Impact site: Egypt is given a base near the Ethiopian dam

3 2020 June 31

The authorities of South Sudan provided Egypt with the opportunity to build a military base on its territory, near the construction of the Ethiopian Renaissance dam. It is reported by the Arab edition of Arabic Defense.

The South Sudanese government approved Egypt’s request for a military base in Pagak, a former opposition stronghold located in the Maywoot region of Upper Nile State. The base contingent will include hundreds of Egyptian soldiers, which, apparently, is the Egyptians' clear readiness for all the surprises associated with the construction of a huge dam by Ethiopia. The military facility of the Egyptian army may become the site of a possible strike on the adjacent territory.

An official from South Sudan said on condition of anonymity:

The Government of the Republic of South Sudan and the People’s Defense Forces agreed to allot land to our Egyptian brothers, who asked for a piece of land in eastern South Sudan to deploy their military forces there.

The source added that Egypt remains the only country in Africa that has supported South Sudan since it gained independence. Egyptian authorities continue to assist Sudanese.

Egypt initially opposed the construction of a dam by Ethiopia. The project to launch a dam on the Blue Nile has been implemented since 2012. According to some experts, the functioning of the dam can lead to water shortages in Egypt and South Sudan, which are located downstream of the river. Interested countries held several dozen meetings to resolve the problem, but a visible result has not yet been achieved.

31 comment

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Dear sofa expert.

+1

3 June 2020 13: 14

It will be interesting to see the reaction of the world community to the destruction of this dam.
gorenina91

-2

3 June 2020 15: 21

Impact site: Egypt is given a base near the Ethiopian dam

- And where is looking ... Israel ??? - To give such a trump card into the hands of Egypt ... - After all, Egypt can easily become a "blackmailer" ... - The ability "on occasion" to easily destroy this dam ... - And why is it for ... - Egypt is so far away from their lands are suddenly allowed to create a military base ... on foreign territory ???
- Or Israel wants to make Egypt its "tool" and influence everyone in the region ... - and the hated Saudis, including ...
1. Natan bruk
  
  -2
  
  3 June 2020 19: 29
  
  Which side is Israel here? :)))) Is it to him that up to the Egyptian-Ethiopian Turks in Africa thousands of kilometers from him? By the way, for broadening the horizons - Israel and Egypt have peace, and more than 40 years - diplomatic relations, trade, tourism. Yes, and what does the Saudis have to do with Ethiopians?
  1. gorenina91
    
    -2
    
    3 June 2020 20: 04
    
    Which side is Israel here? :)))) Is it to him that up to the Egyptian-Ethiopian Turks in Africa thousands of kilometers from him? By the way, to broaden horizons - Israel and Egypt have peace, more than 40 years
    
    - What do you mean ??? - And with Syria, Israel has ... - war ??? - That's why Israel is constantly hammering in Syria ... with missiles ... - Or is it such a world "in Israeli style" ???
    - Don’t tell my slippers ...
    1. Natan bruk
      
      -2
      
      3 June 2020 20: 09
      
      Oh Lord, you would not even be dishonored by ignorance of such things - Israel has been at war with Syria since 1948.
      1. gorenina91
        
        -2
        
        3 June 2020 20: 50
        
        Oh Lord, you would not even be dishonored by ignorance of such things - Israel has been at war with Syria since 1948.
        
        - Oh, what a shame ... - Oh, how can I survive all this ... -Hahah ...
        - Ha, but just recently it was I who mentioned the return of the Dutch Heights ... to Syria ... - and "someone" suddenly "authoritatively" said something there ...
        - Meanwhile ...
        
        In 1981, the Israeli parliament passed the Golan Heights Act, which unilaterally proclaimed the sovereignty of the Jewish state over this territory. The act has not received international recognition.
        
        - So, Israel is an aggressor, which by force has seized and by force holds foreign territory ...
        - And I’m here ...- I’m such a fair-haired shame here ... and I’ll explain something to you ...
        - This is the "moment of truth" ... - When necessary - Israel can use the term war ..; and when some justification is needed for the adoption of the "Law on the Golan Heights" in order to proclaim the sovereignty of the Jewish state over this territory ... - then the "peaceful settlement and delimitation of borders" may well be useful ...
        - In short ... - when he wanted to bomb ... - then we are in a state of war ... - "a weighty excuse" ... - And when he seized someone else's territory and lives there, then ... - "so after all we are a state that has established boundaries and does not attack anyone "... - And we will only fight when we are attacked ... - Just wonderful ... - Everything is logical" ... like ... like in a Jewish joke. ..
        
        Natan bruk
        
        -1
        
        3 June 2020 21: 55
        
        Well, if ignorance does not bother you, then health. As for the Golan Heights (by the way, in the Netherlands there are no heights, there are only lowlands), you would first contact the UN about your sovereignty in Crimea, because no one recognized it, and you do not need a referendum - it is also recognized by the UN as illegal). And about the Golan - out in 1941 Germany attacked the USSR, in the end it paid with territory (Königsberg), Syria attacked Israel - the same thing. What's wrong? The aggressor must pay for aggression. And the fact that the UN did not recognize the Golan as Israeli, just as Crimea is not recognized as Russian. Is this a tragedy for you? Not for us either.
        
        Natan bruk
        
        -1
        
        3 June 2020 21: 59
        
        Yes, and with regard to Syria, this is not a “use of the term,” namely, the war as it is, because after the next defeat of the Syrian aggressors in 1973, Syria refused to sign anything other than the act on the separation of troops, and insisted that the text it was pointed out that this act was not a truce. Well, we need something like that, so be it. The main thing is that the aggressor got his teeth and paid for the aggression with the territory.
        
        gorenina91
        
        -1
        
        4 June 2020 04: 02
        
        Well, if ignorance does not bother you, then health. As for the Golan Heights (by the way, in the Netherlands there are no heights, there are only lowlands)
        
        Well??? - So what ??? Did I say something about the name ??? Or, personally, I began to assert that the Syrian territory occupied by Israel ... is called the Dutch Heights, i.e. - this is personally I came up with the name "Dutch Heights" (which in real life are "lowlands") ??? - To me, what are the claims ... - that I can easily give a name to a geographical place ???
        - So ... what kind of "ignorant" I am then, since I can do this ...
        - Or "ignorance" ... is a necessary attribute in order to perpetuate the geographical name of the area .. ??? -Hahah ... - Are you telling anecdotes or something ???
        
        You should first contact the UN about your sovereignty in Crimea. And the fact that the UN did not recognize the Golan as Israeli, just as Crimea is not recognized as Russian.
        
        - And why would all of a sudden in peacetime the inhabitants of Crimea just like that, almost unanimously decide to return to Russia ???
        - A referendum was held in Crimea; and there was no war there ...- On the contrary ...- it was in turmoil in Kiev itself ..; which actually prompted the residents of Crimea to vote for the return to Russia ...
        - Why are you casting a shadow on the wattle ???
        - Yes, personally, I warn you ... - is that here you are "so freely" so many times addressing me ???
        
        "at least they were not disgraced".; .. "ignorance does not bother you"
        
        - What are you doing ??? Personally, I expect an apology from you personally ... - There are no "Dutch Heights" here ... - What kind of ignorant aggression ??? Where are you???
        
        Natan bruk
        
        -1
        
        4 June 2020 07: 35
        
        As the saying goes, "confusion instead of music" :))) About "Gollandskie heights" - read your previous post, you wrote that way. As for the "referendum" already wrote - the UN recognized it as illegal. Why's that?
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        commbatant
        
        0
        
        4 June 2020 19: 30
        
        Quote: Natan Bruk
        you should first contact the UN about your sovereignty in Crimea, because no one recognized it, yes, and you don’t need a referendum - it is also recognized by the UN as illegal). And about the Golan
        
        Listen, "smart guy", I already wrote here to your fellow countrymen, Israeli Jews (once happily Soviet and betrayed him) that, unlike Crimea, there is a UN Security Council resolution on the Golan (mandatory for all UN member states unlike resolutions not of the Security Council) ... and the RF will not apply to any UN about its sovereignty over Crimea. However, your fellow countrymen can try to challenge it (sovereignty), only then they will burn out completely ... this time ...
        
        Natan bruk
        
        -1
        
        5 June 2020 07: 43
        
        You, apparently, consider yourself a big "wise guy" :))) What you wrote to them is of little interest to me. As for the “Security Council resolution”, it’s the “wise guy” who doesn’t understand that only the veto saves Russia from such a resolution, but the fact is that the UN condemned Russia for the annexation and therefore imposed sanctions (Israel, by the way, did not join them), and for the UN Russia is the same occupier. Do you give a damn? U.S. too. It made fun, of course, about “betrayal” :))) For some reason, people around the world are completely calm about people who have left one country for another, but they are considered “traitors” only in dictatorial and autocratic regimes. Wake up, my dear, the USSR will soon be gone for 30 years. Anyway, many of you shouted here - “Suitcase, train station, Israel”, you should be glad, why now insult and consider traitors? But we don’t need to challenge your “sovereignty” either, do we know your Crimea? Well, about the “burn” - at one time, the “great-mighty”, together with his Arab friends, already tried. Tell me how it ended or take an interest in it? It’s better to look after yourself so that you don’t burn out in the war with the USA.
        
        commbatant
        
        +2
        
        5 June 2020 10: 04
        
        Quote: Natan Bruk
        As for the “Security Council resolution”, it’s the “wise guy” who doesn’t understand that only the veto saves Russia from such a resolution
        
        Does it annoy you? The fact is, my young "friend", that if the Jews were saving my compatriots from concentration camps, then Israel would also be among the countries of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, but since Jews in their entire history have not saved a single nation, but rather the opposite, then they will not be in this top five ...
        
        the fact is that the UN condemned Russia for the annexation and therefore imposed sanctions (Israel, by the way, did not join them), and Russia is the same occupier for the UN. Do you give a damn?
        
        Can you throw off the link to some resolution of the UN or the international court confirming the Occupation of the Crimea of the Russian Federation, and accordingly the Russian occupier?
        
        It made fun, of course, about “betrayal” :))) For some reason, people around the world are completely calm about people who have left one country for another, but they are considered “traitors” only in dictatorial and autocratic regimes.
        
        Well, yes, until recently the Komsomol badge was worn, and here they sharply became victims of the totalitarian regime, especially during the Gorbachev glasnost, pluralism and the beginning of the collapse of the USSR economy ...
        
        The USSR will soon be 30 years old
        
        What are you telling me here ....
        
        On December 6, 2012, the US Senate approved a bill to repeal the Jackson-Vanik restrictive trade amendment.
        
        https://ria.ru/20141206/1036427607.html
        
        those. after 20 years after the collapse of the USSR ...
        
        And we don’t need to challenge your “sovereignty”
        
        That's right, it's more expensive for yourself ...
        
        Do you know your Crimea to us?
        
        The fact that the Israeli-Jews never need someone else's, tell the working people of Palestine and the SAR ...
        
        at one time "great-mighty"
        
        Thanks to him, Israel was created, and also won its first Arab-Israeli war ...
        
        It’s better to look after yourself so that you don’t burn out in the war with the USA.
        
        We have equal opportunities with the United States, in this regard, do not worry ... we are the only ones who are able to destroy your Master ...
        
        Natan bruk
        
        -3
        
        5 June 2020 19: 55
        
        My young friend, maybe you have a master, and I even know who he is, but we do not have a master and never had one. So, do not worry, the United States is the only one who can destroy your masters - the bald king and his oligarchic clique. To reduce your ignorance - in 1967, the United States helped Israel a little less than nothing. At the same time, he defeated several united regular Arab armies, many times superior to the Israeli and fully supported by the Union. Yes, you are not the only one repeating the same nonsense about the fact that Israel was created thanks to the USSR, and even more nonsense that thanks to him Israel won its first war. In this war, the only thing that Stalin did was to allow Czechoslovakia to sell the captured Soviet weapons to Israel. Everything on that. As for the "creation" - the first Zionists created Israel, and the soldiers of ECL, HAGAN and LEHI drove the British. By the time of its proclamation, Israel already existed de facto. Recognition was, of course, important, but it would have existed without it, as there are many unrecognized territories. But the “working people” of the SAR and Palestine are who and what relation do they have to Israel? Maybe they work instead of Jews in Israel? So I still don’t understand - why the hell are we to challenge your sovereignty over Crimea? Well, in fact, why do we need it and what do we have to do with it? The maximum, it can be mentioned to those who speak about the "occupation of the Golan". From the point of view of the UN, you have occupied Crimea, so those who yell about the Golan should shut up. Yes, I asked to throw off the UN resolution - on, hold - A / RES / 68/262. This is a resolution of the UN General Assembly. Oh, by the way, my young, near-minded friend - the Red Army saved the Jews from concentration camps, in which Jews served just like the rest of the USSR nationalities. They were called in exactly the same way as the others, and they fought no worse. Take an interest in the number of Jews - Heroes of the Soviet Union - you will have a break in the template.
        
        commbatant
        
        +1
        
        6 June 2020 07: 55
        
        My young friend, maybe you have a boss, and I even know who he is
        
        Unfortunately, he is no longer young and rather your enemy ... So who is my "master", can you find out in old age? Very interesting.
        
        but we don’t have a master and never had
        
        What do you have - a split personality, what are you saying in a plural face?
        
        The USA is the only ones capable of destroying your masters - the bald king and his oligarchic clique.
        
        I don’t have a master, if by the Tsar and the oligarchs you mean the Russian Federation, then, as I wrote above,
        
        We have equal opportunities with the United States, in this regard, do not worry ...
        
        To reduce your ignorance - in 1967, the United States helped Israel a little less than nothing. At the same time, he defeated several united regular Arab armies, many times superior to the Israeli and fully supported by the Union.
        
        First of all, an ignoramus is you ...
        Secondly, Israel started the "six-day" war, from which the Arabs have such losses ...
        Thirdly, the United States was really afraid of the wrath of the Arabs (since Western countries conducted oil production in these countries), therefore they limited themselves to financial assistance to Israel ...
        
        US provides $ 1,6 billion worth of military assistance to Israeland Germany, under the guise of assistance to victims of the fascist genocide - 3,45 billion marks.
        
        https://voenhronika.ru
        
        Yes, you are not the only one repeating the same nonsense about the fact that Israel was created thanks to the USSR, and even more nonsense that thanks to him Israel won its first war. In this war, the only thing that Stalin did was to allow Czechoslovakia to sell the captured Soviet weapons to Israel.
        
        Of course, I understand the eternal "good memory of all the good" of Israeli Jews, but you need to have some kind of dignity, do not dishonor your old people with lies about those events ...
        Czechoslovakia was used, not as a source of its production (in 1947, the military-industrial complex of this country was in ruins) (or trophy weapons), but as a transshipment point for the delivery of Soviet weapons and volunteers (front-line soldiers and former underground soldiers, partisans, but also active servicemen in the t. including officers and not only of Jewish nationality) from all countries of the socialist camp ...
        Read the English military historian L. Garth. In his book "Strategy of Indirect Actions" he describes well the first Arab-Israeli war, its results and to whom Israel should be grateful for the victory in that war. Many elderly people in Israel still have a portrait of Stalin on their walls ...
        
        As for the "creation" - the first Zionists created Israel, and the soldiers of ECL, HAGAN and LEHI drove the British. By the time of its proclamation, Israel already existed de facto.
        
        That's right, the British liked to set Arabs against Jews ...
        
        Jewish armed irregular formations often used methods of terror and sabotage against the British troops, which later left their mark on the methods of warfare in the modern IDF special forces.
        
        L. Garth. "Strategy for indirect actions"
        
        commbatant
        
        0
        
        6 June 2020 08: 24
        
        Natan Bruk (Natan Bruk) And the “working people” of the SAR and Palestine - who is this and what relation do they have to Israel?
        
        This is a people who work in their countries and on which IDF bombs are constantly falling ....
        
        Maybe they work instead of Jews in Israel?
        
        Many Arabs born in Israel live in Israel and are citizens of Israel (didn’t they know?), Hardworking Arabs come to Israel to work in Israel from neighboring countries ... They would (Arabs) happily work in their homeland, but the bombs of the Zionist state constantly fall on their heads ...
        
        Yes, I asked to throw off the UN resolution - on, hold - A / RES / 68/262. This is a resolution of the UN General Assembly.
        
        Yes you are a stubborn guy, I see ...
        I explained to you how the resolution of the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly differs., one has the mandatory nature of its implementation, and the other recommendatory ...
        Israel, for example, does not comply with the resolution binding on all countries ... which concerns, among other things, Golan Heights ...
        
        СOn November 22, 1967, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution providing for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories occupied during the Six Day War. However, it is known that it was not executed by the Israeli side.
        
        https://topwar.ru/117273-shest-dney-pobedy-i-porazheniya-kak-izrail-razgromil-arabskuyu-koaliciyu.html
        
        So, give back the Golan and water sources next to them (the main value of these territories) to the good hardworking people of the SAR and thank you ...
        
        Take an interest in the number of Jews - Heroes of the Soviet Union - you will have a break in the template.
        
        For participation in the Second World War:
        107 Jewish people, slightly more than Kazakhs (96) .... so what? No breakup happened ...
        
        Heroes of the Soviet Union of different nationalities
        
        https://topwar.ru/4553-geroi-sovetskogo-soyuza-chechency-i-tatary.html
        
        No one disputes the contribution of Soviet Jews to the defeat of the Nazis, and I am forever grateful and obliged to them (Soviet Jews) in the defeat of the Wehrmacht and their allies on the fronts of the Second World War, in the war against Japan and the restoration of the national economy of the USSR after the Second World War ....
        Just why are you suddenly talking about Soviet Jews, you have nothing to do with them ....
        I respect the Soviet and Russian Jews who make their work and knowledge of the Russian Federation more beautiful and stronger ...
        For me, all Jews are divided into two categories - Soviet / Russian and any other ... here you are, who threw his country into hard times, belong to the third category - a Jew who betrayed including other Soviet Jews .... accordingly, for me you are just a shadow ....
Alexzn

0

4 June 2020 11: 39

If Israel is included in the problem, then it is worth finding out which side it is on. Today Israel has a very good relationship with Egypt (more precisely, with the Egyptian leadership). There is nothing special for us to share, but there is a coincidence of interests in the fight against Muslim brothers (primarily supported by Turkey), with Islamists from Gaza (supported by Turkey and Iran). Coincidence of position on the Mediterranean shelf (against Turkey). A similar position in Libya, close in Syria.
But in the conflict of Ethiopia with Egypt and Sudan, Israel has a difficult situation. Ethiopia is our partner on many issues, including on the supply of weapons. Ethiopia is counting on our weapons, Egypt is counting on Israeli non-interference in the emerging conflict. It is difficult to say what threatens the triangle. Better if they find a compromise.
1. gorenina91
  
  -3
  
  4 June 2020 14: 35
  
  If Israel is included in the problem, then it’s worth finding out which side it is on.
  
  - Yes, I personally mentioned Israel because of the fact that its interests will be quite heavily affected ...
  - But the main thing is not even this ...- not this I wanted to remind ... - And the main thing is that Israel today is far from being as cool as it is trying to position itself ...
  - There is only one reason ... - the USA has problems and Israel begins to deflate automatically ... - And now, when the creation of an Egyptian base is planned next to the Ethiopian dam, it becomes real that sooner or later the situation may worsen ...
  
  Ethiopia is counting on our weapons, Egypt is counting on Israeli non-interference in the emerging conflict. It is difficult to say what threatens the triangle. Better if they find a compromise.
  
  - So why a priori provoke this conflict; then to try to avoid it ...- and then try to find a compromise ??? - Is it some kind of politically masochism ...
Alexzn

-2

4 June 2020 22: 00

Quote: gorenina91
If Israel is included in the problem, then it’s worth finding out which side it is on.

- Yes, I personally mentioned Israel because of the fact that its interests will be quite heavily affected ...
- But the main thing is not even this ...- not this I wanted to remind ... - And the main thing is that Israel today is far from being as cool as it is trying to position itself ...
- There is only one reason ... - the USA has problems and Israel begins to deflate automatically ... - And now, when the creation of an Egyptian base is planned next to the Ethiopian dam, it becomes real that sooner or later the situation may worsen ...

Ethiopia is counting on our weapons, Egypt is counting on Israeli non-interference in the emerging conflict. It is difficult to say what threatens the triangle. Better if they find a compromise.

- So why a priori provoke this conflict; to then try to avoid it ...- and
then try to find a compromise ??? - This is some kind of politically masochism ...

First, Israel does not provoke conflict. Israel’s position to compromise.
Secondly, it (the position) is very similar to the Russian one.
Thirdly, if you do not like Israel, it’s your right, but why distort and invent facts?
Who is blown away, who is cool, is worth arguing at the level of logic, and not outside of it. Israel will find its niche in the changing world, which it is doing well.
1. gorenina91
  
  -1
  
  5 June 2020 04: 11
  
  First, Israel does not provoke conflict. Israel’s position to compromise.
  Secondly, it (the position) is very similar to the Russian one.
  Thirdly, if you do not like Israel, it’s your right, but why distort and invent facts?
  
  - Inventing facts ??? Yes, you want - personally, I will announce this "fictional" ... - Please ... - I just had time ... Well, what is there to "invent" ??? Here it is ... "made up":
  - Today, such a situation has created for Israel that ... that ... that perhaps Israel very regrets that the Russian presence in the Middle. The east is too weak ... - There are no powerful Russian bases; no Russian fortified area; there is no powerful large Russian contingent ... - there is none of this ...
  - And who, then, will defend Israel; when suddenly, like a catastrophe near Norilsk; where the supports that propped up whole giant tanks with oil products suddenly sank ... - the "unexpected" will happen ...
  - Well, the version is that there the cause of what happened was warming in permafrost conditions, this set in motion the supports under the fuel tanks. - Well, this is true or not; but an environmental disaster happened ... - it's a fact ...
  - In the same way, "American pillars" can "sink" under Israel itself (they have already begun to sink) ... - and ... and ... and Israel will find itself alone on the "Moro Island" (HG Wells) ... - probably read in childhood ... - Where all kinds of animal life lives, converted (as a result of vivisection) into humans ... - And what a catastrophe it all ends there ... - Hahah ...
  - And who will protect Israel ...- USA .., Egypt ...... - Well, the USA will not climb up to fight for Israel themselves, but Egypt ...- this is ridiculous ...
  - Ah ... - Israel will protect itself ... - well, well ... - But the times are not the same as they were before ... - And your Netanyahu would not visit Russia so often ... - What can I say, if the mighty Israel for decades has not been able to slam Al-Qaeda ... -Well, bombs, strikes ... -but what's the point ...- as she was ...- it is. ..- And then everything around for Israel will become Al-Qaeda ... -Then the tales about the "Iron Dome" will turn into oriental tales of Scheherazade ...
  - Well, who will save Israel ??? - Yes ... Russia is ... - as always ... - The WWII situation will just repeat ... - Well, there was Hitler ... - And here there will already be a "conglomerate": Turks, Iranians, Iraqis, Saudis , Africans, and the same "friendly Egyptians", etc. ... and quite well armed ... - And getting good weapons today is not a problem ... - just pay ... - The same China will easily arm all this community .., which has money in bulk ... - And China does not need Israel either ... - China itself wants to become "Israel" on Dal. East ...
  - Here ... only Russia can again really come out on the side of Israel ...
  - For this, a powerful Russian fortified region would be useful in Syria ...
  - Of course ...- I write very schematically ...- there is simply no way to paint the nuances; but thesis is all stated ...
  1. Alexzn
    
    -4
    
    5 June 2020 11: 10
    
    Arkharov was right; there is no cure for aspirin alone.
Alexzn

-3

4 June 2020 22: 13

Quote: commbatant
on the Golan there is a UN Security Council resolution (binding on all countries included in the UN, unlike non-Security Council resolutions)

The recognition by states (as a permanent member of the UN Security Council) of the annexation of the Golan will automatically disavow UN Security Council resolution 497. In fact, today the annexation of Crimea is legally little different from the annexation of the Golan, except that the Russian Federation is a great power.
PS Nonsense about burning this time is EXTREMELY inappropriate.
1. commbatant
  
  +1
  
  6 June 2020 08: 38
  
  Quote: AlexZN
  In fact, today the annexation of Crimea is legally little different from the annexation of the Golan
  
  Not at all. There are significant differences. The resolution on the Crimea (where there is no word about occupation) was adopted by the UN General Assembly and has a recommendatory character from the legal point of view (international law), but the UN Security Council Resolution (adopted including on de-occupation by the Zionist state of the Golan Heights) is mandatory .... until now, it has not been executed by Israeli Jews ...
  1. Alexzn
    
    -2
    
    6 June 2020 17: 28
    
    Once again, the US recognition of annexation disavows resolution 497. The states vetoed ... Therefore, in December 2019, a resolution of the General Assembly was adopted (in fact, instead of the UN Security Council resolution), similar to the resolution on the Crimea, with about the same score when voting.
    1. commbatant
      
      +1
      
      7 June 2020 22: 21
      
      Quote: AlexZN
      Once again, US recognition of the annexation disavows resolution 497. The United States vetoed ...
      
      Again, write nonsense. The UN Security Council resolution cannot be approved by one or several states, either all for (abstained) or all against (abstained) ...
      
      Therefore, in December 2019, a resolution of the General Assembly was adopted (in fact, instead of the UN Security Council resolution), similar to the resolution on the Crimea, with about the same score when voting.
      
      UN civil defense cannot be stronger from a legal point of view of a UN Security Council resolution, respectively, your
      
      US recognition of annexation
      
      not worth a stale cracker ...
Alexzn

-2

4 June 2020 22: 19

Quote: gorenina91
So why a priori provoke this conflict; then to try to avoid it ...

I would very much like to know WHEN and HOW Israel provoked the conflict.
1. gorenina91
  
  -2
  
  5 June 2020 05: 16
  
  I would very much like to know WHEN and HOW Israel provoked the conflict.
  
  - And not only the conflict ... - But the whole bloody catastrophe ...
  - Who framed our Il-20 on September 18, 2018, 16:35 ???
  
  The provocative actions of the Israeli Air Force led to the deaths of 15 Russian troops on the Il-20 ...
  
  - This is for all the good and humane that Russia has done for Israel ... - And so ... to do ... - And everything remained for Israel ... unpunished ...
  1. Natan bruk
    
    -1
    
    5 June 2020 07: 47
    
    "Framed" your IL only for shirnarmass, trustingly listening to the snowstorm carried by Konashenkov. Specialists spat on this nonsense. By the way, he did not disdain a direct forgery - he gave out marks of civil aircraft over Cyprus for Israeli fighters.
    1. gorenina91
      
      -2
      
      5 June 2020 08: 15
      
      "Framed" your IL only for shirnarmass, trustingly listening to the snowstorm carried by Konashenkov.
      
      - Personally, I don't know what Konashenkov published there ... - But in real life ... - who would suddenly start firing at the Russian Il-20 for no reason or reason ??? - Do you yourself believe that the Syrians would suddenly begin to specifically shoot at a Russian plane ??? - Well, it is clear that they were simply misled ... - And if Israeli fighters did not fly anywhere and constantly strike at the territory of Syria, then no one would have started shooting ... - It just would not have happened reasons to use air defense ... - Isn't that so ???
      - Not only ... - looking at the Israelis and Turkey, it began to use its UAVs and launch strikes ... - And without that, Turkey would not have dared to launch air strikes on the territory of Syria ... - Did not Israel provoke Turkey in this ?? ?
      - Yes ...- and you will not deny that today Israel is more hopeful that Russia will become more real protection for it than the USA ...
      - Read my "comment" at the top ... - it is stated in more detail ...
Alexzn

-3

5 June 2020 11: 06

Quote: gorenina91
I would very much like to know WHEN and HOW Israel provoked the conflict.

- And not only the conflict ...- but the whole bloody catastrophe ...
- Who framed our Il-20 on September 18, 2018, 16:35 ???

The provocative actions of the Israeli Air Force led to the deaths of 15 Russian troops on the Il-20 ...

- This is for all the good and humane that Russia has done for Israel ... - And so ... to do ... - And everything remained for Israel ... unpunished ...

You, when writing, follow at least minimal logic! If we write about the conflict between Egypt and Sudan, then to give an example of the IL-20 is stupid! Due to the lack of communication between the dam and Silt, and due to the lack of CONFLICT in the very case of the destruction of the Syrian air defense Il-20.
Alexzn

-2

8 June 2020 08: 12

Quote: commbatant
Quote: AlexZN
Once again, US recognition of the annexation disavows resolution 497. The United States vetoed ...

Again, write nonsense. The UN Security Council resolution cannot be approved by one or several states, either all for (abstained) or all against (abstained) ...

Therefore, in December 2019, a resolution of the General Assembly was adopted (in fact, instead of the UN Security Council resolution), similar to the resolution on the Crimea, with about the same score when voting.

UN Civil Defense cannot be stronger from a legal point of view of a UN Security Council resolution, respectively, yours.

US recognition of annexation

not worth a stale cracker ...

Is there logic in what you write?
1. A permanent member of the UN Security Council recognizes the annexation of the Golan and disavows resolution 497, i.e. used the right of veto.
2. Adoption of a UNGA resolution INSTEAD of a disavowed UNSC resolution 497. Why make confusion with the word TOP.
3. US recognition of the annexation is Worth it.