Russia can be provoked to war with Azerbaijan


After the military defeat of the Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh, relations between Moscow and Baku can no longer remain the same. They started talking in Azerbaijan that this country has become one of the strongest not only in the region, but also in the world, as well as public dissatisfaction with the presence of Russian peacekeepers. In general, everything goes the same way as was expected, only at an accelerated pace. Now the only question is when the Azerbaijani military will start firing at the Russians.


Another violation of the ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh became the immediate reason for a vigorous portion of chauvinistic statements. The Azerbaijani special forces tried to take control of several Armenian villages that remained in its rear after the surrender by Yerevan. Since, in accordance with the ceasefire agreements, Baku is supposedly not supposed to do this, Russian peacekeepers intervened and stopped the firefight that had begun. In response to this, Adil Aliyev, the vice-speaker of the Azerbaijani Milli Mejlis, on his page on the social network issued a series of statements about “the ancestral and ancient Azerbaijani lands presented under a different name”, “the ambiguous perception of Russian peacekeepers” by Azerbaijani society, as well as that Azerbaijan now belongs to "one of the strongest states in the world." Despite his surname, this Aliyev is not a relative of the president, but his brother Colonel-General Maharram Aliyev holds the posts of assistant to the President of Azerbaijan and head of the military affairs department of the Presidential Administration. In general, Adil Aliyev is also not the last person in the Republic, to put it mildly. Is this the private opinion of a hot oriental man, or was he used as an unofficial mouthpiece to convey a message to the Kremlin?

For the reasons why it's not over yet, we detail reasoned earlier. Baku, sooner or later, will try to take over the entire territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. But his increased appetites may not be limited to this, if one follows the logic of President Ilham Aliyev's statement:

Zangezur (Syunik region of Armenia), Goycha (Sevan), Irevan (Armenian capital Yerevan) are our historical lands!

It is easy to see that the Azerbaijanis gained such courage after they were openly supported by Turkey, and Russia withdrew itself from participation in the military conflict. There were plenty of reasons to do this, but it would have negative consequences. Ankara and Baku drew their conclusions from the tragic incidents with the Su-24 bomber and the Mi-24 helicopter, which are that peace, friendship and Turkish Stream with the Akkuyu nuclear power plant are in the first place for the Kremlin. But there will be no peace, since the attempt to feed Ankara with generous gifts is interpreted by them as weakness. The Greek neighbors have the following eloquent saying about this:

If a Turk speaks of peace, then there will be war.

In fact, this means that a little earlier or a little later, but the Azerbaijani military, with the support of the Turkish, will try to repeat the blitzkrieg on the remnants of the territory of Karabakh that they do not control, or even go further. The key question is, what should the Russian military do in this case? Recall that a whole brigade of peacekeepers is deployed there, but without heavy weapons. If the attackers try to move on Armenia, they will be obliged to protect our ally in the CSTO, but if the hostilities are conducted on the territory of the remnants of the unrecognized republic? The peacekeepers seem to be supposed to prevent this, but their real capabilities are very limited, since they are actually in a blockade. And do not forget that the Kremlin really did not want to fight with Azerbaijan, so as not to spoil relations with it. Our military is in an extremely ambiguous position.

The key question is whether the offensive will begin before the withdrawal of the Russian peacekeepers or after. Let us recall that they have been placed there for only 5 years, but nothing will prevent Baku from raising the issue of early withdrawal from its territory, which Adil Aliyev hinted at. If the Russian leadership is not really ready to fight the Azerbaijanis, then perhaps it is worth starting to gradually reduce the military contingent there, quite rightly citing the high cost of its constant support. Then it is necessary to again leave Yerevan alone with Baku in Nagorno-Karabakh and help Armenia to strengthen only its own defense. If we continue to pretend that we are "in the house", it may turn out badly.

Otherwise, the Turks can use the already tried and tested method of action against our military through their "proxies" in Idlib. The Syrian militants brought to Karabakh will arrange a second "Khmeimim" for the Russian peacekeepers, conducting constant attacks with the help of attack UAVs, missile and cannon artillery. At the same time, Ankara itself will remain a “friend and partner” for Moscow, buying from it air defense systems and combat aircraft to solve problems on other fronts. How can this be stopped? Only with hard retaliatory missile and air strikes against the attackers. But it should be borne in mind that attacks will occur from Azerbaijani territory. This is not Syria, where we are located and act with the consent of the official authorities. The answer will be to speak in the spirit of "we will never be brothers", since their brothers are now Turks.

Baku will be able to accuse Moscow of aggression. And here it is worth remembering the seemingly stupid statement of Adil Aliyev that Azerbaijan is one of the strongest states in the world. Let's not forget that behind Azerbaijan's back now is Turkey, which is a NATO member. If Baku projects on itself the aggregate military power of the North Atlantic Alliance, this is a completely different alignment. Indeed, if Russia is provoked and forced to strike on Azerbaijani territory, President Aliyev can ask NATO for help, and his senior partner, President Erdogan, will assist him in this. The alliance's exit to the Caspian Sea and the South Caucasus is in no way good for us.

Alternatively, if the "sultan" intends to continue building his own pan-Turkist project, Azerbaijan will be rapidly integrated by Turkey within the army of Great Turan. And so, and so, everything turns out badly for Russia. And how it all began ...
  • Author:
  • Photos used: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 21 December 2020 16: 20
    0
    Otherwise, the Turks can use the already tried and tested method of action against our military through their "proxies" in Idlib.

    In this case, Russia will have a free hand for the operation to eliminate ISIS (banned in Russia) in Azerbaijan itself. And only Allah knows who will fall under the hot hand and who will then remain to lead Azerbaijan. There was such a leader in Afghanistan, Hafizullah Amin ... Moreover, Azerbaijanis who trade in Russia may also fall under the fight against these militants. Do they send money to Azerbaijan? So they are sponsors of terrorism! Well, Turkey's intervention is easily offset by Iran's intervention. There are many Azerbaijanis there and they hardly love Turks ...
  2. 123 Online 123
    123 (123) 21 December 2020 16: 30
    +1
    If the attackers try to move to Armenia
    If the Russian leadership is really not ready to fight the Azerbaijanis
    If we continue to pretend that we are "in the house"
    If Russia is provoked and forced to strike on Azerbaijani territory

    Not too much if? After all, just one is enough to transform a grandmother into a grandfather smile
    Are you just making up bad news for us? Another "positive" article?
  3. Just a cat Online Just a cat
    Just a cat (Bayun) 21 December 2020 16: 35
    +2
    There is a Russian diaspora in Azerbaijan, but not in Armenia .... So it's debatable.
  4. zloybond Offline zloybond
    zloybond (steppenwolf) 21 December 2020 17: 10
    0
    ... and Russia withdrew itself from participation in the military conflict .... - I do not think that the Author smoked something ... rather worked out, but not competently. RF initially stood above the conflict. We must not forget that the relations between the two countries, in contrast to the relations with Armenia, are more direct. Direct calls are more trusting. In dealing with Armenia, the opinion of the 2000 US Embassy was always taken into account. There really is one thing in the eye, but a fig in my pocket.
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 24
      -1
      Quote: zloybond
      and Russia withdrew itself from participation in the military conflict .... - I do not think that the Author smoked something ... rather worked out, but not competently. RF initially stood above the conflict. Not

      Explain the difference between self-withdrawn and stood over, please.
      1. zloybond Offline zloybond
        zloybond (steppenwolf) 22 December 2020 17: 59
        +1
        take a course in the history of military art
  5. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 21 December 2020 17: 19
    +2
    Again horror stories ... In addition to the statement of some deputy, what is in real life? Except for the assumptions of Mr. Marzhetsky, who tirelessly fanning the fire? If in Azerbaijan, and in other countries, they begin to react to every speech of the same Zhirinovsky, then it is high time to fight.

    Shoigu: Not a single serious incident occurred in Nagorno-Karabakh

    https://ru.oxu.az/politics/450924

    Moscow and Baku are in a state of regular and very close constructive dialogue on all issues.

    https://ru.oxu.az/politics/450856

    The ceasefire is observed along the entire line of contact.

    http://mil.ru/russian_peacekeeping_forces/bulletins/[email protected]
    1. Binder Offline Binder
      Binder (Miron) 21 December 2020 17: 49
      0
      Quote: Bakht
      Horror stories again ...

      And don't say. The analyst of Mr. Marzhetsky sometimes looks more like the fantasies of the authors of novels in the genre of alternative history, the author's thoughts and conclusions are too far from reality. After thirty years, the Azerbaijanis won back what was torn away from them; they do not strive to seize the territory of Armenia in Baku, as well as to confront the Russian Federation. However, Mr. Marzhetsky simply plainly distorts the facts, trying to substantiate his point of view -

      Quote: Bakht
      The Syrian militants brought to Karabakh will arrange a second "Khmeimim" for the Russian peacekeepers, conducting constant attacks with the help of attack UAVs, missile and barrel artillery. At the same time, Ankara itself will remain a "friend and partner" for Moscow, buying from it air defense systems and combat aircraft

      In one phrase, there are several such distortions at once:
      1. The massive participation of Syrian militants in the hostilities in Karabakh has not been proven by anyone.
      2. UAV attacks on the Khmeimim base in Syria were carried out using primitive homemade products and not attack drones, and therefore the effectiveness of these attacks is extremely low.
      3. What purchases of Russian combat aircraft are we talking about? As far as I know, there is not a single Russian-made aircraft in the Turkish Air Force.
      1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 28
        0
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        And don't say. The analyst of Mr. Marzhetsky sometimes looks more like the fantasies of the authors of novels in the genre of alternative history, the author's thoughts and conclusions are too far from reality. In thirty years the Azerbaijanis won back what was torn away from them; they do not strive to seize the territory of Armenia in Baku as well as to confront the Russian Federation.

        What are you talking about, Mr. Bindyuzhnik? And who authorized you, an American-Israeli, to speak on behalf of Baku?
        As for the alternative reality, in fact, almost all of my predictions come true, with rare exceptions.
      2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 39
        -1
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        In one phrase, there are several such distortions at once:
        1. The massive participation of Syrian militants in the hostilities in Karabakh has not been proven by anyone.
        2. UAV attacks on the Khmeimim base in Syria were carried out using primitive homemade products and not attack drones, and therefore the effectiveness of these attacks is extremely low.

        First, the involvement of the militants has not been convincingly refuted. Secondly, even if their participation in the battles was not significant, this does not mean that they are not there and they will not show themselves in the future.
        Next, about the UAV. What did you want to say at all? That when terrorists get yours or Turkish UAVs, everything will change? Well, that's how I write about the same thing. So what's the distortion?
        As for Russian-made aircraft, the fact that they are not there now does not mean that Turkey is not interested in acquiring them. So what's the distortion again?
        Do you have incontinence comments or what?
        1. Shmurzik Offline Shmurzik
          Shmurzik (Seymslav) 22 December 2020 16: 55
          +1
          First, the involvement of the militants was not convincingly refuted.

          First:
          The accused is not obliged to refute anything!
          Secondly :
          It is the responsibility of the prosecutor to prove anything, with facts! - otherwise it is a slip of the tongue - ... blablabla!
          Thirdly;
          Do not prompt: -How to convincingly prove "presence of absence" ???
        2. KARAKURT21 Offline KARAKURT21
          KARAKURT21 (KARAKURT21) 23 December 2020 16: 27
          -1
          Balabol you are excellent!
    2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 25
      -1
      Quote: Bakht
      Again horror stories ... In addition to the statement of some deputy, what is in real life? Except the assumptions of Mr. Marzhetsky, who tirelessly fanning the fire?

      And what kind of fire am I fanning this? Excuse me, but what can change from the fact that I expressed my opinion in the article? Putin will read and start a war, right? Or your fellow tribesmen-Azerbaijanis, who need my advice?
      1. Bakht Offline Bakht
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 13: 26
        +2
        The title of the article is absolutely correct. AND IF (!) Russia is provoked to a war with Azerbaijan, there is no need to pretend to be innocence. Your articles are aimed exactly at this.
        According to a population survey, 37% of the population of Azerbaijan welcomes the presence of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh. 44% view this negatively. Which group will you vote for?
        1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
          Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 37
          0
          Quote: Bakht
          The title of the article is absolutely correct. AND IF (!) Russia is provoked to a war with Azerbaijan, there is no need to pretend to be innocence. Your articles are aimed exactly at this.

          Didn't quite understand what it means not to build innocence out of yourself? Who doesn't need it? The one who provokes or the one who is provoked?
          My articles are aimed at the fact that the Kremlin needs to understand well what it actually wants. Why are these peacekeepers there and what are the real tasks before him? And how far is Putin ready to really go if (when) our peacekeepers are killed there?
          1. Bakht Offline Bakht
            Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 14: 43
            +3
            Are you sure they will start killing them there?
            What does the Kremlin want? I have written many times. The Kremlin needs the security of its immediate borders. Peacekeepers in the South Caucasus provide this security. You insist that they should be taken out of there.
            1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
              Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 47
              -1
              I think the likelihood of anti-Russian provocations is very high.
              This brigade cannot really do anything there. They themselves will be the target of attack. Before introducing them there, it was necessary to understand what was really required of them. Otherwise they were simply framed.
              1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 15: 10
                +2
                I already said. They were introduced to consolidate Russia's influence in the South Caucasus. Not Turkey, but Russia. And I predicted this back in early October.
                To date, one of the Russian peacekeepers has been wounded and one has died. Didn't you know that?
                Nobody set them up. The task of the military is "to defend the Motherland." So they protect her. And in Syria and the South Caucasus. Do you want to withdraw them? Or fight with Azerbaijan for Armenian interests?
                So I heard your answer that you work for TopCor, but I haven’t believed it yet.
                1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
                  Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 15: 52
                  -2
                  Quote: Bakht
                  So I heard your answer that you work for TopCor, but I haven’t believed it yet.

                  It's your right. I said my word.
                  I have spoken about everything else more than once, I will not repeat myself.
          2. KARAKURT21 Offline KARAKURT21
            KARAKURT21 (KARAKURT21) 23 December 2020 16: 32
            -1
            Armenians have already started killing your peacekeepers there. On the second day of their arrival there was a skirmish with the "partisans" shitty. Killed 3 peacekeepers, and in the Russian media a friendly silence. Recently, another sapper was killed during mine clearing. By the way, the Armenians also put a mine, the territory was previously under their control. And the question is: Why don't the Armenians pass the map of minefields to the RF MS?
  6. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 21 December 2020 17: 55
    -3
    Those who see no threat live with blinders on their eyes. There is a threat. But there is a way out! Recognize the NKR and admit it to the Russian Federation (Crimea). Unscrew the hands of Azerbaijan and implement a transport corridor with the Russian Federation. There are many such corridors there now. Yes, the RF region will turn out to be small, but very important. It will feed itself and export its products. When attacking her, you can no longer be shy.
    1. Just a cat Online Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) 21 December 2020 18: 10
      0
      To take away Karabakh from the Armenians and Azerbaijanis, to take it into the structure of Russia and then keep an all-round defense from the Armenians and Azerbaijanis? it is in what American university such "specialists" are trained? laughing
    2. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 21 December 2020 19: 33
      +2
      Are you suggesting starting a full-scale war between Russia and Azerbaijan over Karabakh?
      Do I understand you correctly?
    3. To me Offline To me
      To me (Rinat) 23 December 2020 08: 39
      0
      Unfortunately, as practice shows: couch heroes in war are just as cowardly as they are talkative in their statements. It would be necessary for the Chinese to chop off Vladivostok from your Motherland, then we'll see how you sing your friend. With such an aggressive approach on the example of Abkhazia, Crimea and now Karabakh (well, if you have the courage to do this, otherwise everything is blah-blah-blah), Russia will make even more enemies for itself. So before you talk nonsense, think about what you write
  7. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 21 December 2020 18: 09
    -5
    We started to fight global terrorism in Syria and Libya. Now they are on the territory of the former USSR (Azerbaijan). What to expect? When will they be in Rostov, Astrakhan, Volgograd? They will be fast, do not hesitate! Are the Kremlin liberals thinking of reaching an agreement with them when they come to Moscow? The genitals will be cut off for everyone!
    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 21 December 2020 19: 34
      -2
      International terrorists were brought to Karabakh by the Armenians. You have already been told that the participation of militants from Azerbaijan has never been proven by anyone.
      1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 32
        0
        Quote: Bakht
        International terrorists were brought to Karabakh by the Armenians. You have already been told that the participation of militants from Azerbaijan has never been proven by anyone.

        Our Bakhtiyar continues to bend his line about bad Armenians and good fellow tribesmen, Azerbaijanis. good And surprisingly he sings in tune with the American-Israeli Miron Bindyuzhnik, who is acutely worried about the expansion of Russia's influence in the CIS. smile Coincidence?
        1. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 13: 30
          +1
          I continue to bend my line that fighters from the Armenian side fought in Karabakh. There are supporting facts and documents for this. And the Armenians themselves never hid it. So far, no one has provided documents and facts confirming the presence of militants from the Azerbaijani side. As well as not presented a single corpse of a terrorist mercenary. The jackals probably ate them all.
          And the funniest thing is that you didn't notice. I just welcome the expansion of Russia's influence in the CIS. But in your articles I constantly see that you do not like the presence of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh. Again you turned everything upside down.
          And why don't you like it?
          1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
            Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 41
            0
            Quote: Bakht
            And the funniest thing is that you didn't notice. I just welcome the expansion of Russia's influence in the CIS. But in your articles I constantly see that you do not like the presence of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh. Again you turned everything upside down.
            And why don't you like it?

            I answered the question about the peacekeepers above.
            Please specify which country you are a citizen of, the Russian Federation or Azerbaijan. You wrote in your comments that you have lived in Baku for 30 years. And explain to me on your fingers how the defeat of the Armenians in Karabakh and the arrival of Turkey in Azerbaijan lead to the strengthening of Russia's position in the CIS, in the South Caucasus, in particular?
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 14: 46
              +2
              I have lived in Baku for 60 years. This is the time of the Karabakh conflict for 30 years. How does the presence of a Russian peacekeeping brigade in Karabakh (de jure in Azerbaijan) mean the arrival of Turkey in Azerbaijan? Can you explain to me on your fingers?
              1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
                Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 48
                -2
                Well, now we have decided who is in which trench. As for the Turks, I have already written several articles, where I have detailed my thoughts on this matter. You have certainly read them, I see no reason to repeat myself.
        2. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 13: 55
          +2
          Necessary addition. Your phrase

          about bad Armenians and good fellow-tribesmen-Azerbaijanis.

          Translate it from Russian into Russian? On the whole, the word "tribesman" is quite correct. In any case, it is in the dictionary. But personally, it hurts my ear. Say, if I call the Russians your fellow tribesmen, does this mean that the Russian people are a tribe? This is of course a moot point, but to be honest, I personally would try to find another word.

          About the good and the bad. I have never defined the whole nation. And I saw enough in my life to transfer the personal qualities of one or several people to the people.
          The Karabakh conflict began because of the territorial claims of one country to another. And I know too well who is to blame for this conflict. I am sure that it is better than you. And who is "good" in this conflict and who is "bad" is beyond doubt.

          For many years I have tried to prove with my notes that it is best for Armenia to agree to a peace settlement plan. I was told that they won these lands will not be given away either.
          Now I am trying to convey to all readers that peace is needed. And therefore I DO NOT publish photos of what the Armenians have done in Karabakh over 30 years. The past is in the past.

          St. John Chrysostom
          But Jesus said to him: follow me, and leave the dead to bury their dead

          What is the meaning of your article? The Agreement DOES NOT PROVIDE the withdrawal of peacekeepers earlier than 5 years. It is possible to discuss Azerbaijan's attack on Russia only if you are not even a fantasy writer, but a dreamer. The States do not risk attacking Russia, but here you describe how the formidable Azerbaijan, together with Turkey, attacks Russia. I would laugh. But only once. And you bend this line with constancy. And have already painted how you will strike

          Only with hard retaliatory missile and air strikes against the attackers.

          Who does Mr. Marzhetsky work for?
          Besides you, another "corridor cutter" has appeared here. I can see that Armenians are selling their houses in Stepanakert. A two-story house with a plot of land for 35 thousand dollars. Buy and cut any corridors. Just remember that any corridor to Stepanakert lies through Baku. There are no other roads.
          1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
            Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 44
            +1
            Quote: Bakht
            What is the meaning of your article? The Agreement DOES NOT PROVIDE the withdrawal of peacekeepers earlier than 5 years. It is possible to discuss Azerbaijan's attack on Russia only if you are not even a fantasy writer, but a dreamer. The States do not risk attacking Russia, but here you describe how the formidable Azerbaijan, together with Turkey, attacks Russia. I would laugh. But only once. And you bend this line with constancy. And have already painted how you will strike

            I wrote about the attack on Russian peacekeepers by terrorists who were brought to Azerbaijan by the Turks. And about the possibility of a retaliatory strike against them by Russia on Azerbaijani territory, with the ensuing consequences. Do not attribute to me what I did not write.

            Besides you, another "corridor cutter" has appeared here.

            Maybe because I'm right? Do other people think the same?

            Only with hard retaliatory missile and air strikes against the attackers.

            Who does Mr. Marzhetsky work for?

            To the reporter edition. And you?
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 14: 47
              +1
              When I see a terrorist in Azerbaijan who was brought here by Turkey, I agree with you. Until then, you are wrong.
              1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
                Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 50
                +1
                This is about Nagorno-Karabakh. Are you directly there? Are you able to personally examine each person who is there?
                And from such wave of assumptions, do you consider it possible to conclude that it is me who is wrong?
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 15: 12
                  0
                  Well, if only because the Russian peacekeepers did not see them there either. You drew conclusions based on fake news. Sorry, but you do not have any information that Azerbaijan used mercenaries.
                  1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
                    Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 15: 51
                    0
                    Quote: Bakht
                    Well, if only because the Russian peacekeepers did not see them there either.

                    Did they say that themselves?
                    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 16: 39
                      +2
                      I guess, yes. They said it themselves. I look at the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and I don't see anything there about mercenary terrorists.

                      http://mil.ru/russian_peacekeeping_forces.htm

                      Information has now passed from the Turkish General Staff. TOTAL 60 Turkish servicemen have been sent to Azerbaijan. Mostly sappers. Help to clear mines. Compared to 2000 Russian peacekeepers, this is probably the huge influence of Turkey in Azerbaijan. And according to the information of the Turkish Defense Ministry, the terms of stay of the Turkish military personnel in Azerbaijan will be coordinated with the Russian peacekeepers. That is, the number and length of stay is determined by the Russian side.

                      https://ru.oxu.az/politics/451254

                      I wonder how many terrorists are now in Nagorno-Karabakh? They are definitely not in Baku. In Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian peacekeepers do not see them.
                      But I promise you. As soon as I see one, I'll write right away.
                  2. armusala310 Offline armusala310
                    armusala310 (armusala310) 23 December 2020 08: 38
                    -2
                    The Armenians have at least 2 Syrian prisoners, they tell everything in detail (video on YouTube) ... and what kind of terrorists do Armenians have? there are Armenians from different countries who came for free to protect their brothers and sisters, if you call them that, then no one else will call you (and also Turks and Pakistanis are your "brothers"
                    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 23 December 2020 12: 01
                      +4
                      Those on YouTube have long been dismantled. One Kurd, the second from the same series.
                      But the Kurdish Armenian battalion was lit up in full. The documents were transferred to the Russian side.
                      And in the photo there are Kurds next to the Minister of Defense of Armenia.
                      So far, there is not a single fact (real fact). Well, if you look at YouTube, then I already wrote - Boeing was shot down by a Russian BUK, Russian Aerospace Forces bombed schools in Syria, and the Syrian army is using OV. And to the heap, Skripal and Navalny were personally poisoned by Putin.
                      Once again - except for fake links, there are no REAL facts.
                    2. Seal Offline Seal
                      Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 25 December 2020 10: 04
                      0
                      Here is the full text posted on the official website of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service.
                      Press bureau of the SVR of Russia, October 6

                      As the Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation Sergei Naryshkin stated: “Moscow is concerned about the escalation of tension around Nagorno-Karabakh. representatives of the friendly Armenian and Azerbaijani peoples are dying.

                      Clashes on the line of contact in Nagorno-Karabakh have occurred before. The current aggravation of the situation causes heightened concern not only by its scale, but also by the fundamentally new influence of external factors. For the first time Turkey has so openly and unequivocally sided with Azerbaijan. In addition, the flaring up armed confrontation in Karabakh, like a magnet, attracts militants from various kinds of international terrorist structures.

                      According to the information available in the SVR, mercenaries from the international terrorist organizations fighting in the Middle East, in particular, Jabhat al-Nusra, Firkat Khamza, Sultan Murad, are actively moving into the conflict zone. as well as extremist Kurdish groups. Moreover, we are talking about hundreds and even thousands of radicals hoping to make money on the new Karabakh war.

                      We have no doubt that, with the assistance of the international community, the parties to the conflict will eventually stop using force and sit down at the negotiating table. However, we cannot but be concerned that Transcaucasia can become a new springboard for international terrorist organizations, from where militants can subsequently infiltrate into states adjacent to Azerbaijan and Armenia, including Russia. "


                      Head of the Press Office

                      SVR of Russia S.N. Ivanov

                      06.10.2020

                      Please pay attention to: as well as extremist Kurdish groups.
                      Question: Did the Kurdish extremist groups also fight on the side of Azerbaijan? And further. The difference in terms between extremist and terrorist is rather arbitrary. In fact, in this context, they are synonyms.
          2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
            Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 14: 56
            -1
            Quote: Bakht
            Translate it from Russian into Russian? On the whole, the word "tribesman" is quite correct. In any case, it is in the dictionary. But personally, it hurts my ear. Say, if I call the Russians your fellow tribesmen, does this mean that the Russian people are a tribe? This is of course a moot point, but to be honest, I personally would try to find another word.

            I didn't mean to offend you. And in general, we once got nasty at each other. For this, I apologize on my behalf. I just react quite emotionally to personal attacks.
            I have a lot of blood mixed in: Russian, Belarusian, Polish, even a little Tatar. I am a citizen of the Russian Federation and consider myself Russian, although ill-wishers did not call me as soon as possible.
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 22 December 2020 15: 16
              +2
              I have not been offended by quotes on the Internet for a long time. I'm just not a journalist. But you position yourself as a journalist. Or at least by the person who writes the articles. I have already said why I am not writing. Just commenting. Because I'm a techie. But the journalist must be careful with his instrument (in this case, words), just as I am careful with my instrument (computer)
              I am a citizen of Azerbaijan. But for me "Russian World" is not an empty phrase, as for Lukashenka, for example
              1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
                Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 15: 51
                -1
                Quote: Bakht
                I have not been offended by quotes on the Internet for a long time. I'm just not a journalist. But you position yourself as a journalist. Or at least by the person who writes the articles

                I am both a journalist and a lawyer.
        3. KARAKURT21 Offline KARAKURT21
          KARAKURT21 (KARAKURT21) 23 December 2020 16: 39
          -1
          In fact, these are your tribes, with which you, by the way, do not get along throughout your history!
  8. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 21 December 2020 18: 47
    +5
    Yeah, but NATO will scatter to die under a hail of nuclear warheads of the Russian Federation for Azerbaijan and Turkey, which spoiled relations with this very NATO, and with Greece, in fact, it is in a state of frozen military conflict, and with France it almost came to hostilities and relations with Germany are not ah and with Saudi Arabia, dear to the American heart, on the brink of war.
    1. Binder Offline Binder
      Binder (Miron) 21 December 2020 22: 25
      -6
      Quote: Sapsan136
      Yeah, but NATO will run away to die under a hail of Russian nuclear warheads for Azerbaijan and Turkey,

      Why are you trying to scare everyone with Russian warheads? After all, no one is afraid of these warheads - it turns out a pure circus. laughing Is it not destiny to understand that the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation will inevitably cause an appropriate response and will not seem to anyone? It is clear that the majority of ordinary citizens of Russia have nothing to lose, they may and want to go to the paradise promised by Putin as soon as possible, but the guarantor himself and his neighbors have something to lose, so you shouldn't expect them to take such a step. hi
      1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 December 2020 10: 41
        +3
        And why are you scaring us with museum Turkish tanks and 50 pieces of Turkish F-16 block 50+, is it really not clear that this can scare Georgia, but not the Russian Federation ?! Is it really not clear that no NATA will put its head under a nuclear warhead because of Turkey, which is fed up with NATO, and the Sprat Extinction will surrender if they bother the Russian Federation ?! laughingDo not think that someone will fight for the serf countries, which the developed NATO countries need only in the form of cannon fodder, sales markets and cheap labor! tongue
      2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 22 December 2020 12: 49
        +3
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        Why are you trying to scare everyone with Russian warheads? After all, no one is afraid of these warheads - it turns out a pure circus. Is it not destiny to understand that the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation will inevitably cause an appropriate response and will not seem to anyone? It is clear that the majority of ordinary citizens of Russia have nothing to lose, they may and want to go to the paradise promised by Putin as soon as possible, but the guarantor himself and his neighbors have something to lose, therefore one should not expect that they will take such a step.

        All your comments show that you simply hate Russia.
        I wonder how and when such a transformation can happen to a person. You, apparently, were born in the USSR, received a Soviet education, were brought up in this culture. Even if you emigrated to Israel and somehow got US citizenship in some way (I wonder what such merits), is this a reason to hate your former homeland so fiercely?
        Emigration in itself is not something reprehensible if in another country you were able to open up, realize yourself and become a happy person (in the USSR, you were clearly very oppressed, right?). But even if your life in a new place is easier, more satisfying and more fun, wouldn't it be more correct from the moral point of view to adhere to a certain neutrality, so obviously not gloating over Russia's failures and problems?

        Or do you, living in a residential area of ​​Haifa, already consider yourself directly involved in all the successes of the United States and Israel, seeing an enemy in Russia? I'm really interested in what you and others like you have going on in your head about this.
        1. Binder Offline Binder
          Binder (Miron) 22 December 2020 16: 15
          -1
          Quote: Marzhetsky
          All your comments show that you simply hate Russia.

          This is something with your eyesight. And in general, Mr. Marzhetsky, instead of being interested in my moral principles and biography, you should focus on the topics to which you devote your publications. Analytics only makes sense when the facts on which to draw conclusions are undeniable. You often have a desire to adjust the facts to fit your very controversial conclusions. This negatively affects the quality of the analysis.
  9. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 21 December 2020 20: 08
    -2
    If now (in 5 years) we leave Karabakh and leave, then we need to start digging trenches around Russian cities. Someone writes about the all-round defense against Armenia and Azerbaijan. They dare not. And if so, then you shouldn't feel sorry for them. See how they behave in Moscow - a wild flock of jackals. Russians are not people for them, so ... victims.
  10. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 22 December 2020 23: 42
    -1
    As a result of the war Azerbaijan-NKR (Armenia). RF in the Caucasus and in the world suffered a crushing defeat. Turkey (NATO) is the winner. Turkey through Azerbaijan entered the territory of the Caspian Sea, to Central Asia, to the borders of the Russian Federation. Turkey has shown how and with what it is necessary to fight in the 30st century. Turkey has strengthened its economy, reduced oil and gas dependence on the Russian Federation to zero. The defeat of the Russian Federation was to be expected: the Baltics - NATO; Ukraine - USA; Moldova-NATO, Abkhazia-Turkey; Georgia - NATO; Armenia - USA; Azerbaijan - Turkey; Kazakhstan - NATO, these are the former republics of the USSR with a defined political vector. Over the 1990 years of Yeltsin-Medvedev-Putin rule, the Russian Federation has only lost its territory. Crimea was annexed by the military, without the permission of the Kremlin. Russia (USSR) as a result of the state. coup in 30 lost 20% of its territory. Lost victory. On the first day of the Armenia-Azerbaijan war, the Russian Federation should have been forced to voluntarily sign Azerbaijan, Armenia and the NKR on the NKR's entry into the Russian Federation. The accession of the NKR to the Russian Federation would be a victory for Russia. In the future, what can Turkey do. Capture Armenia and very quickly, it will be a small war. The Russian Federation will not render any assistance to Armenia, except for the Odessa noise. Azerbaijan can be considered the territory of Turkey. Georgia, this is NATO, no one will let the Russian troops enter Armenia. Iran will remain silent. Russia will not fight NATO because of Armenia. After great international noise, Turkey will leave Armenia, but the Syunik region of Armenia will join Azerbaijan. This was the main goal of the war. Thus, the enclave of Nakhichevan will be connected with Baku. Baku will have a XNUMX% increase in area and will have a direct independent exit to Turkey. Turkey will fulfill its immediate task in the Caucasus and show the whole world that Moscow is an empty shell.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 25 December 2020 16: 39
      0
      Vlad127490, write nonsense (in vain or on purpose). Why is there a problem territory for the Russian Federation, with Chechnya and Dagestan alone, there are few problems, and there is no benefit from Karabakh, only losses ...
  11. Artyom Perfect Offline Artyom Perfect
    Artyom Perfect (Artyom Perfect) 23 December 2020 00: 28
    -1
    Alarmist and provocateur
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Seal Offline Seal
    Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 25 December 2020 09: 54
    +1
    Quote: Bulanov
    In this case, Russia will have a free hand for the operation to eliminate the ISIS (banned in Russia) in Azerbaijan itself.

    Rave. Where can the ISIS in Shiite Azerbaijan come from ??? After all, for ISIS a Shiite is much worse than a Christian. Anyway, the article, like your answer, is clearly provocative. Azerbaijanis will not shoot at our servicemen, no matter how hard you and the author of the article and the Armenians try to provoke them.
  14. marciz Offline marciz
    marciz (Stas) 26 December 2020 05: 09
    -1
    Everywhere they put like fools in an ambiguous position !!!!! Well, they slam the peacekeepers "women still give birth" !!!!!
  15. SCHAMAN Offline SCHAMAN
    SCHAMAN (Boris Batudaev) 26 December 2020 16: 07
    +1
    No need to fantasize. No one wants to fight Russia.