Western aviation predicted "complete stunning" due to the appearance of "Murmansk-BN" in Kaliningrad


Russia made a powerful claim to an advantage over NATO forces in Europe by deploying the Murmansk-BN electronic warfare system in Kaliningrad in early October. According to the French resource Atlantico, the Russian electronic warfare system will thus be able to jam all enemy signals in a huge radius.


The air and naval forces of NATO can be exposed to the impact of these electronic weapons by blocking signals in a certain area. For example, Atlantico believes that Russia, if necessary, may not allow American F-35 fighters to take off, and they will actually be chained to their airfields.

Thus, Moscow is able to block the operation of satellite and cellular communications and navigation systems on the entire European continent, including Lisbon, located about 3 thousand kilometers from Kaliningrad. Western combat systems can be completely "stunned".

NATO forces now face complete paralysis and inability to respond in time

- say the French experts.

Murmansk-BN systems can be deployed on other sections of the Russian border. So, one of these complexes is already on a combat watch on the Kola Peninsula. The Crimea and the Kerch Strait are protected in a similar way, where the electronic warfare system covers about 3 thousand square meters. km of the Black Sea region.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Starover_Z Offline Starover_Z
    Starover_Z (Yuri) 4 November 2021 11: 01
    0
    How real is it? Was it somewhere tested in conditions close to combat, on "partner" aircraft?
    1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
      Michael1950 (Michael) 4 November 2021 23: 35
      -5
      This is just nonsense. NATO aviation will not even notice this - the main ranges of the NATO Air Force are located outside the zones of suppression of this electronic warfare ...
      1. oderih Offline oderih
        oderih (Alex) 5 November 2021 06: 27
        +4
        What are the frequencies that are not susceptible to suppression? Nonsense, you are a Jew
        1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
          Michael1950 (Michael) 5 November 2021 09: 23
          -5
          It's time to understand, Hyperborean, that Jews are not delusional - from Moses, Solomon, David, Yeshua ha-Nozri - to hundreds of Jewish Nobel laureates in the XNUMXth and current centuries.

          Short waves (also decameter waves) - a range of radio waves with a frequency from 3 MHz (wavelength 100 m) to 30 MHz (wavelength 10 m).

          Murmansk-BN - short-wave coastal electronic warfare complex. The complex conducts radio reconnaissance, intercepting enemy signals and suppressing them throughout the short-wave range at ranges up to 5000 km ...

          The complex is mounted on seven KAMAZ vehicles. The antenna complex is mounted on four telescopic supports up to 32 meters high. The standard deployment time is 72 light hours. The complex is capable of detecting and bearing typical short-wave (HF) radio communications and interfering with HF radio communication lines in the operational-strategic and operational-tactical command and control units of the enemy.

          This antediluvian mastodon that nobody needs is in no way capable of hindering the work of American military aviation in any way - neither tactical, nor strategic, nor even transport ... laughing lol So much iron was thrown into the trash! .. crying
          1. isofat Offline isofat
            isofat (isofat) 5 November 2021 10: 25
            +2
            Quote: Michael1950
            ... Jews are not delusional - from Moses, Solomon, David, Yeshua ha-Nozri - to hundreds of Jewish Nobel laureates in the XNUMXth and current centuries.

            Michael, and if we do not end the list with Nobel laureates, then I think we can easily find quibbles among your brother. love laughing
            1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
              Michael1950 (Michael) 5 November 2021 11: 17
              -5
              - Pidypki "among our brother" - there are sometimes, "every family has its black sheep"but they are much moreоmore rare than among your ... laughing lol
              1. isofat Offline isofat
                isofat (isofat) 5 November 2021 11: 39
                +2
                Quote: Michael1950
                ... but they are much more rare than among your ...

                This is possible if you are considered stupid. And immediately the question is, how do you distinguish your stupid from strangers? wink
                1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
                  Michael1950 (Michael) 5 November 2021 17: 33
                  -3
                  It's elementary, Watson!

                  Someone else's fools address me immediately by nationality, believing that in the paradigm of the Russian language "Jew" is a swear word! laughing lol
                  1. isofat Offline isofat
                    isofat (isofat) 5 November 2021 17: 47
                    +2
                    I realized you do not love those who you at once tells the truth. wink
          2. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
            Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 5 November 2021 17: 56
            +2
            Jews are not delusional - from Moses, Solomon, David, Yeshua ha-Nozri - to hundreds of Jewish Nobel laureates in the XNUMXth and current centuries.

            The fact that there are many Nobel laureates among Jews does not mean anything after Obama was given this prize, and for which he probably does not know himself, she completely discredited herself. This despite the fact that in the United States itself he is considered the weakest president in history.
            1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
              Michael1950 (Michael) 5 November 2021 18: 51
              -2
              The fact that Brezhnev was given the FOUR GOLDEN STARS of the Hero of the Soviet Union - does this mean that this title and this medal have turned into an "empty trinket" ?! am
              You are definitely not a Jew. Turkmen? Tajik?! laughing lol
              1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 5 November 2021 19: 39
                +3
                Do you have anything against Tajiks and Turkmens? Do not compare it with a finger, the Soviet Union was an international organization that handed out gold stars to just about anyone? If you are a Jew, then the campaign is definitely not the smartest
                1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
                  Michael1950 (Michael) 6 November 2021 05: 26
                  -4
                  You argue that "the Nobel Prize is worth nothing, because it was given to such an unworthy subject like Obama." I agree that Obama is crap, but I strongly disagree that now the Nobel Prize is “worthless” and gave a mirror example with the title “Hero of the Soviet Union” - and four similar awards on jackets from Lenka Brezhnev.
                  Do you not understand this ?! Then you are not a Turkmen. You are Polynesian - in terms of perception ... lol
                  1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                    Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 6 November 2021 15: 45
                    +2
                    Not only Obama, if you think that this prize is really worth something and is awarded impartially, can you answer why such a person like Gorbachev received it? Maybe he is also one of yours?
      2. shinobi Offline shinobi
        shinobi (Yuri) 7 November 2021 03: 20
        +1
        "Old" NATO aircraft of the Cold War period, but they will not notice. In-52, B-1, F-15 and 16. Those were developed according to the old school, which meant that each unit that had survived after a nuclear strike could fight without additional escort from outside. NATO aviation cannot do this structurally. Without network support, it is blind and deaf. It cannot determine who is his own and who is not.
  2. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 6 November 2021 05: 30
    -5
    After all, this nonsense has already been chewed here, "not a horse feed":
    https://topcor.ru/20257-pochemu-pentagon-opasaetsja-vozmozhnostej-rossijskogo-kompleksa-rjeb-murmansk-bn.html#comment-id-175618
  3. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 6 November 2021 20: 05
    -2
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    Not only Obama, if you think that this prize is really worth something and is awarded impartially, can you answer for what such a person like Gorbachev received it?

    - Yes, you, my friend, do not "catch mice" at all! Gorbachev did (from the point of view of the West) the greatest thing: he destroyed the main enemy (at that time) of the WESTERN WORLD - the SOVIET UNION! He did what NATO could not do in 40 years of its existence! laughing lol AND THE THREAT OF A THIRD WORLD WAR WAS DISAPPEARED (for a while, until China rises in full might).

    maybe he is also one of yours?

    - No-no! "Jews" I would accept Deng Xiaoping! wink And Gorbachev - he is yours, with giblets, to the marrow of bones ... "Combiner from Stavropol", with the permission of Andropov and the company, seized power ... Yours, yours! lol
    1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
      Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 6 November 2021 21: 13
      +2
      Gorbachev did (from the point of view of the West) the greatest thing: he destroyed the main enemy (at that time) of the WESTERN WORLD - the SOVIET UNION! He did what NATO could not do in 40 years of its existence! laughing lol AND THE THREAT OF A THIRD WORLD WAR GONE (for a while, until China rises in full force).

      This is exactly what I had in mind! The key here is “from the point of view of the West.” From this one can draw a simple conclusion that the Nobel Committee is nothing more than a bourgeois “club of interests”, the value of the awards of which is obvious only to him hi
      1. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
        Michael1950 (Michael) 6 November 2021 23: 32
        -2
        - Naturally, the Nobel Committee represents the interests of the West, that very "golden billion". And whose other interests should he represent? Zimbabwe? Burkina Faso? China? Ethiopia? Russia? Iran? Syria?
        =================
        However, the Nobel Prizes in Science and Technology are outside of politics. And everything is more than objective there. Even in the era of the "cold war" itself, Soviet physicists were also receiving them ...
  4. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 7 November 2021 13: 39
    -3
    Quote: shinobi
    "Old" NATO aircraft, the period of the Cold War, but they willеlice after a nuclear strikeеNicholas could fight without additional escort from outside. The new NATO aircraft cannot do this structurally. Without network support, she is blind and deaf. She cannot determine who is hers and who is not.

    - Lord, what wild nonsense! Everything is exactly the opposite: Aircraft of the 5th generation are good for the fact that they can work completely autonomously, in conditions when there is a scorched nuclear desert around! They themselves carry out reconnaissance of the target, they themselves make a route to it, they themselves strike ... And network centricity is a useful and pleasant option, and just it is the 5th generation aircraft that are among the most important sensors in this network, collecting and transmitting information to: their AWACS and their 4th generation aircraft ...
  5. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 7 November 2021 13: 46
    -3
    Quote: oderih
    What are the frequencies that are not susceptible to suppression? Nonsense, you are a Jew

    - And I already said this in a similar next topic - for the Slavs, Chukchi and sympathizers, I repeat for those who failed the Unified State Exam:
    Murmansk-BN operates in the frequency range 3 - 30 MHz, i.e. at wavelengths 100 - 10 meters. And what can he "suppress" in AUG in this range?
    1. Communication - satellite, - no, does not suppress, - another range
    2. Navigation - satellite, GPS, - no, does not suppress, - different range.
    3. Radar (all) - work in the centimeter range, - no, it does not suppress.
    4. SAM "Aegis", missile control - centimeter range - no, it does not suppress.
    So what can suppress this multi-ton crap worth crazy money in AUG ?? Answer: NOTHING SERIOUS. So what is it for today? It is not needed by anyone, except for those who were profitable to get the loot for it, "burying it in the ground" a thousand times greater funds ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Monax Offline Monax
    Monax (Hermann) 8 November 2021 14: 47
    +1
    Quote: Michael1950
    It's time to understand, Hyperborean, that Jews are not delusional - from Moses, Solomon, David, Yeshua ha-Nozri - to hundreds of Jewish Nobel laureates in the XNUMXth and current centuries. crying

    That is why you are afraid to write the Truth. Indeed, in Israel, even in mathematical examples and tasks, they are afraid to put the mathematical sign +, but instead they put ...

    And what is most interesting - you are "well" informed about the performance characteristics of the electronic warfare "Murmansk-BN".
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 8 November 2021 17: 42
      0
      It's simple, he is so looking for knowledgeable people.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. Oleg Valevsky Offline Oleg Valevsky
    Oleg Valevsky 14 November 2021 21: 59
    -2
    including Lisbon, located about 3 thousand km from Kaliningrad.

    the electronic warfare system covers about 3 thousand square meters. km of the Black Sea region.

    It immediately became clear that the author got confused in the concepts of distance and area.

    And if it can be assumed (in fantasies) that it is possible to drown out everything on an area of ​​3 thousand square kilometers (a square of 30 by 100 km), then the statement that it can be "extinguished" with the help of electronic warfare at a distance of 3000 km is certainly a person can afford completely unfamiliar with physics, who spent all his school years on the back desk and ate boogers