Russians warned of approaching social revolution

8
In the year 2000, when Vladimir Putin came to power, among the goals he designated then was the transformation of Russia into a social state. By definition, a state is social policy which aims to redistribute material wealth in accordance with the principle of social justice for the sake of achieving a decent standard of living for every citizen, smoothing out social differences and helping those in need.





Indeed, certain successes were achieved, for example, the number of dollar billionaires in Russia reached 2018 by 106, having increased, despite Western sanctions, by 29 people over the past two years. However, the government still has work to do. According to official statistics, the country has about 20 million citizens who can be attributed to the poor. That is, it is 13% of the population. However, there are other methods of calculation, in addition to the "Rosstat". Given the application of the deprivation method of counting, it turns out that the poor in Russia are 36 million people, i.e. one fourth of the population of the "rising from its knees" power.

If we turn to the May Decree of Vladimir Putin, it becomes clear that for the fourth time the elected president is ready to continue to build a social state in Russia. However, the ways in which the government appointed by him is ready to fight for the social well-being of Russians raise a lot of questions.

If you believe Dmitry Medvedev, people in Russia began to live longer and more fun than in the 30s of the twentieth century, and therefore it's time to increase the retirement age, men, most likely, up to 65, women - up to 63 years. True, evil tongues argue that the problem is in the pension system itself, which is simply unable to pay pensions to an aging population while reducing the working population. What is the responsibility of the executive branch itself in the formation of this pension system and such working conditions in the country so far remains outside the brackets. The fact is that since 2013, pension accumulations of citizens have been frozen by the state every year. The government is actively trying to promote innovations in the form of a self-employed tax, as well as a voluntary-compulsory system of individual pension capital.

So far, the fate of early pensions for a number of state employees, in particular, for law enforcement officers, remains suspended. Vice Prime Minister Golikova believes that, until recently, an actively promoted ball system and a return to classical pension insurance are needed:

The pension should depend on the length of service and the earnings that the employee received during his labor activity


Also, the government, pursuant to the presidential decree, should turn its eyes to the health system. He was ordered to reduce the shortage of personnel in polyclinics and other medical institutions, which she himself arranged for massive layoffs. It is hoped that Dmitry Medvedev’s office will not solve the problem of a shortage of personnel in medical institutions at the root by eliminating some of these institutions.

Raising the retirement age will add a lot of problems to the Russian labor market. Obvious employment problems are experienced by Russian citizens over 50 and under 25 years old. As of April 2018, almost 10% of Russians surveyed considered themselves completely unemployed.

It should be remembered that social benefits, high salaries, benefits and pensions are the result of development economics state. That is why the government should focus on creating a diversified and competitive economy, however, the reappointment of the head of the cabinet of ministers, Dmitry Medvedev, which causes a mixed opinion among some Russians, and the recipes offered by him question the possibility of achieving this goal.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 May 2018 16: 14
    Here's another question that requires a positive solution for millions of retirees like me: We were not taken into account for 5 years of study at the university! The same ones, for example, who studied for 3 months or a year after the 8th or 10th grade at the courses of tractor-bulldozer drivers and the like, now they are all labor veterans and, accordingly, with a much higher pension than highly educated specialist engineers and others ... Very not fair! Adds tension and resentment greatly.
    PS I understand that this voice is egregious, the current government and the president do not need ...
    1. +1
      12 May 2018 13: 32
      Quote: Tatar 174
      Here's another question that requires a positive solution for millions of retirees like me: We were not taken into account for 5 years of study at the university! The same ones, for example, which weaned 3 months or a year after the 8th or 10th grade at the courses of tractor-bulldozer drivers and the like, now all labor veterans and, accordingly, with a much higher pension,

      I worked and studied in absentia for 6 years, and also worked in two jobs OFFICIALLY for about 9 years. Unfortunately, all this cannot be summed up in the general experience, although they believe that this is also unfair. But alas, the laws are not approved by us, but by the State Duma.
    2. 0
      15 May 2018 14: 25
      But the convicts have seniority
  2. +1
    13 May 2018 06: 50
    Wherever you throw, there is a wedge everywhere. And what am I sorry for the population thought when they elected their president? And now, do you see questions, before they had to be asked and preferably to oneself, but now it's too late to drink Borzhom when the kidneys have failed. An increase in the retirement age will be unambiguous, and I am afraid they will cancel the harmful grid, but everything is heading towards that. We have been rumors for a long time about the cancellation of harmful work experience, I understand, this is what a burden on the budget (irony), so why are there so many harmful industries in our country? Is the population to blame for this? Let's cancel this grid, and who will be interested in mining coal and ore, standing in a smelting shop or breathing polluted air at chemical plants and nuclear power plants, who are Medvedev's comrades? I propose to the government to do simply, to bring these 25% of the population to the point, well, you think there will be 36 million fewer inhabitants in Russia, but for them we are just numbers in reports ...
    1. +1
      13 May 2018 08: 17
      Where not to throw, everywhere a wedge. And what do I apologize for when the people elected their president?

      The people have become impoverished
      1. 0
        13 May 2018 12: 56
        I think the people were placed in such a framework where they are concerned about ordinary survival.
      2. +1
        15 May 2018 14: 30
        Quote: nemec55
        Where not to throw, everywhere a wedge. And what do I apologize for when the people elected their president?

        The people have become impoverished

        I do not agree with you. The people had no choice. I think worthy people have long been pushed into a dark corner.
        Remember who "fought" for the presidency? It is funny and sad at the same time. And you say "the people have chosen."
        I repeat: "There was no one to choose from"
  3. +1
    13 May 2018 16: 43
    The state is looking for fools who will believe all the rubbish that it composes. For you, the "workers" of the pension fund - theorists and practitioners, I repeat that the state old-age benefit should be reduced to the same denominator. A person has reached the established retirement age - receive a pension according to statutory benefits for each year of work experience. I don't give a damn about who you were in life: a minister or a cleaner. The state paid you money for work and the salaries were different. If you wanted to live in old age, bathing in milk and champagne, save yourself on your own. And in retirement you are just a person without responsibilities and positions. And all kinds of personal pensions should concern only the president. Want to pay extra for rewards? Count how much and for what, and not just at your own discretion.
    There isn’t enough money, because the pensions of those who haven’t hit a finger on one finger and have been living on budgetary funds are several times higher than labor. 9 rubles a pension from an uncle who worked on a collective farm and as a farmer from 000 years old until old age ... What can I say. You have chosen your future - reap! Amuse the vanity of ghouls asking for relief and handouts ...