Black Sea shipbuilding. Ukraine has lost another giant plant

22

Modern weapons, such as high-precision torpedoes or the latest generation of anti-ship missiles, make it possible to sink even the most powerful and formidable ships from among those surfacing today in the navies of various countries with one or two shots. But in order to "sink" an entire shipyard, and one of the most powerful, if not on the entire planet, then at least in the "post-Soviet space" - it was necessary to try very hard! One-time "torpedoing" of this enterprise, from the stocks of which the ships that constituted the strength and pride of the navies of both the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, of course, did not work out.

The Black Sea shipyard was “sunk” for a long time and persistently - some because of their own “selfish” interests, and some simply because of the complete absence of statist thinking in the presence, alas, of the highest government posts. In general, the fate of the plant is a typical Ukrainian story of fantastically mediocre squandering and destruction of the richest heritage that this country inherited three decades ago.



"Liquidation" in Nikolaev style


De jure, the last point in more than a century history of the shipbuilding enterprise, founded in 1897, was set by the decision of the Economic Court of the Nikolaev region with full, as the classics wrote, "non-resistance of the parties" Society "Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant". The cash register is empty, the property is sold to the last nail, the proceeds were distributed for debts (at the same time, about 40% of the company's creditors were lucky to return at least something), all employees were dismissed, the seal was destroyed ... Representatives of both the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the former owner were present at this the plant - the company "Smart-Holding", did not express the slightest objection to this decision.

Some representatives of the creditors who were left with nothing tried to be indignant, but after the official completion of the liquidation procedure, they can only complain to the UN. However, in this case, this is far from the most important point. Much more interesting is the question of how the largest shipyard in Ukraine could have become bankrupt. Destroyers, cruisers, submarines and even battleships were built there even before 1917. Subsequently, under Soviet rule, until the Great Patriotic War, a variety of ships, both military and civilian, left the stocks of the Black Sea shipbuilding - from the same cruisers and destroyers to tankers and icebreakers. From its first days, the enterprise also mastered the production of aerial bombs, as well as other products that were urgently needed for the front.

The Hitlerite invaders tried to use the enterprise (all valuable equipment from which it was evacuated) for their own needs under the name of "Yuzhnaya Verf". Rolling back from the city under the blows of the Red Army, the invaders simply wiped out the Black Sea shipbuilding plant from the face of the earth - out of almost 800 of its buildings and structures, two miraculously survived! Nevertheless, it was restored in the shortest possible time - already in 1945 the factory workers began to complete the construction of the previously evacuated military vessels. The development of the enterprise, which followed its rebirth from the ashes, was rapid - there one after another mastered the latest Technology, adopted the most advanced manufacturing processes used in the industry. In the 60s of the last century, the first Soviet anti-submarine helicopter-carrying cruisers "Moskva" and "Leningrad" were laid down and launched there; in the 70s, it was the turn of aircraft-carrying cruisers.

One of them - "Admiral Kuznetsov" to this day is part of the Russian Navy. The other two, Admiral Gorshkov and Varyag, continue to serve under the Indian (Vikramaditya) and Chinese (Liaoning) flags. The last of these ships, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Ulyanovsk, remained unfinished, since it was laid down in 1988, when the Soviet Union had only a few years left to exist. The Gorbachev clique of "perestroika" that came to power had no intention of strengthening the defense capability and military might of the country, which it sought to destroy. Objectively speaking, it should be admitted that the path to the decline and complete collapse of the Black Sea shipbuilding began not even from the collapse of the USSR, but earlier - from Gorbachev's "disarmament" and "conversion", which later almost led to the destruction of the Russian military-industrial complex.

"Nezalezhnoy" aircraft carriers are not needed


Indeed, the military ships, which only the world powers can afford to maintain and operate, needed the military vessels, which had grasped the longed for "independence" of the Ukrainian "elite", about the same as the button accordion to the well-known domestic animal. The corporation "Ukrsudstroy", created in the country, which included the Black Sea Shipbuilding Corporation, clearly did not know what to do with the overwhelming "legacy" that had fallen on it. Enterprises that previously worked primarily for the needs of the Navy, faced with a complete lack of orders and, accordingly, funding. The line under the "aircraft carrier projects" was drawn in 1992 by cutting the unfinished "Ulyanovsk" into scrap metal. A powerful navy was not needed in those troubled times, alas, not only for Kiev, but also for the then Russian "power", enthusiastically breaking down and ruining its own military industry.

Salvation, it would seem, came in 1993, when the management of the enterprise, where in despair they began to "rivet" anything, including equipment for sugar factories, managed to conclude a contract with the Greek company Avin International SA for the construction of three tankers for the transportation of products. In the end, there were twice as many such ships - they were the ones who “kept afloat” the plant until 2002. However, more orders from abroad were not received, but about domestic (due to the miserable state of the Ukrainian economics) did not even have to dream. Once again, "clouds thickened" over the Black Sea shipbuilding in 2003, when, for completely incomprehensible reasons, it was excluded from the state register of strategic enterprises not subject to privatization. However, some hope soon dawned on - and it was connected with Russia.

After the coming to power of Vladimir Putin and the clearly emerging tendency for him to revive the country's military power at the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant, they were cheered up and filled with good expectations, which, albeit indirectly, were confirmed by the frequent visits to enterprises of Russian high-ranking guests, in particular, our country's Ambassador Viktor Chernomyrdin. Alas, all hopes for multimillion-dollar orders for the Russian Navy were in vain. Moscow decided not to use the services of Ukrainian enterprises - and as subsequent events showed, it did the right thing. The last real attempt to save the Nikolaev shipbuilding giant was the decision of Viktor Yanukovych, who is now accused of "non-profit" in all conceivable and inconceivable sins, to launch a program to build corvettes for the local navy.

Tellingly, the matter was not limited to empty promises - funds in the amount of about 200 million hryvnia were allocated (funding was planned in twice as much). The hull of the first Ukrainian corvette "Vladimir the Great" was completed by 43% - and that was the end of it. There is no money for the implementation of an ambitious program, according to which the "non-cash" by 2026 was to receive 10-12 such ships (and four of them were planned to be launched by the current year, 2021), and, as they say, is not expected. And why should a country own corvettes (as well as shipbuilding in general), which purchases military and naval scrap from Western "partners", and intends to build new ships on their loans and at their own shipyards? Britain, France, Turkey - anyone but the Black Sea shipbuilding, which no longer exists.

In theory, this sad story should have been completed with another portion of curses against the "Maidan" of 2014, which finally and irrevocably put an end to any prospects for the normal development of Ukraine and led to the final collapse of its industry and economy as a whole. Nevertheless, let us show once again our objectivity - since 2007, the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant has belonged to the industrial and investment group Smart-Holding, which is owned by the Ukrainian oligarch Vadim Novinsky. At one time he was a person close to Viktor Yanukovych, however, like all people of his level and circle, he feels great under the “post-Maidan” authorities.

Smart-Holding has been repeatedly accused of deliberately bringing the shipbuilding enterprise to full bankruptcy (and will probably sound for a long time). Contradicts logic - will the real owner never destroy his property? Do not tell me ... Novinsky and his partners have conceived an ambitious project - the creation in Nikolaev of the so-called "industrial park" Naval ", the main link of which will be a new seaport - for the export of metal and grain from the country. And they are going to develop its construction just on the territory that until June 25 of this year was occupied by the destroyed Black Sea shipbuilding plant.

Naturally, the holding company rejects such "insinuations" with the deepest indignation, however, they do not deny their intentions to create a port with an appropriate transport infrastructure. They are also offended at the same time - they say, "Naval" will be able to provide the city with as many as 5 thousand jobs, and you are still outraged and slander! For reference: about 25 thousand people worked on the cleaned-up Black Sea shipbuilding plant before the collapse of the USSR. In fact, today's fast-rich people think in completely different categories, having nothing to do with state and national interests. They want super profits - a lot, at once and at any cost. At present, it is much more profitable and easier to export agricultural raw materials, ore and primitive metallurgical products from the "nezalezhnoy" than to build ships. So there won't be any ships! The process of Ukraine's transformation into a pitiful agrarian and raw material appendage of the West did not begin in 2014. Now we are just observing its final stage - the complete and total liquidation of the local industry.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. 123
    +3
    3 August 2021 10: 37


    What can I add?
    1. +1
      3 August 2021 12: 48
      And what's this in the raid? Abandoned barges for kavuni?
      1. 123
        +3
        3 August 2021 14: 37
        And what's this in the raid? Abandoned barges for kavuni?

        This is your honor, I believe Putin and Biden are having fun in a naval battle at their leisure by video link. Yes A-4, wounded, A-5 by ... And local sailors on combat boats "chips" move on the field. smile
  3. +2
    3 August 2021 10: 42
    In general, and on the whole, this is all known, let them drain themselves to the end.
    Let the zagrebetniks still live a little; the west will dispossess them to the fullest, the work of the simple and not simple
    It’s a pity for workers and itr, of course, but there’s nothing to be done, God sees everything.
  4. +5
    3 August 2021 10: 59
    We will destroy everything that has gotten from the nasty Muscovites, and then ... We will go to Poland to work in the fields and clean our shoes on the streets.
  5. +4
    3 August 2021 12: 41
    In fact, these giants of shipbuilding are ONLY assembly plants. Dimensions, territory not on the amount of equipment and the variety of technological lines. They are from the size of the piece of iron, cut out and transported on the stocks. My plant, where I worked for 25 years, and was the leading designer of the SKB, was engaged in just small electrical gizmos for shipbuilding. The plant was located in Siberia and belonged to the Ministry of the Coal Industry. An interesting detail, isn't it? After the War, it was decided to spread military orders for all, more or less suitable factories throughout the country. In order to increase the sustainability of production if something happens. The Nikolaev giant is worth nothing without that numerous cooperation, connections with hundreds of factories in Russia, Kazakhstan, the Baltic States ... .. It is necessary either to redo the finished product in order to use the other. Purchased, possibly abroad. For a currency that does not exist.
    1. 0
      3 August 2021 16: 42
      Nonsense, dear, they wrote! Our two unique steamers were launched in Nikolaev - "Academician B. Konstantinov" and "Academician N. Andreev", I may be wrong, in 1987. Naturally, not all components were manufactured at this plant, as well as at any other enterprise - this is "cooperation".
  6. -1
    3 August 2021 13: 32
    I wonder why the Square needs another port? The capacities built under the Union for the current export of wheat, rolled ferrous metals, ore and sunflower oil are quite enough.
  7. 0
    3 August 2021 13: 58
    When Nokia was in crisis, Finnish “patriots” suggested nationalizing one of the symbols of national pride. One of the ministers replied to this in the spirit that if nobody needs Nokia (no buyers), then why does the state need it?
    The situation is similar with the Black Sea plant. The plant is private, large, there are no orders and is not foreseen, and to sell is not for sale, there are no volunteers.
    The internal market is minuscule, but Western "friends and comrades" will not allow them to break through to the external market. All the valuable documentation, along with smart people, must be taken away long ago. To do something, to support unprofitable production at the expense of the budget? It's expensive though.
  8. +1
    3 August 2021 16: 56
    Quote: sergand sergand
    Nonsense, dear, they wrote! Our two unique steamers were launched in Nikolaev - "Academician B. Konstantinov" and "Academician N. Andreev", I may be wrong, in 1987. Naturally, not all components were manufactured at this plant, as well as at any other enterprise - this is "cooperation".

    Didn't it catch on to what I had written? "Launched" can be something that has a hull and main mechanisms. It is collected in the dock, in the air. Launched (not yet a ship, not a ship), the hull is being completed on the water. moreover, much longer than on the stocks. That's where they drag them from all over the country. We have had corvettes without engines from Ukraine for several years. Until they began to make them themselves. Understood? And on the nuclear icebreaker "Arktika" (the one that was launched in 1980) had 2,5 thousand of my electrical boxes. The Siberian plant made them. Ministry of Coal Engineering, departments. And without them I would have to do something. One tiny example.
  9. +3
    3 August 2021 17: 03
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    All the valuable documentation, along with smart people, must be taken away long ago.

    Any smart documentation, drawings, are tied to a specific production, equipment, materials and technologies. In another production, this waste paper has no value. For your information, the curious: The SU-27 aircraft weighs 18 tons. The design and technological documentation in one copy weighs exactly the same.
    1. 0
      3 August 2021 17: 49
      Do you want to say that in such a large and modern enterprise there is nothing that would be of interest to Western “friends” and Eastern “enemies”? Clever people must have been bought up.
  10. +1
    3 August 2021 21: 17
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    Do you want to say that in such a large and modern enterprise there is nothing that would be of interest to Western “friends” and Eastern “enemies”? Clever people must have been bought up.

    What do you think, if our company (any) invites a super-class engineer to work, or better not just an engineer, but a designer (this is closer to me), will there be any sense in his presence? Convinced - not at all. He does not know the range of materials. He doesn't know the system of standards. He does not know the equipment, and the designer must know this first. He does not know the technical requirements for the production of products. He doesn't know the language. And he doesn't know a lot. It so happened that after leaving the belligerent republic, my family moved to their native Russia. Difficulties with housing forced me to look for a place in a village, not far from a large city. And here I am, an instrumentation and control engineer at a poultry farm. A Dutchman worked for us as a consultant. Why the hell was he invited, I don't understand. Of course, he didn't do a damn thing, but they dragged around with him like a chicken and an egg. It was enough for six months. Why am I? And to the fact that our geniuses there as the hell are not needed by anyone. For the same reasons. As specialists. And you can wash toilets without knowing all that, according to your specialty. Or a chauffeur.
    1. 0
      4 August 2021 13: 32
      All this can be attributed to any type of activity. If so, what was the reason for the presence of Sshasov specialists at all defense enterprises and, as Vladimir Putin said, not a single decision was made without their supervision - they were forced out. And gore for Motor Sich, flying to other planets cannot make aircraft engines or an early warning system without assistance?
  11. 0
    4 August 2021 08: 50
    In country 404 decided that if

    Modern weapons, such as high-precision torpedoes or the latest generation anti-ship missiles, make it possible to sink even the most powerful and formidable ships with one or two shots.

    then you don't need to build anything.
  12. 0
    4 August 2021 10: 34
    And how is the NKI? Nikolaev Shipbuilding Institute - also liquidated?
  13. 0
    4 August 2021 15: 25
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    All this can be attributed to any type of activity. If so, what was the reason for the presence of Sshasov specialists at all defense enterprises and, as Vladimir Putin said, not a single decision was made without their supervision - they were forced out. And gore for Motor Sich, flying to other planets cannot make aircraft engines or an early warning system without assistance?

    Do you often use your laptop to hammer in nails? Probably, you understand that these things are not made for each other. So, probably, aircraft engines and rockets, although they fly, are made of completely different materials and on different equipment. Let me give you a more paradoxical example. A tank factory can never make a good tractor.
  14. 0
    4 August 2021 19: 05
    Quote: dub0vitsky
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    All the valuable documentation, along with smart people, must be taken away long ago.

    Any smart documentation, drawings, are tied to a specific production, equipment, materials and technologies. In another production, this waste paper has no value. For your information, the curious: The SU-27 aircraft weighs 18 tons. The design and technological documentation in one copy weighs exactly the same.

    And plus more ballots, slightly less than the tonnage of the aircraft itself. That's the whole alignment. Overall, you are right. I myself am an aircraft manufacturer, and I know how much documentation and technology there is. About the carabel, I am completely silent, there is even more than on the plane. And everywhere its own complexity in production.
  15. 0
    4 August 2021 19: 27
    Farewell to the plant, burn and hut.
    Chronicles of the Square ..

    1. +2
      6 August 2021 14: 04
      It began with the fact that the representatives of Western Ukraine decided to kill the rest of Ukraine in order to promote the Ukrainian language.

      The commander-in-chief of the UPA Roman Shukhevych explained to his subordinates the bloody methods of struggle: “You shouldn't be afraid that people will curse us for our cruelty. Let half of the 40 million Ukrainian population remain - there is nothing terrible about that "

      You can add more - let the remaining half be poor and hungry. The Westerners fiercely hate Eastern Ukraine, therefore they close the enterprises located there, and they themselves go to Poland to work for the master. They are not the heirs of the Zaporozhye Cossacks who fought against the Poles, they are attached when it suits them. The question is - will a new Bohdan Khmelnitsky appear in the near future or will there be a "Ruin"?
  16. +1
    5 August 2021 02: 07
    Quote: Joker62
    And plus more ballots, slightly less than the tonnage of the aircraft itself.

    That's it. Looking at someone else's documentation or a product (for example, a printed circuit board of some radio toy), I see that the seal has a drawing number and a photomask change number. I don’t trust one whose change number is less than 10 (raw materials, an obvious flaw), and more than 40. This means that the designer was in a fever in production on trifles, jumping from one to another. Scary crow, in short. Both are crap.
  17. 0
    8 August 2021 12: 47
    Sorry for "Ukraine" - and died at the wall. What do you call a ship ... fool