The same people "undermine" Russia and the USA
Have you noticed that the outrage in Russian society over the pension reform project and the scandal in the United States over the arrest of Mr. Manafort, the former head of the Trump election campaign, occurs almost simultaneously, almost synchronously? Both cases are accompanied by widespread public outcry and protests. Supporters of the theory of the "black world order" believe that the events taking place in Russia and the USA are not only interconnected, but also provoked from a single center.
Fighting World Projects
There is a theory according to which in the world at different times and in different countries there were three world projects: white, red and black.
The white world project was formed in the era of feudalism and is concluded in a social contract between the elite and the people. The people contain the elite and allow it to control themselves, and the elite must take care of it and serve it. The red project appeared in the twentieth century and became a reality in the USSR and other socialist countries. It involves the elimination of the elite from the old scheme and complete popular self-government without its participation. This project can be called a dead end, since it did not last long and today does not play a significant role in the world.
The black world project, according to supporters of the theory, was first put into practice in Nazi Germany and some Latin American countries. It also cancels the social contract between the elite and the people, but the people are eliminated from the scheme. It is assumed that all decisions are made by the elite, not taking into account the interests of the people. The people are considered only as a resource to ensure the comfortable existence of the elite. And care for it is carried out only to the extent that this resource retains its existence and fulfills the functions assigned to it.
Either I was not sufficiently imbued with the postulates of this theory, or the theory itself "noticeably limps on both legs," or both. There are many inconsistencies in it, but there are common thoughts.
Black versus White in Russia and the USA
If you believe the supporters of the theory described above, the main confrontation in the world today is between the “black” and “white” world orders. Moreover, in both the USA and Russia, none of these two systems is dominant. In the US, there is a struggle between Trump supporters who advocate a “white” world order and “black” forces, whose leaders can conditionally be called Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
In Russia, the movement of "blacks" emerged in the 90s. Its most prominent representatives were Yegor Gaidar, Anatoly Chubais and Yevgeny Yasin. They once created a "black hole" that swallowed up public consumption funds created in the Soviet Union. Now those who survived after economic reforms in the 90s run the risk of being left without pension savings today. I do not know why, but the "theory of world orders" ranks Dmitry Medvedev among the "blacks", that is, he considers Gaidar and Chubais to be the heir to their cause.
Of course, in the described theory there are many inconsistencies and even absurdities, but some rational kernel is still present in it. Don't you find?
Fighting World Projects
There is a theory according to which in the world at different times and in different countries there were three world projects: white, red and black.
The white world project was formed in the era of feudalism and is concluded in a social contract between the elite and the people. The people contain the elite and allow it to control themselves, and the elite must take care of it and serve it. The red project appeared in the twentieth century and became a reality in the USSR and other socialist countries. It involves the elimination of the elite from the old scheme and complete popular self-government without its participation. This project can be called a dead end, since it did not last long and today does not play a significant role in the world.
The black world project, according to supporters of the theory, was first put into practice in Nazi Germany and some Latin American countries. It also cancels the social contract between the elite and the people, but the people are eliminated from the scheme. It is assumed that all decisions are made by the elite, not taking into account the interests of the people. The people are considered only as a resource to ensure the comfortable existence of the elite. And care for it is carried out only to the extent that this resource retains its existence and fulfills the functions assigned to it.
Either I was not sufficiently imbued with the postulates of this theory, or the theory itself "noticeably limps on both legs," or both. There are many inconsistencies in it, but there are common thoughts.
Black versus White in Russia and the USA
If you believe the supporters of the theory described above, the main confrontation in the world today is between the “black” and “white” world orders. Moreover, in both the USA and Russia, none of these two systems is dominant. In the US, there is a struggle between Trump supporters who advocate a “white” world order and “black” forces, whose leaders can conditionally be called Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
In Russia, the movement of "blacks" emerged in the 90s. Its most prominent representatives were Yegor Gaidar, Anatoly Chubais and Yevgeny Yasin. They once created a "black hole" that swallowed up public consumption funds created in the Soviet Union. Now those who survived after economic reforms in the 90s run the risk of being left without pension savings today. I do not know why, but the "theory of world orders" ranks Dmitry Medvedev among the "blacks", that is, he considers Gaidar and Chubais to be the heir to their cause.
Of course, in the described theory there are many inconsistencies and even absurdities, but some rational kernel is still present in it. Don't you find?
Information