Rumors about the death of the Ukrainian pipe are clearly exaggerated. Or is it not?

18

В previous text we examined the fate of the Ukrainian gas transportation system after the conclusion of the Biden-Merkel pact and the attitude of the citizens of Ukraine and their expert community to all this. I promised to prove by numbers that the rumors about the death of the Ukrainian GTS are somewhat exaggerated. I keep my promise.

General data first. The total volume of natural gas imported by Europe (including Turkey) is 600 billion cubic meters of gas per year. Remember this figure. It includes both pipeline gas and LNG. There are not so many suppliers, they are all known - they are Russia (180-200 billion cubic meters / year), Norway (100-110 billion cubic meters / year), Holland (25 billion cubic meters / year), Algeria (10 billion cubic meters / year), cubic meters / year) and Azerbaijan (5 billion cubic meters / year). Everything! This completes the list of suppliers of pipeline gas to Europe. The rest of Europe's gas needs are covered by LNG suppliers - Qatar, Nigeria, the United States, Algeria, and recently Russia (represented by the Novatek corporation) has joined them. LNG supplies are extremely irregular, suppliers are guided by the prices that have formed at European gas hubs, and although they are now scrap like for the summer (they fluctuate around $ 400-450 per thousand cubic meters), the trouble is that the South In East Asia (Southeast Asia), they are even higher - and all LNG floats there, hence the gas shortage in Europe, hence the high prices. The market is an icon of liberalism!



Production volumes are falling for everyone, except for Gazprom


Moreover, this is not all the sadness for Europeans. The trouble is that both the Norwegian and Dutch gas fields are old (they have been exploited since the end of the 60s of the last century), and therefore they are being developed, production is falling. Norway is barely keeping the volume of supplies in the region of 100-110 billion cubic meters of gas per year due to the connection of new small fields on the continental shelf of the North and Norwegian Seas (old ones are being developed and dry up), and new ones are very scarce and everything goes to the point that by 2030 a country like Norway will not remain on the EU gas importers market.

The Dutch fairy tale has already ended. The operator of its main asset, the Groningen gas field Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij, referring to the decision of the Dutch government, has already announced that in the summer of 2022 it will curtail gas production for reasons beyond its control. From 25 billion cubic meters of gas per year to zero. And there was a time when they produced 80 billion cubic meters of gas a year (the record was set in 1976 - 88 billion cubic meters), but sooner or later everything ends, this Christmas story is over. The reason is as trivial as life. The operation of the field since the end of the 60s of the last century has led to an increase in the seismic activity of the region due to the subsidence of mined formations, which has led, since 1994, to 900 earthquakes (the most powerful with a magnitude of 3,6). As a result, the government of the country made a responsible decision to stop the development of the field already in 2022, without waiting for the previously adopted date of the compulsory end of operation, determined for 2030, for the simple reason that the Netherlands is 85% below sea level and does not smile at anyone there. one fine day go to the bottom of the sea, i.e. it is banal to disappear from the face of the Earth.

Except for Gazprom, there is simply no one on the European gas market to replenish 2022 billion cubic meters of gas leaving the market in 25. Pipeline gas suppliers (and there are only three of them, not counting Miller's department) cannot increase their production, and not only is LNG expensive, it will also go wherever they pay more for it (and these are recently premium markets of Southeast Asia, and not even the Dutch TTF gas hub at all). As a result, the latter will most likely cease to exist, giving up this place under the sun to the German newly created THE (Trading Hub Europe) and the Austrian CEGH (Central European Gas Hub in Baumgarten), powered by Nord Streams, the Ukrainian GTS and the gas pipeline "Yamal-EU", which both the Germans and the Austrians are only happy about. Gazprom is calmly watching the development of the situation, and is not going to cut off supplies along the central corridor, which includes both Yamal-EU and the Ukrainian route, as the Poles and Ukrainians are not provoking.

From the above, one more figure should be remembered - 25 billion cubic meters of gas per year, these are the volumes retiring from the market, which were previously supplied by Groningen. It is by this figure that the export of Russian gas to Europe can increase, and it will have to be pumped through something. Here the Ukrainian GTS comes to the rescue, which the non-brothers have already buried in their sad forecasts. But I will not get ahead of myself, I will give the layout of the gas pipelines at Gazprom's disposal somewhat below.

For now, I draw your attention to the fact that all these tales about Gazprom's monopoly on the European gas market are nothing more than delirium of an inflamed European consciousness, you can see for yourself of this. True, in fairness, it should be said that none of the players on the European gas market I have mentioned above have the opportunity to increase their supplies. Except perhaps only in Azerbaijan, but there, too, doubling the capacity of the Nabucco Southern Gas Transmission Corridor, which supplies gas from the Azerbaijani Shah Deniz field to Southern Europe, from 10 to 20 billion cubic meters of gas per year is not so distant, but still the future (and Baku can double them only by connecting Turkmenistan, Iraq and Iran to the SGC corridor). But the rest of the participants in the European gas market have absolutely no problems. Everyone, except for Gazprom.

Transport capacity is everything


Now we turn to the transport facilities at its disposal. Skarshevsky in previous text in my video I have already said about them in part. This is the famous Ukrainian GTS (with a design capacity of 290 billion cubic meters of gas per year at the inlet and 170 billion at the outlet, including 142,5 billion cubic meters per year towards the EU - in the best years it pumped such volumes), in 1999 the Yamal-EU gas pipeline was added to it, passing through the territory of the Republic of Belarus and Poland (with a design capacity of 33 billion cubic meters / year); cubic meters / year). In 2003, Nord Stream (now called SP-17) was added to the existing flows, linking Russian Vyborg and German Greifswald along the bottom of the Baltic Sea (with a design capacity of 2012 billion cubic meters / year), and in 1 it was added also the "Turkish Stream", which connected the European part of Turkey with the Anapa region of the Krasnodar Territory of the Russian Federation, also along the bottom of the Black Sea (its design capacity is 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year, half of which goes to Turkey, the rest to the South and South). Eastern Europe). And finally, in 2020, Nord Stream-31,5 should start working, its design capacity, like SP-2022, is 2 billion cubic meters per year (it will be supplied to it within 1-55 years, so again, how do not twist, but Gazprom, in order to fulfill its contractual obligations to European buyers, cannot do without the Ukrainian pipe yet, and this I still do not take into account the growing need for gas in Europe caused by the phasing out of nuclear and coal generation, which is insisted on by the "green" useful idiots of Gazprom ).

Now we take a calculator and count. SP-1 + SP-2 (110 billion cubic meters / year), plus Yamal-EU (33 billion), plus GP (17 billion), plus TP (31,5 billion). Total: 191,5 billion cubic meters of gas per year. The existing liabilities of Gazprom are 200 billion, plus 25 billion from the Netherlands. In total, the share of the Ukrainian GTS remains at least 33,5 billion cubic meters / year. And I have not yet included the growing needs of the EU in this figure. How much did Miller promise the Ukrainians? 15-20 billion cubic meters of gas per year. As you can see, he did not deceive much. It's minimum! And if Ukraine's friends in the EU manage to bring SP-2 to the norms of the Third Energy Package, then 50% of the pipe's capacity will remain unfilled (supposedly for an alternative supplier, so as not to fall under the "oppression" of Gazprom), then my figure is 33,5 billion cubic meters / a year it will be possible to add 27,5 billion, falling from the joint venture-2, in total, 61 billion cubic meters of gas per year are broken off to the share of Ukraine. Agree, you can live. Whatever one may say, but Gazprom cannot do without the Ukrainian pipe. Therefore, we will leave all these scarecrows that after the completion of the SP-2 Russia will attack, we will leave for not quite healthy people with an unstable psyche. It's just that after the appearance of alternative routes, the appetites of the Ukrainian comrades for setting tariffs for pumping aggressor gas through their GTS will have to be reduced. They are already almost the highest in Europe.

Money on the barrel!


Let's move on to the monetary issue - about the colossal damage that the Ukrainian side may suffer after the start of operation of the SP-2. It's even funny to talk about it. Figures, even against the background of microscopic budgets of Ukraine, clearly do not kill all living things. Judge for yourself, according to the current Agreement between Gazprom and Naftogaz, Gazprom is obliged to pump or pay (here the principle is - pump or pay!) 225 billion cubic meters of gas over five years from 2020 to 2024 inclusive. Moreover, in 2020 this figure was equal to 65 billion cubic meters / year, and in the next four years it will decrease to 40 billion cubic meters / year. The pumping rate is fixed, it is very high, but in December 2019 there was nothing to do - SP-2 was frozen, it had to be concluded on the terms of the Ukrainian side. As a result of the signed Agreement, the Ukrainian side will receive a fixed amount of 7,2 billion dollars for its services within five years. In 2020, it has already received $ 2,1 billion, for the next four it should receive another $ 1,3 billion a year. Those. at stake are $ 1,3 billion / year. This is the price of the issue.

Even against the background of all income items of the Ukrainian budget, which are planned in the region of $ 2021 billion in 40, this figure does not kill all living things, and is equal to 3,3% of all revenues to the Ukrainian budget. Why they are killed about $ 1,3 billion, allegedly lost due to SP-2, and do not worry about $ 1 billion, lost due to the "Turkish Stream", I do not know. And in the past, before the Turkish and Northern streams, Ukraine received for transit both $ 3 billion and even $ 5 billion a year, let's cry about them. Who is to blame for this? The greed and stupidity of the Ukrainian ruling elite at the time. They were then offered to create a Consortium of a supplier (RF), a transit country (Ukraine) and a recipient (EU) on the basis of their pipe. Refused! They said - the pipe is our national treasure, clean up your hands! We cleaned up and started building bypass routes. What was to be done? We have the right! Now it's too late to drink Borjomi. Better let the Ukrainians calculate how much they have lost billions of dollars from the severance of trade relations with Russia. Why don't they cry for them?

The real threat looming over Ukraine


The answer lies in a real threat that could hang over all Ukrainians if, God forbid, the transit of Russian gas through its GTS stops. They do not tell anyone about this threat, but in its scale it is comparable to the consequences of an atomic war. The thing is that the entire distribution gas network of Nezalezhnaya is powered from the high-pressure main gas pipeline. The pressure in it is maintained only due to the pressure in the GTS - there is no gas in the high-pressure pipe, and the whole of Ukraine is sitting without gas. Reverse reverse (from the EU side) is technically impossible - compressor stations are not able to catch up with gas from the western border of the Independent to its eastern part, the East will remain without gas, and therefore without heat. And this is already a disaster! To avoid it, you need to increase your own gas production, build additional compressor stations or increase the capacity of existing ones, or fall on your knees in front of Miller with requests - do not leave us, dear, please! What is Ukraine doing? The exact opposite - he falls to his knees in front of the muddy guy Biden, accuses Frau Ribbentrop of callousness and curses the villain-Putin. I think that with such a mood they will not sell their elephant (I hope you know this anecdote).

Summary


If until now Ukraine played in the main team of Russian gas transit countries to the EU, then thanks to its stupid and incompetent policy She was transferred to the reserve squad, now new promising young players - Germany and Turkey - are playing on the field, and her lot is to sit on the bench and wait for one of the main players to be crippled, and then she may be released as a substitute. Or maybe not. This is the lot of all venerable footballers who think that they are better versed in football than their coach.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    30 July 2021 08: 43
    Oh, ugly-pipe ... Pipe there, pipe here, daily peremogi ...
  2. -2
    30 July 2021 09: 04
    Rumors about the death of the Ukrainian pipe are clearly exaggerated. Or is it not?

    - Of course, they are exaggerated ... - Ukraine will drink a lot of blood from Gazprom (or rather, from Russia) through this "Ukrainian pipe" ...
    -And Russia will easily pay $ 5-7 billion to Ukraine in the next 2-3 years ... - There is no way to get away from this and there is no way to get rid of it ... - But these are all "mistakes of youth"; which cannot be corrected in any way ... - Only time can correct them ... - so 5-8 years ...
    - But that's why Russia (Gazprom) started repeating and making these mistakes again with a vengeance ... - And no time will fix them ...
    - Well, now what can Russia do with the Turkish Stream, which Russia itself has built with the money of its Russian taxpayers ??? - And what to do with "Azeri Stream"; which very soon the Turks will begin to lead (to have a very strong influence on this "Azerbaijani gas process" ... - Russia created all this just for the sake of one "Erdogan's smile" ??? - What's next ??? - Even if Erdogan suddenly goes somewhere or it will disappear and the power in Turkey will change ... - then this will not in any way affect the successful "gas affairs" of Turkey ... - Russia simply took and dragged Turkey into the gas business on its hump ... - to make Turkey a full-fledged world gas "competitor-partner" ...
    - Anyone at least understood this ???
    - This is good ... - even though China will not allow Turkey to "manipulate" the Turkmen gas ... - otherwise Turkey's quota ... - as a gas supplier to Europe, would become even greater ... - And Russia ... - less ... - or rather, more "more problematic" ...

    Ukraine played in the main squad of the Russian gas transit team to the EU, then thanks to its stupid and mediocre policy, it was transferred to the reserve squad, new promising young players, Germany and Turkey, now play on the field instead.

    - Ha ... - Yes, what does it have to do with ... here ... here is Ukraine ??? - Damn ... - "Don't shoot the pianist - he plays ... as best he can ..." ...
    - But how everything is "cool and cool" now ... - "new promising young players - Germany and Turkey" have appeared ... - Hahah ...
    - No, well, Germany - that's all right ... - here you really have to bet on Germany ... - And Turkey is here ... here ... where did it turn out to be ???
    - But it turned out ... - Russia paid for Turkey and ensured her a place in this "gas club" ... - Well, now Russia will have to pay for all the "freaks" and "surprises" of Turkey ... - Ukraine in comparison with Turkey it will seem just a naive little "naughty girl" ...
    1. 0
      30 July 2021 13: 27
      To spite my grandmother ... Bulgaria
      If not Turkey, for example, then who and how?
  3. +2
    30 July 2021 09: 56
    The Richter scale is used to determine the strength of an earthquake. 3,6 on the Richter scale is not a lot.
    Magnitude determines the energy of an earthquake. And 3,6 (no points here) in magnitude is already serious.
    Gazprom's obligations are much less than 200 billion cubic meters per year. There is no data, hardly more than 100-120 billion. The minimum pumping rate was 140 billion years ago, and no obligations were violated. Now Poland and Bulgaria can be subtracted from this figure. Italy, Slovakia and some other countries drop out of the contract within a year or two.
    The Ukrainian GTS can exist if it brings the transit tariff in line with the cost of pumping through the joint venture. Both Putin and Miller spoke about this. Transit through Ukraine will be preserved if there is an ECONOMIC feasibility. Something tells me that it meant economic feasibility for Gazprom, and not for Europe or Ukraine.
    1. +1
      31 July 2021 01: 40
      for Richter ATP, corrected, I did not understand about Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Italy, even if their current contract with Gazprom ends, then there is nowhere else to take gas. In 1998, Gazprom pumped 141 yards of gas through Ukraine alone, and in 2018 gas supplies to the EU (including Turkey) amounted to 200 yards, in 2019 the same
      http://www.gazpromexport.ru/statistics/
      All infa open
      1. +2
        31 July 2021 06: 08
        Contractual obligations and needs are different things. You wrote

        so again, whatever one may say, but Gazprom to fulfill its contractual commitments to European buyers, we cannot do without a Ukrainian pipe yet

        At the moment, without SP-2 and with planned repairs, GasProm easily fulfills its contractual obligations. With the commissioning of the SP-2 (even by 50%) and with the withdrawal from the contracts of several European countries, GasProm will easily fulfill its contractual obligations and without GTS.
        I have always tried to draw attention to the fact that there is a significant difference between the actually supplied gas and the contract. The contracts were concluded 20-25 years ago and the volumes there are relatively small. So, without the Ukrainian GTS, no penalties will threaten Gazprom. Reality today. The transit through Poland and Ukraine is practically frozen. And nothing terrible happens. Unless the price on the hub exceeded $ 500. But I had to think about this when they filed a lawsuit. Seis GazProm simply beats off the money that Ukraine, Poland and Bulgaria illegally obtained through arbitration.
        Germany can ask for GazProm will preserve transit so that it will use the UGS facilities in Ukraine. But it has no real leverage over Russia. So the preservation of transit depends only on reducing transit costs.
        1. +2
          31 July 2021 09: 41
          I have always tried to draw attention to the fact that there is a significant difference between the actually supplied gas and the contract. The contracts were concluded 20-25 years ago and the volumes there are relatively small. So, without the Ukrainian GTS, no penalties will threaten Gazprom. Reality today. Transit through Poland and Ukraine practically frozen... And nothing terrible happens. Is that the price of hub exceeded 500 dollars... But I had to think about this when they filed a lawsuit. Seis GasProm simply beats off the money that Ukraine illegally received, Poland и Bulgaria through arbitration.

          As for the highlighted points, the prices are different at different hubs, the Dutch TTF and the English NBP are higher because there are no Russian pipeline gas supplies, the Austrian CEGH and the German THE are lower for the reason given above. For NBP, the price has not yet exceeded $ 500 / thousand cubic meters - 495 ... 498, for others it is even lower. Poland and Bulgaria have not yet received anything from Gazprom, and Bulgaria has not even sued yet, by the way, for what? Transit through Ukraine is not frozen, every month Gazprom, in addition to 109 million cubic meters / day, which it has to pump under the contract, buys another 15 million cubic meters / day from above with an increasing coefficient of 1,2 on top of the tariff
          1. +1
            31 July 2021 12: 50
            In Bulgaria. Last year, the gas price fell to $ 50 and Bulgaria achieved a reduction in gas prices at the prices of the Dutch hub. Verbatim

            The European Commission believed that Gazprom was abusing its dominant position by imposing oil indexation contracts on these consumers. Now these countries can demand a revision of prices from the Russian monopoly if they differ significantly from the quotations of gas hubs in Western Europe.

            The funny thing is that if the price on the hub is higher than Gazprom's, then no one requires revision. But Bulgaria has achieved that now the gas price for it is determined in Holland (the same is for Ukraine and Poland). Information for yesterday

            Gas prices in Europe have set another record for the rise in the cost of "blue fuel" in Asia. The value of the futures contract closest to the spot quotes - the September futures on the TTF gas hub index on ICE Futures - reached the level of $ 510 per thousand cubic meters, Interfax reports.

            https://newdaynews.ru/moscow/731401.html
      2. 0
        31 July 2021 06: 11
        The link is good, but the same nuance. The data on the actually supplied gas are in the public domain. The volumes of the contract are not indicated anywhere. This is absolutely classified information.
        1. +1
          31 July 2021 07: 00
          One more point. According to your link, in 2019 more than 50 billion cubic meters of gas were supplied to the Netherlands, Turkey, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary. And according to Gazprom, contracts with these countries amount to 30 billion cubic meters per year. GazProm pumps additional volumes. He easily fulfills contractual obligations.
          General site problem. People provide links without critically analyzing their content. It is not enough to find a link. We need to check it out and think it over. This is not personal to you. Don't take it personally.
        2. +1
          31 July 2021 09: 48
          I analyzed only EU gas import needs, 200 yards is a real figure, will be even higher, plus 25 yards minimum
          1. +1
            31 July 2021 12: 53
            The needs may be over 200 billion. At least 500 billion, even a trillion. Gazprom's contractual obligations are much lower. So, strictly speaking, Ukrainian transit is not needed.

            In the zoo on the elephant's cage it is written that he eats 40 kilograms of bread, 30 kilograms of potatoes, 50 kilograms of cabbage, 20 kilograms of bananas ... One of the visitors asks an employee:
            - Tell me, will the elephant eat it all?
            - He will eat something, but who will give him ?!
      3. +1
        31 July 2021 06: 19
        At the beginning of the year, Elena BURMISTROVA, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Gazprom, announced that the company expects a wave of renegotiation of long-term contracts expiring in 2021-2024 with its old clients in Western Europe. During this period, the monopoly contracts with the Netherlands, Bulgaria, Serbia, Italy, Turkey and Hungary are coming to an end with a volume of over 30 billion cubic meters.
  4. GRF
    +1
    30 July 2021 10: 17
    Yes, many need it, but is it enough for her to survive? What's with wear and tear? How do Ukrainians invest in its repair / maintenance? After the Maidan I heard how the pan-heads threatened to blow up / close / disassemble it, this is a "communist" legacy, then the truth was they were reassured, but for how long? Will the wording in the next transit agreement be adequate? Will Ukraine not die? What recommendations will the IMF have? Will Europe need such volumes of gas? After all, the Stone Age can come very unexpectedly ...
  5. -1
    30 July 2021 23: 34
    Rumors in Europe that gas will cost 500 euros and even more are published by their most "authoritative" newspapers and regularly. Some with fear, some in a whisper, but no, no, and such a "publication" will break through in all sorts of times and spiegels ... This, of course, if SP2 is stopped by the Americans or the "greens" together with the Americans ...!

    In these articles, Europe is clearly hinting to its burgers that there is no need to worry. All SP2 threats, no matter who they come from, are actually BLUFF!

    Conclusion: SP2 will never be stopped, but they will try to pretend that they are very, very bad from SP2. They will achieve lower prices, financing of Bandera's Ukraine (and financing of just that part of it, which is Bandera's) Ukraine at the expense of Russia ... And our effective managers will break into an open door and, most likely, will succumb to the "divorce".

    More precisely, they will pretend that they have succumbed to deception. In fact, this is like a tribute for their personal safety in their long-bought houses on the French Riviera! Their or their children ...
    They do not care about the interests of Russia. They are already well fed!
  6. +1
    31 July 2021 09: 52
    Where did the author get the obligations of Gazprom for 200 billion m3? Taking into account the tolerance (the buyer's right to reduce the volume of purchases to the lower limit established by the contract), the mandatory volume of supplies is significantly less, because Gazprom also has the right to supply according to tolerance, which is now doing, which has raised gas prices ... - sell less, getting more, and then last year the utyrk finished badly - selling gas in Baumgarten below
    cost price!
  7. +2
    31 July 2021 22: 39
    Unfortunately, it is obvious that it is the Ukrainians, not their government, and not the Americans with the Europeans, who are promoting Nazism in the former Ukrainian SSR. These are not Western tourists and diplomats in 2013, crowds of thousands filled the cities of the former USSR and there they rode and screeched "Moskalyak on Gilyak" (hang the Russians on boughs!), ) !!! This was done by the Ukrainian population in the former USSR. Which with huge %% elected a Nazi Jew who openly supported all these Maidans with their calls for the destruction of the Russian population of the former Ukrainian SSR as president of the former Ukrainian SSR. Didn't the Ukrainians know, burning the unarmed Russian citizens of Odessa, that they just wanted the federalization of the former Ukrainian SSR and friendship with the Russian Federation. ...? Or did the Ukrainians not see the brutal shelling and bombing of Lugansk and Donetsk, choosing Poroshenko, who also paid for the Kiev Maidan ?! Poroshenko, who, before the start of the school year in 2014, promised to drive the children of Donbass into the basements with Ukrainian bombings !! ?? .... The difference between the Ukrainians living in the former USSR and the Russians is not in the language / mov. And in ideology. Russian, whether he is Poleschuk, Hutsul, Lemok or Rusyn of Transcarpathia, is an internationalist by nature. Russian is a belief! The Ukrainian is a nationalist, and now, judging by the actions of the Ukrainians, he is a Nazi, a Nazi by conviction. ..... Yes, and it became clear from 1991 immediately, when pseudoscientific works (including in the Printing House of the Verkhovna Rada) about the inferiority of Russians, as the Ukrainians then called us - "the filthy ugro -Finnish people ". Further more. All these years, the Ukrainians only developed the theme of the Ural-Turkic inferiority of the Russians' non-Slavism. As if we, Russians, are ashamed of kinship with Finns and Turks!?! .... And since 2013, Ukrainians have not called us names other than quilted jackets (hard workers). And the Belarusians are called scoops. But they themselves, the Ukrainians-ukroarii, etc. Sick. Long and chronically sick with Nazism. ... And the Ukrainians will, in spite of the choice of the Russian population of the former USSR, choose only scum like Poroshenko or Zelensky. The Nazis are essentially different and will NEVER choose. And for Russians, the road to elections is closed by the ban on the parties of Slobozhanshchina and Novorossiya, or by persecution of Russian politicians.
  8. +2
    2 August 2021 01: 39
    Gazprom needs to transfer gas to European consumers who receive gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system, on the Russian-Ukrainian border. Let Europe pay for transit to Ukraine, doubts take that the Europeans will agree to the tariff that we are paying now. To go even further to sell gas for rubles and arrange a spot in this direction. Provided that the GTS between the entrance and exit has minus 60 billion cubic meters, it will be just fun for Europeans from Ukrainian greed. Then Europe will be able to appreciate Ukraine at its true worth. It probably makes sense for Gazprom to move away from complex price formulas, but to do it in different directions. For example Ukrainian, the price for rubles on the border with Ukraine is not less than 50% of the price for the final consumer in Europe. A very good offer.