The Russians reacted to a fatal accident with the participation of actor Efremov


On the evening of June 8, 2020, the infamous Soviet and Russian theater and film actor Mikhail Efremov, while intoxicated, committed DPT, as a result of which 57-year-old Sergey Zakharov lost his life. At the same time, Efremov, being a public man, had not previously concealed that he was “drinking”, but he did not consider himself an alcoholic, but called him a “cheerful drunkard”.


After the accident, he also admitted that he drank alcohol before he got behind the wheel. A test conducted immediately after the accident showed that in the air exhaled by him the alcohol content is 2,1 ppm (the permissible norm is 0,16 ppm).

However, according to Telegram channel 112, the examination revealed not only alcohol, but also drugs in the actor’s blood and urine. Traces of cocaine and cannabinoids were revealed in him. After that, the investigator wrote out a search warrant in the actor’s apartment and summoned Efremov for questioning at the Department of Internal Affairs in the Central Administrative District of Moscow.

The Russians reacted to a fatal accident with the participation of actor Efremov


Comments from Web users were not long in coming:

Efremov’s lawyer said that cocaine and cannabinoids were planted in the body of his client

- with a banter wrote a certain "Manya Papiroskina."

By brutal and treacherous attack in the nearest club

- clarified the user under the nickname "something."

He will file a counterclaim that coke and weed were of poor quality ...

- considers "kelevra".

Pianchugu smeared
Forgetting about drinking bouts.
Life is cheaper
Wallpaper Roll

- wrote “Cheburgen” in poetic form.

I do not agree with you completely. Yes, the lawyer will be expensive (probably good), but Efremov shines from 5 to 12 years of a real term. Previously, it might have climbed, but now it’s not!

- the user of “Cheburashka” did not agree with “Cheburgen”.

As an actor, Efremov is good, but as a man - no!

- One of the readers of a large Russian site believes.

Efremov’s dad is certainly not so rich, but the whole liberal community will defend the "innocently" oppressed actor. He is almost a child. And they drove, they say, he framed himself. It's all sad

- thinks T.Henks.

In the worst case, it will be like with Kokorin and Mamaev. But since they didn’t arrest them right away, they would get off easily. The raven will not peck out the crow

- considers the "steelmaker".

A long history. Probably, in the neighboring cells should be the people who gave him the rights, and before that - a driver’s medical certificate

- writes the reader of one of the domestic publications.

People, what are you talking about? We already have thousands of people driving drunk, just if someone is knocked down the news so not advertised. Examine the statistics of the traffic police. And those who have connections and money will not even get into these statistics.

- the user is sure "lost coast".

A popular person must be an example to the rest. Therefore, for such vile behavior, for murder in a drunken stupor - popularity is only an aggravating circumstance

- “Igor Imenyarek” considers.

If they give a "condition", I will be completely disappointed in Russia completely

- summed up "jekasimf".
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

26 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Observer2014 Offline
    Observer2014 9 June 2020 21: 14
    -2
    • 1
    • 3
    In the worst case, it will be like with Kokorin and Mamaev. But since they didn’t arrest them right away, they would get off easily.

    The raven will not peck out the crow.

    - considers the "steelmaker".

    Tortured by this liberalism! Wherever you stick, everywhere this liberal public negative

    the user of Cheburashka did not agree with Cheburgen.

    And this is generally beyond! How can this be, because it can be?
  2. Gennady1959 Offline
    Gennady1959 (Gennady) 9 June 2020 21: 17
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    Not in Russia it is necessary to be disappointed, but in that corrupt power that exists in Russia.
    1. Observer2014 Offline
      Observer2014 9 June 2020 21: 31
      -2
      • 1
      • 3
      Quote: GENNADY1959
      Not in Russia it is necessary to be disappointed, but in that corrupt power that exists in Russia.

      Gene. And what does Russia have to do with it, and who tried to give up on it? There is a specific article -

      The Russians reacted to a fatal accident with the participation of actor Efremov

      Of which a lot of similar pro response forced to print media. Read it. Svezhak, so to speak, from the front ranks .. Like? For me it’s so super! good
  3. A.Lex Offline
    A.Lex (Secret information) 9 June 2020 22: 20
    +5
    • 6
    • 1
    I have only one opinion - they will release everything on the brakes and take it out of the blow of justice ...
    The fact that he is an alcoholic has been known to everyone for a long time. The fact that he is ALWAYS against statehood in the Russian Federation - everyone also knows for a long time. The fact that they have their own judges in the courts, everyone also knows (EVERYONE REMEMBERS the Special opinion of the FAMOUS JUDGE of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, who has NOT WORKED IN THIS SYSTEM FOR ONE YEAR ???????) This accident killed a person - early or later it was supposed to happen .........
    I myself was deprived twice (in my youth) - they did everything right (okay, at least they didn’t put it, damn it (at that time !!!!!!!!). There should be a UNIFIED LAW in the country for everyone! Violated - forward according to the gravity of the violation ( or deprivation, or to jail, or a wild fine, or a life sentence).
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 9 June 2020 22: 34
    -8
    • 1
    • 9
    We inflated a minor traffic accident to universal proportions, as if there were no other topics. Excuses all this and a distraction of public opinion from much more acute problems. For example, from the signing of the law on the creation of a unified register of information about Russians. What do not say about it?
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 11 June 2020 16: 01
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Small, Sergey, speak? By the way, the person died ... Or are you so cynical?
      1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 11 June 2020 20: 36
        0
        • 0
        • 0
        Incidentally, the signing of the law on the creation of a unified register of information about Russians affects not ONE person, but ALL the population !!!
        1. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 12 June 2020 12: 47
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          ... I don’t understand ... and what does it have to do with it?
          1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 12 June 2020 19: 14
            0
            • 0
            • 0
            Read above: "Excuses all this and a distraction of public opinion."
  5. King3214 Offline
    King3214 (Sergius) 9 June 2020 22: 49
    +3
    • 6
    • 3
    Here Efremov gets up and I say "homosexual."
    And then "national" and "deserved", half-bent, will run to Putin with a request to "have mercy on Misha." Remember how they ran along Serebryakov?
    Moral freaks!
  6. Indifferent Offline
    Indifferent 10 June 2020 05: 36
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    He will be imprisoned for sure, but most likely not for long. He will get the top five, and then in a couple of years they will be released on parole. You look, in the next booze a couple more people will take with them to the next world. "Celestials" can do anything. He has solid “incentives”: he killed for the first time, had not sued before, was not involved, well, got a hundred fines, so this is not a criminal offense ... And here is such a talent! Pleases the audience with very funny poems about Putin. This is so "cool"! A group of other "celestials", and the honored order bearers will write another "open letter" in defense of "Detochkin" and that's it! "Long live the Soviet court" - the most humane in the world.
  7. Cheburgen Offline
    Cheburgen 10 June 2020 06: 33
    -3
    • 0
    • 3
    For the killing under the fly
    At home
    What is forbidden to man
    That can scum.
    1. nov_tech.vrn Offline
      nov_tech.vrn (Michael) 10 June 2020 07: 16
      +3
      • 5
      • 2
      The liberal public already expresses condolences to the Efremov family - they say, a sick person, an unhappy alcoholic. And for me, since I got drunk behind the wheel, it’s already a premeditated murder, and alcohol, as an aggravating basis.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. begemot20091 Offline
    begemot20091 (begemot20091) 10 June 2020 09: 39
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    Quote: King3214
    Here Efremov gets up and says - I am “homosexual”.
    And then "national" and "deserved", half-bent, will run to Putin with a request to "have mercy on Misha." Remember how they ran along Serebryakov?
    Moral freaks!

    Well, then they will definitely start to otmazyvat this "star". The only question is - why is it "popular"? I have seen one or two decent films over the last 20-30 years. But this vile physics was not lit up in them. I don’t think that this is a decent actor (my opinion). Well, his dad - the drunk is the same - but he played at least a few decent roles. But I would never put him on a par with Leonov, Yankovsky, Y. Solomin. Here it is, a patrimonial heritage. Truly: "An apple from an apple tree ...."
  10. jekasimf Offline
    jekasimf (jekasimf) 10 June 2020 10: 13
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Ahem. Found the main summary ....
  11. Tramp1812 Offline
    Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 10 June 2020 12: 49
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    What happened is an unintentional crime with grave consequences. It belongs to the category of especially serious crimes. The state of intoxication during the commission of a crime, including through negligence, may be considered by the court as an aggravating circumstance. Well, and, of course, taking into account the identity of the driver who committed the accident - the deed received a public outcry. About the "smear." The task of the investigation is to establish objective truth in the case. Judging by the information, Efremov drove into the oncoming lane and made a collision with the vehicle. By his actions, he violated traffic rules. But this is not enough for a guilty verdict. You need to install:

    1. The technical condition of the car, which was driven by Efremov;
    2. The state of health of Efremov at the time of the accident;
    3. whether there were valid reasons why Efremov went into the oncoming lane;
    4. whether he could avoid a collision (speed, visibility);
    5. Could the victim have avoided a collision? In this case, it is necessary to establish along the braking distance, scree of fragments speed, the place of collision;
    6. whether there was a violation of traffic rules in the actions of the victim;
    7. Considering that the crime was committed through negligence, a lot depends on the position of Efremov and the victims, including the issue of compensation.

    The rest is all "noble emotions" and not a legal approach to the issue.
    1. nov_tech.vrn Offline
      nov_tech.vrn (Michael) 10 June 2020 13: 35
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      The state of health has been examined, the presence of alcohol is much higher than the permissible norm, in addition, cannabis and cocaine. There are objective video recording materials at the time of detention. The technical condition of the vehicle is the responsibility of its owner.
      1. Tramp1812 Offline
        Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 10 June 2020 13: 59
        -1
        • 0
        • 1
        Yes, he answers. But then this is another qualification of the deed. In addition, the issue of sudden failure, for example the brake system, will be checked. The fact that Efremov was drunk can be recognized by the court as an aggravating circumstance. No more. The main one is a violation of traffic rules due to criminal negligence, or criminal arrogance. Suppose ten, or even 1000 times, the car that Efremov drove was in good condition. All the same, this question of the investigation must be verified by appointing a technical examination. You suggest, taking into account the fact that Efremov was in a state of alcohol and drug intoxication, stop researching the circumstances of what happened. Limit the available video recording. And what can it be used to determine the speed of a car, or its serviceability? This is not a legal approach, but a street one. In addition, the spouse of the victim is already refusing a settlement and compensation. Today refuses, and tomorrow does not refuse. This is an extremely serious question in cases of reckless crimes, especially road accidents. Serving his sentence in prison, Efremov does nothing to help an orphaned family. So even though the widow is some and considerable, judging by the reaction of Efremov, he will receive compensation. The term of imprisonment of 12 years is not real. There is judicial practice in this category of cases. But taking into account the resonance, about 8-10 years is quite. Provided, of course, if all the evidence of guilt is collected. Note that so far, Efremov has not been charged. Not because they от otmazyvayutsya ’is not the case, but because there is no expert opinion yet. And not only technical, but also a number of others. They are also obliged to do a comprehensive one.
        1. nov_tech.vrn Offline
          nov_tech.vrn (Michael) 10 June 2020 17: 37
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          Stop blabbering the question, the confirmed facts - this is the iron culprit of the accident with a fatal outcome, the rest of the flood is already from the area, so to speak, of law enforcement. The fact itself - the body is driving with 2 ppm in the blood, this is already a criminal.
          1. A.Lex Offline
            A.Lex (Secret information) 11 June 2020 16: 16
            0
            • 0
            • 0
            ... all the more so since the case became "resonant" ...
    2. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 11 June 2020 16: 11
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      .. given that the crime was committed through negligence

      Negligence, say? Well then, watch the video of an accident. You will see negligence there, and the “state of health”, and the state of the vehicle (it went in a straight line with a set of speeds - like an airplane taking off), and the braking distance (or rather, its complete absence - along the side lights (where you, hopefully, know the brake lights) it is clear that you did not press the brake pedal).
      Compensation issue, say? So tell me - what compensation, Rogue 1812, would you want if your loved one died (God forbid, of course, BUT ...)
      1. Tramp1812 Offline
        Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 11 June 2020 21: 42
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        Quote: A.Lex
        .. given that the crime was committed through negligence

        Negligence, say? Well, then watch the video of an accident. You will see negligence there, and the “state of health”, and the state of the vehicle (it went in a straight line with a set of speeds - like a plane takes off), and the braking distance (or rather, its complete absence - along the side lights (where you, hopefully, know the brake lights) it is clear that you did not press the brake pedal).
        Compensation issue, say? So tell me - what compensation, Rogue 1812, would you want if your loved one died (God forbid, of course, BUT ...)

        I’m not saying this, it is the norm of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, according to which charges will be brought. And at least 1000 times, or even more, demand that Efremov be tried and convicted of intentional murder, this will never happen. Since the norm of a special part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, according to which his actions are qualified, is a criminal offense committed by negligence. There will be no other, in spite of all your righteous anger. There will be no material compensation, Efremov will serve time and the family of the deceased will not receive anything at all. Rather, in a civil lawsuit they can draw any amount in court. But he will pay 20% of his earnings in places of punishment. And even then, after all the deductions for its maintenance there are legal costs, which will go into the pocket of the state. True, nothing will go into the state’s pocket either, because earnings in places of deprivation of liberty are symbolic. Think for yourself that, in addition to the emotions that overwhelm you, there is content in your post. Well and legal illiteracy, of course. Nothing at all. Everything that I wrote, the investigation is obliged to fulfill, otherwise the subject of proof will not be disclosed. I tell you this as a person who has been engaged in proving during the investigation all his life. But you still won’t understand anything. Because you are not aware that evidence of guilt or innocence is concrete facts obtained from sources established by law, in the manner prescribed by law, by an authorized person and having a procedural medium. And each of the five signs of evidence is regulated by the mass of articles in the section "evidence and proof". There will be at least one sign, evidence is recognized in court as unacceptable. And expelled. And you are spraying saliva and doing demagogy. As befits a layman who knows nothing even in the basics of the theory of reflection, which is the basis for the implementation of the tasks of the investigation. I recall the literary dialogue of Pontius Pilate with Yeshua, described by the genius Bulgakov: "Do you, tramp, know what truth is?" It’s just right for me to ask you a question about what absolute truth is, whether it is attainable, relative truth, depth of proof, objective truth .... And I will get an answer to all questions that Efremov is an alcoholic and drug addict, everything is clear, everything is on the video. In general, this is a deliberate murder, he is a major, let's quarter it. All over the world. Or something like that. Regarding my modest person. I’ve never driven a drink in my life, but even the next day after a drink I don’t sit down. And when I sit down, I’ll pre-breath in the breathalyzer. I drive 25 years and not a single accident. True, fined, and more than once, for improper parking. But neither I, no one else on the track is guaranteed from an accident. The only thing you can agree with is that a person who is driving while intoxicated does not correctly assess the traffic situation, distance, interval, he has a slow reaction. Therefore, it is provided as an aggravating circumstance that an accident occurs in a state of drug or alcohol intoxication. There is also liability for driving while intoxicated. But this does not affect the duty of the investigation to objectively, fully and comprehensively investigate all the circumstances of the incident and collect evidence of guilt. I repeat, everything that I said will be carried out by the investigation to the last letter. There is a typical set of investigative actions that are conducted on a particular category of crimes. And what you write is the flair and incitement to the most base instincts. No one will otmazyvat Efremov will not. He will receive his eight to ten years. Something would even benefit him. Since, according to a court decision, he will be subjected to compulsory treatment while serving a sentence of imprisonment. But everything should not be within the framework of salivation, as you have, but the rule of law. So that the punishment is legal, and proven guilt. But not like you and others like you. Is that at least clear? Although unlikely.
        1. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 12 June 2020 12: 46
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          ... what the law says is one thing. But here we are discussing not the law and our attitude to it, but the CAM act, the crime itself and the reaction to it. Everyone who is supposed to deal with this crime - let them do it. On the same pages, pointing to the obligatory execution of certain actions on the part of the suspect by the law enforcement agencies, you want AND WE to be impartial to this livestock that has lost all human appearance and has also lost all shores in its behavior. But we are ordinary people, and therefore ... go to the corresponding websites of jurists and prove your case there, and here we are, somehow, - in the old fashion we will condemn our human attitude to the bastard who committed the crime.
  12. Cheburgen Offline
    Cheburgen 10 June 2020 13: 12
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    Quote: Rogue1812
    The rest is all "noble emotions" and not a legal approach to the issue.

    If a thief should be in prison, then the KILLER - even more so. He strove for this for a long time and stubbornly; his fines for violating traffic rules will not fit into a 20-ton container.
    1. Tramp1812 Offline
      Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 10 June 2020 13: 25
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      And why then the Code of Criminal Procedure with its requirements, the investigation, the court ... Take and without checking any of the questions raised by me, but "swell" 12 years. To the maximum. Or, even better: return the days of Stalin and shoot without trial. Go so far. And one moment. Everything that I have sketched out as questions requiring verification will still be verified. This is not a whim - it is a requirement for proof and evidence. Do not check - the verdict is not decided. And if it is confirmed that the car driven by Efremov was in a technically malfunctioning state, or if there were good reasons why Efremov went into the oncoming traffic lane, then the case would also be stopped for lack of corpus delicti. A thief, of course, should be in prison, but not after they drop a wallet (as the movie hero did, apparently you are pretty), or drugs, like a journalist, but after he committed a crime and evidence of its commission. By the way, according to the film: your hero hid the professor behind bars, not at all in the case. So I repeat, as a pro, by the way. The rest, the court of the street and "noble emotions."
  13. Tramp1812 Offline
    Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 10 June 2020 20: 59
    -2
    • 1
    • 3
    Quote: nov_tech.vrn
    Stop blabbering the question, confirmed facts - this is the iron culprit of the accident with a fatal outcome, the rest of the flood is already from the area, so to speak, law enforcement, the fact itself - the body is driving with 2 ppm in the blood, this is already a criminal.

    But what about the subject of proof, the presumption of innocence, the tasks of the investigation, the principles of the process, the rights of the parties? What you write is the emotions of a legally illiterate person, pretty implicated in demagogy, Cap. The questions specifically designated by me are subject to obligatory proof, you call "zabaltivanie". Nevertheless, everything that I posted will be verified by the investigation. Moreover, in much larger volumes than those that I indicated. Because the investigation, being the subject of evidence, is obliged to establish all four signs of the crime, without which there is no subject of proof. And without it - the decision of the conviction. What you offer is not the application of law, but the escalation of passions and the Lynch court. So you write that Efremov committed the “deliberate murder”. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not know such a concept. There is a premeditated murder, with extenuating circumstances, qualifying circumstances, reckless murder. Here is a violation of the rules of DD and there is a reckless murder. But it still needs to be proved. If you translate your proposals into legal terminology, they are called "objective imputation." There is a corpse - there is a causal link between death and the actions of Efremov - enough. But you are not living in Kampuchea since Pol Pot. Proving is a science, a whole section is devoted to it in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. And you are so famously. .... "Slow motion," say, well, well.