New Crimean War will be the last for Great Britain


The "Collective West" has firmly decided to make another attempt to "put in place" Russia, or, at least, to test the strength of its borders. The initiator of this extremely dubious initiative is the most consistent and dangerous geopolitical enemy of our country - Great Britain. There, the question of the need to "contain" Russia and "curb" it is being discussed at the level of the country's legislative body - the parliament. The special report prepared by the members of the defense committee of his House of Commons is, in fact, nothing more than a clear program to oust our country from the Black Sea region and to weaken its positions as much as possible.


The fact that the "creativity" of gentlemen from parliament is by no means abstract speculation or empty talking shop is very clearly evidenced by the recent actions of the British land and naval forces, on whose account there are already quite a lot of provocations committed on our borders, and other actions. aimed at whipping up tensions in their immediate vicinity. How far can the aggressive aspirations of London and the "allies", incited by it to the anti-Russian demarches, go? What underlies the amazing self-confidence of the Anglo-Saxons, who increase the risk of a global armed conflict with their adventures? Let's try to figure it out.

Who will draw the "red lines" and to whom?


In the document I mentioned above, prepared by British parliamentarians, our country is traditionally held responsible for "subversive actions against neighboring countries" and even for "unceasing military aggression" against them. Naturally, I mean Ukraine, which the British continue to present as an innocent victim, claiming that Moscow is to blame for the "aggravation of the situation in Donbass" and the failure to comply with the Minsk Agreements, and not Kiev, which stubbornly refuses to implement them. On this occasion, the parliamentarians recall Russia’s spring deployment of troops to the Ukrainian borders, saying that the withdrawal of units and subunits that then took part in the measures to check the combat readiness was carried out "by no means in full." And from this moment not just claims, but demands begin. Moreover, they are extremely arrogant. The authors of the report declare that our country "must remove all its auxiliary military forces" not only from the border with the "nezalezhnaya" (because their presence is "a threat to young democracy"!), But also from the Russian Crimea. It turns out that the right to determine where, in what capacity and in what quantities the Russian military can be located does not belong to Moscow at all, but to London! This is something new…

The Kremlin's repeated reminders that Russia is, in fact, a sovereign state capable of independently making decisions regarding the deployment and relocation of its own Armed Forces in order to ensure its security, no one in London even thinks about. It is quite traditional, however. They continue to talk about the "illegal annexation" of the peninsula and the "destabilization of all of Europe", which is allegedly carried out by our country, and not NATO, which has turned the Old World into a continuous military training ground for its incessant maneuvers.

Moreover, the British take the audacity to declare that for Russia "red lines must be defined", the crossing of which "will trigger appropriate responses." Of course, all the North Atlantic Alliance is invited to act, but the role of the "vanguard", and, calling things by their proper names, the main provocateur, the British gentlemen are ready to take on with great willingness. So, the well-remembered recent attempt to break through by the Royal Navy URO destroyer Defender to Sevastopol, from which there was less than half a step before the armed conflict, in London is stubbornly called a "peaceful passage" and clarifies that such, no less defiant demarches will certainly follow in the future. The authors of the report we are talking about are confident that Britain "must assume the responsibility to ensure freedom of navigation in the Black Sea" and, first of all, firmly intends to "enjoy complete freedom of action in this area."

However, the British would not be British if they decided to expose exclusively their own destroyers under the fire of our anti-ship missiles. The role of the main supplier of "cannon fodder" in the coming conflict is destined, as you might guess, for Ukraine. This territory, like any colony of its own, is being turned by the British into a military foothold and an outpost directed against Russia, sparing no effort or money for this. The local parliamentarians directly point out in their document that London and its allies should generally not pay the slightest attention to Moscow's warnings that Kiev's accession to NATO and, in general, the further expansion of this bloc to the East will be perceived by it as an encroachment on the “red lines ”, drawn in the Kremlin. Gentlemen are confident that they have the exclusive right to designate something on the world map.

Crimean War 2.0?


Alas, talks about "strengthening military cooperation with Ukraine" and London's desire to "strengthen its potential in every possible way" in confrontation with our country are not idle talk. This is evidenced by the sharply intensified recent actions of the British side to "build up the muscles" of the "nezalezhnoy". So, in the process of the recently held provocative exercises Sea Breeze 2021 aboard the same ill-fated destroyer Defender, an agreement was concluded between London and Kiev on cooperation in the field of military shipbuilding, providing for the supply of not only two minesweepers to Ukraine, but also eight missile boats. The most interesting thing is that only two of the latter are planned to be built in Britain. The rest, it seems, should be created with its help in the very "nezalezhnoy". Where and how they are going to do this after the inglorious death of the Nikolaev shipyard is deeply incomprehensible.

However, these are the problems of Kiev. For our country, it is much more important that the memorandum signed on board the violating destroyer speaks of "help" that the British allegedly intend to "provide to the Ukrainian side" in the creation of two naval bases - both on the Black and Azov Seas. And this cannot but cause alarm. Of course, the British in life will not be engaged in the construction of military facilities of this level for some natives there. We were going to build conscientiously - that means, exclusively for ourselves. In any case, even if the "zhovto-blakit" banner flutters over these bases, the "white sahibs" will rule there. And, therefore, their warships will be able to settle in the very immediate vicinity of our borders at any moment.

Exactly the same applies to the ground forces of the British army, which are currently conducting the Cossack Mace 2021 (Cossack Mace) maneuvers in the Ukrainian South together with the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Such, according to representatives of the "receiving side" "will improve the level of compatibility and interaction between the headquarters and units of the armies of Ukraine and the United Kingdom." Well, still - before driving the natives to slaughter, you should teach at least elementary commands and the most necessary actions. One gets the impression that London has firmly decided to repeat its own experience of almost two centuries ago, which went down in history under the name of the Crimean War. This armed conflict was provoked and unleashed against Russia exclusively by the British Empire, all the other participants played the role of "extras" and "support group". That, however, did not in the least prevent France and the Ottoman Empire, who were involved in this bloody adventure, from suffering human losses in its course, many times exceeding the victims of the British themselves.

Let me remind you that in London, starting the Crimean War, which was pompously called “the battle of civilization against barbarism,” the goal was not only to defeat the Russian Empire, but to actually dismember it and turn it into a downtrodden and disenfranchised quasi-state. The then head of the British government, Lord Palmerston, proposed to tear away from our country not only Poland and Finland, which belonged to it at that time, but also the Baltic states, Crimea, the Caucasus, Moldova ... Not weak appetites, isn't it? True, it did not work out with their satisfaction - Russia suffered a military defeat, but was not, as expected, utterly defeated, and this "Pyrrhic victory" was too expensive for the British and their allies.

Then, in 1854, who headed the very House of Commons of the British Parliament, whose members are now scribbling Russophobic plans, John Russell called for "pulling the fangs from the Russian bear" and assured his compatriots that "until the arsenals of Russia and its fleet on the Black Sea are destroyed, peace in Europe will never be. " Apparently, despite the past centuries, nothing has changed. In any case, in the minds of English gentlemen. A country whose public debt, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), will exceed 30% of GDP in the next 120 years, continues to inject huge sums into the arms race, hypocritically repeating the "Russian threat" in the same way , as in the distant nineteenth century. The sums that London intends to invest in its own military programs in the foreseeable future are estimated at astronomical values ​​- not so long ago, it was about 80 billion pounds sterling "for the modernization of the army and navy", which is planned to be allocated in the near future, and 200 billion of military appropriations for the upcoming decade.

At the same time, Britain is well aware that its ground forces, with their outdated tanks and other technique in no case are they capable of withstanding the Russian Armed Forces in a large-scale clash. Obviously, proceeding from this, the Black Sea region was chosen as the point where the British lion is going to "try" our forces, in which the British expect to use their more or less combat-ready navy and aviation. Well, and in order to carry out provocations leading to the unleashing of a conflict and the subsequent "filling up with corpses" of the enemy, they expect to use the Armed Forces of Ukraine, somehow prepared by their instructors. These are not a pity.

To our great regret, those who today are making aggressive plans in London against our country refuse to take historical facts into account. The Russian Empire suffered its defeat in the Crimean War of 1853-1856 due to the technical backwardness of its army and the indecisive actions of its leadership. Today, those who decide to repeat this adventure cannot count on anything like this. The new war will be the last for its instigators.
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 22 July 2021 10: 49
    .
    Ah, .... they were measured by this, cartoons were measured, weapons too, now, according to the media, it is time to measure themselves with "red lines", who is redder and more linear ...

    But seriously, since Biden "warmed up", then the Saxons were probably asked to "cool down" in advance, and even politely leaked about it ...
    1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
      Ulysses (Alexey) 24 July 2021 22: 15
      +3
      Ah, .... they were measured by this, cartoons were measured, weapons too, now, according to the media, it's time to measure themselves with "red lines",

      The United States surrendered Afghanistan, Iraq is next.
      Guaido and Tikhanovskaya are babbling something in the train.

      About the "red lines". smile

      And life goes on.
    2. Raul Castro Offline Raul Castro
      Raul Castro (Lucifer) 24 July 2021 22: 39
      0
      Sergey Latyshev (Serge), tolko odin vopros k tebe-skolko ti stoish ?!
  2. Cyril Offline Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 22 July 2021 11: 19
    -8
    aboard the same ill-fated destroyer Defender

    Why the ill-fated one? he is completely safe and sound.

    The Russian Empire suffered its defeat in the Crimean War of 1853-1856 due to the technical backwardness of its army and the indecisive actions of its leadership.

    The respected author forgot another important (but actually the most important reason) - namely:

    The socio-economic reason for the defeat was in the preservation of serfdom, which is inextricably linked with the lack of freedom of both potential hired workers and potential entrepreneurs limiting industrial development. Europe to the west of the Elbe was able to break away in industry, in the development of technology from Russia thanks to the social changes that took place there, contributing to the creation of a capital and labor market.

    Technical backwardness was only a consequence of this reason.
    1. sgrabik Offline sgrabik
      sgrabik (Sergei) 22 July 2021 11: 32
      +8
      Quote: Cyril
      Why the ill-fated one? he is completely safe and sound.

      It is he who is still safe and sound, but if at least once he tries to repeat his stupidity and invade the territorial waters of Russia, he will instantly lose his integrity and intact, and very quickly go to the bottom !!!
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 22 July 2021 11: 38
        -8
        but if even once he tries to repeat his stupidity and invade the territorial waters of Russia, he will instantly lose his integrity and intactness, and very quickly go to the bottom !!!

        You can talk about this only after it happens.
        1. sgrabik Offline sgrabik
          sgrabik (Sergei) 22 July 2021 11: 41
          +8
          I agree, but for this it is necessary that the British destroyer decided to repeat its provocation in our territorial waters, but I think it will not repeat it again, the guts are thin !!!
    2. Raul Castro Offline Raul Castro
      Raul Castro (Lucifer) 24 July 2021 22: 42
      +4
      Cyril (Kirill) -takie kak ti prodajutsja i pokupajutsja, au nas v Germany prezirajutsja
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 24 July 2021 23: 51
        -3
        People like me - what are they?
  3. Binder Offline Binder
    Binder (Miron) 22 July 2021 16: 28
    .
    The analogy with the Crimean War of the century before last is very clear. Let me remind you that then, before the battle on the Alma River, the commander-in-chief of the Russian forces Menshikov promised to throw hats on the enemy, the battle was lost, like the war as a whole. And today the author predicts a crushing defeat for the British - the lesson of history has not been learned.
    1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
      Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 22 July 2021 22: 47
      +7
      And today the author predicts a crushing defeat for the British - the lesson of history has not been learned.

      One-on-one Russia will crush the Britons, even with conventional types of weapons, just look at the number of the British Armed Forces, it's another matter that they will only decide to fight as part of NATO, but in this case Russia has a nuclear club, therefore, there is no victory for the Britons, and how fair noted the author, this war will be the last for them, however, as well as for any other aggressor who wished to squeeze something from Russia or bite off
      1. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 22 July 2021 23: 18
        .
        Russia was unable to win in two Chechen wars even a handful of illiterate mountain shepherds, where can she butt with the Britons? bully
        1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
          Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 22 July 2021 23: 56
          +8
          Why couldn't it? All the field commanders of the so-called independent Ichkeria from Dudayev to Khotab were eliminated, the Caucasus was stabilized, our special services proved that they are rightfully considered one of the best in the world
        2. Ugr Offline Ugr
          Ugr 23 July 2021 09: 01
          0
          Yeah, then why did all the bearded Barmalei fled to European countries, they were accepted as refugees by Belgium, Austria, Germany, in general, the entire European Union ???
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 23 July 2021 17: 38
            .
            Oh really? Kadyrov has not fled anywhere, he feels very comfortable on the territory of the Russian Federation. yes
        3. silver169 Offline silver169
          silver169 (Aristarkh Feliksovich) 23 July 2021 17: 21
          +5
          Miron, again wishful thinking. Ridiculous, really.
        4. boriz Offline boriz
          boriz (boriz) 23 July 2021 21: 13
          +8
          Take care of your country better. The Arabs have already begun to noticeably influence the policy of Israel. And if the existing demographic trends persist, the country, in the medium term, will cease to be Jewish. And no war is needed.
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 23 July 2021 21: 24
            -7
            Israel was, is and always will be the state of the Jewish people, the influence of the Arabs on the country's politics is zero. And the Jews have no problems with demography. But all this has nothing to do with the topic of discussion, do you have anything to say about it?
            1. boriz Offline boriz
              boriz (boriz) 23 July 2021 22: 08
              +5
              1. Lift your eyes up to the comment to which I replied. Where is the Crimean War and where are the fresh Chechen wars? Or "is it different"? A faithful Jew can get off the topic, but is it forbidden for the goyim?
              2. Your manner of broadcasting with slogans that have no connection with reality amuses. The impression is that your father / mother or grandfather / grandmother worked in the ideological department of some regional committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Something dear is heard.
              Actually:
              On April 19, the unexpected happened: the Arab party RAAM, during a vote on the format of the Knesset organizing committee (which forms the government), said its weighty, decisive word. And she said it against Netanyahu. While Netanyahu negotiated for several hours with Naftali Bennett about the fate of the portfolios of the future government, Mansur Abbas quickly reached an agreement with Netanyahu's opponents and voted against him. The Arabs decided the fate of the Israeli government. This is just one example.
              Even according to your official statistics, the population growth of your Arabs exceeds the growth of the Jewish population by more than 2 times.
              And here's how things stand in reality:
              http://www.iton.tv/osobaya-papka/16373-yakedmi-kogda-v-izraile-budut-soblyudat-zakon-razbudite-menya-nochyu.html здесь, начиная с пятой минуты.
              You can say whatever you want about Kedmi, but I don't see any reason to prefer your opinion to Kedmi's opinion.
              1. Binder Offline Binder
                Binder (Miron) 24 July 2021 05: 56
                -6
                Bibi was wiped out from power by his ill-wishers-Jews, the Arab party in this matter was only one of the tools.
                By demography: the birth rate in the Muslim sector of Israel is -3.3 children per woman, among the Jews 3,1, i.e. practically on this indicator there is equality.
                You, of course, can believe Kedmi, for this he is paid from Moscow, but his opinion has nothing to do with the real situation.
                1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                  Cyril (Kirill) 24 July 2021 23: 53
                  -3
                  Kedmi, in general, got a job :)
                2. boriz Offline boriz
                  boriz (boriz) 25 July 2021 00: 01
                  +2
                  Muslim Arabs number 1,506 million (as of 2016), accounting for 84,75% of Israel's Arab population and 17,45% of the total population.

                  In 2010, the estimated number of children born to one mother was 3,84, which is a drop in fertility from 3,97 in 2008. The country's Muslim population is mostly young - 42% of Muslims are under 15 years of age. The average age of Muslim Israelis is 18, while the average age of an Israeli Jew is 30. The percentage of people over the age of 65 among Muslims is only 3%, compared with 12% among Jews [28].

                  According to the Central Statistical Bureau of Israel as of 2003 [28], the annual increase in the Arab population of Israel was 3%, compared with 1,4% for the Jewish population of Israel and an increase of 1,7% in Lebanon, 2% in Egypt and 2,4. XNUMX% in Jordan and Syria.

                  The average Arab family numbered 4,9, while the average Jewish family numbered 3,5.

                  Well

                  By demography: the birth rate in the Muslim sector of Israel is -3.3 children per woman, among the Jews 3,1, i.e. practically on this indicator there is equality.

                  And how many women does an Arab man have?
                3. boriz Offline boriz
                  boriz (boriz) 25 July 2021 00: 07
                  +3
                  Bibi was wiped out from power by his ill-wishers-Jews, the Arab party in this matter was only one of the tools.

                  I don’t argue. The coalition against Bibi turned out to be funny. United only by the desire to overthrow Bibi, the rest is very multidirectional. How they will rule is not clear. So they will continue to squabble among themselves, and the Arabs will speak the final word. And grow in numbers.

                  You, of course, can believe Kedmi, for this he is paid from Moscow, but his opinion has nothing to do with the real situation.

                  You can of course prove it ...
              2. Cyril Offline Cyril
                Cyril (Kirill) 24 July 2021 23: 52
                -3
                Your manner of broadcasting with slogans that have no connection with reality amuses.

                Yes, whose cow would bellow :)
            2. Raul Castro Offline Raul Castro
              Raul Castro (Lucifer) 24 July 2021 22: 50
              +2
              Bindyuzhnik (Myron) -esli takie kak ti dalshe budut takuju eres tut pisat, to Izrael prosto perestanet sushestvovat
        5. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Terry18 Offline Terry18
    Terry18 (Andrey Evdokimov) 22 July 2021 17: 43
    -8
    Are the British very scared? And the Crimean War in the 19th century ended with the defeat of Russia.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  5. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 22 July 2021 19: 57
    .
    And from this moment not just claims, but demands begin. Moreover, they are extremely arrogant

    When our hucksters themselves were a family, the business was "hostage" voluntarily sent to the NATO countries. And why the British, so brazenly, do not behave with mediocrities? What can mediocrity do to them? "And the chest just opened."
    1. Volga073 Offline Volga073
      Volga073 (MIKLE) 23 July 2021 06: 29
      +7
      You are not a huckster, you are a Judas ..
    2. Ugr Offline Ugr
      Ugr 29 July 2021 08: 16
      -1
      Why minus the steelmaker, because he speaks the truth ...
  6. Volga073 Offline Volga073
    Volga073 (MIKLE) 23 July 2021 06: 30
    +2
    The Crimean Bridge will have to be pulled to Scotland.
  7. Alexander Pankov (Alexander Pankow) 23 July 2021 10: 14
    +2
    I already submitted the idea of ​​the Crimean War 2.0 here some time earlier, I hope that the Russian authorities understand this and are preparing. Russia, of course, is not as backward in military technology as 1.0, but it will be difficult. All the same, cannon fodder will now come not only from Turkey, Britain and France, there are no allies as then. But what can you do, there is nowhere to retreat.
    1. silver169 Offline silver169
      silver169 (Aristarkh Feliksovich) 23 July 2021 17: 25
      +5
      Why is it difficult? Nuclear bombs for all britains and co. enough in abundance.
  8. Yurets Offline Yurets
    Yurets (Yuri) 23 July 2021 23: 34
    +5
    If the Brits had just once been decisively kicked in the teeth, they would have calmed down long ago. But this does not happen, and the Anglo-Saxons continue to become impudent!
  9. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 23 July 2021 23: 53
    +4
    In fact, not all are fools in the WB and are not going to get into a war with the Russian Federation.
    They just need to complicate Putin's life with small nasty things so that he gives up and agrees to the WB's participation in Yalta 2.0.
    If the WB goes directly into the war with the Russian Federation, then the WB will have to forget about Yalta 2.0. So, there will be no war, people have other concerns.
  10. AND Offline AND
    AND 24 July 2021 21: 51
    +5
    Deja vu or snake kudlo assembled again? Soras' navalnata gathered again: Latvian earring, cyril, bandage worker, steelmaker. Not even surprised by all this one face duplicating each other. Just like a negotiated match. As usual, fairy tales for curators. Russia is always weak and bad with them. What are you doing here proteges of America. Enough arrows to translate nigative people.
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 24 July 2021 23: 56
      -3
      steelmaker

      Especially the Stalinist "steel maker" - well, such a straight bulk, where to go :)

      Deja vu or snake kudlo assembled again?

      It's just that you haven't slept through after Friday, that's what it seems :)
  11. The comment was deleted.