An artificial island instead of an aircraft carrier: Is it possible for Russia to create a base off the coast of the United States

23

After the collapse of the USSR, our country surrendered many of its positions abroad, voluntarily leaving Cuba and Vietnam. An attempt to open a modest logistics center on the Red Sea in Port Sudan for the needs of the Russian Navy turned out to be an unpleasant failure. The demonstrative visit of the Tu-160 "White Swan" strategic bombers to friendly Venezuela eventually ended in a scandal there, since Caracas is a member of the Treaty on the Prohibition of the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean, and therefore it is prohibited to receive aircraft equipped with nuclear weapons. Talk about the possibility of opening a new base for Russian submarines in Cuba has remained just talk. Have we nailed down all the paths for ourselves to create a pain point in the southern underbelly of the United States?

Let's turn to the experience of the "Chinese comrades", where, if you wish, you can see some kind of hint. Let's make a reservation right away that further reasoning is purely theoretical in nature and is not a call for immediate active action. So what did China learn there?



As you know, Beijing has territorial disputes with almost all of its neighbors. In particular, his geopolitical ambitions extend to the South China Sea, where he claims 90% of its water area. This interest is due to the presence of large reserves of hydrocarbons in its continental shelf, as well as the strategic importance of the sea, through which most of China's foreign trade goes. The problem is that other countries, such as Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Vietnam, are claiming the same territory. And the position of the United States, which maintains its Seventh Fleet in the region, is also strong here. To avoid the threat of a naval blockade by the Americans and their allies, China is rapidly building its own aircraft carrier fleet. However, this is not the only tool with which Beijing is strengthening its claims to the South China Sea, which I would like to discuss separately.

The entire controversial water area is dotted with small islands, reefs and sand spits. The Chinese have been building their own artificial bulk islands on their basis for several years now. This causes tremendous tension among all the neighbors of the Celestial Empire, and here is why. The 1982 UN Convention defines an island as follows:

An island is a naturally formed expanse of land surrounded by water that is above the water level at high tide.

Also, the document mentions "structures artificially built in the sea", but there is no unambiguous definition of "artificial island". Legal science is trying to give various options for defining this phenomenon, and here is one of the options:

An artificial island (or Anthropogenic island) is a stationary hydraulic structure in an open water area (in seas, lakes, rivers), such islands are created by man, not nature.

However, the Convention establishes that the territorial sea, continental shelf and other sea spaces can only be on natural islands. This is done in order to avoid possible abuses with the redrawing of maritime boundaries. So what is China doing then? And he acts simultaneously in two directions.

At first, not every rock or reef sticking out of the water is considered an island. This is what part 3 of article 121 of the Convention on the Law of the Sea says about it:

Rocks that are not suitable for supporting human life or for independent economic activities do not have any exclusive economic zone, no continental shelf.

The issue is very serious, because due to the dispute over whether the Serpent Island is or is still a rock, Ukraine and Romania, for example, were suing each other, trying to divide the resources of the Black Sea continental shelf in their favor. In other words, for the island to be recognized as an island, it needs to have some kind of developed infrastructure for human life and a governing administration. In the South China Sea, for several years now, specialized ships of the PRC have poured soil onto small reefs, increasing their area. And then the controversial reefs actually turn into islands due to the construction of infrastructure on them. For example, on the artificial island of Yongshu (Fiery Cross Reef), a runway up to 3 kilometers long appeared in a short time. The Chinese authorities claim that the runway will be used for the needs of both civil and military aviation. If Beijing can legally prove the transformation of reefs into islands, their owner will expand its territorial waters and the adjacent continental shelf. True, in The Hague this initiative was looked at with great disapproval, not recognizing the PRC's claims to the new islands, but the Chinese wanted to sneeze at the opinion of the Europeans.

Secondlyas already mentioned, the PLA does not hesitate to use the bulk islands for military purposes. It is not only a convenient "unsinkable aircraft carrier" in the South China Sea, but also a real fortified area. The Chinese deployed YJ-12B anti-ship missile systems with a range of surface targets up to 295 nautical miles and HQ-9B anti-aircraft missiles with a range of up to 160 nautical miles on the artificial islands of Zhubi, Meiji and Yongshu. Like this.

Indeed, a very interesting experience, but can we try to learn from it something useful for ourselves? In general, yes. In accordance with Article 16 of the Federal Law "On the Continental Shelf" and the norms of the UN Convention of 1982, "the creation, operation, use of artificial islands, installations, structures on the continental shelf can be carried out to ensure the country's defense and state security." For example, somewhere in the Arctic to protect the Northern Sea Route. But what if for the needs of the RF Ministry of Defense it is necessary to create a bulk island outside our continental shelf, in the open sea?

This is the most interesting thing. The fact is that there is a large gap in international law, which practically does not regulate the legal status of an artificial island on the high seas. Article 147 of the 1982 Convention refers only to certain “installations used for the conduct of activities in the Area”, which are not islands, must have exclusively peaceful purposes and not interfere with navigation. But nothing is said about artificial islands. De jure, this means that there is no direct prohibition on trying to build a new artificial island around the no-man's rock in the ocean.

For example, anywhere in the Caribbean, in the Mediterranean or Red Sea, in the Pacific or Indian Ocean, or elsewhere. And after that, arrange there a logistics center for ships and submarines, cover them with air defense systems and anti-ship missiles, and also build an airstrip capable of receiving strategic missile carriers. The most interesting thing is that on the high seas you don't even need to ask anyone for permission. True, it is possible that such a step could subsequently lead to the opening of Pandora's box.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    8 July 2021 13: 45
    Japan, China, Arabs, and the Yusovites have been creating islands for many years, and they have probably already summed up the international legal framework. And oil platforms, etc. Not unusual.

    Nothing will break off here. Not logistically, not in terms of money, not in politics, not in law, not in the Armed Forces.
    This is not to give territory to China and Norway "out of friendship" (even where the USSR shed blood) .......
  2. +1
    8 July 2021 13: 45
    Talk about the possibility of opening a new base for Russian submarines in Cuba has remained just talk.

    Why just talk? I remember that the Russian Federation recently forgave Cuba a huge debt. Maybe in honor of this and open a submarine base in Cuba. Perfect cover for a nuclear baton. And the Cubans will be respected more. And the Russian Federation will help lift the naval blockade from Cuba.
  3. -4
    8 July 2021 13: 52
    Our hucksters can only sell islands. And if they build something, then only together with someone. They cannot build anything on their own, and if they do, it will only be a single copy, so that they can be shown at parades and exhibitions!
  4. 0
    8 July 2021 14: 09
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    Japan, China, Arabs, and the Yusovites have been creating islands for many years, and they have probably already summed up the international legal framework. And oil platforms, etc. Not unusual.

    What kind of legal framework? There is a Convention and a number of other documents, you have already been told everything about them.
    1. -3
      8 July 2021 14: 59
      These unfortunate 3 paragraphs - just the same "everything"?
      Do not make me laugh.

      Drive into the search - there are sections, sources and institutes of dofig ...

      Artificial islands with structures cost billions. And so that the owners do not legally insure themselves?
  5. 123
    +3
    8 July 2021 14: 45
    Why is it trifling? Can a new continent be poured out at once? Let's say Atlantis was found and we are the legal successors.
    The Chinese are building to protect their borders and the shelf with oil, you want to throw out a lot of money to make life less comfortable for the states.
    By the way, there are enough islands on the Northern Sea Route, periodically new ones are found.
    1. 0
      8 July 2021 15: 09
      This is true!
  6. +5
    8 July 2021 14: 53
    China, unlike us, has long ago put on all these The Hague, and with a large device ... laughing
  7. 0
    8 July 2021 16: 25
    Inspired by the "Floating Island" by Jules Verne. The author, by the way, is the second most translated in the world.
    Bandera-Balts-repatriates
    Forward!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    8 July 2021 17: 48
    Anchor Kuzyu near America!
    Already a fortified area!
  9. An island is not needed for hypersound! Shmalnul from Ryazan - and the enemy is laid!
  10. +1
    8 July 2021 19: 20
    A base in Cuba is too expensive. Cuba itself will have to be taken into the load, providing a standard of living comparable to that of the Sshasovites. In addition, it is known what the USSR's attempt to deploy missiles in Cuba led to.
    China's artificial island focus is fueled by disputes over the ownership of the archipelago. The PRC is conducting diplomatic work, but it took and poured an island, no one has any reason to dispute its belonging.
    It is impossible to repeat such a focus of the Russian Federation and nowhere, except in the Caspian Sea.
    It's easier to rent for 99 years somewhere, somewhere, some island port town with all the port infrastructure, as China does along the sea version of the new Silk Road, there would only be enough money.
    State organizations will not be allowed to do this, but there is a variant of Savvidi, dummy foreign campaigns and private individuals, and other options.
    If it works out, you can have not only a deep-water port in warm seas, where it will be possible to build not only civilian large-tonnage ships, but also equip an airfield, a supply point, and all sorts of others in the interests of the state.
  11. +1
    8 July 2021 21: 32
    After the collapse of the USSR, our country surrendered many of its positions abroad, voluntarily leaving Cuba and Vietnam.

    These were the positions of the USSR. Russia became overnight an independent country, why should she have all these Cubes, Vietnam, Tajikistan and Ukraine. The Syrian training ground is not enough, but we have tightened up in Karabakh. Some experts got ready to go to Afghanistan. Funny turns.
  12. -2
    8 July 2021 22: 06
    To wash the island - you need money. As well as on an aircraft carrier. As well as on "competence". And they are also needed to guard it. And also: equip with something that will not wipe off the face of the earth in 2,5 seconds with a conventional "three-dollar" howitzer.

    And now Russia has no money of its own. We have to sell something to get dollars. And then, exchange them for cents. And those - even smaller "bills". Only then will we have him, "today's Majesty" - loot! On the "aircraft carrier" budget. Well, or "islands".

    And where to get them, if not enough for anything ...? It's just awful, how much we miss! Not for strategists, Not for ... Even transport planes are now being built by Russia not in dozens or hundreds, but in units a year. These are 10-2 pieces.

    And how much will American firms, soil reclamation contractors charge us ...? Or the British? Will the budget at least be enough to reach the surface, so that the admirals might not drown, overlooking the ribbon?

    Profanation of reflections on the effectiveness of the budget for military development. I am generally silent about "military effectiveness". And we are all seriously discussing "this"? Sorry mua.
    1. 0
      9 July 2021 12: 47
      Nonsense talking impoverished master
      1. -1
        10 July 2021 08: 03
        You would be my "impoverishment". What nonsense is this about? In general, in general? Always always?
  13. +1
    9 July 2021 08: 35
    At the present time, it seems to me, it looks like geography fiction.
  14. 0
    9 July 2021 09: 04
    Alternatively, the island of Nauru can be included in Russia, I think they will not mind there.
  15. 0
    9 July 2021 10: 45
    It is not for nothing that the saying dashing trouble began. The PRC did this by creating an artificial island. Estessno for this having spent a lot of money, but now the Chinese have an unsinkable aircraft carrier. It always starts small. The United States prevents us from building our bases through military threats and sanctions against countries that agree to make deals with us. Maybe this is the way out for our country ????
  16. -2
    9 July 2021 12: 49
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    These unfortunate 3 paragraphs - just the same "everything"?
    Do not make me laugh.

    Drive into the search - there are sections, sources and institutes of dofig ...

    Artificial islands with structures cost billions. And so that the owners do not legally insure themselves?

    Dear, learn the materiel before writing such comments. International law is also international that everyone should sign it. This means that separately neither the United States nor the UAE can "legally insure themselves." This is a matter of the level of the Conventions.
  17. -2
    9 July 2021 12: 52
    Quote: 123
    The Chinese are building to protect their borders and the shelf with oil, you want to throw out a lot of money to make life less comfortable for the states.

    What does it mean to make it less comfortable? Is the deployment of a military airfield capable of receiving Tu-160s "making it less comfortable" or ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation through the creation of a counter threat to the United States? Why are you twisting and making fun of?
    1. 0
      10 July 2021 08: 22
      Pardom mua ... Why then "wash"? Is there an island in the North? Ready. With the shortest distance to the USA. Bring cement and luggage runways ... AND USYO! And with the sizes they have - it will obviously be more posh ... than the "reclaimed" ones somewhere in the Atlantic? In the Quiet then, the depths - oh-oh-oh!

      In general, it is a utopia. This is probably the most correct word for what is proposed to be discussed here. Meanwhile, there are those who wish. And your humble servant is one of them ...

      We need to think about it and offer our fantasies to the "reporter's" editorial office. If such "opuses" are paid for, then ... Although the "earnings", probably, you have - not very much! ...
      And how much is "waste paper" today?

  18. 0
    9 July 2021 12: 53
    Quote: Bulanov
    Talk about the possibility of opening a new base for Russian submarines in Cuba has remained just talk.

    Why just talk? I remember that the Russian Federation recently forgave Cuba a huge debt. Maybe in honor of this and open a submarine base in Cuba. Perfect cover for a nuclear baton. And the Cubans will be respected more. And the Russian Federation will help lift the naval blockade from Cuba.

    The service provided is no longer worth anything. As for the bases, it was necessary to negotiate before writing off.