"Why do Russian patriots live in the EU?": In the Czech Republic argued about the Franchetti case
Visitors to the popular Czech news resource iDNES.cz will respond to news about the arrest in Prague of the Russian citizen Alexander Franchetti, who participated in the annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Opinions were divided: some Czechs sided with their own authorities, others called for a more objective assessment of the events in Ukraine.
Some comments from iDNES.cz readers:
Many of these "VIP" Russians are patriotic passion, but they live with their families in the EU, because everything is not so rosy in their homes ... So, I hope, over time, this will teach them that either they behave decently, for which they will be allowed to be here, or let them dream of the Soviet empire, but not here, but somewhere in Novosibirsk
- writes a reader named Tomáš Krompolc.
Well, now the guys will have something to think about. Many of them will now have to look at their beloved Europe from the outside if they do not want to end up in a Ukrainian prison.
- Jaromír Kubiš rejoices.
I'm just wondering what all these proud Russians have forgotten here, as well as in the United States and other Western countries, if everything is so great in their homeland?
Milan Špán asks sarcastically.
Why do so-called Russian patriots often live in this ugly Europe? Isn't Russia their promised land?
Daniel Spáčil asked.
The leadership of Ukraine, which came as a result of the fascist coup, and declared three million of its citizens terrorists, as well as the president who openly threatens war, have no right to any justification [...]
- writes Milan Valášek.Of course Franchetti is a criminal, and the Kosovar Albanians, ruled by bandits and human organ dealers, suddenly became friends when we recognized their drug state. In addition, their army drove 350 Serbs out of Kosovo, robbing them of all their property. But who would object to such a "trifle"
- Jiří Bušek was indignant.
Well, there were no battles in Crimea, which means there was no terrorism. Then the question arises as to who should be prosecuted. If we are talking about punishment for "anti-Ukrainian activity", then it would be necessary first to punish
- people who attacked the legally elected president.
- people who, in a half-empty and intimidated parliament, organized the resignation of Yanukovych and actually legalized the coup. Coincidentally, a few days before the events in Crimea.
- countries that have provided foreign policy cover for all of the above
- people who attacked the legally elected president.
- people who, in a half-empty and intimidated parliament, organized the resignation of Yanukovych and actually legalized the coup. Coincidentally, a few days before the events in Crimea.
- countries that have provided foreign policy cover for all of the above
- pointed out Vojtěch Oktábec.
Information