The first channel recognized a fake about the downed Boeing in the sky over the Donbass


On December 9, 2019, the American edition of The New Yorker published an interview with the Director General of the Russian Channel One Konstantin Ernst, in which he recognized the 2014 plot as a fake that the Malaysian Boeing could be shot down by a Ukrainian fighter. At this time, at the “Normandy format” summit in Paris, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky discussed steps to resolve the crisis in the Donbass.


It should be noted that Ernst admitted that a mistake was made, but it was not made on purpose. After that, media representatives began to ask questions to the Russian authorities, “Does such a mistake undermine confidence in the state television channel?”

To this, the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov officially replied - "does not undermine at all." That is, the Kremlin did not see any reason for distrusting the “First Channel”, which aired the above story.

At the same time, the Kremlin’s opinion about Ernst himself, who gave a similar interview to the American publication, is still unknown. Nor is it known of the reasons that prompted Ernst to recollect and revelate.

Around the resonant topic and around such a tragedy that happened with the Boeing, it is important to give the whole palette of versions. Not one version, as many Western channels prefer, namely the version palette

- said Sands.

In this regard, yes, some versions that come forward at a certain stage, then their insolvency or doubtfulness is confirmed. And at a certain stage it could very well be

- added Peskov.

We remind you that in November 2014, in the program “However” by Mikhail Leontyev, a picture was allegedly taken, allegedly made by a foreign spy satellite. The picture showed a fighter that could bring down a Boeing. However, it later became clear that the "sensational" picture was fake.
  • Photos used: https://poslednie-news.ru/
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Observer2014 Offline Observer2014
    Observer2014 11 December 2019 19: 57
    +2
    I remember that picture. It needs to be complete .. fool To take seriously info about the Su-25 wassat laughing And on the "Snapshot" Su-27. In the history of the Military Review hi monitor.
  2. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 11 December 2019 20: 10
    +2
    Does such a mistake undermine confidence in the state television channel?

    No, it does not undermine. Almost nobody watches it, even those who watch TV.
    1. Hayer31 Offline Hayer31
      Hayer31 (Kashchei) 11 December 2019 20: 48
      0
      But I watch Evening Urgant, just that.
      1. boriz Offline boriz
        boriz (boriz) 11 December 2019 20: 51
        0
        I stopped watching Urgant after the nightingale droppings. Not that I am a fan of Solovyov, but it would be unacceptable to do so on the screen of the central channel. Although I looked at Urgant two times at about the third.
        1. Petr Fedorov Offline Petr Fedorov
          Petr Fedorov 11 December 2019 23: 45
          +1
          Still watching TV? I am amused. Good luck, Cossack!
        2. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 12 December 2019 07: 11
          0
          And what does not litter?
  3. isofat Offline isofat
    isofat (isofat) 11 December 2019 22: 38
    -1
    And who is the author of this stuffing? Sorry, but nowadays you need to publish a link to the source. What is stated here is in great doubt. The ambitious headline categorically speaks of the fact of recognition of the fake, and the content completely refutes the headline:

    The first channel recognized a fake about a downed Boeing in the sky over the Donbass.

    It should be noted that Ernst admitted that a mistake was made, but it was not made on purpose.

    etc. etc.

    PS Are liars losing their skills?
    1. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 12 December 2019 07: 13
      -1
      And what was originally incomprehensible that it was a fake? No belated apologies are needed. A complete disgrace to the whole world.
      1. isofat Offline isofat
        isofat (isofat) 12 December 2019 13: 22
        -2
        Do not disgrace and do not fool people! Initially, it was clear that the Sun revolved around the Earth ... it turned out to be a mistake. Notice the error, not the fake.
        1. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 12 December 2019 19: 48
          -1
          Such errors are unlikely to occur. Rather, they thought it would slip free then, and disgraced the whole world. What then can be faith?
          1. isofat Offline isofat
            isofat (isofat) 12 December 2019 20: 40
            -1
            If you are satisfied with getting a salary with a high degree of probability ... they will hardly be given ... maybe they will ... and in the same vein, then the flag is in your hands and a steam locomotive towards you. Good luck.
            1. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
              Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 12 December 2019 20: 44
              -1
              Forgive me, I did not understand who was on whom and what does the salary have to do with it? You have something from the series: "an elder in the garden, uncle in Kiev".
              1. isofat Offline isofat
                isofat (isofat) 12 December 2019 20: 48
                -1
                Quote: Arkharov
                Excuse me, I didn’t understand anything, who was standing on whom and where does the salary come from?

                These are your problems, mister good.
  4. Petr Fedorov Offline Petr Fedorov
    Petr Fedorov 11 December 2019 23: 41
    +3
    So what? For fake news entih will not be judged? K678
    The Federation Council approved amendments to the law on information and the Code of Administrative Offenses, establishing liability for the dissemination of knowingly false public information.

    Recall that for disseminating false information under the guise of truthful, a fine is prescribed for citizens, it will be from 30 to 100 thousand rubles with or without confiscation of the subject of an administrative offense; for officials - a fine of 60 to 200 thousand rubles with or without confiscation of the subject of an administrative offense; for legal entities - a fine of 200 to 500 thousand rubles with or without confiscation of the subject of an administrative offense.

    No matter how the law is. Ali only for poor fellows?
    1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
      Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 12 December 2019 09: 00
      +1
      Exactly!!! Only for poor fellows !!!

      And on TASS and RIO (ile Lente) there is still a page about the downed by noble rebels An.