“Expecting the Worst”: London prepares to lose US leadership


The current leadership of the UK Department of Defense demonstrates a surprisingly objective view of the processes taking place in the field of geopolitics.


In an interview with The Sunday Times, Defense Minister Ben Wallace said that Americans could leave the world's leading position, and therefore Britain should strive for independence in the military.

According to him, “Britain is preparing for the worst,” and understanding this perspective “keeps him awake at night.”

The Minister noted that the withdrawal of US troops from Syria and Trump's calls for a more active participation of NATO in the situation in the Middle East, indicate that it is time for Britain to think about a new defense strategy that does not include assistance from the United States.

In conclusion, the minister noted that London’s hopes for an unbreakable alliance with Washington did not materialize:

The 2010 assumptions that we will always be part of the US coalition, in fact, simply do not reflect what will actually happen.


In conclusion, it is worth noting that Wallace’s statements are in tune with the statements of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on the need for a large-scale review of the kingdom’s defense capabilities against the backdrop of increasing isolation policy USA.
Photos used: https://www.pexels.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

6 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexzn Offline
    Alexzn (Alexander) 12 January 2020 10: 37
    -2
    • 0
    • 2
    If the trend of resigning the duties of the world gendarme continues, then European countries will have to revise their doctrines and increase military budgets. The process is obvious.
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 12 January 2020 18: 04
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Quote: AlexZN
      The process is obvious.

      ... but impossible ....

      European countries will have to revise their doctrines and increase military budgets

      Not in all countries, taxpayers can allow this to their older comrades ....
      The European countries of NATO, this is not the Russian Federation, which can deploy whole formations and associations (approx .: 1st TA, 8th OA) in peacetime, create new airborne forces with stationary objects from “0” (note: Hmeimim ATS) ...
      If any Prime Minister of Great Britain proposes to recreate the 1st AK of Great Britain in the "rotting" Federal Republic of Germany, voters will immediately hang him on a lantern, the same will be done by the heads of the Netherlands and Belgium, who decide to recreate their tank troops equipped with tanks that they refused to still 2011
      The British Armed Forces themselves have tripled since the end of the HV; taxpayers will not allow it to be increased, although there are objective reasons for this ...
      All European Armed Forces became dwarf and were imprisoned that the US Armed Forces fulfill their mission of defending Europe ...
      And if the United States withdraws its armed forces from Europe, then the European countries of NATO will have nothing to protect themselves from the Russian Federation, to say nothing, modern armed forces and armed forces of the Republic of Belarus are capable of defeating most armed forces of the European NATO countries ...
      In addition, the armed forces of the European countries of NATO (except Great Britain) are imprisoned for the defense of the European theater of operations, and the existing military budgets are quite enough ...
      Great Britain, which, as in the "glorious" years of the twentieth century, supplemented the US armed forces, needs to increase the military budget and the number of its armed forces, because its aircraft are sharpened for military operations outside the European theater of war ...
      In addition, with the modernization of the Russian Federation of its KSF and VKS, the UK will have to increase the capabilities of its naval forces, primarily the anti-aircraft forces in the North Atlantic .... the construction of the UK multipurpose aircraft carriers and the acquisition of the US F-35, is part of this plan ... .
      NATO’s European countries will be saved only by the combined AK and the combined air and naval commands / formations .... This will save money and lead to the combat coordination of formations and units of “different languages” and equipped with different NATO countries ...
      The advantage of the British Armed Forces is the large number of overseas territories and its friendly states (most of which are members of the British Commonwealth of Nations), many of which have a strategic position in the global maritime communications (Falklands, Gibraltar, Cyprus, Brunei, Oman). ..
    2. kriwo.alek Offline
      kriwo.alek (Alex) 13 January 2020 20: 52
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      Well no. Or create your own European shield, or go under the "wing" of a stronger country.
      Imagine: the unification of Europe (if not all countries) into a coalition with Russia and China. Where will the USA be?
      Right. In deep h ...
  2. Jar.serge Offline
    Jar.serge (Reznik) 12 January 2020 11: 20
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Well, yes, puppets are only worth considering.
  3. And as the worst, London expects it, because the power of Doodles is diminishing!
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 12 January 2020 18: 13
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Quote: BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
      And as the worst, London expects it, because the power of Doodles is diminishing!

      It does not decrease, but is redistributed to the Asia-Pacific region, which does not prevent "brewing porridge" in BV before leaving, because it will affect the economy of the EU (US competitors) ...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. commbatant Offline
    commbatant (Sergei) 12 January 2020 18: 11
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    In an interview with The Sunday Times, Defense Minister Ben Wallace said that Americans could leave the world's leading position, and therefore Britain should strive for independence in the military.

    Comrade Ben Wallace is cunning, he apparently wanted to say that since his country is leaving the EU, then why should Britain keep at least its own military forces in Europe, which will save budget money and free up military personnel located in Germany for expeditionary operations? ... let the units of beggars from Eastern Europe stand near Ivangorod, and Great Britain needs BV ...
  6. The comment was deleted.