The turret of the T-14 "Armata" tank was shown without protective casings

November 27, 2021 71

On November 26, a representative delegation of the Russian Ministry of Defense visited the assembly shop of JSC NPK Uralvagonzavod in Nizhny Tagil (part of JSC Concern Uralvagonzavod of Rostec State Corporation). The high-ranking military was shown all technological production chain of T-72B3M, T-90M "Breakthrough" and T-14 tanks based on the heavy unified Armata platform, as well as individual systems and units of combat vehicles.

In the photographs presented to the public from the enterprise, the uninhabited tower of the T-14 "Armata" was lit up, which was without protective casings. According to the State Defense Order, serial deliveries to the troops should begin even before the end of state tests. By the end of 2021, the Ground Forces of the RF Armed Forces will receive 20 units of a pilot batch of such tanks to develop operating experience.

The state tests of the T-14 "Armata" are expected to be completed in the first half of 2022. After that, a larger-scale rearmament of combat units for these combat vehicles will probably begin. In the period from August to October 2021, the tank units were being finalized. For example, he acquired reinforced road wheels similar to those used on the T-16 ARRV.

T-14 "Armata" is a new generation tank designed for network-centric warfare. It can be used as a command tank for the T-72B3M, T-90M "Breakthrough" groups, as well as conduct independent combat operations. Its 125-mm cannon can fire with existing TURs at a distance of 7 km, and the engine power (1500 hp) allows the 55-ton combat vehicle to accelerate to 82 km / h.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Observer2014

-3

27 November 2021 10: 01

A purely practical question. And what do these protective covers protect from? Well, it’s clear that there are no people in the turret. But the very combat mission of the tank as a tank is the ability to fight under enemy fire. Won’t a 12mm bullet or a fragment become fatal for the equipment of the tank turret? I am silent already about 23-30 mm guns and so on. .From what will this protective casing protect the equipment of the machine? And to be honest, this casing looks somehow flimsy. And in the picture of the tower without a casing, even wires seem to be visible ....
1. gunnerminer
  
  -19
  
  27 November 2021 10: 24
  
  An attempt to strengthen the protection of the tank, in the absence of an analogue of the KAZ Trophy. There is no crew in the turret. But there are mechanisms without which the tank is just a cart with wheels.
  1. Binder
    
    -26
    
    27 November 2021 11: 20
    
    Alas, the creation of a complex of active protection, approaching in its characteristics to the Israeli Trophy, turned out to be beyond the power of the Russian military-industrial complex, therefore, even the most modern, "unparalleled" Armata tanks have to mold primitive casings ...
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -20
      
      27 November 2021 11: 27
      
      R&D on the T-14 in the last three years has come to resemble crash-and-tumble efforts, a sign that someone very active but incompetent has rubbed their goggles on top, especially on the engine or electronics.
    2. Old Skeptic
      
      +17
      
      27 November 2021 12: 47
      
      Jews, as always, praise their swamp.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        27 November 2021 19: 47
        
        Think correctly. Anyone with his opinion, a Jew, a Ukrainian, a Pole and a bully.
        
        Old Skeptic
        
        +4
        
        27 November 2021 23: 52
        
        Think correctly. Anyone with his opinion, a Jew, a Ukrainian, a Pole and a bully.
        
        You are still such evil as the Anglo-Saxons have forgotten.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        28 November 2021 00: 12
        
        If our military construction went on as planned, and without panamas, cuts, kickbacks, failures, and without lies, no evil spirits could darken the joy of the population from the wise actions of the Ministry of Defense and NGSH. State programs 2005, 2010, 2011-2020 were consistently failed. And no one even tried to explain it publicly. To punish the guilty, at least morally.
        
        Old Skeptic
        
        +1
        
        28 November 2021 01: 22
        
        People assume, but God disposes.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        28 November 2021 14: 12
        
        It is easy to blame your laziness, stupidity, eyewash, theft on the intrigues of foreigners.
        
        Old Skeptic
        
        0
        
        29 November 2021 00: 39
        
        Taki, these are your words.
    3. Komissarov Pavel
      
      +5
      
      27 November 2021 13: 33
      
      Yes, Yasha, let's praise our Jewish tanks-shells and stuff more loudly. Let's make a good deal!
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. ALMO66
      
      +3
      
      27 November 2021 19: 22
      
      Penguins do not yet have their own KAZ, therefore they buy a Jewish one, along the way developing their own. The KAZ "Afghanit", which is highly effective against the American TOW and Javelin ATGM systems, is regularly installed on the Armata. Study mat. part and do not write nonsense!
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        27 November 2021 19: 51
        
        In a combat situation, KAZ Afghanit was not checked. Soviet and Russian specialists put a fuk on the TOW ATGM, and medium-trained horsemen on the Syrian bridgehead burned SAA tanks so that the Syrian express did not have time to deliver. And the T-90 tried this old complex. The level of combat also plays a role preparation of an ATGM calculation, fire guidance, reconnaissance, position camouflage. In addition, more than a single ammunition will be used for armored vehicles equipped with KAZ, and from different directions. If the crews are equipped with half-educated conscripts, then no KAZ will save. in tanks.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        8 December 2021 21: 26
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        If the crews are staffed with conscripts, dropouts, then no KAZ will save. And in the case of a large kirdyk, it is the conscripts who will be in the tank.
        
        I have very bad news for the calculations of the enemy's ATGM - the crews will be staffed in the event of a "big kerdyk" with guys over forty. That was how it was during that great war; it was very unpleasant for the Hitlerists.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -1
        
        9 December 2021 11: 34
        
        in the case of a "big kerdyk", the kipazh will complete uncles over forty.
        
        These conscripts will not pass the medical examination, and they will not want to fight for the oligarchs.
        
        That was how it was during that great war; it was very unpleasant for the Hitlerists.
        
        You are confused. Then the Soviet people fought for common interests. And the crews were also staffed with snotty dropouts. Therefore, the losses among Soviet tankers were huge, even in April 1945.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        9 December 2021 11: 42
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        These conscripts will not pass the medical examination, and they will not want to fight for the oligarchs.
        
        About 50 thousand fascists who died in cauldrons in the middle of the Donetsk steppe thought the same way ...
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 11: 53
        
        The death of the Armed Forces of Ukraine servicemen did not alleviate the fate of the civilian population of the LDNR. The Ministry of Defense and the National General Staff of Russia, with the voluntary muzzle of the Minsk Agreements, cannot protect them from attacks by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        9 December 2021 12: 06
        
        don't jump off the topic.
        The sal-loving invaders were not helped in any way by the absence of a medical examination from the militia.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 12: 10
        
        Apparently it helped. The offensive of the LPNR formations in the winter of 2015 arose from the increase in the number of losses, and due to the lack of trained reserves.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        9 December 2021 12: 11
        
        did this resurrect the dead ukrov?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 12: 26
        
        Yes, as well as the Armata tower without casings, and without KAZ.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        9 December 2021 12: 28
        
        again?
        Well, merge quietly if you stuffed a full panama hat, no, you continue to jump from topic to topic and disgrace yourself to the last bottom.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 12: 29
        
        T-14 only on parade. In front of the gullible inhabitants of the capital.
        
        Vladislav N.
        
        0
        
        9 December 2021 12: 34
        
        Since you are not sticking to the topic and are clearly generating income with offtopic writing, I have to flag your comment as inappropriate content.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 12: 35
        
        The topic is about the T-14 and its defenseless turret. Ten "Armata" is laughter. It will be much easier to cope with ten tanks, even the most progressive, “not having” and sophisticated ones, than with a hundred not so innovative, but tested by more than one war. Your arguments on the topic of the post are over. Without starting.
    6. zenion
      
      +1
      
      29 November 2021 16: 58
      
      Binduzhnik. A good but wayward tank. It can easily fall into a ditch, it can fall off a hill and bend the trunk. Maybe, like a Popandopulo machine gun, shoot at your own. There was one who asked and begged to stop shooting at his own people, or not to shoot at all, let him rest. He launched a couple of shells and then began to machine-gun. But he did not obey and the commanders admitted that an evil spirit had moved into the tank. And he was handed over to the museum after spraying with something holy. Then there was the same harmful machine gun, which had to be abandoned. There is such a technique or Zionist completely for the Jews, or vice versa. Help is impossible. Photos do not need to be shown, this can awaken evil spirits in them.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        9 December 2021 11: 53
        
        The level of training of the crew, communications, reconnaissance is important. The technical characteristics of the tank are secondary.
  2. silver169
    
    +2
    
    28 November 2021 15: 13
    
    Gunka, they threw you out of the BMPD, so you decided to publish your pearls here?
    1. General Black
      
      +2
      
      28 November 2021 18: 19
      
      And I'm all Gurvinek, Gurvinek. Gunka is five!
2. S WITH
  
  +2
  
  27 November 2021 17: 25
  
  protect against 12 mm bullets and reduce the EPR of the tank. attachments KAZ is a consumable item, it (kaz) will be destroyed anyway after being hit by a scrap projectile, as well as kaz Trophy. but the machine gun (a KAZ element, shoots down an anti-tank gun) on the turret can be automatically guided not only by the radar, but by IR UV and swir cameras. it is quite possible that it will work after a projectile hits the turret (if the cameras are intact). in any case, the crew of the t-14 even without KAZ is well hidden and protected, unlike NATO tanks
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -9
    
    28 November 2021 00: 14
    
    not only radar, but infrared uv and swir cameras
    
    This equipment and armament is not subject to the handles of half-educated conscripts.
    there are far fewer contract soldiers in the tank forces than it seems.
    1. General Black
      
      +3
      
      28 November 2021 18: 16
      
      Silver169 asked you a question.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -4
        
        28 November 2021 18: 20
        
        Have you become his orderly?
        
        General Black
        
        +3
        
        28 November 2021 18: 22
        
        So you answer the question.
Hayer31

-7

27 November 2021 11: 27

3 main tanks ???, + T-80, 4 types are obtained. Again the old way?
Well, in my opinion, it's better to have 500 new ones than 10 different ones.
1. gunnerminer
  
  -7
  
  27 November 2021 19: 55
  
  Someone worthy of the CIA Gold Medal brings such variety with a modest military budget and rickety tank repair factories.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+3

27 November 2021 12: 03

Quote: Observer2014
even the wires are visible

this one you are right, trshch! Entot postings can be cut with a woman's manicure knife, and - mustache, kaput Armat!
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+8

27 November 2021 12: 04

Quote: gunnerminer
in the absence of an analogue of KAZ Trophy

And how is Afghanite? It will not work?
1. Old Skeptic
  
  +16
  
  27 November 2021 13: 05
  
  Ouch. I beg you, this is the Jews.
  They have all the most, the most.
  The heaviest tanks, the greatest warriors (they've been spitting them for a couple of thousand years, all and sundry), the largest heads, the longest Aseledeans (even two - so what, what's on the temples).
2. Alex Orlov
  
  +9
  
  27 November 2021 13: 05
  He apparently (like the rest of the would-be commentators) is not aware that the complete tower is protected by "Afghanite". They think that if DZ blocks are not hung, then there is no protection at all :))
  1. sgrabik
    
    +5
    
    27 November 2021 15: 05
    
    But how do they know that, they think that only they are capable of creating advanced high-tech weapons, but as they say, wishful thinking is a senseless, stupid and ungrateful occupation !!!
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -7
      
      27 November 2021 20: 40
      
      The delivery date of Armata tanks to the troops has been postponed once again. Now for 2022. But it was originally planned to start mass production around 2015. As a result, the breakthrough design of the ultra-modern tank, instead of becoming a triumph for the Russian defense industry, showed its weaknesses to the whole world.
      Those imported components that you can still buy presented another surprise - an ever-increasing price. After all, the ruble has been steadily declining in recent years. As a result, Uralvagonzavod simply could not name the final cost of serial production of Armat. In 2015, it was about 250 million rubles, in 2018 - already about 450 million. The original plan of the Ministry of Defense to purchase 2300 new-generation tanks, even at the first price, did not fit into reasonable budgets. And the appearance of a new price tag put negotiations on bulk purchases on a long pause.
      If we recall the military budget of the USSR, then it was 5 times higher than the budget of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in dollar terms. This explains why the Soviet Union could afford to produce tanks by the tens of thousands. Despite the obvious advantages of the T-14 over the obsolete T-72, the price has become a major problem in promoting the "Armata". Therefore, the Ministry of Defense decided to abandon mass purchases for the time being, and apply the developments used in the T-14 to modernize the existing T-72 and T-90.
      1. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
        
        +8
        
        27 November 2021 23: 36
        
        and you cry, soaring - it will become easier!
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        28 November 2021 15: 35
        
        A lot of muddy water, for internal use.
        
        1. The T-72B3 and T-90M tanks are also enough. The main qualifications of the crews, unit command, reconnaissance and combat control.
        2. The operation of the T-14 will result in a pretty penny. As well as the training of crews.
        3. The tower has a lot of innovative stuff. All this is demolished by the usual OFS. By the way, it is not only about the T-14. What, should KAZ remove this threat?
        4. Problems with the T-72/80/90 gun and ammunition? This makes it easier to make an SPG in addition to tanks, on the same chassis (T-72/80/90).
        5. Gradual transition to 2A-83, i.e. caliber 152 mm? Why not right away?
        6. New ammunition (Lead-2, Vacuum, ...) is not suitable for the T-72 / 90x (and not because of the gun, replacing 2A-46xxx with 2A-82xxx will not change anything - there is a problem with the dimensions of the body and the automatic loader) ... Or have they already made so many that you need a tank capable of shooting them? Again - why not a "cheap" SPG?
123

+7

27 November 2021 16: 43

In the spring, the state tests of Bumarang should begin.

State tests of an armored personnel carrier and an infantry fighting vehicle based on the Boomerang platform are scheduled to begin in the spring of 2022, Lieutenant Colonel Yuri Chikin, head of the 154th military representative office, said at the Arzamas Machine-Building Plant.
“The machine has passed preliminary tests with a positive result. Currently, prototypes are being finalized to present them for state tests, which are planned to begin in March - April 2022, ”said the head of the representative office.
He clarified that "the completion of state tests is planned in November - December next year."

https://vestnik-rm.ru/news/oborona-i-bezopasnost/novosti-programmy-bumerang-gosispytaniya-nachnutsya-vesnoj-2022-goda?utm_source=warfiles.ru

For a whole year, all sorts of gunmen and other emigrant ill-wishers will be "emergency convulsive efforts" describing their fingers in blood on the keyboard to break
1. gunnerminer
  
  -8
  
  27 November 2021 19: 56
  
  They must, they will, they promise, they will increase, if they create ...
  1. 123
    
    +4
    
    28 November 2021 00: 32
    
    They must, they will, they promise, they will increase, if they create ...
    
    Are you jealous? Go watch how they are trying to get rid of the contaminant on the Abrams.
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -5
      
      28 November 2021 14: 14
      
      What to envy? Ochkovtiraetlstvo, instead of real reforms that increase combat readiness? Fables about the miracle of weapons against the background of a failed recruitment for a contract, against the backdrop of a really decreasing combat readiness of the fleet and aviation?
      1. 123
        
        +3
        
        28 November 2021 18: 35
        
        What to envy? Ochkovtiraetlstvo, instead of real reforms that increase combat readiness? Fables about the miracle of weapons against the background of a failed recruitment for a contract, against the backdrop of a really decreasing combat readiness of the fleet and aviation?
        
        Look for the section of chubatoy fiction on other sites, you go there. Tailwind to the scalial back
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        28 November 2021 19: 17
        
        Only B.A. Chubais is capable of raising aircraft, shipbuilding, and tank building in Russia, he understood RUSNANO to unprecedented heights. it would not be a piece for the parade to do, but serially.
        
        123
        
        -1
        
        28 November 2021 20: 06
        
        Only Chubais B.A. can raise aircraft building, shipbuilding, and tank building in Russia, he understood RUSNANO to unprecedented heights.
        
        Aircraft building, shipbuilding and tank building are developing normally in our country.
        Will you compare with Switzerland and Uzbekistan this time? Why so?
        Chubais is of course still a figure, but we will survive. There are a lot of companies that have worked with a loss around the world. This also happens. How are the Uzbek aircraft manufacturers doing? Or can they only breed now?
        
        Here is who would have raised the Russian machine-tool industry from the dung (it fell 167 times in relation to the Soviet one) and machine building!
        
        Do not worry will be raised. It is recovering little by little. How are Uzbek machine tool builders doing? Have you surpassed the Soviet indicators?
        
        You look, and the T-14 could not do a single piece for the parade, but serially.
        
        They say to you in Russian, tests are underway. And yes, let's not break the tradition. What about the Uzbek tank builders?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -4
        
        28 November 2021 20: 24
        
        The aircraft industry is in failure. I can’t even believe that they could do the T-144. The failure in military transport aviation, the basis of the Air Force. The Il-76MD-90A and Il-78MD-90A are being made at a snail’s pace. The regiment will be formed for 10 years. With the Il-112V failure. The An-124 service life is coming out, but there is no Russian engine for it. There is no engine for the Be-200. With Tu-160M2 failure. With Tu-22M3M failure. 57 did not go for export. Failure with the IL-30-100. Failure with the restoration of the An-114.
        With the production of modern submarines, a failure. Project 677 was filled up, without VNEU, only two units were made with an unfinished SED-1. BUGAS, with a backward air regeneration system. Project 6M is planned for only 877 units. And 855 is required. At the price of three SSBN 8A projects. Without electric propulsion. With wooden torpedoes and the same GPE devices.
        Gone is the reconnaissance and attack naval aviation. PLO aviation shameful museum exhibits useless against modern submarines.
        They do not make raid minesweepers. Basic minesweepers 1 per year. I will staff the division for 10 years. Sea minesweepers are not released. There are no breakers and liquidators, new contact and non-contact trawls.
        
        123
        
        +1
        
        28 November 2021 21: 04
        
        The aircraft industry is in failure, and it’s hard to believe that they were able to make the T-144.
        
        If we judge by this criterion, then the material is a failure. I can't even believe what the Concorde managed to do.
        
        The failure in military transport aviation, the basis of the Air Force. The Il-76MD-90A and Il-78MD-90A are being made at a snail's pace.
        
        Failure? Production is being restored bit by bit. Why are you silent like a fish on ice about the successes of the Uzbek aircraft manufacturers? Before, after all, they produced the IL-76. And now they are making children, but somehow they are not very good at working with their hands. A serial board was transferred to the troops, the pace of production is increasing. A new assembly line has started.
        
        The Il-112V is a failure. The An-124's service life is approaching, but there is no Russian engine for it. There is no engine for the Be-200. The Tu-160M2 is a failure.
        
        Il-112 is being created to replace the Ukrainian aircraft. All sorts of independent neighbors ruined production. Everything has to be rebuilt from scratch. Not everything works out quickly.
        The PD-14 has been made, and the engine for the Be-200 will also be made. not all at once. What is the failure with the Tu-160M2? By the new year, they plan to lift the first board into the air. The production of engines and the aircraft itself was restored.
        With the Tu-22M3M failure? Is there something that doesn't suit you?
        
        Serial production of the Su-57 failed. Even product 30 is not.
        
        Not a failure, but a delay. Show who does better? The USA, which put out the F-35 and now do not know what to do with it? Who else did something like that? Maybe Uzbeks?
        
        SZHZH-100 was not exported. With Il-114-300 failure. With restoration of An-2, failure.
        
        Your nagging is standard. They didn’t do it, if they did it then didn’t go into the series, if they did it, they don’t like the pace, if everything is fine with the pace of construction, then the export is small.
        The creatures ruined the country, now everything is being restored bit by bit. The communists of the country are pr ... well, you know. They "re-profiled" into democrats and for 10 years they derbanded her. And you can only moan that they are recovering at the wrong pace.
        What are you not talking about the successes of independent Ukrainian-Uzbek and other aircraft manufacturers? Everything has to be restored.
        
        Project 677 was filled up, without VNEU, only two units were made with an unfinished SED-1
        
        Is it that simple in your opinion? Why weren't they built earlier under the USSR?
        
        Poor Varashavians, and then only 6 did.
        
        Your brains are bad Learn to count. 6 pieces only for the Black Sea Fleet.
        
        Only 855 units are planned for the 8M project, while 20 are required.
        
        Who needs it? Why 200? Did Admiral Kizyachny consider the needs themselves?
        
        For the price of three Project 955A SSBNs. Without electric propulsion. With wooden torpedoes and the same GPE devices.
        
        You have a wooden block on your shoulders.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        28 November 2021 21: 29
        
        In Dubai, the Russians recently failed to sell planes, while Boeing with Airbas sold hundreds of planes.
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        28 November 2021 22: 38
        
        In Dubai, the Russians recently failed to sell planes, while Boeing and Auerbus sold hundreds of planes.
        
        Do not choke with a forelock for joy.
        How much did Uzbekistan sell to Ukraine?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        28 November 2021 22: 45
        
        Compared to Ukraine and Uzbekistan, the UAC looks good in terms of aircraft construction, at the level of 0, but in comparison with Boeing and Airbus it is very bad.
        
        123
        
        0
        
        28 November 2021 23: 20
        
        Compared to Ukraine and Uzbekistan, the UAC looks good in terms of aircraft construction, at the level of 0, but compared to Boeing and Airbus it is very bad.
        
        Why so? The Uzbeks breed well and they are all educated. Ukraine that finally finally can be stored. Well, where is the result?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        29 November 2021 06: 24
        
        Well, where is the result?
        
        Read the entire thread again.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+2

27 November 2021 18: 50

but vaasche something - T-14 zer gut machine, it is necessary to test in Syria
1. gunnerminer
  
  -9
  
  27 November 2021 19: 57
  
  Good on the forums. Try it. Just try not to give the T-14 into the hands of the Turks.
  1. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
    
    +6
    
    27 November 2021 23: 37
    
    do not flap, cabbage roll, if we sell it to the Turks and Egyptians, and vaasche - to everyone who buys
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -11
      
      27 November 2021 23: 39
      
      Promise a lot, do little.
2. gunnerminer
  
  -7
  
  28 November 2021 16: 38
  
  The rear repair units and subdivisions will not be able to maintain the T-14 because of the complex equipment. So, the repair subdivisions are staffed by conscripts who have dropped out.
gorenina91

-7

27 November 2021 20: 34

- Once upon a time in my hometown of Omsk - the "Omsk Transport Engineering Plant" built so many T-80B tanks (with subsequent all kinds of modifications) - that today you can easily equip several tank corps from these tanks ... - True - that was even before my birth ... - And then this plant was "killed" ... by enemies of the people ... - But today they "remembered" about the produced tanks - and they began to intensively modernize them ...
- As for the T-14 tank, it simply amazes me - why there are so many sharp corners and edges in its hull (in the turret) - there is no "streamline" - although the turret is "uninhabited" - but still ... - Personally I am not an expert in this type of weapon - but it was possible to somehow "smooth the corners" - after all, it is not AFAR that is installed on it ... - after all ... - Or is it thermal imagers and "Afganit" - that's how they influenced on the "tank streamlining" ???
1. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
  
  +2
  
  27 November 2021 23: 39
  
  I've heard that these angles scatter the radar beams and make the car less visible. However, I may be wrong
Krilion

0

28 November 2021 07: 57

a couple of hits on the turret with a small caliber - and all the buckets that were hung will be destroyed, followed by the tank with the crew .. the cable routes outside the hull are especially impressive ..
1. silver169
  
  +3
  
  28 November 2021 15: 23
  
  Of course, you potheads know better. You, according to your "immortal" cyborgs, successfully fought the Armata back in 2014. Many people remember the stories of these "heroes" how they tore off the towers of the Armat in the Donbas with their bare hands.)))))))))))))
Observer2014

-4

28 November 2021 08: 54

How overexcited the audience was. One really interesting question raised and ... What kind of bullshit you will not read. And even especially, as always, stupid cheers of the marginals, even with insults, climbed up. God did not give more intelligence ..
But the question remains open. The answer to which we will get after the operation of these twenty tanks with this turret. For "Armata" is a combat complex, a platform, as it is fashionable to say now .. In this period, and it is on this modification that it is equipped with this particular turret. Let's see in the future how it will be, or rather where its modernization will go. Personally, my opinion: it (the tower) will be made more secure.
And yes, I don’t need to explain about the safety of the crew. I did not raise this topic. This is another topic. There will be questions or a suitable topic for an article. Then we’ll talk about this.
1. gunnerminer
  
  -7
  
  28 November 2021 15: 44
  
  For "Armata" is a combat complex, a platform, as it is fashionable to say now.
  
  This is true of any tank. The expensive T-14 is not suitable for the most massive tanker as a conscript. It is not provided with fire support helicopters, military air defense, and reconnaissance.
PotatoSoup

0

14 February 2022 14: 26

99% of this comment section are people with zero knowledge of MBT's