Syria destroyed by order of Israel
After the meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump, it might seem that peace in Syria is close, this issue was one of the key on the agenda. In this context, agreements were reached on the security of Israel.
Consider the situation in the region and, in particular, policies Israel, which, according to the visionary expression of Orwell, is waging a "permanent war for a permanent peace" in the Middle East and does not stop bombing Syrian territory. The official rationale is the confrontation with Iran, which Israel sees as an existential threat, while striking not only Iranian positions.
In assessing the prospects in the region, several extraordinary quotes will help us.
Francois Fillon recalled that in 2009, when he was Prime Minister of France, he was invited to London. He was informed that in two years the West would start a war with Syria with the goal of overthrowing Bashar al-Assad and was recommended to join the military operations. Fillon asked what Syria and Assad were guilty of. In response, he heard that the campaign is in the interests of Israel, and "Assad speaks a lot against Israel."
In 2016, Julian Assange published Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's correspondence for the period from 2010 to 2014. In one of the letters, the US Secretary of State informed that "Syria and Assad must be crushed in the interests of Israel."
Assange also published a secret dispatch from the US Department of Defense, here is a quote: “Iraqi al-Qaeda rebels know Syria and fight against the Assad regime from the very beginning. "Western countries, Gulf monarchies and Turkey support their plan to take over Syria." So ISIS arose (banned in Russia).
Roger Wicker, US Senator, in April of this year frankly answered the question of Fox News correspondent Carlson, what national interests of the United States will serve as a regime change in Syria:
That is, the United States has interests in protecting the interests of Israel.
Of course, the US has its own economic and political interests in the region, as well as those of the Gulf countries and Russia: explosive, like hydrocarbons, a mixture of interests.
In particular, Bashar al-Assad impeded the plans of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE to organize the supply of natural gas and oil to the European Union and establish full control over the European gas market. In 2009, he refused to sign an agreement on the Qatari-Turkish gas pipeline in order to protect Russia's interests. Assad probably knew what risk he was taking, but he did not betray a faithful ally.
In July 2011, the governments of Iran, Iraq and Syria signed an agreement to build a new gas pipeline. A signed agreement would turn Syria into a gas transportation hub in the Middle East.
Since Israel does not produce or sell hydrocarbons, its economic interest is less objectively expressed than that of the Gulf countries, Russia or the United States. Therefore, it is important to determine the fundamental interest of Israel.
For this, it is necessary to understand the logic of Israeli statesmen: Israel is a religious state where political and economic issues are inseparable from religious ones.
The lands from the Nile to the Euphrates, the authorities of Israel - at least some statesmen - consider their own, as it is so prescribed by the Creator and recorded in the Torah.
The Book of Bereishit (15:18). That day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying:
Book of Dvarim (1: 7-8):
Supporting quotes from the founding fathers of the State:
Moshe Diane in 1952 declared that the task of his state was to prepare the Israeli army for a new approaching war in the name of achieving the only goal - the creation of the “Israeli Empire”.
Ben Gurion, in 1958 about the Suez War, said that its real reason was "the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon in the Biblical borders."
The idea of the "Israeli Empire" has its supporters among Israeli thinkers. Politicians also make a feasible contribution, and in the long-term regional politics Israel historically proceeds from the priority of building a state in the Biblical borders. In particular, the King of Jordan was invited to join the confederation with Israel. The king refused.
What is the role of ISIS?
It is clear from the US Department of Defense dispatches that the role assigned to ISIS is the conquest of part of Syria and the overthrow of Assad. After that, the valiant American soldiers with the support of Israel could well restore order on the lands conquered by terrorists. At the same time, the United States would leave the wells under the control of its TNCs - it is necessary to compensate for the costs of participating in the war, and the southern and eastern territories would gradually pass under the protectorate of Israel. Could there be other real options?
Long-term forecast for the region:
No state in the world pursues its foreign policy as consistently as Israel. Since and while Israel is a religious state, it is unlikely to depart from the idea of building a "kingdom of David and Solomon in the Biblical borders." Because who are we and who is God? And if He said so, then so be it.
Therefore, the most likely long-term scenario is that the war in the Middle East will continue until the disintegration of Syria and some other neighboring territories. Although, on the way to the promised goal, there may well be periods of ceasefire.
In the confrontation with Syria, Israel has many regional Sunni allies who consider the Alawites to be heretics. The time of the Sunnis themselves has not yet come.
This is the case when I would like to make a mistake in the forecast, but, as you know, “life is what it is ...” One must proceed from real life and not take what is desired for reality.
Consider the situation in the region and, in particular, policies Israel, which, according to the visionary expression of Orwell, is waging a "permanent war for a permanent peace" in the Middle East and does not stop bombing Syrian territory. The official rationale is the confrontation with Iran, which Israel sees as an existential threat, while striking not only Iranian positions.
In assessing the prospects in the region, several extraordinary quotes will help us.
Francois Fillon recalled that in 2009, when he was Prime Minister of France, he was invited to London. He was informed that in two years the West would start a war with Syria with the goal of overthrowing Bashar al-Assad and was recommended to join the military operations. Fillon asked what Syria and Assad were guilty of. In response, he heard that the campaign is in the interests of Israel, and "Assad speaks a lot against Israel."
In 2016, Julian Assange published Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's correspondence for the period from 2010 to 2014. In one of the letters, the US Secretary of State informed that "Syria and Assad must be crushed in the interests of Israel."
Assange also published a secret dispatch from the US Department of Defense, here is a quote: “Iraqi al-Qaeda rebels know Syria and fight against the Assad regime from the very beginning. "Western countries, Gulf monarchies and Turkey support their plan to take over Syria." So ISIS arose (banned in Russia).
Roger Wicker, US Senator, in April of this year frankly answered the question of Fox News correspondent Carlson, what national interests of the United States will serve as a regime change in Syria:
If you care about Israel, you should at least be interested in what is happening in Syria ... I think our country has interests in Syria.
That is, the United States has interests in protecting the interests of Israel.
Of course, the US has its own economic and political interests in the region, as well as those of the Gulf countries and Russia: explosive, like hydrocarbons, a mixture of interests.
In particular, Bashar al-Assad impeded the plans of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE to organize the supply of natural gas and oil to the European Union and establish full control over the European gas market. In 2009, he refused to sign an agreement on the Qatari-Turkish gas pipeline in order to protect Russia's interests. Assad probably knew what risk he was taking, but he did not betray a faithful ally.
In July 2011, the governments of Iran, Iraq and Syria signed an agreement to build a new gas pipeline. A signed agreement would turn Syria into a gas transportation hub in the Middle East.
Since Israel does not produce or sell hydrocarbons, its economic interest is less objectively expressed than that of the Gulf countries, Russia or the United States. Therefore, it is important to determine the fundamental interest of Israel.
For this, it is necessary to understand the logic of Israeli statesmen: Israel is a religious state where political and economic issues are inseparable from religious ones.
The lands from the Nile to the Euphrates, the authorities of Israel - at least some statesmen - consider their own, as it is so prescribed by the Creator and recorded in the Torah.
The Book of Bereishit (15:18). That day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying:
I gave this land to your posterity from the river Mizraim to the great river, the river Prat.
Book of Dvarim (1: 7-8):
Turn and go on a journey and go to Mount Emory and to all his neighbors on the plain, on the mountain and in the lowland, and on the south and on the sea coast, to the land of Kenaani and to Levanon to the great stream, the stream Prat. Look, I have given the earth before you. Go and take possession of the land that the Lord swore to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Yaakov, to give (her) to them and their offspring after them.
Supporting quotes from the founding fathers of the State:
Moshe Diane in 1952 declared that the task of his state was to prepare the Israeli army for a new approaching war in the name of achieving the only goal - the creation of the “Israeli Empire”.
Ben Gurion, in 1958 about the Suez War, said that its real reason was "the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon in the Biblical borders."
The idea of the "Israeli Empire" has its supporters among Israeli thinkers. Politicians also make a feasible contribution, and in the long-term regional politics Israel historically proceeds from the priority of building a state in the Biblical borders. In particular, the King of Jordan was invited to join the confederation with Israel. The king refused.
What is the role of ISIS?
It is clear from the US Department of Defense dispatches that the role assigned to ISIS is the conquest of part of Syria and the overthrow of Assad. After that, the valiant American soldiers with the support of Israel could well restore order on the lands conquered by terrorists. At the same time, the United States would leave the wells under the control of its TNCs - it is necessary to compensate for the costs of participating in the war, and the southern and eastern territories would gradually pass under the protectorate of Israel. Could there be other real options?
Long-term forecast for the region:
No state in the world pursues its foreign policy as consistently as Israel. Since and while Israel is a religious state, it is unlikely to depart from the idea of building a "kingdom of David and Solomon in the Biblical borders." Because who are we and who is God? And if He said so, then so be it.
Therefore, the most likely long-term scenario is that the war in the Middle East will continue until the disintegration of Syria and some other neighboring territories. Although, on the way to the promised goal, there may well be periods of ceasefire.
In the confrontation with Syria, Israel has many regional Sunni allies who consider the Alawites to be heretics. The time of the Sunnis themselves has not yet come.
This is the case when I would like to make a mistake in the forecast, but, as you know, “life is what it is ...” One must proceed from real life and not take what is desired for reality.
Information