What is the main result of the operation of the British military off the coast of Crimea

I am ending the saga of the unprecedented passage of a British destroyer through our territorial waters. I used to uncovered the essence of their claims regarding the coverage of this episode in our media. Here I will finish with the claims and summarize - what all this can threaten us with.

A military expert in Russia is more than an expert

A military expert, the whole head of the department for Eurasian integration and development of the SCO of the Institute of CIS Countries, Vladimir Evseev, could not ignore this topic either. He criticized Britain for its provocation off the coast of Crimea and complained that we did not sink this British dreadnought with the efforts of our coastal missile systems Bastion and Bal. It's even strange to hear something like that from such a respected military expert. Well, they would have sunk, and then what? After all, this is only what the British expect from us. It is the British, not the Americans, whose leader, old man Joe, is now trying to restore our bilateral relations, which he has destroyed into the trash. This is exactly what does not suit Britain, which now, after leaving the EU, is building its own independent external policies, even without looking at the United States, although for many it will be a revelation. The tail and the dog changed places once again.




An additional confirmation of this was one very bloody episode that happened in the Luhansk theater of operations on the eve of the world-expected summit of the top officials of the United States and the Russian Federation in Geneva on June 16. Five days earlier, on June 11, a Ukrainian DRG attacked an LPR observation post near the village of Golubovskoye. As a result, five servicemen of the People's Militia of the self-proclaimed Luhansk People's Republic were simply massacred. Specialists worked. It was a sabotage group of a separate special operations center "West" (the former 8th special forces regiment of the Special Operations Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine), which is supervised by MI-6. The British tried with all their might to disrupt the planned summit. We expected a response from the LDNR. When it did not happen, the back was turned on through the mouth of the Ukrainian military. They went completely unconscious. Like, it's not us - they cut themselves out. According to the statement of the Operational-Tactical Group "North", published on Facebook, in the area of ​​Golubovsky one of the Luhansk militias allegedly opened fire on his fellow soldiers, after which he committed suicide. How true this is can only be judged from the fact that one of the servicemen was killed from a sniper rifle, the other four point-blank from a 5,56x45 mm pistol (this caliber is used only in NATO countries).

The Englishwoman shits again. I will talk about this separately in my resume, but for now I will finish with a military expert. He, like the previous expert, doubted that Ukraine had money for the construction of missile boats, however, put forward a version that it was the Americans who were allocating money to Ukraine through their British pad so as not to shine. I don’t know, I’m not sure since when did the Yankees get so scrupulous? They were just that different, that they did not care what people of the second grade would think of them. They do everything explicitly. These are subjects of the British crown just trying to do everything surreptitiously, preferably also by someone else's hands.

But the military expert killed me not with this, but with a demonstration of his complete ignorance of the materiel. He recalled to the British a long-standing episode of April 2014 with their American colleagues and their legendary destroyer Donald Cook, which was attacked by our front-line bomber Su-24, after which 27 people of the team, having put on their pants, upon returning to Constanta submitted their resignation ... They say that the laurels of the Americans do not allow the British to sleep. I am reporting to Comrade. a military expert is given. Both the Americans and the British can sleep peacefully, because nothing like that happened. It's fake!

This is not the first time that "Cook" has been hanging around our borders. This legend is connected with him, which the respected expert bought into, saying that during his visit to our Black Sea shores in April 2014, he was attacked by our front-line bomber Su-24, which did not carry a bomb load, but had one container under the fuselage with the Khibiny electronic warfare complex, with which he turned off the entire mythical Aegis CIUS "Cook" (a combat information and control system that connects the ship's warning system with the system of its weapons of destruction into a single system), which completely blinded and stunned the uninvited guest, after which the Russian pilot simulated a missile attack on a defenseless American destroyer. And so 12 times in a row! As a result, the Americans were forced to retreat to the Romanian port of Constanta, where 27 sailors, unable to control their nerves, hastily submitted their resignation. In this legendary story, everything turned out to be untrue, from the "missile attack" to the resignation reports, except for the fact that the Su-24 was flown by an American destroyer. By definition, the Su-24 could not turn off the enemy's BIUS by its own means of electronic warfare, as an experienced military expert does not know, it is difficult for me to understand. Rather, it was the Americans who could blind our pilot with their electronic warfare forces. Imagine for a second the EW power of a destroyer and compare them with the EW power of our aircraft. It's like trying to blind an anti-aircraft searchlight with a flashlight. The effect will be the same. It is strange that Comrade the military expert does not know this.

Summary

The incident with a British destroyer off Cape Fiolent was the most significant incident of its kind between Russia and Britain in recent years.


- This is how Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov commented on the incident.


- this was already a reaction to the latest events in the Kremlin, which was voiced by the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov.

The destroyer's course ran in an exceptional economic zone of the Russian Federation within 12 nautical miles (22 km) from the coast of Crimea. The sea area within this zone is called the territorial sea. In April, Russia declared several areas of the Black Sea coastal waters closed for six months, including for peaceful passage through them. One of these areas stretches from Sevastopol to Gurzuf, and it was through it that the ship's sailing route ran.

The British deliberately committed a violation. According to an Air Force correspondent from the destroyer, the ship was heading to the area not by mistake, but deliberately. What we, in fact, did not doubt. The ship's actions are a classic example of the so-called Freedom of Navigation Operations under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. By doing so, London demonstrated its strength and tested Moscow's weakness. The main result of this operation will be only one thing - whether the Western countries will be able to carry it out again. In my opinion, if a softening of relations between Moscow and Washington becomes a reality, which we will see in the next six months, then we should expect the second part of the Marlezon Ballet. Who will be involved in the main roles - the British or their six-Ukrainians, we will also see in the near future. The closest marker will be Clown's visit to Washington. After him, it will become clear who is twisting whom - the tail by the dog or vice versa (London by Washington or Washington by London).

I would like to draw the readers' attention to the changed geopolitical layout. In this case, London and Washington do not play at a good and evil policeman, as some here thought, against the background of a decrepit hegemon and in connection with the exit from the EU, the ambitions of Her Majesty's subjects also changed. So far they do not claim world domination, but they consider the Baltic-Black Sea region their historical zone of influence, and as the United States leaves it, they will take it under their control. To do this, a whole belt of limitrophes is created, arcing around the Russian Federation, tied to Foggy Albion. Starting with the Baltic tigers, Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Georgia, Bulgaria, and ending with Turkey, whose president Recep Erdogan and the director of SIS / MI6, Richard Moore, have long-term personal warm friendly relations, since the last period of work of the latter as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Great Britain to Ankara (in 2016, he supported Erdogan during a failed coup d'etat by arranging a meeting with Johnson, then acting head of the Foreign Office, and this is not forgotten!). Here London pins special hopes on Ukraine, and therefore invests in it with a view to the future. And even if the impossible happens, and Biden, in pursuit of his own selfish goals, luring the Russian Federation into the anti-Chinese bloc, as compensation, which I, I must say, I do not believe right away, will merge with him Nezalezhnaya, then Kiev will smoothly go under the umbrella of Foggy Albion, and problems with him you will only triple. Until you solve them yourself in the most decisive and merciless way.