Russia tested new electronic warfare systems on annoying US Navy scouts

December 28 2021 29

On December 28, a rare event was recorded and documented off the coast of Crimea. Russia tested its new electronic warfare systems, electronic warfare systems and other equipment on the annoying US Navy reconnaissance aircraft that literally "settled" in the Black Sea.

Usually, Russian air defense fighters take off towards the "guests and partners", which "politely" make it clear that flights are a very unpredictable business. However, in recent days in this area there has been activity of the Russian flying laboratory Il-114LL - a turboprop aircraft built in the first half of the 2000s on
"Tashkent Aviation Production Association named after V. P. Chkalov" in Uzbekistan and equipped with the necessary equipment at JSC "Research and Production Enterprise" Radar mms "in Russia.

Navigation and monitoring resources were able to detect the proximity of Russian and American specific aircraft. The US Navy's Boeing P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft flew to the Crimean coast from the distant Sigonella airbase in Sicily, Italy. An IL-114LL flew towards us from Simferopol. After meeting over the sea, the planes began to draw oval circles, "dancing" in the air and "communicating" with each other. Probably, the Americans did not really like the unusual neighborhood, since they did not linger.

Il-114LL is an extremely useful aircraft. It is designed for flight testing of tested samples of radio electronic equipment, for performing complex radar, photo and thermal imaging of the earth and water surfaces. On board are installed side-looking radar centimeter and meter ranges, a combined television-thermal imaging gyro-stabilized system for observing the space and documenting the operation of radar facilities.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

gunnerminer

-11

28 December 2021 18: 02

Russia tested new electronic warfare systems on annoying US Navy scouts

Keep it up. The Il-114LL was exhibited at the MAKS-2019 exhibition. The presence of electronic warfare systems on its boar was not established, otherwise it would have been noticeable externally.
https://igor113.livejournal.com/1263593.html
1. boriz
  
  +7
  
  28 December 2021 20: 23
  
  Now the presence of antennas does not have to be visible on visual inspection. Antennas can be embedded in the skin of the aircraft. On the Su 57, almost the entire surface is used to accommodate antennas, such as side-looking radars. The information is not new, there is even on the Wiki.
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -12
    
    28 December 2021 21: 17
    
    This statement does not apply to the antennas of electronic warfare transmitting devices (EW). Fedot is not the same. The discussed aircraft is a narrowly specialized machine. I can not give arguments about the Su-57, in some places, information is not for publicity. Wiki has not yet published such information .You are not accurate.
    1. ck9999999
      
      +5
      
      28 December 2021 21: 40
      
      That Fedot, even like that. Especially if for you infa Wiki as a priori (and if you figure it out - like iff throw on the fence). As an example: who knew during the Cold War that the building of the US Embassy was "working" for the good of the KGB, like a relay))?
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -10
        
        28 December 2021 21: 45
        
        Wiki often publishes reliable information, but it does not exist for a long time. Wikipedia should be read by a trained person who knows how to distinguish reliable information from inaccurate information. Or to have the opportunity to promptly qualified advice. You can double-check through the English version, but then double-check.
    2. boriz
      
      +3
      
      28 December 2021 23: 34
      
      You are not accurate.
      
      Not obvious.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -9
        
        29 December 2021 01: 08
        
        For those who are in the subject, it is very obvious.
2. Kristallovich
  
  +2
  
  28 December 2021 21: 06
  
  So what? Can you cite 2003 as an example?
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -17
    
    28 December 2021 21: 37
    
    The avionics of Russian specialized aircraft are non-operatively updated. For example, the KTOF Naval Aviation includes IL-38s that have not yet been equipped with the Novella system. Outdated 30 years ago. The same age avionics were installed on the modernized Tu-142M. Outdated 30 years ago. Or, for example, in the MA KCHF they operate the Be-12, with avionics of the mid-60s. For the same reason, they stopped sending the Tu-214R for flights over the former SAR. With the AWACS and U complex, the Vega concern has been working on the basic set of avionics since 2000, so an example from the early 2000s is quite relevant. You can ask the servicemen of the Aerospace Forces.
    
    Officially, the general director of Vega, Vladimir Verba, expressed himself very optimistically, promising a major breakthrough and the readiness of the project in three to four years. In 2011, the then Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force, Alexander Zelin, specified that the A-100 would take to the air in 2016.
    
    https://vpk.name/news/83980_rossiiskii_avaks_moralno_ustarel_do_poyavleniya_na_svet.html
    
    During the war 080808, all the work of electronic warfare of Russian aviation units was reduced to the use of 36D6 anti-radar missiles. Currently, there is an IL-22PP aircraft. But in the quantity and condition inadequate to the needs of the VKS GC. To put it correctly.
    1. Kristallovich
      
      +10
      
      28 December 2021 21: 43
      
      What is the use of this scribbling at all? There is a plug in every barrel. If only to question everything. In 2019, at MAKS, the car was without external electronic warfare systems, which means that in 2021 they cannot be there either. Your "logic" is junk again.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -14
        
        28 December 2021 21: 52
        
        A narrow-minded person accepts information without a doubt. I agree. A thinker doubts. Checks from reliable sources.
        
        In 2019, at MAKS, the car was without external electronic warfare systems, which means that in 2021 they cannot be there either. Your "logic" is junk again.
        
        In the blog I pointed out, there were photos taken in the cabin of an airplane, which were later deleted.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +10
        
        28 December 2021 21: 53
        
        A narrow-minded person accepts information without hesitation. I agree. The thinker doubts.
        
        And the troll just floods.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -14
        
        28 December 2021 21: 54
        
        I am writing only on the topic of the post. The data is reliable. The sources are indicated.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +5
        
        29 December 2021 09: 20
        
        In the blog I pointed out, there were photographs taken in the cabin of the plane. Later, they were removed.
        
        What's next? Or do you want the developed electronic warfare systems to be demonstrated at the exhibition? Can you publish the technical specifications right away?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        29 December 2021 13: 26
        
        These electronic warfare systems could have been developed a long time ago and lose their combat value. The USA, France, Germany, Israel, for example, even keeps the appearance of individual devices included in the electronic warfare complex a secret. Since the civilian was launched into the cabin without hiding the devices with foreign objects. , so they were not afraid. The technical characteristics, printed in the open access, are not of operational interest to the mining authorities. There is a lot to draw. But the dimensions, layout, number on the carrier, power supply, it is certainly interesting ..
      2. Raul Castro
        
        +2
        
        29 December 2021 13: 28
        
        Kristallovich (Ruslan) -brat ne obrashay vnimanie na etogo "pisatelja" -gunnerminer, on zaregistrirovalsja na etom sayte 21 nojabrja i uspel nza 1 mesjac napisat 1282 komentarija.Ehto t "pisatel" tuta mono prosto otrabvoi provokator.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        29 December 2021 14: 16
        
        You are on a Russian resource. Treat the state language with due respect and do not use foreign letters.
        
        If you are not friends with your head, you serve the State Department for the loot,
        Vomiting lies and abomination, Dreaming of America.
        Kohl forgot about the Motherland.
        Who are you? Right, .....!
        
        Raul Castro
        
        +2
        
        31 December 2021 21: 45
        
        a ja ne russkiy, ja iz Germany, no ochen lublu Rossiju i russkih, moy papa bil russkiy, a takih parney, kotorie tut eres protiv Rossii i vsego russkogo pishut prosto preziraju, dlja menja takie pisateli prosto-merzost !!!
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -4
        
        1 January 2022 23: 00
        
        For you, sending to Russia for permanent residence is worse than a nuclear strike.
        
        Raul Castro
        
        0
        
        7 January 2022 19: 00
        
        strashnee imet takih sosedey kak ti i hvatit tut ahineju pisat, ili ti rebenok u kotorogo net drugih hobby ?!
viktortarianik

-1

28 December 2021 20: 37

How far does the electronic warfare complex operate?
dub0vitsky

+1

28 December 2021 21: 22

Quote: viktortarianik
How far does the electronic warfare complex operate?

It depends what kind of equipment it is targeting.
1. Teaser
  
  0
  
  29 December 2021 14: 16
  
  How do you know that these electronic warfare systems actually affect American reconnaissance aircraft?
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -5
    
    29 December 2021 17: 50
    
    Learn from news media.
Teaser

0

29 December 2021 15: 32

Quote: viktortarianik
How far does the electronic warfare complex operate?

From zero up to several hundred kilometers. It all depends on the noise immunity of those radars that it has to suppress.
1. Teaser
  
  -1
  
  30 December 2021 11: 33
  
  With humor, the author of the note is very good:
  
  The US Navy's Boeing P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft flew to the Crimean coast from the distant Sigonella airbase in Sicily, Italy. An IL-114LL flew towards us from Simferopol. After meeting over the sea, the planes began to draw oval circles, "dancing" in the air and "communicating" with each other. Probably, the Americans did not really like the unusual neighborhood, since they did not linger.
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-8_Poseidon#Specifications_(P-8A)
  maximum speed: 907 km / h
  cruise speed: 815 km / h
  service ceiling: 12,496 m
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilyushin_Il-114#Specifications_(Il-114)
  maximum speed: 500 km / h
  cruise speed: 470 km / h
  service ceiling: 7,600 m
  How did they, with such a difference in parameters, "dance" around each other ?? Boeing P-8 Poseidon at an altitude of 12 kilometers should not have noticed the Il-114 at an altitude of 7600 meters at all.
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -5
    
    30 December 2021 21: 17
    
    The deliberate use of electronic warfare equipment in international airspace can be assessed as an act of aggression. Visually, the Boeing P-8 Poseidon crew might not have noticed. There is someone to tell. NATO has a continuous information space. Especially not far from the main base of the KChF.
Teaser

-1

30 December 2021 21: 51

Quote: gunnerminer
The deliberate use of electronic warfare equipment in international airspace can be assessed as an act of aggression

That is unlikely! "Poseidon" simply did not notice him ...

Visually, the Boeing P-8 Poseidon crew might not have noticed. NATO has a continuous information space. Especially not far from the main base of the KChF.

The crew and the combat crew of the Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft operators laughed for a long, long time ...
1. gunnerminer
  
  -4
  
  31 December 2021 11: 44
  
  When sending an aircraft for reconnaissance, the command of the formation is obliged to maintain constant and continuous communication with its crew, as well as constantly and continuously, to the maximum extent, to provide reliable data on the location of the enemy aircraft in the task execution zone. This area is fairly saturated with NATO reconnaissance forces and means, including UAVs, ground-based surveillance radars. NATO ground-based radars reveal the situation at the lower echelons of heights around the clock, and accordingly inform their crews in the air.