have gas for sale, Europe needs gas very much, from the point of view of the economy there are no questions, but the EU is trying to prohibit itself from buying gas in Russia.
      And what about the economy?
      
      At first: even when it came to military victories, the ultimate beneficiary (winners) was determined at the negotiating table in the form of signed documents and alliances being created.
      In what way will the military technical advantage be realized?
      We need a zone of influence in Eastern Europe, if we get it, it's a win. But for example, events can go like this: a mess in 404, the EU will be put in a tough confrontation with Russia, a new iron curtain. This was already played out in 2014, and in Ukraine. The EU countries did not want to impose sanctions against Russia, MH17 happened, Russia was blamed, sanctions began to be introduced with a whistle, unanimously.
      1. Art Pilot
        
        +1
        
        4 February 2022 18: 34
        
        1. "Disintegration". Russia today bears little resemblance to the USSR with its 15 republics. Today, even in Chechnya, they understand that outside of Russia they will either choke on blood or slowly die out.
        2. "Economics". Russia got off the gas needle. And the EU will not be the first to withstand the economic blockade, their pain threshold is very low, everything will fall apart. In addition, I think that such a "medicine" will not hurt us. Russia has all the resources for a normal existence. In addition, the States will not close the whole world to us. China, India, Vietnam, Iran, Pakistan, South America, Africa....the market size is more than sufficient.
        3. You won't have to occupy country 404. Enough to destroy its military infrastructure. The country will fall apart, and then it will be necessary to take what we really need (Novorossia, at least).
        
        ivan2022
        
        0
        
        5 February 2022 02: 22
        
        Quote: ArtPilot
        "Decay". Russia today bears little resemblance to the USSR with its 15 republics.
        
        And where did you get the idea that the USSR collapsed from the presence of 15 republics? Who gave you such nonsense? The USSR, even in the most difficult periods of the Second World War, was only stronger from its republics. One might think that Russia, with its 3% of world GDP, has become stronger than the USSR with its 15-20%.
        
        The process that went on even under Mishka Tagged is not going to stop. It is only more carefully managed and we are on the eve of its next stage. Which is presented in a "patriotic image". And where are the specific forces that are objectively interested in stopping him?
        
        Or do you think that if a politician gives the people "a signal - I am mine" before the elections and for this puts on a flight helmet or a black naval overcoat with a white scarf, this guarantees the integrity of the country in the future? And who brought the politician to power? What political party does he belong to and what party does he depend on? From none? But does it happen?
    2. ivan2022
      
      +2
      
      4 February 2022 22: 41
      
      Quote: ArtPilot
      What will that loss look like? Why would Russia lose its statehood? where do we disappear to?
      
      Taki Kedmi says that everything will be OK ...... But his ancestors, the ancient Jews themselves, once lost their statehood due to the war. Once they betrayed Christ and after about 30 years the state perished. From the Romans. Although there were tough patriots.
      Those who, almost 30 years ago in October 1993, watched on TV how the defenders of the White House and the All-Russian Congress of People's Deputies were dying, probably forgot everything ....... but in vain.
      1. Art Pilot
        
        -1
        
        5 February 2022 09: 26
        
        You quoted my question (Where will we disappear to?), but did not answer it. And I'm wondering what Kedmi meant and what you mean. What will happen in the place of Russia. when will the forecast-warning of Kedmi and your fears come true ... and will Russia lose its statehood?
        More specifics!
        
        ivan2022
        
        0
        
        5 February 2022 10: 31
        
        Quote: ArtPilot
        You quoted my question (Where will we disappear to?), but did not answer it. But I’m wondering ... when Kedmi’s forecast-warning and your fears will come true ... and Russia will lose its statehood? More specifics!
        
        And you yourself have at least some specifics?
        You yourself correctly answered that "there are concerns." And I even explained why they are there .... I guess that's enough. But now it also became interesting for me to know why you demand a prophecy about what will happen in the place of Russia? I quoted something completely different from you; "....where will we disappear to?" And nowhere .... you can only disappear to nowhere or move to another place. I don't think Russia can move. Are you satisfied?
2. Bitter
  
  -2
  
  4 February 2022 22: 49
  
  How else? The recommendation is probably this, like praising to scare the unlucky layman. There is no reason for concern, but one must always be on the alert, especially now.
Alexey Davydov

-4

4 February 2022 15: 24

If Russia succeeds in the negotiations, it will be a defeat for the US and a weakening of its influence not only in Europe. In fact, this will mean that Washington no longer determines the rules of the game in geopolitics. If Moscow fails to outplay Washington, this will mean the defeat of Russia in general and Vladimir Putin in particular.

It's true, but it's useless to argue with reality
Binder

-4

4 February 2022 18: 08

Kedmi once again demonstrated that he is only an irresponsible demagogue, completely devoid of the ability to think logically and adequately assess the realities of international relations.
1. Monster_Fat
  
  -2
  
  5 February 2022 07: 39
  
  He is not a demagogue, he is a Jew. Russia will have to go under China, no options. Moreover, cunning China will certainly put forward territorial demands on Russia - it already made such demands when it planned the "New Great Silk Road", though it didn’t work out - Russia fell under sanctions and China decided not to take risks - laying something through a rogue country is risky. And yes, the Chinese then demanded 5 km away from the road being laid for rent for 50 years, but effective managers at that time still hoped for something. Now the situation has changed - there is no choice, 100% effective managers will make any concessions to China, and China will raise its requirements, it will not miss its own.
  1. Binder
    
    -2
    
    5 February 2022 08: 23
    
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    He is not a demagogue, he is a Jew.
    
    One another is not a hindrance. Israelis have a saying: "Two Jews - three opinions."
2. bobba94
  
  -1
  
  5 February 2022 23: 54
  
  I wanted to talk about the loss of the remnants of the former imperial influence, but I decided that it was too much, ....... I said about statehood and the result was a paragraph ...... They lit up here, you know, the search for deep meanings, and here is a simple overlay .. .
AC130 Gunship

-1

4 February 2022 22: 19

As they say in America, Man has to pay the bills. From one show of Solovyov, the population already has a gag reflex. He has now discovered...
1. Nicolas
  
  +1
  
  5 February 2022 09: 51
  
  Many already guess that Solovyov and Kedmi, and many guests of this talk show, are sent Cossacks. Solovyov, with his brutal servility, is intended to make the population allergic to power.
Merzlyaev

-1

4 February 2022 23: 01

We have a cadmi shameful laughing stock.
1. The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
Art Pilot

0

5 February 2022 09: 22

Quote: ivan2022
And where did you get the idea that the USSR collapsed from the presence of 15 republics? Who gave you such nonsense?

So that you do not fantasize and attribute to me what I did not say, I will decipher it especially for you: the division of the USSR into republics initially carried the potential for the collapse of the Soviet empire, and the unity of the country was based on the maximum concentration of power in one party. The national elites of the republics did not want to take risks in the struggle for secession from the USSR, but when the right moment came, they were delighted at the prospect of becoming the elite of the new independent states.
This is very different from the situation in modern Russia. There is no mass separatism of regional elites in Russia. Suppose the elite of some Tula region is not mistaken about the prospects for "independence" from the rest of Russia.
kolsky

0

5 February 2022 10: 23

This Standupper talks one thing after another.
Art Pilot

0

5 February 2022 15: 45

They messed up my question. I started with Kedmi's statement that Russia, militarily superior and having "the most stable economy," after negotiations with the United States, could "lose statehood."
Since losing statehood according to the scenario of the USSR will not work (too big differences), I asked HOW IT WILL HAPPEN? How will Russia, after failed negotiations with Biden, lose its statehood?
I needed SPECIFIC.
Starik59

0

5 February 2022 18: 28

Delirium of the instigator! Israel, what do you want?? Yasha in white, we are in ...!
Submariner971

+1

6 February 2022 00: 19

We have been in "strategic defense" for 20 years, this is understandable ... But, like that traffic cop who jumped out of the bushes with a radar and saw a government ZiL in front of him: "... Why did I leave the trench ??" An information failure, now it is already obvious, in all directions, a failure in China too ... I wonder how they will crawl out of this zugzwang in the information field, where have they driven themselves? However, I admit that strategically this is not a surrender of interests, and in general it changes little. But only "why did I leave the trench?"..
Crunch

0

6 February 2022 00: 39

Quote: ArtPilot
According to Kedmi, Russia:
- gained absolute superiority in strategic weapons
- and the Russian economy has become the most stable.
And then he declares that the existence of Russia as a state (!) now depends on negotiations with the United States.
It seems to me that the logic here did not spend the night.

You don't see her. In the world, in politics, nothing is finally achieved. Everything is changing. And the victory of one side harms the other, limiting its development in the future. And on the magnitude of victory or defeat. the consequences are showing soon. Who in the 1980s could say that the USSR had 10 years left to live? Yes, he would simply be trampled on the tram if he said that. Victory must be developed without stopping there. And Kedmi is right when he says that pressure needs to be increased, not weakened.
1. Art Pilot
  
  0
  
  6 February 2022 09: 42
  
  To my question about how Russia will lose statehood after "losing in the negotiations", no one gave me an intelligible answer. One demagoguery, chattering out the question and no specifics.
  Then I'll ask one more question: "What is "losing" in negotiations?" So far, one thing is clear - both sides remained on their own. The positions of the parties have not changed. Who lost?