New presidential term: why Yeltsin was not allowed, but Putin can

March 12 2020 21

Senator Andrei Klishas, who co-chairs the working group to prepare proposals for amending the Constitution, explained why Yeltsin was not allowed and Putin could be elected for the next presidential term.

In comment for publication Lenta.ru report The politician said the following:

The Constitutional Court (in 1998) had no legal grounds, no other constitutional norms that would allow other decisions to be taken.

According to him, now there are legal grounds, because they are included in the amendment law.

It clearly states that there is a special rule (moreover, this is introduced in article 81 and in transitional provisions), which allows the incumbent president to be elected in the next election

- added the senator.

Recall that in 1998 the Constitutional Court denied Yeltsin the right to go for a third term, even though during his first term, in 1993, a new Constitution was adopted in the country.

Klishas also drew attention to the fact that the presidents following Vladimir Putin will not be able to take advantage of the rule from the new version of the Constitution, since article 81 will clearly state that these provisions only apply to the head of state in force at the time this article entered into force.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Oleg Rambover

+2

12 March 2020 15: 22

And why the next one will not rotate the Constitution, as Vladimir Vladimirovich allows himself?
Arkharov

-2

12 March 2020 16: 33

Not very convincing. Just then they didn’t do such things, and that’s all. Probably did not think of it, and there were times, and there were other people.
1. mister-red
  
  +3
  
  12 March 2020 16: 41
  
  These are your words unconvincing. Yeltsin was old and had no support whatsoever among the people, that was the reason. And the fact that other people - yes, that's true. Yeltsin and the team did not care about Russia.
  1. Arkharov
    
    -1
    
    12 March 2020 16: 48
    
    You live on the moon ....
    1. vik669
      
      +3
      
      12 March 2020 21: 17
      
      Or in the cooperative "Lake".
      1. mister-red
        
        +1
        
        14 March 2020 23: 53
        
        I'm too young for the "Lake" cooperative)
        And I look at everything from another country, maybe from here it’s somehow differently seen.
  2. Oleg Rambover
    
    -5
    
    12 March 2020 17: 34
    
    Then the constitutional court said that if the new Constitution is not adopted, then the terms are not updated. Now, too, the new Constitution is not adopted, I wonder what the court will say. I think this is some kind of game. Putin will not go for a fifth term.
    1. vik669
      
      +1
      
      12 March 2020 21: 26
      
      And it seems to me that if Tereshkova voiced the desire of the "common people", then I will have to go. In the best traditions - our leaders traditionally left their posts only after ...!
      1. xilia72
        
        +1
        
        12 March 2020 23: 08
        
        There was a time, during the first term of Putin, the two former were out of work, and under Medvedev, too, were two former. Although now there are still two former out of work.
    2. Arkharov
      
      -1
      
      14 March 2020 07: 23
      
      I doubt the game. In general, in my opinion, some disgrace.
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        0
        
        14 March 2020 11: 20
        
        Well, if I really was going to sit until the age of 36, then yes, in the best African traditions, to the grave.
Citizen Mѣshkov

+1

12 March 2020 23: 04

What do you mean Yeltsin was not allowed? Forgot something that he left ahead of time. If he didn’t leave, he could "glue the flippers" at any time. That makes all the difference. If Yeltsin was twenty years younger, we would still see him in the status of president.
1. Oleg Rambover
  
  -2
  
  12 March 2020 23: 46
  
  So Yeltsin was about the same as Putin now.
  1. Citizen Mѣshkov
    
    0
    
    13 March 2020 02: 22
    
    Yes, but Yeltsin’s condition, remember yourself what it was then.
    1. Bitter
      
      -2
      
      13 March 2020 10: 55
      
      His condition was normal.
      He messed up - God forbid everyone, and no one was able to stop him, everyone was busy accumulating "start-up capital".
      
      The moment of truth just came when he realized that if he didn’t screw it now, they would sweep it away.
      
      And the rest, everything is according to plan. A bad president is a good president.
      At first they made the people very bad.
      In the process, they poked resources and money in private pockets.
      Then they returned everything to their circles, for it could no longer be worse than under the BNE.
      1. Arkharov
        
        -3
        
        14 March 2020 07: 25
        
        Is it better now?
        
        Bitter
        
        0
        
        14 March 2020 22: 04
        
        Unambiguously, the "looters" today are forced to share with the people.
        The welfare level in the state has generally grown and the social situation cannot be compared with the times of the bosom buddy of American President Bill Clinton.
        Maybe not everything is pink everywhere, but this is normal capitalism.
        Look in America somewhere on the far periphery. There, too, everything is forgotten by God and the people live on coupons that can only be bought in one village store.
2. Arkharov
  
  -3
  
  14 March 2020 07: 24
  
  I doubt he was a completely different person.
3. mister-red
  
  0
  
  14 March 2020 23: 55
  
  I wrote almost the same thing, and in response to me that I live on the moon. Well, apparently, I'm not alone - hello to another "sleepwalker".
Sergey Latyshev

+2

13 March 2020 00: 03

Spit. Everything has been clear for so long. Life President / Senator.
The best traditions of Russia and Africa!
69

0

13 March 2020 06: 50

All this looks disgusting, but there are also positive aspects, such as the hysteria and cramps of the liberds of various Shenderovichs, Sotnikovs, Venediktovs, and the rest of the synagogue’s patients, there are even more disgust and contempt for them than for the unscrupulous chantrap who occupied the Duma as a trough with purifications .