World media on oil deal: New agreement will not help


The world media are actively commenting on reports that Russia, along with other exporting countries, will reduce the production of "black gold", mainly refusing to have an unambiguous assessment of who to record as winners and who as losers.


Only in the article “Russia Loses the Oil War - and the Middle East” does Foreign Policy magazine unequivocally award victory to the Saudis. Other publications are more cautious in their assessments, agreeing that the reduction was a forced and non-alternative step.

Shortly before the announcement of the outcome of the negotiations, many foreign resources were very skeptical about the possibility of consensus.

And even if a deal is reached, oil producers will continue to face an unprecedented global crisis and, as a result, sluggish demand

- wrote on the eve of the popular American weekly Newsweek.

A publication citing Reuters notes that oil demand could fall another 30 percent below even the current historic low.

A similar attitude to the OPEC + agreements was shared on the eve of The New York Times.

Demand for oil collapsed due to the fact that commercial air transportation was frozen, and the movement of vehicles fell sharply due to the fact that about half of the world's population is under one or another quarantine

- noted in the assessment.
Photos used: https://pixabay.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

33 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Observer2014 Offline
    Observer2014 April 11 2020 08: 15
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Demand for oil collapsed due to the fact that commercial air transportation was frozen, and the movement of vehicles fell sharply due to the fact that about half of the world's population is under one or another quarantine

    It is what it is.

    New agreement will not help

    Late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys fell off. Although ... Miracles do happen. yes
  2. Mihail55 Offline
    Mihail55 (Michael) April 11 2020 08: 56
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Why are only small fry punished for predictable errors ???
    Weakly press down glavnyukov ???
  3. Nick Offline
    Nick (Nikolai) April 11 2020 09: 11
    -1
    • 3
    • 4
    Most importantly, the situation created by Putin on the oil market forced him to join the decline in the US and Canada. Well, who hired and forced someone? "Analysts" like Margetsky and others like him can wipe themselves out.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 09: 26
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Damn him, that his hut burned down, the main thing is that the cow died from a neighbor.

      - old proverb.
      1. Nick Offline
        Nick (Nikolai) April 11 2020 09: 30
        -1
        • 3
        • 4
        Quote: Arkharov
        Damn him, that his hut burned down, the main thing is that the cow died from a neighbor.
        - old proverb.

        In our case, your hut did not burn out, as you would like, but it burns out at the neighbors, because it was not possible to steal fire extinguishers from our hut. laughing
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 10: 04
          -1
          • 2
          • 3
          How is the weather on Mars now? Dust storms not getting enough?
      2. Fourth Horseman Offline
        Fourth Horseman (Fourth Horseman) April 11 2020 10: 10
        +1
        • 3
        • 2
        Hut (ukrmova) house, dwelling.
        Clarification: this is a popular Ukrainian proverb.
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 10: 58
          -3
          • 0
          • 3
          And what does that change? Does the saying cease to be correct?
          1. Fourth Horseman Offline
            Fourth Horseman (Fourth Horseman) April 11 2020 11: 35
            +2
            • 3
            • 1
            For Ukraine, nothing changes.
  4. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) April 11 2020 09: 36
    +1
    • 4
    • 3
    Quote: Nick
    Most importantly, the situation created by Putin on the oil market forced him to join the decline in the US and Canada. Well, who bent whom and forced? "Analysts" like Margetsky and others like him can wipe themselves out.

    You don’t understand anything at all. The agreement is an obligation to reduce the production that Russia has undertaken. The United States did not enter into a deal and did not bind itself to any restrictions. They have reduced production due to market conditions, when demand begins to grow, they will increase production because there are no restrictions on them. In Russia they will be and we will not be able to increase it.
    Well, yes you explain it, it's like throwing beads in front of pigs. Useless lesson.
    1. Nick Offline
      Nick (Nikolai) April 11 2020 12: 52
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      You don’t understand anything at all. The agreement is an obligation to reduce the production that Russia has undertaken. The United States did not enter into a deal and did not assume any restrictions.

      Countries that previously did not participate in the deal to reduce OPEC + oil production - Canada, the USA, Norway, Argentina and others - agreed to reduce the total oil recovery by 5 million barrels per day. About this channel "Russia-24", - said the Minister of Energy of Russia Alexander Novak.

      https://e-news.su/mnenie-i-analitika/327600-soglasie-ssha-sokratit-dobychu-nefti-ne-imeet-kriticheskogo-znacheniya-dlya-strany-colonel-cassad.html
      1. 123 Offline
        123 (123) April 12 2020 00: 33
        +2
        • 2
        • 0
        Do not argue, it is useless, the Khatul Madan does not heed the arguments. request The main thing for him is to crow crowing, but at least do not dawn there. yes
  5. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) April 11 2020 09: 37
    -1
    • 3
    • 4
    Quote: Marzhetsky
    Quote: Nick
    Most importantly, the situation created by Putin on the oil market forced him to join the decline in the US and Canada. Well, who bent whom and forced? "Analysts" like Margetsky and others like him can wipe themselves out.

    You don’t understand anything at all. The agreement is an obligation to reduce the production that Russia has undertaken. The United States did not enter into a deal and did not bind itself to any restrictions. They have reduced production due to market conditions, when demand begins to grow, they will increase production because there are no restrictions on them. In Russia they will be and we will not be able to increase it.
    Well, yes you explain it, it's like throwing beads in front of pigs. Useless lesson.

    If you still do not understand, I’ll directly say: they bent Vladimir Vladimirovich.
    1. Fourth Horseman Offline
      Fourth Horseman (Fourth Horseman) April 11 2020 10: 14
      +1
      • 4
      • 3
      Oh, those wet fantasies, neocommies, mother's revolutionaries and non-brothers.
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 11: 00
        -5
        • 0
        • 5
        Come to the nearest store. Buy lemons for tea.
        1. Fourth Horseman Offline
          Fourth Horseman (Fourth Horseman) April 11 2020 11: 33
          +2
          • 3
          • 1
          Do not tell me what to do, and I will not tell you where to go.

          Confucius
    2. rotkiv04 Offline
      rotkiv04 (Victor) April 11 2020 11: 32
      -2
      • 2
      • 4
      So they still do not believe that they bent it with gas, and drove it under the baseboard, but they can, because they are adepts and are obliged to believe their God.
    3. Nick Offline
      Nick (Nikolai) April 11 2020 12: 40
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      Quote: Nick
      Most importantly, the situation created by Putin on the oil market forced him to join the decline in the US and Canada. Well, who bent whom and forced? "Analysts" like Margetsky and others like him can wipe themselves out.

      You don’t understand anything at all. The agreement is an obligation to reduce the production that Russia has undertaken. The United States did not enter into a deal and did not assume any restrictions. They have reduced production due to market conditions, when demand begins to grow, they will increase production because there are no restrictions on them. In Russia they will be and we will not be able to increase it.
      Well, yes you explain it, it's like throwing beads in front of pigs. Useless lesson.

      If you still do not understand, I’ll directly say: they bent Vladimir Vladimirovich.

      You are poorly informed, for a true analyst, so I will tell you. Amateur, in a word. It’s Putin who has “bent,” speaking your language, of everyone, including Americans, Mexicans, and Canadians. All are involved in the deal, 24 countries producing oil are participating in the deal. Well, who bent whom? You are weak in analytics, it’s not yours or your training manual is not ice. wassat
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 13: 02
        -3
        • 0
        • 3
        Everyone is involved in the deal, 24 countries producing oil are involved in the deal.

        - And what does Putin have to do with it ?! Can you clearly answer?
        1. Nick Offline
          Nick (Nikolai) April 11 2020 13: 09
          +2
          • 3
          • 1
          Quote: Arkharov
          Everyone is involved in the deal, 24 countries producing oil are involved in the deal.
          - And what does Putin have to do with it ?! Can you clearly answer?

          You on Mars in dust storms do not understand. But you can ask Marzhetsky.
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 13: 26
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            All that could answer? So I thought, and not for a second doubted that you essentially have nothing to answer.
            1. 321 Offline
              321 (321) April 11 2020 14: 44
              +1
              • 2
              • 1
              Quote: Arkharov
              All that could answer? So I thought, and for a second did not doubt that you essentially there is simply nothing to answer.

              Do you answer on the merits? You start with yourself, someone here just recently wrote about Mars, no? laughing bully
              1. Arkharov Offline
                Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 14: 57
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                I wrote about Mars, because it does not seem that some local commentators on Earth live, and even more so in the Russian Federation. In my opinion, all but a couple of local "brothers in mind" understood this very clearly. In my opinion, I did not write this nonsense:

                In our case, your hut did not burn out, as you would like, but it burns out at the neighbors, because it was not possible to steal fire extinguishers from our hut.

                So I would like the author to somehow explain this?
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) April 11 2020 15: 15
                  +2
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  Quote: Arkharov
                  I wrote about Mars, because it does not seem that some local commentators on Earth live, and even more so in the Russian Federation. In my opinion, all but a couple of local "brothers in mind" understood this very clearly. In my opinion, I did not write this nonsense:

                  In our case, your hut did not burn out, as you would like, but it burns out at the neighbors, because it was not possible to steal fire extinguishers from our hut.

                  So I would like the author to somehow explain this?

                  I also didn’t have any questions about the meaning of that quote, everything is clear enough - well, if you need clarifications, then the way you asked about it, you are unlikely to get them ...
                  PS And about the fact that everyone understood everything, you decided because no one had any questions for you?
                  It was you who decided so in vain, but rather something else - your reputation here has long been known, didn’t you know? Now you know ... hi
                  1. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 15: 17
                    -3
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    With such a "reputation" here, I can only be proud. Each plus under my comment upsets me, which means that I wrote something wrong.
                    But on the merits of the question, how did we all bend so wonderfully, so no one answered me ....
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) April 11 2020 15: 19
                      +2
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      Quote: Arkharov
                      With such a "reputation" here, I can only be proud.

                      This is your right ... And - note that you yourself put a reputation in quotation marks. bully hi
                      1. Arkharov Offline
                        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 15: 21
                        -4
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        Well, I don’t think it is its true and corresponding truth, in principle. What can this be an objective indicator? !! Therefore, I set it. Quite consciously.
                      2. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) April 11 2020 15: 23
                        +3
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        The main thing is that about what you want and what you seek, it has been known for a long time, and the rest is the details ... hi
                      3. Arkharov Offline
                        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 11 2020 15: 29
                        -4
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        Good. Thanks. I have no more questions.
            2. 123 Offline
              123 (123) April 12 2020 00: 37
              0
              • 1
              • 1
              So I would like the author to somehow explain this?

              The offer is sound, good try to ask him yourself, otherwise he begins to hysteria over questions, I don’t want to bring him to a heart attack. sad
  6. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 12 2020 20: 14
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    On Friday, 23 countries, including Russia and Saudi Arabia, agreed on a new reduction in production under the OPEC + deal - by 10 million barrels. per day, starting from May 1.
    “I would give an example of the Brest Peace when the Bolsheviks in 1918 were forced, for various reasons, to make a deal with Germany, which was humiliating and difficult. I have approximately the same analogy.”

    LUKOIL Vice President Leonid Fedun.

    https://www.rbc.ru/business/11/04/2020/5e91acab9a79473e09a92356"
  • 69 Offline
    69 April 11 2020 15: 52
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    Quote: Arkharov
    With such a "reputation" right here, I can only be proud

    This is not a reputation, but a diagnosis.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Astronaut Offline
    Astronaut (San Sanych) April 13 2020 00: 30
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Foreign Policy unequivocally confers victory on the Saudis.

    Our experts themselves have recognized our defeat.

    https://www.rbc.ru/society/11/04/2020/5e91bfa49a794744e4cde46f