Accounts Chamber: Russia faces environmental collapse

The Accounts Chamber posted a report on the network with brief results of the expert-analytical event “Monitoring the implementation of the activities of the national project“ Ecology ”.

Briefly summarizing the information presented in the report, the environmental situation in Russia remains dysfunctional and continues to deteriorate: accumulated problems and climate change pose a threat of loss the economy countries 30% of GDP over the next ten years.

A special line marks the impact on Russia of global warming, which in our country is 2,5 times faster than the global average.

This results in droughts in the agricultural zone and permafrost thawing, which threatens the infrastructure of cities and enterprises located at high latitudes, and also significantly increases the risks of emergency and technological disasters.

Actually, the national project "Ecology" is aimed at solving these problems. The total cost of the national project is estimated at 4 trillion rubles.

At the same time, under the project, the state plans to allocate only a fifth of the required funds - 17,4% from the federal budget and another 2,9% from the regional budget.

According to the government, the main financial burden should be borne by investors: it is expected that 3,223 trillion rubles will come from them.

At the same time, the Accounts Chamber notes the fact that neither the passports of federal projects nor other related documents contain a list of investors or a mechanism for attracting investments.

Thus, according to the remarks of the Accounts Chamber, “it is not possible to assess the adequacy and validity of financing.”
  • Photos used: Ilya Karatchenko / https: //
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Pivander Offline Pivander
    Pivander (Alex) 14 January 2020 18: 14
    A complete letter crap that ... just crap out of letters.
  2. businessv Offline businessv
    businessv (Vadim) 14 January 2020 20: 10
    Thus, according to the remarks of the Accounts Chamber, “it is not possible to assess the adequacy and validity of financing.”

    The authors of the article believe in the implementation of nat. projects? Without a change of government, all projects will end with a crazy cut, the search for the last and the departure of bureaucrats over the hill, after the stolen money!
  3. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) 14 January 2020 20: 16
    Ecology is wonderful, first you need to transplant the accounting chamber on bicycles.
  4. maiman61 Offline maiman61
    maiman61 (Yuri) 14 January 2020 20: 47
    Whatever the loafer is, the ecologist! Shovel, scrap and these environmentalists on the virgin lands!
  5. Vasil K. Offline Vasil K.
    Vasil K. (Vasil K.) 14 January 2020 21: 30
    In metallurgy, ten years ago I saw the technology of the forties. Crimson and green rivers flowed from the plants ...
  6. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 14 January 2020 23: 14
    The Accounts Chamber just politely pointed out the blame of the project ....

    Could not openly call nonsense ...
  7. Bitter Offline Bitter
    Bitter (Gleb) 14 January 2020 23: 28
    Where is the problem? Introduce an environmental tax, albeit low (a kind of ecological fifty dollars) and impose absolutely everything and everything on them. Funds for the construction of treatment, garbage and other environmental projects. The industry will be held accountable with the opportunity to receive soft loans for the modernization of production. To think over and implement the levers of real public control over this whole process.