Who can buy the first Russian Su-75 fighter?

26

The official presentation of the modern Russian fifth-generation single-engine fighter Su-75, which took place two days ago, largely due to its skilful advertising campaign, made a great resonance in our country and abroad. Ill-wishers mock, people who are adequate to the appearance of the newest combat aircraft rejoice, and skeptics ask one question, for whom is "Checkmate" really intended?

First, let's go through the announced tactical and technical characteristics of the Su-75. Its practical range is estimated at 3 thousand kilometers, the practical ceiling is 16,5 thousand meters. The maximum speed of a multipurpose fighter should be 1,8-2 times the speed of sound (1,8-2 M), and the combat load should be 7,4 tons. Not bad, especially considering that the presence of only one power plant makes the aircraft more affordable for purchase and subsequent maintenance. For the picky buyer, the Su-75 will cost between $ 25 million and $ 30 million, which is why it was immediately dubbed the "F-35 for the poor." If we take into account that in the future it is possible to create a two-seater version, as well as an unmanned version, we get a very interesting proposal. General Director of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) Yuri Slyusar commented on the novelty as follows:



The idea was born from economics... In our opinion, there are a lot of single-engine aircraft on the market now ... But there is no fifth-generation single-engine aircraft at an acceptable, economically justified price that would be within the power of most customers of military multifunctional aircraft.

Well, a very practical approach. If we take into account the well-run PR campaign, one gets the impression that we have finally learned not only to create an excellent military machinery, but also to sell it competently. But it was around this that the most heated discussion began. Who can really buy our Su-75?

If you watch the promotional video, it becomes obvious that Rostec is counting on India, Vietnam, the United Arab Emirates and Argentina. And the state corporation does have certain grounds to count on success. The production of competing F-16s began back in 1975, the Saab JAS 39 "Gripen" - in 1997, that is, it is by no means new. The Sino-Pakistani Chengdu FC-1 Xiaolong (JF-17 Thunder) is fresher, it began operating in 2007, but this is a Sino-Pakistani quality. The F-35, despite the many identified "jambs", is produced and "vparivayutsya" to the American allies in batches, but that's the problem. Its $ 80 million price tag for a "flying iPhone" seems a bit expensive to many. And do not forget about the need for further maintenance, depending on the manufacturer from the United States. Against this background, the brand new Su-75 for $ 25-30 million may be in great demand. Each buyer of such military equipment always thinks well where and against whom it can actually be used. The countries shown in the Rostec commercial do not seem to be going to war with the United States and NATO, which means that a light multipurpose aircraft may well be enough to solve the problems facing fighter aircraft. Russian.

Yes, that's right. However, there is one narrow point. The fear is quite rightly expressed that an aircraft that is not in service with the Russian Aerospace Forces is unlikely to be in demand abroad. And this is quite fair. The same Indians had previously abandoned the "older brother" of the Su-75, but later made a clarification that they should carefully study the experience of operating the Su-57 in the Russian troops. The customer is always right, right?

What do we have in the bottom line. A promising aircraft with good characteristics for a very capacious market niche, which from the very beginning is positioned as an export aircraft. At the same time, according to the statement of the UAC, the fighter was developed by the corporation without attracting funds from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, that is, on an initiative basis, and even in the shortest possible time. Somehow all this is atypical for our realities. Where have you ever seen this? Probably, this absurdity may be the answer to the main riddle of the Su-75.

One very plausible version is being cautiously expressed in the Russian press, and according to it, the lightweight Sukhoi project actually has its own customer from the very beginning, who finances this entire program. And it may turn out to be the United Arab Emirates, whose representative is shown in the Rostec video. It would seem, why should the Emirates, loyal to the United States, order the development of a fifth generation fighter in Russia, if it can buy an F-35 from its ally? And the Arabs have their own reasons, which are rooted in their long-standing difficult relations with neighboring Israel.

Tel Aviv was the first foreign buyer of fifth-generation American fighter jets that would guarantee it air superiority over any enemy in the region. With the coming to power of President Biden, the United States signed a contract with the UAE for the supply of 50 fifth-generation Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II fighters for $ 10 billion. But this was done with one caveat: the manufacturer made the "Arab" versions of the F-35 visible on the IDF radars. Here is such a selective "invisibility". In any case, Reuters wrote about it. It is not surprising if Arab sheikhs with an Odessa accent asked, but they need it.

Of course not. Let's go back to 2017, when at an arms exhibition in the UAE, the head of Rostec, Sergei Chemezov, told reporters that Russia was negotiating with the Emirates on the joint development of a fifth-generation light fighter based on the MiG-29, which should appear in seven to eight years. And now we really have a new fifth-generation light multi-role fighter, however, based on the Su-57. At the same time, the UAC, in some unknown way, in the shortest possible time, developed an aircraft without an order from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, and even without budget funds, and an Arab pilot is visible in the commercial. Coincidence?

It may, of course, be a coincidence, but there are too many oddities in the matter, too much indestructible confidence of Rostec in its stake on the export market without a pre-order from the RF Ministry of Defense. This is not usually done in our country. By the way, the experience of cooperation with the UAE in terms of the development of weapons already exists. This is our Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system, which was ordered by the Arab sheikhs, and they use it quite successfully, despite their friendship with the United States.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -9
    22 July 2021 15: 41
    In order:
    1. There is no single-engine fighter of the fifth generation Su-75, there is not even a flying prototype, there is only a full-size exhibition model.
    2. If, as the author claims, 50 F-35 fighters that will be supplied to the UAE cannot remain invisible to Israeli radars, then the product of the Russian military-industrial complex is even less capable of this. The point here is not in some intentionally spoiled F-35 for the Arabs, but in the capabilities of the Israelis.
    3.And a question to Mr. Marzhetsky for filling - where exactly are the military from the Emirates "quite successfully using" Russian "Armor"?
    1. +6
      22 July 2021 16: 50
      And who told you, or where did you read that there is a flying sample? All maps are open, the first flight is in 2023, where is what is wrong? It is obvious, even from Putin's face at the presentation, that this is a machine for foreign customers, developed on an initiative basis ...
    2. -8
      22 July 2021 18: 55
      So I’ll tell you, dear Bindyuzhnik: Since the time of the MiG-19, the USSR really didn’t have 1 ENGINE Fighter! With a single-engine system, the USSR could not ensure the flight of the Letakovs produced!
      1. +2
        22 July 2021 20: 18
        Since the days of the MiG-19, the USSR really DIDN'T HAVE 1 ENGINE Fighter!

        MiG-21 was, Su-17, Su-19, Su-22 were also.
        1. -10
          22 July 2021 22: 03
          And where are they? SU 17,19,22 in its essence is the same aircraft and before the appearance of SU 24 of a real FRONT fighter-bomber (the weight of the combat load at the level of the Great Patriotic War), the USSR did not have it! The MiG 21 aircraft made its first flight in 1958, there was no radar on board, after its installation the aircraft began to lose its advantages RAPIDLY, because one engine could not cope with the increased weight! Do you know that the engine installed on this MiG is based on Rolls-Royce engines: "Derwent-V"?
          1. +2
            23 July 2021 11: 47
            I just said that there were single-engine aircraft after the MiG-19. I did not assess their fighting qualities. However, the MiG-21 nevertheless showed itself very well and is still in service in some countries.
          2. +4
            23 July 2021 16: 02
            The Indians are still using the MiG-21UPG. And there is a radar on the car, and modern avionics for the year of release, and weapons for air combat, and "earthlings" to treat. In the USSR, there were single-engine fighters, it was Russia that never built them
      2. +3
        23 July 2021 15: 57
        Quote: Alexander K_2
        So I will tell you, dear Bindyuzhnik: Since the time of the MiG-19, the USSR really DIDN'T HAVE 1 ENGINE Fighter

        The MiG-23 was. A very good car for its time. And the MiG-27, its shock version
  2. 0
    22 July 2021 16: 41
    Ideal for the Chinese. They put their electronics, and that's it ...) It would seem ... But, not that Sagittarius ...)
  3. +5
    22 July 2021 18: 19
    The fear is quite rightly expressed that an aircraft that is not in service with the Russian Aerospace Forces is unlikely to be in demand abroad.

    Nowhere was the opinion expressed that the aircraft would not be in service with Russia. Several versions of the performance for the Emirates or what? I doubt it. I also doubt that they started yesterday, today they did it, for sure the development of the single-engine version began immediately after the SU-57 appeared in metal, if not earlier.
  4. +1
    22 July 2021 19: 15
    If you listen to the statements of Sukhoi representatives at the exhibition, it becomes clear that the Su-75 is just a new glider (let's leave the question of the Kh-32), which is equipped with a relatively old engine (time-tested technologies ...), side radars from the Su-57, the main AFAR radar (possibly a stripped-down Squirrel). The armament is not new either, close and medium ranges, nothing new ... The Su-75 is not a fighter against the F-35, but just an unobtrusive aircraft capable of effectively fighting many opponents of the 4th generation and striking the ground. As a result, the Su-75 can become a significant factor both for the countries with the 4th generation, and for the countries with the F-35, as well as for the ground air defense of all countries, which the Su-75 could oppose. Its low price means more distribution, which in fact is a factor in itself that everyone will have to take into account.
  5. AND
    +3
    22 July 2021 19: 30
    Quote: Bindyuzhnik
    In order:
    1. There is no single-engine fighter of the fifth generation Su-75, there is not even a flying prototype, there is only a full-size exhibition model.
    2. If, as the author claims, 50 F-35 fighters that will be supplied to the UAE cannot remain invisible to Israeli radars, then the product of the Russian military-industrial complex is even less capable of this. The point here is not in some intentionally spoiled F-35 for the Arabs, but in the capabilities of the Israelis.
    3.And a question to Mr. Marzhetsky for filling - where exactly are the military from the Emirates "quite successfully using" Russian "Armor"?

    As usual .... Lizba blurt out.
    Israeli radar? American radar for their money is made and blind by 50% .... Palestine was firing old rockets like a bucket of holes at Israel with their rockets.
    1. +2
      23 July 2021 08: 05
      In general, it is better not to react to Bindyuzhnik. This is an Israeli troll-Russophobe, an outright enemy. What to discuss with him at all?
      We recently saw the capabilities of the Israeli military: they shoot themselves down laughing
      1. -3
        23 July 2021 11: 49
        We recently saw the capabilities of the Israeli military: they shoot themselves down

        When was this?

        Well, the real capabilities of the Israeli military are quite demonstrated to themselves in their combat missions in Syria. So I see no reason for irony here.
      2. 0
        23 July 2021 18: 33
        Quote: Marzhetsky
        We recently saw the capabilities of the Israeli military: they shoot themselves down

        what are you talking about?

        Quote: Marzhetsky
        knock themselves down

        well, you shouldn't have said that. Not an indicator at all. In the history of each aircraft there are episodes when it fell to its own. When Powers was ground, how many planes were shot down?
        1. -1
          25 July 2021 21: 05
          "When Powers was grounded, how many planes were shot down?"
          One.
          1. 0
            25 July 2021 21: 06
            Quote: reynor 77
            "When Powers was grounded, how many planes were shot down?"
            One

            Sure?
            1. -1
              25 July 2021 21: 08
              Of course I’m sure.
              1. 0
                25 July 2021 21: 11
                Quote: reynor 77
                Of course I’m sure.

                And who shot down the MiG Safronov? Or did he fall himself?
                1. -1
                  25 July 2021 21: 21
                  Can't you read?

                  When Powers was ground, how many planes were shot down?

                  Apart from the U-2, one plane was shot down (yes, MiG Safronov, Ayvazyan dodged. Do you get the sense of what you have written?
                  1. 0
                    25 July 2021 21: 24
                    Quote: reynor 77
                    Can't you read?

                    You can't read that. Know how to admit a mistake. What does it have to do with it

                    Quote: reynor 77
                    Apart from U-2

                    ??? On that day, two planes were overwhelmed - a reconnaissance aircraft of Powers himself and by mistake - a MiG-19 starley Sergei Safronov.
  6. -3
    22 July 2021 20: 21
    The price of the plane is kind of strange. Su-30 (aircraft of the fourth generation) drove India at a price of 50-60 million dollars, and the aircraft of the 5th generation - only 30? This, incidentally, and the announced price of the Su-57 concerns.
  7. -1
    24 July 2021 22: 46
    Let's trade SSU75 layouts! While there is a demand for them. And then in 15 years they will completely forget about him. lol
  8. -1
    25 July 2021 21: 00
    I read recently that the Russian Defense Ministry plans to acquire 2 Checkmate squadrons. So "one narrow moment" is completely leveled out.
  9. 0
    27 July 2021 13: 18
    It remains to decide on the material. Make it from papier-mâché or cast tin. What do you think will be more in demand?
  10. 0
    4 August 2021 22: 53
    I propose to sell the Chinese - take Taiwan!