NATO's quick victorious war: is a blitzkrieg possible against Kaliningrad?


The likelihood of a conflict between Russia and NATO is constantly increasing. One can already name its location - the Kaliningrad region and the Baltic region as a whole. Also, with a high degree of certainty, we can assume the time when the desire to hold a blitzkrieg outweighs someone's common sense - 2024, plus or minus a year or two.


As the classic said, if a gun hangs on the wall in the first act, in the last it should shoot. How do both sides of the potential clash, Russia and NATO, build up their forces in the Baltic states?

What is NATO doing


The United States, a leading power in the North Atlantic Alliance, has actually returned to the strategy of operational deployment of its troops in Europe during the Cold War. The transfer of 20 thousand US troops to the 40 that already exist in the EU has begun, as part of the large-scale exercises Defender Europe 2020. Plus 7 thousand National Guard and 7 hundred reservists. In addition to the United States, soldiers from 18 European countries will take part in the maneuvers. A few days ago the first ship with the US military technique arrived in Belgian Antwerp.

Under these troops, the Pentagon is preparing additional warehouses with equipment and ammunition. Over the past six years, specialized military infrastructure facilities have been created in Europe in Poland, Germany, Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands. The US military plans to create an additional warehouse in Europe, as well as expand stockpiles in the Pacific, on islands near Taiwan and the Philippines, which is obviously directed against China.

For example, in Poland, in the territory of the Povidze air base, US engineering troops began the construction of a storage facility for military equipment sufficient to equip a tank brigade of ground forces. In addition to fuel and fuels and lubricants, 90 M1A2 Abrams tanks, 130 Bradley and 18 Paladin self-propelled guns will be placed there. All this will be located near Kaliningrad, and personnel from the United States can be quickly deployed by air. Such is the alternative to "Trump".

In addition, Poland also has another Pentagon military infrastructure: helicopter refueling points and arms, runways for drones, shooting ranges for tanks, storage facilities, field camps, and medical posts. This year, it is planned to introduce elements of the American missile defense system.

They are not asleep in Warsaw itself. To the east, she created a reinforced mechanized division, in which three brigades, four battalions each. There are 58 modern German Leopard tanks per battalion. Plus, the 19th mechanized division is deployed in Lublin. All this is reinforced by the multinational battalion of NATO.

How is Russia preparing


The main goal of NATO, of course, is the Kaliningrad region, cut off from the rest of our country. Enclave protection is based on a powerful air umbrella and coast guard. S-400 systems of the 44th Air Defense Division with headquarters in Gvardeysk should protect the sky from the North Atlantic Alliance aviation. The Ball and Bastion complexes of the 25th Coastal Missile Regiment will have to sink NATO ships.

This is a serious force, but in the West it was estimated that it would last for about two weeks of fighting. This conclusion was reached by the authors of the report “How To Defend The Baltic States” of The Jamestown Foundation. After, in their opinion, the superior NATO countries will crush the Kaliningrad region. Today, its ground forces are represented by one motorized rifle brigade, one motorized rifle regiment, one missile brigade and one artillery brigade.

Indeed, against the accumulated armored fist, NATO is not very impressive. That is why this year, on the basis of the 11th army corps, a motorized rifle division will be deployed in Kaliningrad. The 11th separate tank regiment has already delivered 70 T-72B tanks.
Thus, an increase in the military potential of the enclave should allow it to last longer in the event of an attack. However, we are forced to mention a number of additional difficulties that the Russian Defense Ministry may face.

The defense of Kaliningrad is strategically tied to Belarus, from where it is supposed to cut through the Suvalki corridor. Also, on the territory of the former Belarusian military district, ammunition storage areas were preserved, which previously had everything for a full-fledged war: from cartridges to strategic missiles. Today, this 46th arsenal Bronnaya Gora serves the interests of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus. Also in Novokolosovo the 25th arsenal of the Strategic Missile Forces was preserved, in Gomel - the 1868th artillery weapon base, and not far from Orsha - the 655th aviation depot of missile weapons and ammunition.

In theory, if necessary, the territory and military infrastructure of Belarus should be used by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to protect Kaliningrad. However, recent events have shown that a period of serious political discord begins between Moscow and Minsk. President Lukashenko, who demonstrates a reluctance to integrate within the Union State, was denied the day before the coveted discounts on the purchase of Russian oil.

It seems that Alexander Grigoryevich really really went too far, and they no longer intend to forgive him for this. If this is the case, then in the upcoming presidential election in Belarus, the Kremlin can rely on another candidate. Together, this will mean that a very black cat ran between Moscow and Minsk, which could negatively affect the military cooperation between the two countries. If you add the so-called “problem-2024” to this, a window of opportunity is emerging that NATO might want to use to resolve the Kaliningrad issue.

As for the argument regarding the nuclear arsenal, the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski spoke quite cynically at the time:

Russia may have any number of nuclear suitcases and nuclear buttons, but since 500 billion dollars of the Russian elite are in our banks, you still figure it out: is it your elite or already ours? I do not see a single situation in which Russia will use its nuclear potential.


This is his opinion. Time will tell who the truth was.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
    Afinogen (Afinogen) 9 February 2020 10: 46
    -2
    Indeed, against the accumulated armored fist, NATO is not very impressive.

    The three Iskander missiles will launch their missiles with tactical nuclear warheads at the foe and shuffle the NATO armored fist. laughing With the modern development of high-precision missile and nuclear weapons, planning and dreaming of war is a utopia, and NATO understands this (not really fools). And these games in the war are nothing but the development of very large funds, not only we like to use money. laughing
  2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 9 February 2020 11: 00
    0
    Quote: Athenogen
    Indeed, against the accumulated armored fist, NATO is not very impressive.

    The three Iskander missiles will launch their missiles with tactical nuclear warheads at the foe and shuffle the NATO armored fist. laughing With the modern development of high-precision missile and nuclear weapons, planning and dreaming of war is a utopia, and NATO understands this (not really fools). And these games in the war are nothing but the development of very large funds, not only we like to use money. laughing

    But the Iskanders themselves are not a target for NATO missiles?
    1. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
      Afinogen (Afinogen) 9 February 2020 11: 16
      +1
      No, they are not. They are very well camouflaged and quickly change positions. Even NATO despaired of finding them and abandoned them to search.

    2. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline Oyo Sarkazmi
      Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 9 February 2020 11: 47
      +2
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      But the Iskanders themselves are not a target for NATO missiles?

      And New York and Dallas are not targets for "Voivod"? Well, to reset the US economy in trade (Wall Street - 80% of world trade in raw materials) and finance (the headquarters of the largest banks are concentrated in Dallas). And if Silicon Valley is also destroyed, then the Americans will be sitting without credit cards, money and oil ...
      1. Osiris Offline Osiris
        Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 05
        -3
        What are the Governors ??? Or do you not know how Pasha Grachev poured concrete starting positions, and then called the US Secretary of Defense with a report? Therefore, they forced the creation of Sarmat. We do not have any Governor. And those that were adapted for space launch.
  3. bubasa Offline bubasa
    bubasa (Konstantin) 9 February 2020 14: 28
    +4
    Yes, there will be enough land for all of you, 2 by 1 meter, we will fertilize the land with the corpses of neuro-omerizans ... Maybe it turns out that they were not bad people and there would be something other than guano from them ..;)
    1. Osiris Offline Osiris
      Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 06
      +1
      But this is true, Konstantin. Just do not want ahead of time in the ground. We will fight again, I hope.
  4. steelmaker Online steelmaker
    steelmaker 9 February 2020 15: 53
    +3
    In order for Russia to be even more convincing, it is necessary to focus the attention of NATO and Europe on the consequences of this attack. And most importantly, to emphasize that there will be no mercy and we will not take prisoners either. If anyone survives, they will be SLAVES! And Russia has already accustomed Europe to the fact that there is NOTHING for an attack. On the contrary, Russia also restores them and feeds them. And the second one. Our government must specifically determine Belarus. Is she our ally or do we have market relations? And how to sell oil and gas, then at the market price, but as WAR, so warehouses with weapons, etc. ZADAR, or what?
    The author of the last paragraph is very convincing! And to these words of Brzezinski neither Putin nor Shoigu, and even more so for some beloved Lavrov, did not even find words, except for convincing SILENCE !!!
    1. businessv Offline businessv
      businessv (Vadim) 9 February 2020 21: 39
      +4
      Quote: steel maker
      And the second one. Our government must specifically determine Belarus.

      In my opinion, we first need to decide on our oligarch so that the replica of the main Russophobe becomes not relevant, and only then it will be easier, more fun, and most importantly, more satisfying to solve all problems! smile
      1. Osiris Offline Osiris
        Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 07
        +1
        good All right. As long as there is no sane government and reliable social policy in our country, no one will want to join us. No one is interested in the power of the oligarchy.
  5. shadow Offline shadow
    shadow 9 February 2020 19: 13
    +1
    As soon as at least one rocket is launched towards Kaliningrad, then Europe and America will not be immediately. After all, no one will sit and wait when they finish there. They get banged by everyone and immediately and by everyone.
    1. Osiris Offline Osiris
      Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 11
      -5
      wassat Is it on Kissel TV? First, millions of fellow citizens will be put under the Abrams and B-52. Or recall how Zhukov threw bundles of people into the frontal? Although Rokossovsky offered other options. Or recall how during WWII on our tanks smoke bombs in the form of a BDS were standing behind and had to sacrifice one tank during a retreat? At a time when the Germans already had smoke grenade launchers on the tower. Our generals are some of the bloodiest in history. It’s bloodier only in China, and the soldiers’ life doesn’t give a damn about it.
      1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline Oyo Sarkazmi
        Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 10 February 2020 22: 50
        +2
        Quote: Osiris
        Our generals are some of the bloodiest in history. It’s bloodier only in China, and there’s nothing at all about the life of soldiers.

        But the bloodiest ruler of the 21st century is George W. Bush. 3 million civilians killed in 5 years of rule. And are you so sick of cretinism that we, too, will agree to such a liberation? Not really, not really, sit on a reservation in Bidenland, and wait for democratic cookies.
        The Americans and the British will not fight if there is at least a minimal threat to their territory. And surrender at the slightest dine. Arden remember? The Germans turned around a bit, and the Americans immediately surrendered.
        And say why the British passed Singapore? When the Japanese approached the island by land, STOPED TEA DELIVERY !!! There were supplies of ammunition, shells, and canned goods, but, being left without tea, the English soldier even agreed to chop off his head. In order not to endure flour without tea at 5 o’clock.
        1. Osiris Offline Osiris
          Osiris (Osiris) 12 February 2020 14: 26
          -2
          Have you ever seen real fighting? What are you talking about? That the Americans are cowardly warriors? Oh well. I want to see the moment when people like you will meet them on the battlefield. There will be surprises, full pants. And about WWII can you say something against? Or throw links to reliable facts to you? WWII won at the cost of losses and courage of millions !!! (hear?) of our people.
          What kind of liberation? I'm saying that our country is NOT READY FOR WAR !!! There are no thousands of Armats, Su-57s, no Coalitions in the troops. And for people like you, it burns. So, in case of war, they will again drive the unprepared infantry, with the AK in their hands. Or will you immediately scream that "everyone is in dust"? What a generation that can't think. Even though you read smart books, let the mobile out of your hands.
          1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline Oyo Sarkazmi
            Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 12 February 2020 20: 00
            +1
            What facts are you going to provide? From the hands of those who arranged the auction: 15 million died. Who is more? Twenty millions! Comrade Suleimenov (who is Olzhas), how many are you? Forty five? Who is bigger? Comrades from the Writers' Union - 55! Victory!
            Already in January 1942 parity came over the losses with the Germans. If it were not for the 2,5 million who surrendered in the summer of 1941, the Germans would have completely lost - 9 million Soviet soldiers, 10,5 million German. And with the dead in concentration camps - 11,5 against 10,5.
            The website of the Ministry of Defense posted all the lists of dead and missing. There I found the burial place of my grandfather.
            For example, in Stalingrad, the Germans suffered 2 to 1 losses: two German were killed on one Soviet soldier. And about the 44th, there’s nothing to say.
            From November 41st to February 42nd, Germans lost 130 thousand people on frostbite alone, froze or became disabled. And this is 8% of the army at that time. Glory to the German quartermasters!
            So, do not drive against the Soviet generals. They were not fools. Studied fast.
    2. Alf Offline Alf
      Alf (Vasiliy) 10 February 2020 19: 29
      0
      Quote: Shadows
      As soon as at least one rocket is launched towards Kaliningrad, then Europe and America will not be immediately. After all, no one will sit and wait when they finish there. They get banged by everyone and immediately and by everyone.

      Anecdote about "still have to bomb Saratov" remind?
  6. Vkd dvk Offline Vkd dvk
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 9 February 2020 23: 04
    0
    So, to fry American lice, we will need not strategic Voivode, but tactical nuclear Iskanders. It's not bad too.
  7. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 10 February 2020 00: 56
    -7
    Only now it is not clear - but WHY NATO attack Russia? Well, what’s the purpose? Resources? So no resources can justify the cost of maintaining 146 million. You won’t send them to the moon. In addition, both in Russia and in the USA, they are well aware that one and the other always have an unacceptable response to the attack. And no wunderwaffles will protect either Russia or the United States from a retaliatory strike. They didn’t think why it was precisely after 2014 that such active armament and alerting of NATO forces began? They simply fear you, as they fear an inadequate gopnik, because there is an active build-up of forces. In general, in 2014 Russia breathed new life into NATO. This is a fee for the Crimea and Donbass.
    1. g1washntwn Offline g1washntwn
      g1washntwn (George Washington) 10 February 2020 06: 42
      +2
      Quote: Natan Bruk
      why NATO attack Russia?

      Learn the reasons in history: Tatar-Mongols, Teutons, Poles, French, Germans ...

      Quote: Natan Bruk
      You are just afraid, as the inadequate gopnik is afraid

      Bueeee ... what a primitive. Once again I am convinced that on the other side of the earth they go upside down. Go back to the beginning and study the historical facts again. If suddenly the USA began to consider the territory of the USSR (and all the former - this is the former USSR) as its own colonies, then this is its problem. The Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR with all the ensuing consequences. And your only snot in your nose.

      Quote: Natan Bruk
      Russia breathed new life into NATO. This is a fee for the Crimea and Donbass

      This stamp only confirms the quote of Mikhail Zadornov. Therefore, I will continue to explain at the level available to you. Pressure on Russia never weakened, only methods and methods changed. Now, seeing the ineffectiveness of these methods, the Anglo-Saxons are returning to attempts at force pressure, kicking Europeans to increase defense spending. Ahead of the engine run only the most zealous, who are not accustomed to lick the master's boots. The rest and 1-1,5% of GDP for defense was enough, because the reason is RESOURCES. Russia has them, Europe has a shortage. And why should we rob the poor? So not Crimea, not Donbass - the reason. The reason is the redistribution of resources, and NATO is just brass knuckles on the hand of those gopniks who are trying to pump rights not in their area.
      1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 10 February 2020 08: 11
        -5
        You will recall the primitive communal system. Today the world is completely different. I can repeat it again if they didn’t read it well — the USSR and the USA have guarantees of mutual destruction and no wunderwaffles will help anyone win the war. Therefore, consider that the United States is going to attack Russia, can only well zombie "federal channels." From there, the passage that the United States considers Russia its colony. What is this expressed in? And yes, what pressure are you talking about? The fact that after 2014 the rest of the countries want to protect themselves from repeating Crimean scenarios? And your Zadornov is a miserable clown. As a squeeze - I ran for treatment over a hill, all the braces suddenly disappeared.
        1. av58 Offline av58
          av58 (Andrei) 11 February 2020 15: 17
          +2
          Quote: Natan Bruk
          Therefore, consider that the United States is going to attack Russia, can only well zombie "federal channels."

          Any army in the world lives in one of two modes: either it is fighting, or preparing for war. This is the alphabet.
          Therefore, NATO troops, and especially the United States, are preparing for war with Russia. There are no our troops on the border in the United States, American troops are on the Russian border. So, the Americans are preparing for an attack on Russia. The Americans are aware of the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Russia, so they take it into account in their plans, hoping to paralyze.
          What the Americans are doing, getting an advantage in armament, we know. Now in Syria, our patrols have been several times on the verge of a military clash with numerically superior American units. That’s all American logic.
          1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
            Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 12 February 2020 13: 24
            -4
            American troops are in the territory of their allies. They have every right. In Soviet times, Soviet troops were on the borders of NATO countries. So they were preparing for an attack on Western countries? And how Russians act, getting an advantage, they know well in the world. Because they are afraid of you, especially after 2014, as they fear an inadequate gopnik with a grenade and take measures to protect him.
      2. Osiris Offline Osiris
        Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 13
        -2
        What story? What is a hundred times rewritten? We don’t really even know where we come from .... who are our ancestors. And about the Second World War in general, the bulk of the archives is classified forever. Why's that???
    2. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 10 February 2020 11: 03
      +1
      Especially for Nathan - Crimea holds the Caucasus, and the Caucasus holds the Volga and the Caspian. And in Crimea, modern Ukraine planned a NATO base. Still explain?
      1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 11 February 2020 02: 20
        -2
        What is there to explain? If you didn’t want a base in the Crimea, get it near Kharkov and Sumy.
    3. Alf Offline Alf
      Alf (Vasiliy) 10 February 2020 19: 31
      +1
      Quote: Natan Bruk
      Only now it is not clear - but WHY NATO attack Russia?

      Why attack if you can buy? RUSAL no longer belongs to Russia, and energy too. These are just the first steps.
  8. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 10 February 2020 06: 19
    +4
    Quote: Shadows
    As soon as at least one rocket is launched towards Kaliningrad, then Europe and America will not be immediately. After all, no one will sit and wait when they finish there. They get banged by everyone and immediately and by everyone.

    That is, some people canceled their vacation in the Maldives, and a new yacht on the Cote d'Azur will burn out because of Kaliningrad?
  9. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 10 February 2020 06: 20
    +4
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    Only now it is not clear - but WHY NATO attack Russia? Well, what’s the purpose? Resources? So no resources can justify the cost of maintaining 146 million.

    Two counter questions:

    1. Who contains us now?
    2. How were the Nazis going, for example, to support the inhabitants of captured Leningrad?
    1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 10 February 2020 08: 56
      -2
      You live in your own country, you have your own government, the Americans are in their own and they have their own government. Do you think the Americans want to conquer Russia in order to select its resources, which are now feeding the Russian people? But will the people themselves send to the moon and populate Russia with Americans?
      1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 10 February 2020 09: 01
        -3
        About the Nazis is generally stupid. The Nazis one of the main principles in the doctrine was the expansion of living space for the Germans. Americans do not need to expand anywhere. And most importantly - times have changed and seriously thinking that one nuclear superpower wants to attack another in order to take resources from it can only be a stupid and narrow-minded person.
        1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
          Bulanov (Vladimir) 10 February 2020 11: 06
          +2
          For Nathan. The states are not going to take away resources, they want to wreak havoc in Russia, as in Libya or Ukraine, in order to deprive China of a reliable rear during the disassembly for the primacy on the planet.
          1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
            Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 11 February 2020 03: 04
            -1
            Is Russia the rear for China? Not even funny.
      2. Osiris Offline Osiris
        Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 15
        0
        America is the world gendarme. And its role is to prevent a large-scale conflict in the world. If it attacks the Russian Federation, then in the event of a civil war within the country, when control over the arsenals of nuclear weapons will be in question.
  10. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 10 February 2020 06: 21
    0
    Quote: businessv
    Quote: steel maker
    And the second one. Our government must specifically determine Belarus.

    In my opinion, for starters, we need to decide on our oligarch so that the replica of the main Russophobe becomes irrelevant, and only then it will be easier, more fun, and most importantly, more satisfying to solve all problems! smile

    Gold words.
  11. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 10 February 2020 06: 26
    +3
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    Only now it is not clear - but WHY NATO attack Russia? Well, what’s the purpose? Resources? So no resources can justify the cost of maintaining 146 million.

    Following up. Attacking Russia with the goal of enslaving it is one unrealistic task. Hitler already tried.
    But a local one, such as the neutralization of Kaliningrad, its transfer under international control and demilitarization, is quite achievable, provided that the Russian authorities are not mentally prepared to use nuclear weapons.
    1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 10 February 2020 09: 04
      -1
      Even more stupid. What is the purpose of “neutralizing Kaliningrad? Another thing is that this region is extremely militarized, and is very close to NATO countries. Of course, they fear him.
    2. Osiris Offline Osiris
      Osiris (Osiris) 10 February 2020 13: 17
      0
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      ... the Russian authorities will not be mentally prepared to use nuclear weapons.

      Sergey, the worst thing is that they are just ready !!! And NATO understands this. Therefore fear. Watch a movie with Putin about the Crimea. He says there that they were ready to use tactical nuclear weapons.
  12. steelmaker Online steelmaker
    steelmaker 10 February 2020 08: 59
    +1
    Quote: businessv
    Quote: steel maker

    And the second one. Our government must specifically determine Belarus.

    In my opinion, for starters, we need to decide on our oligarch so that the replica of the main Russophobe becomes not relevant, and only then it will be easier, more fun, and most importantly, more satisfying to solve all problems! smile

    Gold words.


    After the execution of the Supreme Council in 1993, the People and the Government decided on SPECIFICALLY! All subsequent elections and the adoption of the Constitution only confirm this! And here, on the website, the majority of Belarus, along with Lukashenko, have already, if not enemies, then they have definitely written to the HALAYASCHIKOV. And do you have doubts about the adoption of amendments to the Constitution? It's me, yes you, but we don’t agree. But the people have already decided, now the Oligarchs must decide on Belarus - Ally or is it market relations?
  13. Tektor Offline Tektor
    Tektor (Tektor) 10 February 2020 11: 43
    +2
    Naturally, NATO will try to provoke Russia. Therefore, you need to consider the option of real hostilities. But they are unlikely if the Russian aerospace forces demonstrate their readiness to use nuclear weapons. It is enough to fly into the air a MiG-31BM squadron with 4 K / R-37 each, one or two of which will have a special warhead. And to warn the enemy about their goals in the form of ports, bases and cities. I believe that things will not come to the demonstration of opportunities.
  14. av58 Offline av58
    av58 (Andrei) 11 February 2020 14: 57
    +1
    Whatever Brzezinski says, he is no longer there, and such a surname can be completely forgotten. He has already ingloriously lost his "great chess game", as evidenced by today's Russia (and Ruina-Ukraine). Can NATO attack the Kaliningrad region and occupy it? If we go according to the classics, then according to the law of an offensive battle, the losses of the attackers against the defenders are estimated at about 3: 1. 60000 American soldiers + 7000 national guardsmen + 700 reservists + servicemen from 18 NATO countries, this is something like 5-7 divisions (about ...). On our side - one division, and some other trifle. It is probably possible to crush numerically and occupy the Kaliningrad region, but for how long (considering that divisions will not be deployed at the same time), at what cost, and then what? What, Russia will sit and stare phlegmatically? The attack on the Kaliningrad region is definitely a global war with the infliction of unlimited nuclear strikes on the territories of all NATO countries without exception, and above all on the territory of the United States. So all these questions and plans for an attack on Kaliningrad are from the realm of science fiction, or war games, maybe for a movie script, no more.
  15. Port Offline Port
    Port 12 February 2020 13: 36
    +3
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    how fear the inadequate gopnik

    Gopnik in the world there is only one, it is under-hegemon and his sixes, which you represent here.