The main goal of the amendments to the Constitution: what Putin is preparing for the people of Russia

January 30 2020 34

On January 15, Vladimir Putin proposed making a number of important changes to the Basic Law of the Russian Federation, as well as starting a fight against poverty. Just five days later, the president introduced a bill on constitutional amendments to the Lower House of Parliament. What will change in our country after their adoption?

Today, they criticize the 1993 “Yeltsin” Constitution, which, on the one hand, made the president the sovereign master of the country, and, on the other hand, determined the further path of its transformation into the raw material semi-colony of the West and now the East. Among the fundamental points, for example, we can single out a direct ban on establishing ideology as a state.

It is quite obvious that this was done deliberately against communist ideology and possible leftist revenge. Our current Constitution is the result of what is sometimes called the "Yeltsin coup of 1993." In his pursuit, Boris Nikolayevich did not hesitate to use troops and tanks against the House of Soviets, as a result of which there were numerous casualties among the civilian population.

The basic law of the Russian Federation actually turned Russia into a "super-presidential republic": the head of state had even more powers than Emperor Nicholas II. Unless the right was provided for to transfer power by inheritance to their children. However, the slurred language that one should not become president more than two times in a row was interpreted in such a way that it is still possible, but not in a row.

The result was the so-called “castling” of Medvedev and Putin, followed by his re-election for the next two terms. In domestic jurisprudence there are such concepts as “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law”. If everything is clear with the former, the latter, which is more comprehensive in meaning, means the true goals of the dry norms of law, ethical, moral and moral norms embedded in them. The “castling” did not violate a single “letter of the law”, but the question remains open regarding the “spirit of the law”.

In 2024, the next term of office of President Putin expires. By law, the head of state must leave, giving way to another legally elected president. The event is quite ordinary, has happened more than once. However, in the media he was for some reason called the “problem”, the problem of “transit of power-2024”, to be more precise. Once again, in fact, there is no problem, such is the desire of certain power circles to make Vladimir Vladimirovich remain as “helmsman at the helm” further.

From the events that followed the Address to the Federal Assembly, it became clear that, most likely, Vladimir Putin intends, after his resignation in 2024, to head the State Council. Today it is just an advisory body under the president, created in 2000. He is in charge of political questions, but he does not have any powers of authority, since he is not a state body.

The key point in the amendments proposed by Putin to the Basic Law can be considered the endowment of the State Council with constitutional status. Strictly speaking, this is all that is known so far. The adoption of the amendments requires the expression of the will of the people. It is not serious to speak about a full-fledged referendum, most likely, a certain population survey will be conducted. As soon as this is done, and the people give the go-ahead, a new branch of government will appear in our country, probably the control and supervision of all three traditional ones - the legislative, executive and judicial, and even the head of state, the president.

What will be the real powers of the Council of State is now very difficult to judge. All these issues of endowing them with the State Council and their further expansion can be quickly addressed by federal laws through the State Duma and the Federation Council. It is still not clear how and before whom the State Council itself will be responsible for its activities.

It is difficult to judge how effective the operation of such a system, which is redrawn for one particular person, will be. But it is possible that in the long run this could lead to a tug of the blanket between the State Council and inside the unbalanced power triad. Time will tell if this venture was good.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

boriz

-4

30 January 2020 14: 16

Forget the expression "power transit".
The amendments to the Constitution are aimed at eliminating the monopoly of power of the "privatization" group. Until this is done, neither the State Duma nor the government will be able to influence the Central Bank and the economic policy of the Russian Federation. This is the opinion of M.L. Khazin.
shpakov.alex

+4

30 January 2020 16: 48

Putin and his managers have already thrown Russia 300-400 years back in those days when in one night at a ball of some prince "Podmyshkin" the annual income of all peasants of some conditional "Tula province" was drunk under the crunch of a French roll. And the new "fair" redistribution of the earned by the majority into just the income of the parasitic minority is only gaining momentum.
1. A.Lex
  
  0
  
  30 January 2020 17: 02
  
  Ndaaaa ... I read nonsense before ... But not so much ...
  1. shpakov.alex
    
    0
    
    31 January 2020 08: 16
    
    And Putin, judging by the laws that have been passed, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child and for him in the school cafeteria, and without this baby will die of starvation free Putin’s balance.
    1. commbatant
      
      -1
      
      2 February 2020 12: 02
      
      Quote: shpakov.alex
      And Putin, judging by the laws that have been adopted, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child
      
      In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...
      1. plabu
        
        +2
        
        2 February 2020 13: 41
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Quote: shpakov.alex
        And Putin, judging by the laws that have been adopted, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child
        
        In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...
        
        Are you sure that we (figuratively speaking) advocated? The famous formula - yes, yes, no, yes, and so on?
        It was not for nothing that around that time a joke appeared:
        
        - "Boris Nikolayevich, there are two news: first - Zyuganov got 56 percent of the vote, and second - you are leading by a wide margin ..." ...
        
        commbatant
        
        -1
        
        2 February 2020 14: 16
        
        Quote: 321
        Are you sure that we (figuratively speaking) advocated?
        
        Well, this is understandable, after another 10 years, everyone will write here that everyone was against it ... but maybe you want to return to the 90s or even earlier, I personally do not ....
        
        plabu
        
        +1
        
        2 February 2020 21: 14
        
        I wonder why you are only considering extremes?
        And why is it so surprising to you that there were people who even then believed that we had gone the wrong way?
        
        A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        3 February 2020 14: 44
        
        321, the combatant had in mind Shpakov himself, and not all in a row.
      2. shpakov.alex
        
        -1
        
        3 February 2020 09: 33
        
        Quote: commbatant
        In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...
        
        In a capitalist society they pay for labor and do not intentionally confuse it with slaveholding. Count up, and in the days of slavery, they didn’t pay anyone for labor. Here, progress has come, thanks to Putin, compared to those times ....
    2. A.Lex
      
      +1
      
      3 February 2020 14: 42
      
      It’s immediately obvious that you Alexei have no idea about the subject. And most likely, you are not a citizen of the Russian Federation. Otherwise, such nonsense would not have been written.
      For you, for example:
      A family of five (three children) lives in a rural area in the Southern Urals. There is enough money (albeit end to end) for lunches in the school cafeteria, for a communal apartment, and for small pleasures for children, for family holidays, and for a trip to a local resort (in summer), and for car maintenance, and for clothes .. enough, in general. Total family income - 30-32 tr (depending on the time of year).
      Therefore, there’s no need to lie.
      1. shpakov.alex
        
        -1
        
        4 February 2020 09: 25
        
        32000/5 = 6400 per month for a family member and enough for all of the above ?! Choose:
        1) you are a liar and Putin's paid propagandist;
        2) you are absolutely not economically independent in this life, you live at someone else’s expense, you haven’t earned a ruble and you don’t have a clue about the Russian prices for all of the above.
        
        A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        6 February 2020 20: 29
        
        Orenburg region., Saraktash district ... further you will manage.
        Point by point:
        1) I am against GDP (in his statement that Socialism is impossible in Russia - it all depends on the government). Regarding the lie - DATA you did not provide at all (therefore, the liar is you).
        2) Whether I am independent in something or not - not for you to decide. You are nobody and you can’t call you anything. I’m a real person LIVING ON THE EARTH - having my own garden, cattle and salary (wife too) + subsidy for a communal apartment, yes, hard, yes, hard ... but we live and don’t whine. I would like more ... but what is there ... maybe the wife will go for an increase ... maybe we will have the emergency gang returned to our service, in the end ...
        And now we conclude: without providing a single figure, not a single evidence, you draw conclusions, and even blame, and who are you after that? I had the opinion that (at least) you are not smart, or (which is not rejected from the threshold) an ordinary bot - I find something like this in VK and other resources of the software tape.
  2. shpakov.alex
    
    -1
    
    31 January 2020 08: 27
    
    Just like Stalin for the Gulag, is forever inscribed in history as an ogre, just like Putin for pension reform is already forever inscribed in history as a thief.
    1. Potapov
      
      +2
      
      1 February 2020 10: 14
      
      Of course, when Gaidar riveted and robbed us of old people, this is progress. And when Stalin the humanist left as much socially dangerous garbage as you, this cannibalism ...
      1. shpakov.alex
        
        -3
        
        3 February 2020 09: 36
        
        Quote: Potapov
        Of course, when Gaidar riveted and robbed us of old people, this is progress. And when Stalin the humanist left as much socially dangerous garbage as you, this cannibalism ...
        
        Well, for you, apparently, Hitler is a humanist. He also sometimes killed for a reason, but through labor to death ...
A.Lex

-1

30 January 2020 17: 05

The Constitution, the Law, the President ... ideology ... The question is not this (although ideology is the form in which the state exists), but WHAT is the state for us, what is the agreement between the people and this very state - what is this agreement about. In Russia, it is still possible ... In the rest of the world, no.
Now, until we decide on this agreement, everything else is heresy.
1. shpakov.alex
  
  -1
  
  31 January 2020 08: 14
  
  The people have already tried to come to an agreement and were hit in the neck with clubs. In 1905, the people also tried to peacefully convey their view of justice to the tsar and was shot and "Bloody Resurrection". Then there was 1917. You can continue to rave about what you wrote, but normal people have long understood what the state should do and what it actually does.
  1. A.Lex
    
    +2
    
    31 January 2020 14: 38
    
    You can say nothing about 1905 - a provocation (already proven). About 1917 you write in more detail, otherwise you just indicated the figure. And about WHAT the state should do and how, and in what format - also indicate. And then you just got off with general phrases and consider yourself the ultimate truth? ... "people have long understood ..." the clever guy was found ...
    Your whole explanation is based on "the fool himself" ... It's okay ...
    1. shpakov.alex
      
      0
      
      3 February 2020 09: 50
      
      To personally teach you - time to spend, you do not teach. And personally, it really doesn’t make sense for you to say anything — you are a zombie, and you have the whole history of Russia — a complete provocation. Do you want me to reprint the history of Russia here? Take the trouble to familiarize yourself. About 1917, it’s already written so much in detail that one who can read can read it himself.
      
      Quote: A.Lex
      And about what the state should do and how, and in what format - also indicate.
      
      When I pay a rent, I pay it for certain services, and not for the head of the Criminal Code to take as much as I want, and for the rest of the money I hired one Uzbek, sweep the yard once a month. So it is with the budget of the country, which is filled with our taxes. And the country is ruled by thieves and the country's budget is therefore thieves, and therefore there is not enough money and never will, how many taxes do not set. The budget of the country must be written differently, other priorities should be set, and then it will be honest without unnecessary efforts ...
      1. A.Lex
        
        0
        
        3 February 2020 14: 21
        
        If you have so much mind ... why not the President so far ???
        And about the "thieves" ... so in your opinion it was done! You fought so hard that the "free hand of the market" would decide everything in Russia and the state would not boldly interfere in the economy. When you were told that the TOTAL destruction of the planned economy of the USSR would result in SUCH LOSSES that the population would begin to die out, what did you say (like you)? You screamed that the commies lie everything to stay at the helm! So who turned out to be right in the end? These same "commies" were right! And you are only
        
        ... were engaged not in raising money, but in the destruction of communism ...
        
        So here it is your market - your capitalism! Eat it now with full spoons and do not complain.
        
        shpakov.alex
        
        -2
        
        4 February 2020 09: 37
        
        This is not the market and not capitalism, but Putin's thieves' dictatorship - so you eat it as much as you want, but don't feed me this shit. Who slept through your beloved Union? Who ruined the economy of the USSR, bringing the postulates of a planned economy to the point of absurdity? Kind of like the "commies" who tried to support half the world, giving communism a human face by robbing the population of the USSR.
        
        Quote: A.Lex
        If you have so much mind ... why not the President so far ???
        
        A counter question, but how did a person with such a cleverness and thief-like manners get into the presidency? Who brought him there by the handle? Was it Yeltsin, who shot the "commie" from a tank?
        In your head you have a typical porridge of the USE victim and even the Internet will not help you in self-education.
        
        A.Lex
        
        +2
        
        6 February 2020 20: 10
        
        For what people like you fought in the USSR and at the end of it - they got it. Rejoice, because everything that you described was done with your help, with your ACTIVE assistance, and with your agitation (you did not listen to us, you said that we were lying). The Sov.Soyuz was not needed — here's a distortion of capitalism. Everything that is happening now was done by those "communists" who wanted to convert their power into money (and who were not really communists ... you know where, in percentage terms, there were most "members of the CPSU"? - Ukrainian SSR !!!). They did it - you supported it! What are the claims against us, those who were against the collapse? WE WERE AGAINST CAPITALISM, but it was imposed on us. Are you hysterical that he (capitalism) is not like that? So it was the "Pandora's box" that you opened! Have you been warned that capitalism is inhuman? Warned! But you are the smartest, you decided to check on your own experience! So here it is for you - eat it to your health! What are the claims to us ???
steelmaker

-2

30 January 2020 20: 08

And why did EBN shoot people from tanks? To rule forever !!
1. Bitter
  
  +3
  
  30 January 2020 23: 01
  
  Why did EBN shoot people from tanks?
  
  Well, not quite like that, he in this way wished everyone happiness and prosperity.
  Member of the CPSU since 1961, member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, People's Deputy of the RSFSR and Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, ... but after the first trip to "abroad" he became an enemy of his people, in "civilian clothes".
  As much grief as this leader has sowed throughout Russia is immeasurable and over the past 70 years, in any case, there is no one to compare with.
  
  To rule forever!
  
  More likely no than yes. It was just that the "family" had to be taken care of.
Port

+9

31 January 2020 06: 27

What kind of "will of the people" do they hope for after the pension genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have been brought to Russia by that time and given the right to vote, they have no other audience.
Marzhecki

+3

31 January 2020 07: 21

Quote: Port
What kind of "will of the people" do they hope for after the pension genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have been brought to Russia by that time and given the right to vote, they have no other audience.

Therefore, it will not be a referendum, but a poll.
1. commbatant
  
  -1
  
  2 February 2020 12: 05
  
  Quote: Marzhetsky
  Quote: Port
  What kind of "will of the people" do they hope for after the pension genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have been brought to Russia by that time and given the right to vote, they have no other audience.
  
  Therefore, it will not be a referendum, but a poll.
  
  ... have you, as always, been informed before everyone else?
Marzhecki

+3

31 January 2020 07: 29

Quote: boriz
Forget the expression "power transit".
The amendments to the Constitution are aimed at eliminating the monopoly of power of the "privatization" group. Until this is done, neither the State Duma nor the government will be able to influence the Central Bank and the economic policy of the Russian Federation. This is the opinion of M.L. Khazin.

Khazin says a lot of the right things. But he does not always tell the whole truth.
Natan bruk

-1

31 January 2020 21: 20

In general, it seems that Putin will be something like Ayatollah Khamenei in Iran, and the State Council will be an analogue of the Ayatollah council that exists there. After all, there is also a president, but there is also a “supreme ruler”, he is also a “spiritual leader” who oversees everything that happens and it is He who determines the country's policy. At the same time, he is not elected by anyone, he is considered the highest authority and his instructions are carried out implicitly. Although the president is elected there, but firstly, only after the approval of the candidates by the ayatollah council (the future status of the State Council), and secondly, all decisions of the president must be approved by this very council. In general, you are on the right track, comrades.
1. commbatant
  
  0
  
  2 February 2020 12: 08
  
  Quote: Natan Bruk
  In general, it seems that Putin will be something like Ayatollah Khamenei in Iran, and the State Council will be an analogue of the Ayatollah council that exists there.
  
  Some sort of horror that you just won’t read here. Better immediately then the despotism of the absolute monarchies of some BV countries ....
  1. Natan bruk
    
    -1
    
    3 February 2020 09: 46
    
    Why creepy? This seems to be exactly what they are going to do in Russia. Of course, not exactly like in Iran, but adjusted for Russian realities. But essentially the same thing.
bratchanin3

0

1 February 2020 18: 28

I think that the State Council should have the status of a Politburo, as in Soviet times, but taking into account errors.
commbatant

-1

2 February 2020 12: 50

Today, the 1993 Yeltsin Constitution is criticized a lot and quite deservedly.

You never know what we are scolded ... Only experts in this field can deserve to be scolded ... law and areas adjacent to constitutional law ... The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation is a transitional Constitution, the countries of the former police department went the same way .. .

Among the fundamental points, for example, we can single out a direct ban on establishing ideology as a state.

Well, if the author personally cannot live without a mandatory state ideology (which ALL citizens of the Russian Federation should share under the threat of sanctions), then, apparently, his problems ... I am quite happy with the ideological diversity, where I myself can determine my worldview. ..

It is quite obvious that this was done deliberately against communist ideology and possible leftist revenge.

The author again confuses the chronology of events ... the role of the leading and directing CPSU was eliminated in the Constitution of the USSR and the RSFSR in the 89th year, i.e. by the Communists themselves and before the Soviet Union ceased to exist, at that time the BNE had already got rid of its party ticket ...
The communists themselves destroyed the state ideology of the USSR, simultaneously carrying out the GMR economic "transformations" in the USSR, which was impossible (the same effect happened in the FRY) ...

In his pursuit, Boris Nikolayevich did not hesitate to use troops and tanks against the House of Soviets, as a result of which there were numerous casualties among the civilian population.

I completely agree with the author. It was then that the Russian Federation ceased to be a democratic state ...

However, the slurred language that one should not become president more than two times in a row was interpreted in such a way that it is still possible, but not in a row.

It seems that everything in the Constitution of the Russian Federation is clearly written, if the author does not understand the meaning of what he read, let him turn to specialists ...

One and the same person may not hold the office of the President of the Russian Federation more than two consecutive terms.

Clause 3, Article 81 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation

http://www.constitution.ru/10003000/10003000-6.htm

The “castling” did not violate a single “letter of the law”, but the question remains open regarding the “spirit of the law”.

It remains open only to the author ...
The author is not embarrassed by the amendments to the US Constitution on the third term of the US president and it is for a specific person, the author is not embarrassed by "democratic" countries where the Constitution does not limit the terms of office, for example, the current chancellor of the "decaying" Germany is in power more M. Thatcher ...

Once again, there’s really no problem such is the desire of certain power circles to ensure that Vladimir Vladimirovich remains as a helmsman at the helm and beyond.

Again, the author's fantasies .... the problem of the change of presidential power in the Russian Federation arises only among Russian liberals and Western media, after the next presidential elections in the Russian Federation this "problem" instantly disappears ... and if it were not for the upcoming constitutional reform in the Russian Federation, the author of this article I would have written much later, however, I will write more, I'm sure ...

From the events that followed the message to the Federal Assembly, it became clear that, most likely, Vladimir Putin intends after his resignation in 2024 head the Council of State.

In the message about this, not a word, again the author’s fantasies, and why not the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation or one of the DEZ in Uryupinsk?

It is not serious to speak about a full-fledged referendum, most likely, a certain population survey will be conducted.

Well, here the author-expert knows everything in advance ....