Russian anti-aircraft missile system "Antey-4000" nullifies the main trump card of NATO

At the international arms exhibition in the United Arab Emirates, Russia demonstrated the Antey-4000 long-range air defense system and other promising weapons.

In fact, the Antey-4000 is an export version of the S-300V4. This complex is mounted not on a wheeled, but on a tracked base, which allows it to move in the advanced orders of land units, providing reliable cover against any type of air threats.

In the arsenal of the domestic novelty, there are two types of anti-aircraft missiles: a light one, which knocks down all targets moving at speeds of up to Mach 5 at a distance of up to 150 km, and a heavy one, which has a threshold of Mach 7,6 and reaches targets at a distance of 380 km and an altitude of 33 km. ... Plus, this version of the air defense system received an improved radar.

As a result, targets such as cruise missiles or drones are guaranteed to be destroyed with one shot from the Anthea. Stealth fighters and long-range aircraft are shot down by two launches, while ballistic missiles require three. At the same time, the complex itself is equipped with a set of 4 missiles.

Many countries of the world dream of getting the Antey-4000 air defense system at their disposal. But we show our weapons not only for the conclusion of lucrative contracts.

The thing is that the main trump card of NATO in a hypothetical confrontation with Russia is cruise and operational-tactical missiles, as well as strike aircraft. The newest domestic air defense systems nullify the aforementioned enemy advantage, in connection with which the combat effectiveness of its ground units drops by about 7 times, and with it the desire to attack our country disappears.

  • Photos used: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Misha Mihalkov Offline Misha Mihalkov
    Misha Mihalkov (Misha Mihalkov) 7 March 2021 13: 10
    This is very good and beautiful ...
  2. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 7 March 2021 14: 16
    and with it the desire to attack our country disappears.

    Nobody can explain to me. Why would the United States attack Russia when everything is already owned by foreign companies, and not only Rusal? Putin has been guaranteeing the inviolability of foreign property for 20 years! The United States and NATO can attack Russia if there is a threat of losing this property. And this can happen if a patriotic person comes to power instead of Putin.
    From the program of Grudinin in 2018:

    This requires a sharp turn from oligarchic capitalism to a welfare state. We will put the wealth of Russia, its natural, industrial and financial resources at the service of the people. We will carry out the nationalization of strategically important and backbone industries, electric power industry, railways, communication systems, leading banks. The state will regain its monopoly on the production and wholesale of ethyl alcohol. This will give impetus to development and will bring trillions of rubles to the treasury annually; will allow to form a development budget instead of a budget of impoverishment and degradation.
    1. oracul Offline oracul
      oracul (leonid) 8 March 2021 07: 04
      In order to make that turn about which Grudinin speaks, Russia needs to be strong and strong. In other conditions, they will attack and do not blink an eye. The reality is this: everything is visible and visible, the fifth column and foreign agents are not asleep, someone is hiding and waiting for their time, there are no real allies. Need to work.
  3. Cyril Offline Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 8 March 2021 11: 37
    "Zeroed" again, like the flights of the Israelis?
    1. Pivander Offline Pivander
      Pivander (Alex) 8 March 2021 15: 30
      Israelis do not shoot at Syria from Syrian territory. Yes, it was zeroed. And to shoot down the Israelites over the territory of a thread of Lebanon, an international conflict.
  4. Bored Offline Bored
    Bored 9 March 2021 07: 04
    All this is good. But 4 missiles for NATO intimidation are not enough, to put it mildly.
    There should be hundreds and thousands of such complexes in the forward units. Only then will it be possible to repel a massive air strike. But with this a lot of tension. Again, they will "please" that by 2025 the Army will receive 10 such complexes, well, or 15. It's about nothing.