Most likely successors to Putin named

December 28 2020 23

The head of the Russian LDPR party, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, on the air of Vladimir Solovyov's political talk show on the television channel "Russia 1" politicians and statesmen who, in his opinion, could become the successors of the current Russian president.

According to Zhirinovsky, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, Head of the Foreign Intelligence Service Sergei Naryshkin, Governor of the Tula Region Alexei Dyumin, and former Prime Minister and President of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012 can apply for the presidency in Russia after Putin's departure. Medvedev, Chairman of the State Duma Viacheslav Volodin, Head of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation Valentina Matvienko.

However, in his manner, he pointed out that another person would become Putin's real successor - apparently, Vladimir Volfovich transparently hinted at himself.

Russian political scientist Stanislav Belkovsky on the air of the radio station "Echo of Moscow" on Saturday, December 26, suggested that the successors of the current head of state could be Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin or Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin. Both of them are quite ambitious and may well qualify for the presidency.

In November this year, the Chinese portal Soho indicated that the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, could become a very likely successor to Vladimir Putin.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Afinogen

+1

28 December 2020 12: 20

The head of the Russian LDPR party, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, on the air of Vladimir Solovyov's political talk show on the Russia 1 television channel, listed politicians and statesmen who, in his opinion, could be articles by the successors of the current Russian president.

Closely perceive what Zhirinovsky says not to respect himself. He can't say that. It sometimes carries something that cannot be stopped.
1. Marzhecki
  
  0
  
  28 December 2020 12: 47
  
  Pleased with the Chinese Soho ...
beeper

+2

28 December 2020 12: 54

However, in his manner, he indicated that another person would become Putin's real successor.

I think that Volfych is smart enough and realistic, and at all did not "hint" at his own candidacy (he was a noteworthy Russian "liberal leader", however, like his colleague, a noteworthy bourgeois "commander-in-chief", and he lives so well, why should he to hang troublesome presidential "gambel" on your neck ?! )!
And yes, I also agree with Zhirinovsky about the "other person", since I did not "see" any of those listed as the future president of Russia!
Only, for some reason, the immortal lines were vividly recalled:

"... many are called, but few are chosen ..."
Uneven

-6

28 December 2020 13: 07

One word: "Show".
But seriously, the introduction in the USSR of the posts of various kinds of Presidents did not bring anything positive to the country or the people.
Piramidon

+2

28 December 2020 13: 42

former prime minister and president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012 Dmitry Medvedev, ... head of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation Valentina Matvienko.

Chur me!
Igor Pavlovich

-4

28 December 2020 14: 12

head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov may become Vladimir Putin's likely successor

for the "patriots" of Russia this is the very thing ...
steelmaker

+2

28 December 2020 17: 09

At every election, our leadership requires us to go to the polls. Vote for whoever you want, but ensure the turnout! And the result is always the same as the Central Election Commission predicted. Therefore, if Putin says Kadyrov, then all of Russia will go to the polls, and Panfilova will confirm that 70% voted FOR.
Today I read about Prilepin's game For the Truth. His TV program is interesting, he says correctly, in the DPR as it were. But in the elections, the party gathered to support Sobchak and Navalny.
I think if Zyuganov's face were gone from the Communist Party, the party would have more authority !?
1. beeper
  
  +1
  
  29 December 2020 01: 08
  
  Quote: steel maker
  At every election, our leadership requires us to go to the polls. Vote for whoever you want, but ensure the turnout! And the result is always the same as the Central Election Commission predicted. Therefore, if Putin says Kadyrov, then all of Russia will go to the polls, and Panfilova will confirm that 70% voted FOR.
  Today I read about Prilepin's game For the Truth. His TV program is interesting, he says correctly, in the DPR as it were. But in the elections, the party gathered to support Sobchak and Navalny.
  I think if Zyuganov's face were gone from the Communist Party, the party would have more authority !?
  
  Eh, comrade Stalevar, think correctly!
  Only the Communist Party and the party program should be appropriate (at least socialist) and with specifics - how what, what resources, by what date, who is responsible for the execution and control criteria, otherwise, populist balabolism and "sinecure" for the "chief communists"!
  We also had a similar bourgeois "commander-in-chief", he also cowardly refused the presidency from his own, secured by our massive votes for the communists, did not fight, preferred a comfortable "sinecure".
  For years, this sybaric imitator-opportunist fooled people by "blowing steam into the whistle", compromised the Ukrainian Communist Party and profaned comedians, letting the party political work go on the brakes!
  Fewer and fewer people, having lost faith in the bourgeois "communists" and dying of "capital reforms", voted for these "committers", but the "party leader" and fewer voices of naive "faithful Leninists" and pro-socialist-pro-communist-minded fellow citizens, under the calling speeches "with quotations" of the classics of Marxism-Leninism "were still enough to get to the" helm of power "- and until the next" elections ", this lip slap with the guilty eyes of the Ilfo-Petrovsky" alchen "lived happily ever after and everything was" like a goose water"!
  And in 2014, the ugly bourgeoisie're coming out of the "commissary" readily supported the anti-popular, anti-constitutional banderonazi "Maidan coup", apparently in the hope of continuing their previous "feeding" in ZRada, but the notorious anti-communists, Banderlogists, slyly "threw" this scoundrel away from " - "decommunized", they searched his mansion (they say that, among other "nishtyaks", they also found Stechkin's "donated by the capitalists" automatic pistol with cartridges "in the bins" of this "comrade", "an honest fighter for the workers ... . for banknotes "?!).
  As the saying goes, "a fairy tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it for good fellows a lesson!"
  Something for a long time already, there is no development in the communist theory, even the "uphill" Chinese communists are somehow poorly working on this, and more strive for their own "organic integration" into the "capmir" ??!
  1. steelmaker
    
    0
    
    29 December 2020 10: 44
    
    Lots of text. Try to cut your thoughts 3 times. To talk about the program of the Communist Party, you must first read it, and I can be smart too. For example: have you ever seen Putin's program in your eyes? Except for slogans - nothing! But it suits you and you don't need any program. What do you work out "soldering"?
    1. beeper
      
      +1
      
      29 December 2020 12: 28
      
      Forgive me magnanimously that I did NOT guess and did NOT "cut three times", pan "steelmaker", did not take into account the "clip thinking" of the "Pepsi" generation (or you, elementary dyslexia, "steelmaker", where I wrote about "Putin's program" and from what side "suits me" if I gave you my Ukrainian examples of bourgeois "communists" -imitators, seeing some analogies with your Russian ones, or your bourgeois "communists" are not at all such opportunistic opportunists as our Ukrainian ones ?! )!
      "To be clever", yes, I adore, do not feed bread ("my tongue is my enemy!")! So, I nafig "work out the soldering" -I still have enough for bread and water and you, my "friend", I recommend to worry less about the "ration", because all diseases are caused by grubs and nerves!
      Indeed, how is it - "in theory", in the Program of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, one thing is written, but, looking from the "near Zakordonya", "in practice" something completely different happens, to the real Communist Party, "according to their deeds", unlike what something bourgeois sternin from the Central Committee of the "Communist Party" unexpectedly "float out", what is this going on in the "party presidium", "above," and how are things in the "lower party organizations" - "primary organizations", what successes, what kind holiday reports "are preparing, please," think "and" be smart "on this topic," steel cook "or are you more on" cooking water "specials ??!
      All Kind and Peaceful Sky to you, Happy New Year!
    2. Rashid116
      
      0
      
      29 December 2020 18: 13
      
      I also did not read it, there are many letters))). Although I myself can roll a sheet around a drunken bench, I do not insist that someone read, and sometimes I write (when not completely drunk))). Regarding the proposed candidates, there is nowhere to put brands on them. They either do not know how to work in their position, or muddy their interests, the latter most likely. But if everyone again jumps on a rake together, I won't be surprised)))
2. 123
  
  0
  
  29 December 2020 08: 26
  
  Today I read about Prilepin's game For the Truth. His TV program is interesting, he says correctly, in the DPR as it were. But in the elections, the party gathered to support Sobchak and Navalny.
  
  I would recommend you on YouTube to look for what the DPR leadership thinks about this party in general and its "real" owners in particular. And so yes, in words everything is wonderful, Mikheev spoke in their support notably !! (I will replace a burned-out power supply on another computer, I will definitely share a link with you ).
  
  I think if Zyuganov's face were gone from the Communist Party, the party would have more authority !?
  
  This is unlikely to help, the reputation is decently "tarnished"
  1. steelmaker
    
    +1
    
    29 December 2020 10: 51
    
    And whose reputation is not tarnished? Name your name! To begin with, it is necessary that citizenship, family, business, and friends are only in Russia.
    1. 123
      
      0
      
      29 December 2020 11: 51
      
      And whose reputation is not tarnished? Name your name! To begin with, it is necessary that citizenship, family, business, and friends are only in Russia.
      
      Why should I? I believe the current state of affairs is satisfactory, I am not concerned with finding a replacement. You are not satisfied with you and are looking for
      Are you not interested in business qualities and competence?
      By the way, what are your complaints about Putin?
      Citizenship - there is information about the second?
      Family - daughters should be kept in a village near Vologda?
      Business - what does he have?
      Friends - them too to the village?
Jacques sekavar

0

28 December 2020 18: 23

Vladimir Putin did the unthinkable at that time - he kept the Russian Federation from collapse, raised the economy from ruins and put big capital at the service of state interests.
How he succeeded - historians and political scientists around the world will study more than one generation and produce millions of conjectures.
It seems that a time bomb in the desire of big business to escape from the control of the state and in this relies on the Western propaganda industry and the support of the entire capitalist world, not to mention the corrupt media and the fifth column.
Under whatever dressing free elections the succession to the throne is presented, sooner or later a new Gorbachev will come to power, or even worse - Yeltsin.
The stability of the Russian Federation as a state depends only on the support of the majority party, and the majority are proletarians: workers, office workers, the intelligentsia, all whom the capitalists buy and sell wholesale and retail.
Not a single Duma party opposes the sale and purchase of people, which means that there is no political support either, everything rests on the personal qualities of V.V. Putin.
1. 123
  
  -1
  
  29 December 2020 08: 30
  
  And everything seems to be correctly written, but I disagree with this
  
  The stability of the Russian Federation as a state depends only on the support of the majority party, and the majority are proletarians: workers, office workers, the intelligentsia, all whom the capitalists buy and sell wholesale and retail.
  
  It was the rule of such a party (at least declaratively) that brought the country to collapse. So there are flaws in your logical constructions. Theory needs further work
  1. Jacques sekavar
    
    +2
    
    29 December 2020 15: 12
    
    If you mean the CPSU, then it went through a period of formation in the revolutionary period and the civil war under the leadership of V. I. Lenin, flourishing under the leadership of I. V. Stalin, stagnation after his death, decay during the period of dear L. I. Brezhnev, after death which, instead of a “doctor,” the party was headed by the classic populist careerist - Gorbachev and the disease passed into the stage of decomposition, and the end of the agony of the party and the state was put by Yeltsin's betrayal.
    The question arises about the correctness of the theory of scientific communism, which proves the regularity and sequence of the change of social formations (the change from one form of exploitation to another), causes and effects, laws and trends in the development of capitalism, the inevitability of its demise and the victory of a new social system - communism, between which lies a transitional the period of the dictatorship of the proletariat - socialism.
    Karl Marx proved everything and laid it out on the shelves, but did not say a word about what and how to do so that the victory of socialism would become final and irrevocable, it would move to its highest stage - communism.
    Developing the theory of Marxism, V.I. Lenin pointed out the essence of the transitional stage as having the signs of the preceding system, the erroneous interpretation of the dictatorship of the proletariat as a complete and irrevocable rejection of private property, market relations and complete socialization of production.
    Instead, he proposed a new economic policy, the essence of which is not in the destruction of the old world before the founding, but in the creation of a system of state regulation of sale and purchase and money circulation, control and encouragement of private initiative and entrepreneurship, subordinating them to the interests of the state - exactly what the CPC is doing in the PRC and V.V. Putin in the Russian Federation. The only difference is that in the PRC it is done by the Communist Party, and in the Russian Federation - by V.V. Putin in the hostile ideological political and economic environment of the Duma parties and the groupings of big business behind them, who cannot bear even the word "socialism" alone.
    1. 123
      
      +1
      
      29 December 2020 15: 35
      
      In principle, the position is clear, that's just about ..
      
      The only difference is that in the PRC it is done by the Communist Party, and in the Russian Federation - by V.V. Putin in the hostile ideological political and economic environment of the Duma parties and the groupings of big business behind them, who cannot bear even the word "socialism" alone.
      
      It is not entirely correct to believe that Putin alone stands at the Kremlin gates and fights off the pushing bourgeois, and it is simply impossible alone, by the way, not everything is so "monolithic" in China. In my opinion, I have shown this video 3 times. Look at your leisure, in my opinion it is useful
      1. Jacques sekavar
        
        +2
        
        29 December 2020 21: 04
        
        There is such a thing as "relations of production" that determine the behavior of people.
        The charter and program of any political party does not set the task of a peaceful transition to socialism, which in fact does V.V. Putin through the mechanisms of state regulation of sale and purchase and money circulation by economic and administrative measures of large sectors of the production and non-production spheres that form the economic, political , ideological, intellectual and all other structure of society and state. The fact that not everyone likes this can be judged both by the statements of “great and deserved” people, and by party programs, which, like a blueprint, are all concerned about the standard of living and the well-being of the population, and the difference is reduced only to measures of beneficence.
        This is the essence of the enemy environment.
        
        123
        
        +1
        
        29 December 2020 21: 14
        
        And who cares about the statements of “great and deserved people?” Let them smoke “bamboo” and stand aside while the wind is “without knots”.
Ranin

+5

28 December 2020 22: 36

Vyacheslav Volodin is the one who was going to completely abolish pensions in the Russian Federation. We do not need such a president, and such a person is also in power.
beeper

-2

29 December 2020 01: 13

Quote: Jacques Sekavar
Vladimir Putin did the unthinkable at that time - he kept the Russian Federation from collapse, raised the economy from ruins and put big capital at the service of state interests.
How he succeeded - historians and political scientists around the world will study more than one generation and produce millions of conjectures.
It seems that a time bomb in the desire of big business to escape from the control of the state and in this relies on the Western propaganda industry and the support of the entire capitalist world, not to mention the corrupt media and the fifth column.
Under whatever dressing free elections the succession to the throne is presented, sooner or later a new Gorbachev will come to power, or even worse - Yeltsin.
The stability of the Russian Federation as a state depends only on the support of the majority party, and the majority are proletarians: workers, office workers, the intelligentsia, all whom the capitalists buy and sell wholesale and retail.
Not a single Duma party opposes the sale and purchase of people, which means that there is no political support either, everything rests on the personal qualities of V.V. Putin.

Verb the truth, comrade Jacques Sekavar!
I see it too!
Anatoly Gritsenko

0

29 December 2020 11: 53

Yes, and there will be a Chechen Federation, hurray, hurray, hurray! We sailed ........