Why in Helsinki Putin surrendered Ukraine

5
Calm, gentlemen, calm! Of course, I understand that I am now risking incurring the wrath of discontent, both on the part of the Russian patriots and on the part of the pro-Russian-minded population of Ukraine, but I will nevertheless tell the cruel truth that they least want from me now hear. Yes, I myself am not happy with my conclusions of this kind. But I have to admit a sad fact - Putin surrendered Ukraine to the Helsinki summit. That is, in fact, this happened back in May 2014 with the recognition of Poroshenko’s legitimacy, but we still continued to hope for a miracle, for a certain KHPP (Putin’s cunning plan) that would prevent injustice from happening and punish state and war criminals. But time passed, hopes melted and finally melted 4 years later in Helsinki.





No, no one will tell you that Putin and Trump signed an agreement on the division of spheres of influence - to Putin Syria, Trump - Ukraine. No, this did not happen and could not happen. After all, this was the first, in fact, meeting of the leaders of the two great powers in private. And at the first meetings, such issues are not resolved. But no one forbids the parties to exchange views. And they exchanged them. As a result of the exchange of views, it became clear that Putin does not need Ukraine, and Trump does not need Syria (the Crimean issue was not even raised). On that and dispersed. The battlefield remained for the warring parties - the Syrian for Assad (read Putin), the Ukrainian for Poroshenko (read Pindos), I write Pindos, because Trump personally didn’t need it either, it became an internal battlefield between him and the isolationists and his opponents behind him from the camp of globalists (this concept hides the combined detachments of Republicans and Democrats, headed by Madame Clinton, who lost the last election, and the immortal international villain Soros).

Blaming Ukraine’s surrender to Putin does not raise my hand. In fact, he repeated the maneuver of the great Russian commander Mikhail Illarionovich Kutuzov, who surrendered Moscow to the French in 1812. How it ended for them - everyone knows! I hope that the Americans will also have to retreat from Ukraine along the Smolensk road that they have broken and plundered. But it is not easier for me, a resident of Ukraine. It is clear that in the end Ukraine will still remain with Russia, as it should be, but how do we live in a burnt and plundered country? However, in any war without loss does not happen, and in our war, which began with the state. coup in February 2014, they are also provided for and even already written off.

To this, in principle, everything went, but Putin did not set fire to the wick until the last, apparently hoping for something else. After meeting with Trump, hopes obviously collapsed, and he struck a match. The idea voiced by him the other day about the need for a referendum in the Donbass with a question about its status - fell on one side. And the package of sanctions being prepared by August 1 in the government of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, which will provide for a number of measures, both against legal entities and against its individuals, which the GDP must approve by a separate decree, has already fallen on the other hand, after which the territory inside the perimeter should according to his plan, apparently, to turn into scorched earth. At least, all this should accelerate processes within the failed state. Putin will not give another five years to Poroshenko or to the one who should replace him (all the more so since the term of office of the new president of Ukraine goes beyond the last term of the GDP).

The harsh reality is that we have all lived in a paradigm since 2014, that Ukraine is a battlefield between the United States and Russia. So this was until a certain moment, until Obama, the then president of the United States, discovered that Putin, the scoundrel for the war, was not getting off with partisan detachments and, in general, some kind of volunteers. And when in 2015, Putin, under the cover of this smokescreen, also opened a second front against the United States in Syria, then Obama was no longer up to Ukraine. After the changing of the guard in America and the Trump team came to power (I say the team, because Trump is far from Don Quixote, alone fighting with American mills, behind him are very influential isolationist forces opposing the forces of the globalists, which Obama then represented, and now represents Madame Clinton), and so, after the victory of Trump, the Ukrainian front turned into the internal front of the Pindos, where they began to arrange dismantlings among themselves, using one or another leverage to influence the object. Russia, having made a feint with its ears, left the line of fire, minimizing its consequences for itself, and, in fact, it had no levers of influence in Ukraine, except for the Donbass and gas transit.

Putin activated both of these levers after the summit (I already mentioned above about the Donbass, and Putin stated directly at a press conference following the summit that he would be possible if ... And then followed a list of conditions that only the new president of Ukraine could fulfill) . It’s for the candidacy of this president that the war is just now breaking out. But not between the Russian Federation and America, alas, but between the globalists and isolationists of the United States. Putin in this scenario took Trump's side for himself (but there is no talk of a consolidated candidacy yet), since the Russian Federation is now unable to bring its own power to Ukraine due to the circumstances, it will also suit some intermediate transitional candidate from Trump. It is sad to write about this, especially against the background of the accusations put forward by Moscow that it did not influence the elections in America, and here it can’t influence the elections much more than it interests Ukraine.

Nevertheless, the election campaign in Ukraine is gaining momentum, (less than a year is left before the elections), and the actual alignment of forces is as follows. Only three candidates really can apply for the presidency - this is Yulia Tymoshenko (she is now the leader in all polls), Anatoly Gritsenko (goes second) and the third, strangely enough, just do not be surprised, the former president Poroshenko (although he has a lower rating now skirting board, but here everything will depend on Trump, if he puts on it, then his chances increase many times, however Trump has not yet decided on the candidacy). All the other candidates, alas, are not passing, but the ones presented above represent only the right-wing spectrum of Ukrainian politics, which makes it not easier for us or Russia. Why Russia does not bet on any of the "Opposition bloc", I do not know. And Boyko, and Muraev, and Vilkul, and Novinsky, and Rabinovich, and Shufrich, and Dobkin - everything is better than the above. Maybe the Oppoblock needs to nominate a single candidate for this, so as not to erode its own electorate? Wow! But so far there is no single candidate. They go to the polls in several columns, but the primaries will decide everything, which should take place just the other day. Maybe then there will be fewer candidates from the Opoblok and the Russian Federation will be easier to make a choice. Although he still has no chance of winning in the second round, given that everyone will unite against him, including the Americans.

Therefore, we consider the remaining three. Anatoly Gritsenko is a creature of Soros, has long and firmly been sitting on his suction, being, in fact, a paid agent of influence, recruited by a CIA officer (back in 1993, when he was training at the US Air Force Academy), Tymoshenko himself is not able to resist only by teaming up with other candidates who did not qualify for the second round, summing up their votes. And this, in principle, is possible, since the whole oligarchy, which overthrew Yanukovych in 2014, has now united against the figure of the hated Confectioner, crushing all financial flows, will also come out in a consolidated manner against Yulia Tymoshenko, clearly realizing that her victory is there will be a nightmare for them even compared to the Chocolate Eater. And here comes to the fore the figure of a drunken diabetic. He himself has no chance of winning, but from which side he will take, using the remaining ratings and the administrator he has. resource, and it will depend in which direction the pendulum swings. For the Confectioner himself, this will probably be the last chance to bargain for himself at least some preferences or security guarantees and thus avoid a situation where a prison for him would be far from the worst option before the opportunity to repeat the fate of Ceausescu.

Given that Tymoshenko’s candidacy categorically does not suit the Clintonoid clan, it is possible that Trump will put on her, using all the levers of pressure on Petya, (including Onishchenko’s dirt) to encourage him to give his gold share to her. What Soros will offer Confectioner, I do not know. He certainly won’t be able to offer a guarantee of personal security, but where do I not know where to run to the ex-president, stained with the blood of his fellow citizens? Therefore, the chances of winning the Gas Princess grow many times. Putin, however, has already said his word, instituting criminal proceedings against Gritsenko on July 25 on the fact of his calls for terrorism and the undermining of trains in the Russian Federation in 2014. A president under investigation, albeit in absentia, is nonsense!

That is, in fact, right now it is possible to say exactly who will be the future president of Ukraine. His last name will definitely end in "... ko." Ukraine has a long and painful process of survival and not everyone is at risk ... Or, as our metropolitan mayor, having lost the remnants of eloquence in the ring, "not only everyone will survive." We are following the Georgian scenario, only with much worse consequences.

That's all for now! Hold on!
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 July 2018 06: 30
    Those. the elections will not be for, but against any candidates.
  2. +1
    27 July 2018 10: 35
    I disagree about the oppoblock or Muraev. What if the electorate will be active and vote for an adequate candidate. Somehow I don't want to believe that the results of the elections are determined by the "behind the scenes", internal or external. Then it turns out that democracy is nothing more than a sign. Like we have a decent massage parlor, but actually a primitive brothel. In the 14th there were a lot of voters in the stage of exacerbation of idiocy. Even such scum as Lyashko scored 7% !!! For 4 years, I hope that many have let it go and people began to understand that the slogans about "European life", Nazism and Russophobia cannot be smeared on bread. The standard of living directly depends on the state of the economy, which should create a material product, and not resell one another the results of someone else's labor. The Marshal's plan does not shine for Ukraine, so you should not look at the example of Poland. Therefore, choosing Gritsenko, a CIA officer, is stupid. Under him, the West will give money only for the war with the Russian Federation. You don't even count on success, the main thing is to be a pain in the ass of Russia. Somehow I don’t want to be a citizen of a thorn in anyone’s well ... Tymoshenko was already at the helm, we remember the result. Yes, and the young lady has run out of money, it is necessary to restore capital by all available means.
  3. +3
    27 July 2018 11: 09
    guys, you yourself have chosen this. Not by election of Potroshenko, but much earlier. You liked Bandera with Shukhevych (maybe someone didn’t like it, but were silent) I wanted to join the EU’s friendly family, but at the same time get gingerbread from Russia ( gas trading) remember the two chairs, so it turns out, sit in the middle, and there is nothing.
  4. +3
    27 July 2018 11: 48
    Unfortunately you are right. Well, stoned Banderlog was at most 5%, "quilted jackets" (scoops, Colorado, separatists) are much more, but still the overwhelming majority of Khataskrayniks and Eurodreamers. This is personal experience in Odessa. It turns out that by showing a carrot and paying a little extra, you can organize an impressive crowd. And against the background of horses, an organized 5% with appropriate funding can arrange a coup to order from outside. And we can only blame ourselves for the fact that it has become. So you have to live in this madhouse and clean up your own shit.
  5. 0
    28 July 2018 14: 04
    "Ukraine will still remain with Russia" - I'm not sure. Over the 4 years of the war, the number of pro-Russian-minded people has decreased significantly, and this is the age category 60+.