Russia pulled military equipment to the western borders

7
During the confrontation of the two systems, the security of the western borders of our country was ensured by the full power of the Soviet Union. After its collapse in 1991, miserable remnants of the former military potential remained. A significant part of the military infrastructure went west with the former republics and was gradually absorbed by the creeping expansion of NATO. For a long time, the western border of the Russian Federation was not really protected. It saved that the alliance believed in the complete collapse of Russian defense potential.





Everything changed in 2014. The United States of America brilliantly played the Ukrainian card, provoking Russia to the inevitable retaliatory actions in Crimea and the Donbass. The result was collective anti-Russian sanctions, pressure on Nord Stream-2 in order to move it for the sake of selling American LNG to Europeans and declaring our country an aggressor that threatens the Western world order. The latter gave Washington a reason to step up NATO activities in the Russian direction.

President Donald Trump is consistently extorting additional funds from the Alliance member countries for the maintenance of the military bloc. Naturally, the US defense industry is increasing sales of its products to NATO countries. Under the pretext of fighting “Russian aggression”, additional US Army forces are being transferred to Europe to the western border of our country. It is known that since 2014, the number of troops of the North Atlantic Alliance in Eastern Europe has grown from 2000 to 15 000. Over the past six months, over 80 exercises have been conducted by NATO, moreover, many of them are openly directed against Russian Kaliningrad. The maneuvers involved more than 80 NATO soldiers, i.e. 000 times more than before the events of 5. The number of combat aviation of the bloc taking part in such exercises has increased almost 2014 times.

To make matters worse, previously neutral Finland and Sweden are beginning to attract NATO military activity, which dramatically changes the balance of power in the north-west direction. In May 2018, Stockholm and Helsinki signed an agreement with Brussels, which allowed the Alliance to gain access to the territorial waters and airspace of Sweden and Finland. And these two countries became full participants in the military maneuvers of the bloc and tried on the NATO army control systems. This breakthrough of NATO to the East caused a sharp rejection in Moscow, as it destroys parity in the region. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu bluntly stated that these alliance actions will have serious consequences. Back in 2016, Vladimir Putin warned Finnish partners what would happen if Finland joined NATO:

Against the background of such actions, Russian troops will not remain at a distance of 1500 km from the border with Finland, where they were assigned


The logical response of Russia to the approach of a potential enemy to its borders was the formation in the Western District of 70 formations and military units. A new military infrastructure is being created on the western and southwestern borders, more than 5000 units of the new combat force have been sent to the troops equipment. Exercises and reviews are regularly held, as well as sudden readiness checks. Particular attention is paid to developing cooperation with the military of the Union Republic of Belarus.

The situation developing in the western strategic direction requires us to continuously improve the combat composition of the troops and their basing system

- says Sergey Shoigu.

It was previously reported that about a trillion rubles will be allocated between 2018 and 2027 to strengthen the country's defense capabilities.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 July 2018 15: 51
    Quote- "Everything changed in 2014. The United States of America played the Ukrainian card brilliantly, provoking Russia into inevitable retaliatory actions in Crimea and Donbass."
    Comrade Sergei Marzhetsky (Comrade Porter), the US leadership and its special services (they were fresh on the trail, in 2014, the media published the corresponding revelations of the head of the American military intelligence), for a long time "playing the Ukrainian card", they did not expect any response from Russia actions (well, perhaps, the expression of another "concern about the actions of American partners" ?!)!
    Otherwise they would have acted in a completely different way and the Crimean "humanitarian objects" would not have prepared in advance for the introduction of their military structures!
    Russia's decisive retaliatory actions came as a complete surprise to the arrogant Washington maydaunovodov and their Kiev "protégés", so they could not oppose anything serious in fact!
    And only after the fact, clearly annoyed by such a steep bummer, the obvious fiasco of its strategic Black Sea domination in the half-step from the implementation, the United States has already freed up (not disdaining the most heinous provocations) in forcing the EU countries to anti-Russian sanctions!
    I completely agree with the rest in your Article!
    Sincerely.
    1. +1
      25 July 2018 17: 21
      Quote: pishchak
      the US leadership and its special services (they were fresh on the trail, in 2014, the media published the corresponding revelations of the head of the American military intelligence), for a long time "playing the Ukrainian card", did not at all anticipate any retaliatory actions from Russia (well, perhaps the expression another "concern about the actions of American partners" ?!)!

      This is just one of the points of view. There are others. According to which, the capture of Crimea by Russia was completely in the interests of the United States, since it made it possible to impose sanctions, declare aggression, etc., and so on. Why do you think the Americans were quiet while preparations were underway for a referendum and so on? It all took a long time. They could intervene at any time, send Burkhalter not in May, but in March. But did not do it. Perhaps everything that was happening suited them?
      1. +6
        25 July 2018 19: 43
        Rave. in the Crimea, in Ukraine, our fleet stood and the United States put pressure on Ukraine as best they could to throw this fleet out of there. The Americans slept and saw how they owned this mighty unsinkable ship named Crimea. And the fact that Russia returned this island back to itself is like a sickle in the testicles of the Pentagon. So do not look for secret meanings where they do not exist.
        1. 0
          26 July 2018 07: 13
          This is your opinion. There are others.
      2. +2
        27 July 2018 00: 46
        Comrade UralRep! Yesterday I tried my best and, not sparing my personal time, wrote a detailed answer to your comment, but, alas, for some reason it hung up and "did not go", maybe I dug too deep or was too frank winked ?!
        Therefore, thesis and briefly!
        In the interests and plans of the United States, there was an American naval base in Sevastopol, and for this business already in the summer of 2013 they invested resources in the repair of buildings and infrastructure planned for "resettlement"! This is not "one of the points of view", but rather a lot of money of American taxpayers, draw your own conclusions!
        The "story" you were replicating about allegedly "was so conceived" was hung over trusting ears by American propagandons only later, after the fact, when nothing from the Crimean naval base burned out, including the American attempts to use the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the prepared gangs of local extremists failed!
        The Americans and their henchmen in the Crimea "sat quietly", as the "polite people" took all key positions in time and did not allow the mass terror of "unseen" citizens prepared by the pro-American Maidan authorities, providing the Crimeans with a PEACEFUL FREE VOTE (and not at gunpoint of Banderite machine guns, as in Kiev!)!
        I do not need to "think", I know how it was!
        The Americans would have introduced anti-Russian sanctions anyway, the provocation with the Dutch Boeing is just one example of creating such a "news occasion" for sanctions (a fresh example of manipulation with a "newcomer"!)! Something, but the Naglo-Saxons always find reasons (create themselves)!
        1. +2
          28 July 2018 12: 25
          You are right, it would be Russia, and Washington will always find sanctions for it, for them it is like once again celebrating their Christmas ... And Crimea is the blue dream of the United States, to climb into the underbelly of Russia, and establish their bases there forever, which they wanted make more Yushchenko in 2004, so that Crimea is now a kind of Brest fortress, an outpost of the defense of the entire south of Russia. It's just time for us to stop currying favor and bend over to our "partners", and it's time to give in the teeth in response to their provocations, and all our liberal vomit is urgently, "in the last car", to send to the Kolyma and Taimyr, to extract minerals with a pick and a shovel, of which there is a shaft, otherwise Russia will disappear, because these are already ready-made policemen, burgomasters and "Einsatzkommando SS" for the future colonies of the former Russia.
      3. 0
        29 July 2018 14: 47
        Of all the above, only the US interest in the Russian Crimea is true. And then only partly. Everything else is speculation. No more.
        When the Anglo-Saxons need to impose sanctions, an excuse is easily invented on the go.