Zhirinovsky explained why Lukashenka "drew" himself 80% of the votes


On August 19, the head of the LDPR party, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, visited the Lefortovo pre-trial detention center, planning to visit his fellow party member Sergei Furgal, the arrested ex-governor of the Khabarovsk Territory, there. He did not find the van. However, answering questions from ubiquitous journalists, Zhirinovsky soon moved from the disgraced Furgal to protests in Belarus. He explained why Lukashenka received so many votes in the presidential elections.


Alexander Grigorievich, you're finished, everything is against you, we're tired of you

- Vladimir Volfovich is conducting a sort of correspondence dialogue with Lukashenko.

Maybe he got not 80 percent, maybe it was 51 - well, then he would have written to the opposition 49 percent. Or let him have a second round. In this case, it was possible to raise all state employees loyal to him - after all, the state pays them wages. If necessary, we can come to help - we have a Union State! And in the second round, he would have won an honest victory

- so, according to Zhirinovsky, the Belarusian president should have done.

Lukashenka has the mindset of a state farm director. This is not his fault, but his misfortune - Alexander Grigorievich is what he is, a product of the Soviet era

- the politician draws an analogy with the widespread overestimations of their statistics by state farms in the late USSR.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. mivmim Offline mivmim
    mivmim 19 August 2020 17: 58
    +4
    Will he ever retire? I mean Zhirinovsky.
    1. Observer2014 Offline Observer2014
      Observer2014 19 August 2020 18: 35
      -3
      Quote: mivmim
      Will he ever retire? I mean Zhirinovsky.

      And why are you worse than Zhirinovsky of which you are afraid to mention?
      1. Satellite Online Satellite
        Satellite (Satellite) 19 August 2020 22: 17
        +2
        And why are you worse than Zhirinovsky of which you are afraid to mention?

        So you, along the way, are afraid, with your "the one about whom .."))
        1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 20 August 2020 20: 17
          +2
          Zhirinovsky, the personification of the ruling liberal elite, is just as duplicitous, taking the place of the opposition leader .. He accuses the authorities, expresses various nonsense and non-nonsense, but always votes in the Duma for liberals in power ... This cunning type, depicting essentially a clown, but effective inhibiting the revival of the real opposition, has earned a lifetime monument from the ruling liberalism ...
  2. Yuri Mikhailovsky (Yuri Mikhailovsky) 19 August 2020 18: 35
    -1
    It grows old and does not hold its nose in the wind anymore. Or holds it very well?
  3. KYYC Offline KYYC
    KYYC (OXOTHuK) 19 August 2020 20: 17
    0
    Lukashenka's multi-move.
    He studies.
  4. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 19 August 2020 20: 21
    -1
    Furgala betrayed, and translated "arrows" to Lukashenko! Rotten soul!
  5. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 19 August 2020 20: 35
    -2
    Another traitor. As dad used to write to himself and more than 80%, so nothing.
    And as complications, he immediately began to denigrate and bark.

    "Thinking of the state farm director" - word for word slogans of the opposition. "Down with the state farm, let's privatize."
  6. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) 19 August 2020 21: 21
    +4
    If necessary, we can come to help - we have a Union State!

    I raised an interesting question. By the way, the allies have a similar party, the LDPB, it is not clear whether it is headed by Oleg Sergeevich Gaidukevich, or the "honorary chairman" Sergei Vasilyevich Gaidukevich (as I understand it, dad). Something I do not remember their stormy activities to strengthen the union state. Maybe he missed something?
    I watched the program ...

    http://ldp.by/ru/programma-ldp/

    LDPB as a party of statesmen is actively working at the international level. we interact with large political forces of the European Union, the countries of the Near Abroad and Asia, Russia... LDPB promotes a positive image of the country in the international arena and resists any attacks against Belarus.

    In that order. yes EU, neighboring countries, Asia and only then Russia. In my opinion, it is very significant.

    LDPB for a truly multi-vector policywe must build mutually beneficial relationships with all countries in the West and in the East. We are convinced that everywhere it is necessary to firmly and consistently defend our national interests. Belarus is a peace-loving state and stands for equal good-neighborly relations with all countries.

    Multi-vector .....

    The LDPB actively supports the integration processes in the post-Soviet space. The party supports the Union with Russia, the EAEU, the CSTO. The development of relations between our countries is a big plus and the strengthening of our Statehood and Sovereignty. At the same time, any integration formations should only be equal and mutually beneficial.

    Lukashenka read something and remembered something ... Didn't he copy his theses from them?

    I remembered the communists ... They say they went to the rally for Lukashenko, but ... not all ... some went to the opposition ...
    I didn't look for their program. I doubt that anything is different in this regard ...
    Once again I was convinced that there is no pro-Russian political force in Belarus. I remembered the slogans at the rally .... "For the Slavs", but at least half of the country is Russian, but before that everyone was "taught", they are embarrassed to say about it.
    Lukashenka wanted to spit in the face, preferably in the broken one.
  7. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 19 August 2020 21: 54
    +2
    Zhirinovsky is simply jealous of Lukashenka.
  8. g1washntwn Offline g1washntwn
    g1washntwn (George Washington) 20 August 2020 07: 35
    +2
    Open the wiki and read:

    Quote: WiKi
    Liberalism proclaims rights and freedom each a person of the highest value ... ...

    Notice the highlighted "everyone"? And now try to carry out "everyone" in the size of at least your entrance ... To put it mildly, nothing will come of it. You will find a couple of "party members", in three apartments you will be frankly sent, the rest will be ignored and even the door will not be opened, pretending that no one is at home. Precisely because the Society is not "everyone", but the unity and subordination of the minority to the majority (and not like the non-traditional, who demand to be loved just like Santa Claus, or "self-nominated" who blackmail the current government and demanding the crown now and immediately). Liberalism, and consumer democracy as well, proclaim a kind of society where everyone sits in their own apartment, knows no one and does not intersect with anyone ... so that suddenly and inadvertently, his rights and freedoms are not suddenly infringed upon. Doesn't it look like anything? Look at the pseudo-freedom in the United States, which is spreading all over the world, it is no different from our entrances. Everyone is sure that he is free, but the neighbors mercilessly knock on each other for the unmown lawns near the house, you cannot make noise, don’t go in underpants in your house, bring up your children with permissiveness, don’t look at Mademoiselle, don’t deny African-Americans anything ... Sometimes you can go out and beat windows, but no more, otherwise - a police station and a rather big fine. Freedom? And for me, it's the dictatorship of democracy over common sense.

    Man is a social being. If we compare in the primitive, are democratic and liberal forms possible in nature? Look at millions of years of evolution and ask yourself what more or less organized (close to the human definition of "consciousness") species and "animal societies" are the most viable? Anthill - monarchy, gregarious species, prides and clans, rigid intraspecific hierarchy, etc. Even shrimps huddle together in order to increase their chances of surviving as species, and the most cunning-finned ones that pop out with slogans usually end up right there for someone's lunch (hello to the former brotherly ones, because from the stomach of a larger fish they no longer see the whole picture, they are warm and ... blessed with their memory).
    As a philosophical trend, there are rational seeds, I do not argue, but this is purely a protest against autocracy without a practical component of what will replace it. In practice, the result is complete nonsense and confusion, the same vertical of coercion, just the king was replaced by TNCs and the political struggle of the two "Nanai boys", the main component of the Society is again removed (and maybe it should be so - professionals should run the country, not cooks). We are all different, and society should be one, especially when they try to destroy it from the outside. The majority and minority, weak and strong, endowed with different levels of authority and responsibility will always exist, no matter what political trends are declaratively broadcasting.

    How to explain to a child "What is democracy?" Take a piece of pressed refined sugar - this will be our Society (country, collective, etc.), where sugar grains are its components - people, families, political parties, collectives, etc. They are together, because they were united by pressure - they were compressed by rules, laws, principles of morality, equal for all. And now let's take water - a real analogue of democracy, it can be liquid / solid / gaseous, now in a glass it takes any form convenient for itself, has no taste, you can't live without it. We throw refined sugar into a glass and arrange a small revolution for it with a spoon ... What is our refined society turning into? Into a consumer product. Enjoy your meal.

    Sorry for the "multi-letter". But I'm not trying to go into a separate article. Grades and debate are welcome.
    1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 20 August 2020 08: 32
      0
      It's very easy to understand with refined sugar and water! Congratulations!
      1. g1washntwn Offline g1washntwn
        g1washntwn (George Washington) 20 August 2020 10: 22
        0
        If you throw in tea, you get a demonstration of the "color revolution")))
        By the way, there, briefly: Is democracy and liberalism possible in business? Those who are looking for democracy can go to their boss right now and demand that the power be transferred as an experiment.
    2. _AMUHb_ Offline _AMUHb_
      _AMUHb_ (_AMUHb_) 20 August 2020 15: 08
      0
      ... "Philosophy has a beginning, philosophy has no end!"

      - it must be human wisdom (I find it difficult to answer))) ..., there is still:

      "The (human) world is full of imperfection and disorder" ...

      - "With a little mind", obviously, you can invent something or "discover", but this everyday thing (theme) is eternal, but life is not.
  9. Bitter Offline Bitter
    Bitter (Gleb) 20 August 2020 09: 47
    +2
    - Vladimir Volfovich conducts, as it were, a correspondence dialogue ...

    On the other hand, Vladimir Volfovich has been holding firmly the seat of the Duma clown for decades and no "karaliks" will be able to expel him into business or retire.
  10. Anatoly Gritsenko (Anatoly Gritsenko) 20 August 2020 12: 21
    -1
    Zhirinovsky is not to judge Lukashenka's merits - he doesn't eat bread for nothing!
  11. Rashid116 Offline Rashid116
    Rashid116 (Rashid) 21 August 2020 09: 49
    +1
    Who would not shine. The one who really got bored is this clown Zhirinovsky. He himself has been carrying a blizzard for many years in the Duma. The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia is full of Furgals. I had an uncle (already deceased) in Kazan on "movement" was. Together we watched TV, Zhirinovsky was chewing something in his own manner, as usual. I looked, looked and said: What kind of game is he carrying in general, and who will lead to this? He answered like this: "Quiet, quiet, that's how it should be, I talked to him, not a stupid guy, plays his role." It was the middle or the end of the 90s, I don't remember exactly.
    1. Rashid116 Offline Rashid116
      Rashid116 (Rashid) 21 August 2020 09: 52
      0
      This I mean that if someone counts on him as an oppositionist, he will be very disappointed.