The blow took place: options for further revenge of Iran by the Americans

40

After waiting several days after the US reprisal against General Kassem Suleimani, Iran retaliated. The Americans didn’t get rid of Tomatoes: ballistic missiles hit the Pentagon’s infrastructure in neighboring Iraq. According to reports, over 80 people were killed, US Air Force planes were destroyed. What will be the next steps of Washington and Tehran?

It is significant that the Iranians were not afraid of Trump's threats to bomb 52 objects, including the historical and cultural centers of the ancient state. It is noteworthy that under paragraph IX of Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, such actions fall under the definition of war crime. At the same time, the US is called General Suleimani, who was murdered by them without a trace.



What's next?

Now the ball is on the side of Washington. Much depends on whether Trump will go on to further aggravate. So far, the American president has tweeted an encouraging message in the spirit of "everything is fine with us, our armed forces are the best and most equipped." Let's see what moves Iran has in store if Washington does begin to escalate the conflict. The National Security Council of the Islamic Republic has developed 13 plans for "terrible revenge" of the United States. Without pretending to reveal the plans of dodgy Persians, let us announce what lies on the surface.

Second vietnam


The US strategy is to surround Iran with a ring of hostile Arab states. In response, Tehran is actively conducting a hybrid war in the region. He relies on the military and political forces in neighboring countries, for example, in Lebanon it is Hesbollah, in Yemen - the Hussites with their militia Ansar Allah. There are pro-Iranian forces in Iraq, and in Bahrain, and in Saudi Arabia. In aggregate, they are commonly called the "Shiite belt" of Iran.

Tehran’s further actions in response to US aggression may include stepping up a proxy war. The Iraqi direction looks the most promising. The assassination of General Suleymani occurred precisely in the capital of this neighboring state. The US military from Syria was mainly relocated to Iraq. After the massacre of Suleimani, Baghdad demanded the withdrawal of US troops from its territory, but Washington, having at first agreed, quickly turned to refusal.

In fact, the mask of a good policeman was dropped, and we are talking about the banal occupation of a sovereign state. Iran, in turn, promised Washington to establish a "second Vietnam" in Iraq. The threat is realistic and extremely serious. Trump is unlikely to like the stream of coffins under the star-striped flag from the Middle East on the eve of the election.

Ormuz


The blockade of this strait can be quite a serious move. A significant part of the hydrocarbon resources of the Middle East monarchies goes through Hormuz. Its blocking within a month will lead to a global fuel crisis. However, the United States will suffer from it to a much lesser extent than Europe or the Asia-Pacific countries, which certainly will not sympathize with Tehran after this. The likelihood of such a scenario, which does not guarantee a targeted attack on Washington, is not so high.

Nuclear weapons


President Trump recently stated that Iran will never acquire its nuclear weapons. His entire “run over” to Tehran is aimed at restraining the Iranian nuclear program. Ironically, it is the actions of the American president that bring the Islamic Republic closer to creating a bomb.

As the recent experience of the DPRK, which has acquired nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, has shown, this radically changes the attitude of Washington. The United States may have a “bigger red button," but the prospect of a nuclear explosion on its territory makes them more accommodating and respectful of other people's sovereignty.

Having destroyed SPVD with his own hands, President Trump paved the way for Iran to become a nuclear power. Needless to say, after that the tension in the Middle East will only intensify?
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    8 January 2020 11: 51
    And where does the author about 80 dead? Why not 180? What is the little things?
    1. 0
      8 January 2020 13: 21
      I would have added zero ... to fight so to fight ... the more the better.
    2. -7
      8 January 2020 14: 57
      40.000 couriers continuously run between the Iranian ministries, working hard on the next, the 14th version of a powerful and deadly attack on America.
    3. +1
      9 January 2020 18: 09
      Quote: Arkharov
      Why not 180? What is the little things?

      Of course. The Americans are all Terminators, you put 60 clips in it, it will lead with a red eye - there is no damage!
      Even one riddled plane is minus $ 20 million from the pocket of American pensioners. And what if the Iraqi Shiite Grads are pulled up? Moreover, Iran is not Vietnam, it borders on the Caspian Sea with Russia. And on the other hand - the entire eastern coast of the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia at a glance. There will be no easy war. Half the world will go bankrupt over the Strait of Hormuz.
  2. +5
    8 January 2020 11: 56
    Ah yes Iran! Well done! Not afraid, openly hit, like the United States. Now for the United States a choice. Or wipe or hit? And now the United States is not ready for war. Suppose the United States strikes, and Iran is likely to strike even harder, they have enough missiles. And Trump has an ELECTION. Of course, Iran is not the United States, but deserves respect.
  3. +2
    8 January 2020 12: 00
    Quote: Arkharov
    According to reports, over 80 people were killed, US Air Force planes were destroyed. What will be the next steps of Washington and Tehran?

    From open sources. Google to the rescue
    1. +2
      8 January 2020 12: 06
      He only reads what he himself wrote.
    2. -6
      8 January 2020 12: 23
      Marzhecki (Sergei)
      IRGC Press Service?
      1. +2
        8 January 2020 13: 52
        This is better than the press office of the oral office in Washington.
    3. -1
      8 January 2020 16: 51
      News without Google, fresh, from Amersky TV:

      Iranian troops fired more than a dozen ballistic missiles against two military bases in Iraq and stated that at least 80 US soldiers had been killed. The US military said it was still evaluating the result.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/iran-live-updates/2020/01/08/c835c218-31a0-11ea-9313-6cba89b1b9fb_story.html

      The Iranians said Karl, the Iranians, of the 80 dead.

      Amer news on TV today:
      Trump is still silent about the devastation (he will appear on TV soon), but says that the Americans are all intact. Iraqi media say there are no casualties among Iraqis. Amer military - Iran missed.
      Iranian media:

      We launched rockets in the direction of Amer bases to prove our abilities. They did not want to cause human damage, otherwise the war would have begun.

      Maybe the Amer’s air defense didn’t work, because calculated that rockets fly by.
      In short, after Trump’s appearance on TV, I’ll give a message ....
      1. +1
        8 January 2020 17: 04
        Quote: cmonman
        News without Google, fresh, from Amersky TV

        So again, a lie, the United States - the empire of lies and deception! Everyone knows that!
        1. -6
          8 January 2020 17: 31
          isofat
          What are the Americans lying again? The fact that Iran reported 80 dead, or what about this time? What are you doing, my dear?
          1. +2
            8 January 2020 17: 39
            Arkharov, an object that has established itself as a deceiver, is constantly forced to prove its statements and judgments, few people believe it. I just remind you - be careful, deceiver! You can’t believe!
      2. 0
        9 January 2020 18: 13
        Quote: cmonman
        ... calculated that the missiles were flying past.

        Past the American box office. The pictures show the stricken hangars with helicopters nearby, and the destroyed office buildings.
  4. +2
    8 January 2020 12: 20
    And in VO write that

    ... there were no casualties among US troops and a small number of missiles were deployed.

    It turns out that 80 people - this is who came to hand ...
    1. -5
      8 January 2020 12: 25
      It turns out that 80 people - this is who came to hand ...

      - Someone would like it at least, but I think there is nothing of the kind there. I think Iranian rocket launchers are hardly less crooked than Syrian rockets, judging by their air defenses?
      1. -2
        8 January 2020 13: 02
        Let's see, clarify.
        Something similar was in Syria ... First, as if the Syrians shot down 87% of cruise missiles, then they specified - 70%, then they specified - 57%,
        And Israel is bombing them with impunity ....

        And then they shot down our plane ....
        1. +1
          8 January 2020 13: 23
          Let's see, of course ... because this is only the beginning and nothing shines for the Americans in this region, except for guerrilla warfare.
          In Idlib, interesting cases are underway to clean up US terrorists.
        2. -7
          8 January 2020 13: 34
          Sergey Latyshev
          Is the plane somehow very suspicious here, too? Wouldn't I be surprised if someone "framed" again?
          1. -1
            8 January 2020 13: 50
            Yes, yes, and suspiciously few American soldiers were destroyed at the base ... everything is suspicious.
    2. 0
      8 January 2020 13: 53
      American service staff may well be.
      1. -6
        8 January 2020 17: 33
        Aleksey Glotov
        What other service staff? Sherpas, heavis and coolies? Gathered in a heap and meanly put in the middle of the runway, and they hid themselves in bunkers?
        And in general, it seems that everything is turning far not in favor of Iran, a day ago their positions were much better. No matter how they hit the plane, too bad data comes in on this, they try to ditch the boxes, the plane goes into small trash, the lining is in characteristic holes, etc. If anything, you can't say that they were "framed". And in general, to deliver a missile strike on the territory of a sovereign country ?! Iraq has already spoken out.
        1. +1
          9 January 2020 18: 16
          Yes, not in favor of Iran and Syria. The local police, 100 thousand people, are unlikely to tolerate the murder of one of their leaders. The green zone is under blows, the allies are massively fleeing. And they’re unlikely to return.
  5. 0
    8 January 2020 13: 26
    There can be no second Vietnam a priori. The modern world is unipolar. Then Vietnam very strongly supported the USSR. Vietnam would not have won without his help. And now, who will provide such significant assistance to Iran? No one ! But Iran has a strong ground army and an experienced one nonetheless.
    1. -5
      8 January 2020 13: 32
      Barmaley_2
      We have already seen another "very strong army" in this region. So far, it looks like a complete zilch.
      1. -1
        8 January 2020 13: 50
        Are you talking about ISIS, or what?
      2. -1
        9 January 2020 03: 22
        What is one more?
    2. +1
      8 January 2020 13: 54
      Oh well ... and they spoke of Syria just as well ... and she, look - is holding on.
      1. 0
        8 January 2020 16: 41
        And with the help of whom is it held?
        1. 0
          7 February 2020 03: 25
          Assad has many helpers in Syria. Not only the Russian Federation and the Iranians.
    3. +1
      9 January 2020 18: 19
      Vietnam did not border with the USSR, and Iran borders with Russia and Azerbaijan (1/3 of Iran’s population is Azerbaijanis. Therefore, Russia and China will establish supplies to Iran without problems. Not by sea, like Vietnam. Wagons and railways.
      1. +2
        7 February 2020 03: 22
        Why would the Russian Persians be a massive supply of weapons to do? The Persians have little money, but for nothing they will not give. This is not the USSR. Well, China receives oil and gas from them. They have more interest, but the Americans are in a position to tighten the screws to China even more, and while China wins the US trade war. The Chinese are unlikely to go into a very frank conflict and want to lose the American market, which is the lion's share of their foreign trade. In addition, Iran is a very difficult partner and companion for the Russian Federation. It’s hard to do business with them.
        1. +1
          7 February 2020 15: 06
          Given that the Chinese simply have nowhere to put up the dollars they earned, other than buying US debt, China simply gives their goods for nothing in exchange for some technology. So the US market is not so attractive, only as long as the logic of poverty triumphs - dollars in your pocket are wealth.
          Well, we ourselves need oil. In Astrakhan, the refinery runs on Iranian oil - there is no closer transport and sulfur.
          1. 0
            25 February 2020 23: 30
            Do not carry nonsense!

            According to the results of the first ten months of 2019, the trade turnover of China and the United States decreased by 14,9% year on year and amounted to $ 447,83 billion, this is stated in a report published on Friday by the Main Customs Administration of the PRC.
            As follows from the document, the volume of exports from China to the USA in the reporting period decreased by 11,3%, to $ 347,787 billion. Imports of American products to China decreased by 25,4% and amounted to $ 100,043 billion.

            These are gigantic amounts.
            1. +1
              27 February 2020 21: 01
              Indeed, gigantic. It is precisely the reduction in exports to the United States, which is bad for Chinese manufacturers, that makes life easier for the state - it is possible to dump 1 trillion of American debts only for "cash" dollars, which are no better than debt obligations - there is simply nothing to buy in the USA for this amount: what you want is impossible, what is not necessary - they do it themselves.
  6. +1
    8 January 2020 13: 58
    Iran worked perfectly in this case. Now they will just wait for a response from the minke whales and will not use anything. But, if only the minke whales use their force against them, most likely, the Iranians will not strike at the minke whales, but against their ally and sworn enemy of Iran. This will be the further actions of Iran.
  7. 0
    8 January 2020 15: 34
    If Iran climbs even further into the "bottle", then the fate of Iraq awaits it. The funny thing is that Iran is ONE. Neither the Russian Federation, nor China, and even more so someone there in the Sunni Middle East, will not fight for it. So, they will make some noise at the UN for the sake of form and this will be done. And Iran will simply be bombed into the Stone Age and that's it. Yes
    1. +3
      9 January 2020 20: 20
      Well, that’s if Iran does not have nuclear warheads, and it could have dirty bombs ... One nuclear warhead will be enough to destroy Israel ... Qatar will be enough for one too ... The US will bomb those who can’t surrender ... The United States is afraid of contacting the same North Korea, as Kim openly declared the possibility of a nuclear strike on US bases and even Alaska with Hawaii ... and possibly the Pacific coast of the Yankees, because Kim also has submarines with ballistic missiles ... Chances to survive Koreans, of course, will not be much, but the Yankees will have to pay exorbitant th price for another foray into a foreign country.
  8. -1
    9 January 2020 13: 53
    80 dead !? Bullshit !!! It can be seen that both agreed to remove the general, everything in this world is bought !!!
    1. 0
      10 January 2020 12: 55
      But what, the version of the contract murder is quite real - the general took too much power.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.