Russia can make a grand gift to Kazakhstan

10
It is likely that the construction of the Crimean bridge is far from the last grandiose construction project in Russia. They didn’t have time to start moving along it, but they are already talking about the start of the construction of another bridge that will connect Sakhalin Island with the mainland.



And after the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Council, held on May 14 in Sochi, the idea of ​​building the Eurasia shipping channel, which connects the Caspian Sea with the Azov-Black Sea basin, arose. This topic was raised by the President of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. He stated that the project will be beneficial for the states of the region and will revive the cooling relations between the EAEU countries.



The essence of the project

We are talking about a channel with a length of about 900 kilometers, which stretches from the Caspian Sea to the Taganrog Bay or the port of Azov through the entire Southern Federal District. This route is approximately half the length of the route through the mouth of the Volga, the Volga-Don Canal and the Don. In addition, the new project has more bandwidth than the previous one. If the Volga-Don Canal is capable of passing up to 16 million tons per year, then through the Eurasia Canal it will be possible to drive up to 45 million tons of various cargoes.

The expected cost of construction, according to various sources, ranges from 6 to 15 billion US dollars.

Who benefits?

Undoubtedly, the project is extremely beneficial to Kazakhstan. After all, he receives the transit of goods from China to European countries. Thus, he becomes the largest intermediary not only between Russia and China, but also between China and Europe. This should regularly bring billions of US dollars to the treasury of Kazakhstan.

As for Russia, we will not receive such dividends from the construction of the canal.

Firstly, another transit route for Chinese goods will not bring additional benefits. Part of the flow that went through the Trans-Siberian Railway will be redirected along the new route, that is, it will decrease in one place and increase in another.



Increasing the cargo capacity of the water route for Russia is not too relevant. River transport in our country is very poorly involved, and the Volga-Don Canal patency is enough for our needs “with a head”.

There are also a number of environmental and economic factors. For example, it will be necessary to flood part of the fertile land involved in agricultural production. In addition, the route will cross railways, highways and other communications, that is, bridges will have to be built. The new construction will also upset the ecological balance.

Almost the only plus of the project for Russia is the return of Kazakhstan to the orbit of Russia's interests. After all, only the blind could not fail to notice the gradual drift of this country towards the West. This is the introduction of the Latin alphabet, and participation in American military logistics, and much more.

But with the help of this channel, which will bring serious income to Kazakhstan and strengthen its influence in the region, Russia can be sure of the loyalty of its ally.

One wonders whether the new agreements between Kazakhstan and the United States and the demonstrative cooling of relations with Russia were part of Nazarbayev’s ingenious plan in order to push the leadership of our country to sign an agreement favorable to Kazakhstan on the construction of the Eurasia shipping channel?
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 May 2018 06: 22
    It is necessary to do what is beneficial for Russia and its people, and not to weigh the advantages and disadvantages for anyone.
  2. +5
    18 May 2018 14: 26
    Hmm ... Having given two ports of the base for the USA, do you also need to provide them with the possibility of a short penetration from the Black Sea into the Caspian Sea and vice versa?
    Russia, unfortunately, a poor businessman, will not be able to snatch those benefits from this channel that could ... As a result, everyone who is not lazy to use ... And first of all, China and the USA ...
    Well, as for the flooding of the lands ... There was little rake of the Soviet era, when first-class agricultural lands were flooded, and sprawling reservoirs were silted up and instead of doing harm to the national economy ... On the Volga alone, how many problems were created with them ...
    1. +2
      18 May 2018 20: 47
      In addition to flooding there, problems even higher than the head can occur. If you fill the canal with fresh water, then where to get it, for example, in Kalmykia it is already lacking. If you take the sea, inevitably salinization of the soil.

      And as for the short cut for the Americans from the Caspian Sea - to the Black Sea - is not an option at all. The canal is almost a thousand kilometers long, crossing several territories, regions and republics. And on it the American warships imperceptibly sail. How is this? And if from the side of the Black Sea, then it is necessary to draw an American squadron under the Crimean bridge through the Kerch Strait and then cross the Sea of ​​Azov, and also somehow imperceptibly.
  3. +4
    18 May 2018 15: 59
    Invest your money for the benefit of Kazakhstan? - there is nothing ridiculous!
    In Russia itself, it is necessary to equip the Northern Sea Route, to complete the Northern Latitudinal Railway, Belkomur - and many other things!
  4. +2
    18 May 2018 17: 31
    What? Our wise men from the Higher School of Economics, under the guidance of an irreplaceable iPhone, will be able to make such a gift for Amer-Yankees !!! Putin has a lot of plans in his head, and how people live in the outback for both of them on the drum !!! It seems that our elite is working tirelessly for Amer-Yankees !!!
  5. +1
    18 May 2018 20: 05
    -To the great horror for Russia ... -this can take place ... -Climb into the plundered pension fund .., cut down the already long-ago "slaughtered" defense industry (already old decommissioned tanks began to "reanimate") .., they will tear off the cous from health care. ., from education .., scientific research .., will close a number of space projects ... -and ... and ... we will find funds for the "fraternal Latin-speaking" Kazakhstan ... -not the first time ...
    1. +2
      19 May 2018 14: 46
      There are a couple of simpler options. First, let Kazakhstan bear all the expenses, and profit in half. Or an even simpler option. Do not start any construction, but simply use the water route through the Volga-Don Canal more actively.
  6. -2
    19 May 2018 16: 29
    I am convinced that Putin will sell Russia's interests for friendship with this buy.

    According to his last gestures, it’s clear that Russia is not shining anything good. In vain, I voted for him, apparently.
  7. +1
    19 May 2018 18: 39
    My business is side! smile But even from my side it can be seen that if there are no special benefits for Russia, and even environmental problems are very obvious, then the notorious "political expediency (reckoning on possible" return to the orbit of influence ", which in fact is not at all expected!) prevail!
    I don’t think that post-Nazarbayev’s Kazakhstan will stop drifting towards the United States, since it is obviously “alarmed” by the return of Crimea and thus seeks to preserve the Russian lands donated by the Bolsheviks from such a return, which is why the processes are so activated, we will call things our own names, de-Russification (isn't this the essence of "romanization"?) and the authorities are encouraged and sponsored by the authorities to resettle the Kazakh population closer to the borders of Russia ...?
    The same contiguous "concern", after March 2014, is observed on the eastern borders of the Russian Federation, the same drift towards Europe, the same "probes" of public opinion, so far, with rumors about a possible romanization of the alphabet ...?
    All post-Soviet republics, generously endowed with centuries-old Russian territories that have been gathering for centuries, tend to drift, quietly creep away from Russia, "digest" - de-Russify "acquired", alas!
    And no lures, in the form of even billion-dollar preferences, will not outweigh what they can (according to their understanding) now easily lose if they do not have time to lime or assimilate the Russian population of these Russian territories that are within the national republics ?! Look, even the Balts are alarmed, they feel that they separated incorrectly if the Swedish gold crown was paid in full for ever and ever for their accession to the Russian Empire by the Swedish crown ?!
    Therefore, the most realistic action of the Russian government looks to respect the interests of its country and its citizens, both momentary and long-term, COMPREHENSIVE STRENGTHENING OF THE OWN STATE!
    And, as the whole course of Russian History shows, adherents-allies from all over the world will stretch to the strong Russian State, while the weakest ones, even the closest ones, will strive to punish and betray ?! IMHO
    1. +2
      20 May 2018 15: 38
      I think the first thing to do is to observe our own national interests and develop our own economy. Then Russia will be strong, and not only sticks will be drawn to a strong and rich Russia.