The main goal of the amendments to the Constitution: what Putin is preparing for the people of Russia


On January 15, Vladimir Putin proposed making a number of important changes to the Basic Law of the Russian Federation, as well as starting a fight against poverty. Just five days later, the president introduced a bill on constitutional amendments to the Lower House of Parliament. What will change in our country after their adoption?


Today, they criticize the 1993 “Yeltsin” Constitution, which, on the one hand, made the president the sovereign master of the country, and, on the other hand, determined the further path of its transformation into the raw material semi-colony of the West and now the East. Among the fundamental points, for example, we can single out a direct ban on establishing ideology as a state.

It is quite obvious that this was done deliberately against communist ideology and possible leftist revenge. Our current Constitution is the result of what is sometimes called the "Yeltsin coup of 1993." In his pursuit, Boris Nikolayevich did not hesitate to use troops and tanks against the House of Soviets, as a result of which there were numerous casualties among the civilian population.

The basic law of the Russian Federation actually turned Russia into a "super-presidential republic": the head of state had even more powers than Emperor Nicholas II. Unless the right was provided for to transfer power by inheritance to their children. However, the slurred language that one should not become president more than two times in a row was interpreted in such a way that it is still possible, but not in a row.

The result was the so-called “castling” of Medvedev and Putin, followed by his re-election for the next two terms. In domestic jurisprudence there are such concepts as “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law”. If everything is clear with the former, the latter, which is more comprehensive in meaning, means the true goals of the dry norms of law, ethical, moral and moral norms embedded in them. The “castling” did not violate a single “letter of the law”, but the question remains open regarding the “spirit of the law”.

In 2024, the next term of office of President Putin expires. By law, the head of state must leave, giving way to another legally elected president. The event is quite ordinary, has happened more than once. However, in the media he was for some reason called the “problem”, the problem of “transit of power-2024”, to be more precise. Once again, in fact, there is no problem, such is the desire of certain power circles to make Vladimir Vladimirovich remain as “helmsman at the helm” further.

From the events that followed the Address to the Federal Assembly, it became clear that, most likely, Vladimir Putin intends, after his resignation in 2024, to head the State Council. Today it is just an advisory body under the president, created in 2000. He is in charge of political questions, but he does not have any powers of authority, since he is not a state body.

The key point in the amendments proposed by Putin to the Basic Law can be considered the endowment of the State Council with constitutional status. Strictly speaking, this is all that is known so far. The adoption of the amendments requires the expression of the will of the people. It is not serious to speak about a full-fledged referendum, most likely, a certain population survey will be conducted. As soon as this is done, and the people give the go-ahead, a new branch of government will appear in our country, probably the control and supervision of all three traditional ones - the legislative, executive and judicial, and even the head of state, the president.

What will be the real powers of the Council of State is now very difficult to judge. All these issues of endowing them with the State Council and their further expansion can be quickly addressed by federal laws through the State Duma and the Federation Council. It is still not clear how and before whom the State Council itself will be responsible for its activities.

It is difficult to judge how effective the operation of such a system, which is redrawn for one particular person, will be. But it is possible that in the long run this could lead to a tug of the blanket between the State Council and inside the unbalanced power triad. Time will tell if this venture was good.
Used photos: kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

34 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. boriz Offline
    boriz (boriz) 30 January 2020 14: 16
    -4
    • 3
    • 7
    Forget the expression "transit power."
    Amendments to the Constitution are aimed at eliminating the monopoly of power of the "privatization" group. Until this is done, neither the State Duma nor the government will be able to influence the Central Bank and the economic policy of the Russian Federation. This is the opinion of M. Khazin.
  2. shpakov.alex Offline
    shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 30 January 2020 16: 48
    +4
    • 10
    • 6
    Putin and his managers had already thrown Russia back 300-400 years ago, at a time when one night at a ball of some prince “Podmyshkin”, under the crunch of a French roll, the annual income of all the peasants of some conventional “Tula province” was drunk. And the new “fair” redistribution of what the majority earned into simply parasitic minority incomes is only gaining momentum.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 30 January 2020 17: 02
      0
      • 5
      • 5
      Ndaaaa ... I read nonsense before ... But not so much ...
      1. shpakov.alex Offline
        shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 31 January 2020 08: 16
        0
        • 4
        • 4
        And Putin, judging by the laws that have been passed, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child and for him in the school cafeteria, and without this baby will die of starvation free Putin’s balance.
        1. commbatant Offline
          commbatant (Sergei) 2 February 2020 12: 02
          -1
          • 2
          • 3
          Quote: shpakov.alex
          And Putin, judging by the laws that have been adopted, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child

          In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...
          1. plabu Offline
            plabu 2 February 2020 13: 41
            +2
            • 2
            • 0
            Quote: commbatant
            Quote: shpakov.alex
            And Putin, judging by the laws that have been adopted, has managed to recover to the point that in Russia two adults working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, cannot earn a third living wage for an only child

            In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...

            Are you sure that we (figuratively speaking) advocated? The famous formula - yes, yes, no, yes, and so on?
            It was not for nothing that around that time a joke appeared:

            - "Boris Nikolaevich, there is two news: the first - Zyuganov scored 56 percent of the vote, and the second - you lead by a wide margin ..." ...
            1. commbatant Offline
              commbatant (Sergei) 2 February 2020 14: 16
              -1
              • 1
              • 2
              Quote: 321
              Are you sure that we (figuratively speaking) advocated?

              Well, this is understandable, after another 10 years, everyone will write here that everyone was against it ... but maybe you want to return to the 90s or even earlier, I personally do not ....
              1. plabu Offline
                plabu 2 February 2020 21: 14
                +1
                • 1
                • 0
                I wonder why you are only considering extremes?
                And why is it so surprising to you that there were people who even then believed that we had gone the wrong way?
            2. A.Lex Offline
              A.Lex (Secret information) 3 February 2020 14: 44
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              321, the combatant had in mind Shpakov himself, and not all in a row.
          2. shpakov.alex Offline
            shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 3 February 2020 09: 33
            -1
            • 2
            • 3
            Quote: commbatant
            In the capitalist society, for which you advocated in '91, no one owes anything, about the small salary, apparently, you forgot that in the 90s it was not paid to many at all ...

            In a capitalist society they pay for labor and do not intentionally confuse it with slaveholding. Count up, and in the days of slavery, they didn’t pay anyone for labor. Here, progress has come, thanks to Putin, compared to those times ....
        2. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 3 February 2020 14: 42
          +1
          • 3
          • 2
          It’s immediately obvious that you Alexei have no idea about the subject. And most likely, you are not a citizen of the Russian Federation. Otherwise, such nonsense would not have been written.
          For you, for example:
          A family of five (three children) lives in a rural area in the Southern Urals. There is enough money (albeit end to end) for lunches in the school cafeteria, for a communal apartment, and for small pleasures for children, for family holidays, and for a trip to a local resort (in summer), and for car maintenance, and for clothes .. enough, in general. Total family income - 30-32 tr (depending on the time of year).
          Therefore, there’s no need to lie.
          1. shpakov.alex Offline
            shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 4 February 2020 09: 25
            -1
            • 1
            • 2
            32000/5 = 6400 per month for a family member and enough for all of the above ?! Choose:
            1) you are a liar and Putin's paid propagandist;
            2) you are absolutely not economically independent in this life, you live at someone else’s expense, you haven’t earned a ruble and you don’t have a clue about the Russian prices for all of the above.
            1. A.Lex Offline
              A.Lex (Secret information) 6 February 2020 20: 29
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              Orenburg region., Saraktash district ... further you will manage.
              Point by point:
              1) I am against GDP (in his statement that Socialism is impossible in Russia - it all depends on the government). Regarding the lie - DATA you did not provide at all (therefore, the liar is you).
              2) Whether I am independent in something or not - not for you to decide. You are nobody and you can’t call you anything. I’m a real person LIVING ON THE EARTH - having my own garden, cattle and salary (wife too) + subsidy for a communal apartment, yes, hard, yes, hard ... but we live and don’t whine. I would like more ... but what is there ... maybe the wife will go for an increase ... maybe we will have the emergency gang returned to our service, in the end ...
              And now we conclude: without providing a single figure, not a single evidence, you draw conclusions, and even blame, and who are you after that? I had the opinion that (at least) you are not smart, or (which is not rejected from the threshold) an ordinary bot - I find something like this in VK and other resources of the software tape.
      2. shpakov.alex Offline
        shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 31 January 2020 08: 27
        -1
        • 5
        • 6
        Just like Stalin for the Gulag, is forever inscribed in history as an ogre, just like Putin for pension reform is already forever inscribed in history as a thief.
        1. Potapov Offline
          Potapov (Valery) 1 February 2020 10: 14
          +2
          • 5
          • 3
          Of course, when Gaidar riveted and robbed us of old people, this is progress. And when Stalin the humanist left as much socially dangerous garbage as you, this cannibalism ...
          1. shpakov.alex Offline
            shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 3 February 2020 09: 36
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            Quote: Potapov
            Of course, when Gaidar riveted and robbed us of old people, this is progress. And when Stalin the humanist left as much socially dangerous garbage as you, this cannibalism ...

            Well, for you, apparently, Hitler is a humanist. He also sometimes killed for a reason, but through labor to death ...
  3. A.Lex Offline
    A.Lex (Secret information) 30 January 2020 17: 05
    -1
    • 4
    • 5
    The Constitution, the Law, the President ... ideology ... The question is not this (although ideology is the form in which the state exists), but WHAT is the state for us, what is the agreement between the people and this very state - what is this agreement about. In Russia, it is still possible ... In the rest of the world, no.
    Now, until we decide on this agreement, everything else is heresy.
    1. shpakov.alex Offline
      shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 31 January 2020 08: 14
      -1
      • 3
      • 4
      The people have already tried to come to an agreement and got clubs on the neck. In 1905, the people also tried to peacefully convey their view of justice to the king and received execution and "Bloody Sunday". Then it was 1917. You can continue to rave about what you wrote, but normal people have long understood what the state should do and what it actually does.
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) 31 January 2020 14: 38
        +2
        • 4
        • 2
        You can’t say anything about 1905 - a provocation (proven already). About 1917 you write in more detail, otherwise it is only a digital sign. And about what the state should do and how, and in what format - also indicate. And then only escaped with general phrases and consider yourself the ultimate truth? ... "people have long understood ..." the wise guy found ...
        All of your explanation is built on "he is inadequate" ... Normally so ... laughing
        1. shpakov.alex Offline
          shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 3 February 2020 09: 50
          0
          • 1
          • 1
          To personally teach you - time to spend, you do not teach. And personally, it really doesn’t make sense for you to say anything — you are a zombie, and you have the whole history of Russia — a complete provocation. Do you want me to reprint the history of Russia here? Take the trouble to familiarize yourself. About 1917, it’s already written so much in detail that one who can read can read it himself.

          Quote: A.Lex
          And about what the state should do and how, and in what format - also indicate.

          When I pay a rent, I pay it for certain services, and not for the head of the Criminal Code to take as much as I want, and for the rest of the money I hired one Uzbek, sweep the yard once a month. So it is with the budget of the country, which is filled with our taxes. And the country is ruled by thieves and the country's budget is therefore thieves, and therefore there is not enough money and never will, how many taxes do not set. The budget of the country must be written differently, other priorities should be set, and then it will be honest without unnecessary efforts ...
          1. A.Lex Offline
            A.Lex (Secret information) 3 February 2020 14: 21
            0
            • 1
            • 1
            laughing If you have so much mind ... why not the President so far ???
            And about the "thieves" ... so in your opinion it was done! You fought so that the "free hand of the market" decided everything in Russia and the state did not boldly intervene in the economy. When you were told that the TOTAL destruction of the planned economy of the USSR would result in SUCH DAMAGES, that the population would die out, what did you say (like you)? You shouted that commies are lying to stay at the helm! Well, and who ended up right? These same "commies" were right! And you just

            ... were engaged not in raising money, but in the destruction of communism ...

            So here it is your market - your capitalism! Eat it now with full spoons and do not complain.
            1. shpakov.alex Offline
              shpakov.alex (Alexey Shpakov) 4 February 2020 09: 37
              -2
              • 0
              • 2
              This is not a market or capitalism, but Putin's thieves' dictatorship - so you eat it as much as you want, but don’t feed me this shit. Who overslept your beloved Union? Who ditched the economy of the USSR, bringing to the absurdity the postulates of a planned economy? It seems like the "commies" who tried to contain half the world, giving communism a human face due to the robbery of the USSR population.

              Quote: A.Lex
              If you have so much mind ... why not the President so far ???

              A counter question, but how did a person with such a mind and thieves' manners get into the presidency? Who brought him by the handle? Is it not Yeltsin who shot the commies from the tank?
              In your head you have a typical porridge of the USE victim and even the Internet will not help you in self-education.
              1. A.Lex Offline
                A.Lex (Secret information) 6 February 2020 20: 10
                +2
                • 2
                • 0
                For what people like you fought in the USSR, and at the end they got it. Rejoice, for everything that you described was done with your help, with your ACTIVE assistance, and with your agitation (you did not listen to us, they said that we were lying). I didn’t need Sov. Union — that’s the perversion of capitalism. Everything that is happening now was done by those "communists" who wanted to convert their power into money (and who really were not real communists ... do you know where, in percentage terms, there were the most "members of the CPSU"? - USSR !!!). They did it - you supported it! What is the claim against us, those who were against the collapse? WE WERE AGAINST CAPITALISM, but it was imposed on us. Are you hysterical that he (capitalism) is not like that? So it was the “Pandora’s box”, which you opened! Have you been warned that capitalism is inhuman? Warned! But you are the smartest, decided to check it first hand! So here it is for you - eat to your health! What claims to us ???
  4. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 30 January 2020 20: 08
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    And why did EBN shoot people from tanks? To rule forever !!
    1. Bitter Offline
      Bitter (Gleb) 30 January 2020 23: 01
      +3
      • 4
      • 1
      Why did EBN shoot people from tanks?

      Well, not quite like that, he in this way wished everyone happiness and prosperity.
      Member of the CPSU since 1961, member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, People's Deputy of the RSFSR and chairman of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR, ... but after the first trip to the "foreign countries" he became the enemy of his people, in civilian clothes.
      As much grief as this leader has sowed throughout Russia is immeasurable and over the past 70 years, in any case, there is no one to compare with.

      To rule forever!

      More likely no than yes. Just about the "family" had to be taken care of.
  5. Port Offline
    Port 31 January 2020 06: 27
    +9
    • 9
    • 0
    What kind of “will of the people” do they hope after the retirement genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have time to bring it to Russia and give them the right to vote, they don’t have another audience.
  6. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 31 January 2020 07: 21
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    Quote: Port
    What kind of “will of the people” do they hope after the retirement genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have time to bring it to Russia and give them the right to vote, they don’t have another audience.

    Therefore, it will not be a referendum, but a poll.
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 2 February 2020 12: 05
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      Quote: Port
      What kind of “will of the people” do they hope after the retirement genocide, if only all Tajiks and Uzbeks have time to bring it to Russia and give them the right to vote, they don’t have another audience.

      Therefore, it will not be a referendum, but a poll.

      ... have you, as always, been informed before everyone else?
  7. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 31 January 2020 07: 29
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    Quote: boriz
    Forget the expression "transit power."
    Amendments to the Constitution are aimed at eliminating the monopoly of power of the "privatization" group. Until this is done, neither the State Duma nor the government will be able to influence the Central Bank and the economic policy of the Russian Federation. This is the opinion of Khazin M. L.

    Khazin says a lot of the right things. But he does not always tell the whole truth.
  8. Natan bruk Offline
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 31 January 2020 21: 20
    -1
    • 2
    • 3
    In general, it seems that Putin will be something like Ayatollah Khamenei in Iran, and the State Council will be an analogue of the Ayatollah council that exists there. After all, there is also a president, but there is also a “supreme ruler”, he is also a “spiritual leader” who oversees everything that happens and it is He who determines the country's policy. At the same time, he is not elected by anyone, he is considered the highest authority and his instructions are carried out implicitly. Although the president is elected there, but firstly, only after the approval of the candidates by the ayatollah council (the future status of the State Council), and secondly, all decisions of the president must be approved by this very council. In general, you are on the right track, comrades.
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 2 February 2020 12: 08
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Quote: Natan Bruk
      In general, it seems that Putin will be something like Ayatollah Khamenei in Iran, and the State Council will be an analogue of the Ayatollah council that exists there.

      Some sort of horror that you just won’t read here. Better immediately then the despotism of the absolute monarchies of some BV countries ....
      1. Natan bruk Offline
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 46
        -1
        • 0
        • 1
        Why creepy? This seems to be exactly what they are going to do in Russia. Of course, not exactly like in Iran, but adjusted for Russian realities. But essentially the same thing.
  9. bratchanin3 Offline
    bratchanin3 (Gennady) 1 February 2020 18: 28
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    I think that the State Council should have the status of a Politburo, as in Soviet times, but taking into account errors.
  10. commbatant Offline
    commbatant (Sergei) 2 February 2020 12: 50
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Today, the 1993 Yeltsin Constitution is criticized a lot and quite deservedly.

    You never know what we are scolded ... Only experts in this field can deserve to be scolded ... law and areas adjacent to constitutional law ... The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation is a transitional Constitution, the countries of the former police department went the same way .. .

    Among the fundamental points, for example, we can single out a direct ban on establishing ideology as a state.

    Well, if the author personally cannot live without a mandatory state ideology (which ALL citizens of the Russian Federation should share under the threat of sanctions), then, apparently, his problems ... I am quite happy with the ideological diversity, where I myself can determine my worldview. ..

    It is quite obvious that this was done deliberately against communist ideology and possible leftist revenge.

    The author again confuses the chronology of events ... the role of the leading and directing CPSU was eliminated in the Constitution of the USSR and the RSFSR in the 89th year, i.e. by the Communists themselves and before the Soviet Union ceased to exist, at that time the BNE had already got rid of its party ticket ...
    The Communists themselves destroyed the state ideology of the USSR, simultaneously carrying out the HMS economic "transformations" in the USSR, which was impossible (the same effect happened in the FRY) ....

    In his pursuit, Boris Nikolayevich did not hesitate to use troops and tanks against the House of Soviets, as a result of which there were numerous casualties among the civilian population.

    I completely agree with the author. It was then that the Russian Federation ceased to be a democratic state ...

    However, the slurred language that one should not become president more than two times in a row was interpreted in such a way that it is still possible, but not in a row.

    It seems that everything in the Constitution of the Russian Federation is clearly written, if the author does not understand the meaning of what he read, let him turn to specialists ...

    One and the same person may not hold the office of the President of the Russian Federation more than two consecutive terms.

    Clause 3, Article 81 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation

    http://www.constitution.ru/10003000/10003000-6.htm

    The “castling” did not violate a single “letter of the law”, but the question remains open regarding the “spirit of the law”.

    It remains open only to the author ...
    The author is not embarrassed by the amendments to the US Constitution on the third term of the US President’s reign, and it’s for a specific person, the author is not embarrassed by the “democratic” countries where the Constitution has no restrictions on the term of office, for example, the current chancellor of the “decaying” Federal Republic is in power more M. Thatcher ...

    Once again, there’s really no problem such is the desire of certain power circles to ensure that Vladimir Vladimirovich remains as a helmsman at the helm and beyond.

    Again the author’s fantasies .... the problem of the succession of the presidential power in the Russian Federation arises only among Russian liberals and the Western media, after the next presidential election in the Russian Federation, this “problem” instantly disappears ... and if the constitutional reform in the Russian Federation is not being prepared, the author of this article I would write much later, however, I will write more, I’m sure ...

    From the events that followed the message to the Federal Assembly, it became clear that, most likely, Vladimir Putin intends after his resignation in 2024 head the Council of State.

    In the message about this, not a word, again the author’s fantasies, and why not the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation or one of the DEZ in Uryupinsk?

    It is not serious to speak about a full-fledged referendum, most likely, a certain population survey will be conducted.

    Well, here the author-expert knows everything in advance ....