It became known why Rogozin receives almost 2 times more than the head of NASA

November 29, 2019 23

The head of the internal audit service of Roscosmos, Artem Melnikov, explained why the salary of the head of the state corporation Dmitry Rogozin could significantly exceed the salary of his American colleague from NASA, James Frederick Bridenstine. It turns out that Russians pay extra for state secrets. At the same time, Rogozin's subordinate did not explain why he believes that the director of NASA does not have access to classified information.

NASA, with whom we are compared, deals exclusively with civilian topics. We are not only dealing with civilian issues. We are engaged in the entire combat missile techniqueTherefore, all heads of the state corporation are secret bearers, they are subject to a special restriction on contacts and on trips abroad. The strategic nuclear potential depends on them.

- said Melnikov on the radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda".

Melnikov added that the American’s maximum salary of $ 250 per year, mentioned in the media, is different from the real one. At the same time, he clarified that the Americans engaged in military nuclear topics, salaries 10-20 times higher than in "Roskosmos". Moreover, he did not explain how the "military nuclear theme" relates to NASA.

It should be recalled that Rogozin declared his income for 2018 in the amount of 29,5 million rubles. (in the main place of work, almost 23,5 million - about $ 366 thousand, and in general $ 460 thousand). At the same time, in the report published by Roskosmos for 2018, it was stated that the average monthly salary in the state corporation and its organizations was 59,7 thousand rubles, and the average monthly management salary was 396 thousand rubles. At the same time, the official salary (i.e. without allowances) for the candidate for cosmonauts amounted to 60,9 thousand rubles, for the cosmonaut - 63,8 thousand rubles, and for the instructor-cosmonaut - 88,45 thousand rubles.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Sapsan136

+9

29 November 2019 17: 28

C'mon, lie ... The US is launching devices like the Soviet Buran, but they are clearly dual-purpose ... The fact that officials in the Russian Federation receive a lot, but work very poorly and steal a lot is no secret ... The situation needs to be corrected until Russia was brought to a Russian rebellion ... all sorts of bored and ineffective leaders.
1. Arkharov
  
  -8
  
  29 November 2019 17: 36
  
  And why the type of Buran, and not the type of Shuttle? Maybe, after all, Buran himself is also Shuttle-style? Where is your chicken and where is the egg? This is also what to say that Audi makes cars not like Mercedes, but like Moskvich.
  1. Sapsan136
    
    +5
    
    29 November 2019 17: 46
    
    Because the Shuttle program is closed precisely because of constructive miscalculations in their design.
    1. Arkharov
      
      -7
      
      29 November 2019 18: 04
      
      Could not come up with a more original reason? This is a type, if you ask why you have boots on different legs, answer because the highest mountain is Mount Everest. And by the way, is the Buran program still functioning successfully? You could have been able to speak with Solovyov, and maybe with Petrosyan.
Arkharov

-2

29 November 2019 17: 32

It is clear why the results of fruitful work are 2 times greater. All is fair.
steelmaker

+5

29 November 2019 18: 01

The state is ugly, the state is rogue.
In this state, people lie and die.
Unaccountably, recklessly grinning at the mustache,
the state controls us at random and somehow.
Perhaps and somehow do not reign for a horse,
maybe and somehow, like ice and wormwood.
And how many and dangerous people live in the country,
omitted, deprived, like in Gorky's "At the Bottom!"
Hayer31

-6

29 November 2019 18: 40

Well, a normal salary, if VV approves, then everything is under control.
1. Bitter
  
  +2
  
  1 December 2019 21: 50
  
  why Rogozin gets almost 2 times more than the head of NASA.
  
  Maybe they give him a "salary" by weight, per kilogram?
beeper

+6

29 November 2019 22: 41

Previously, for snickering incompetent "bosses" hypermercantilely "caring" not about the assigned business ("for their affairs" - personal productivity and the results of the subordinate department), there was a simple and understandable definition - a grabber, but now they have invented a tolerant euphemism - "an effective manager ", although the essence is the same ?!
Oleg Rambover

+3

30 November 2019 00: 20

So we will win.
1. Arkharov
  
  -3
  
  30 November 2019 10: 24
  
  Whom? Remember Shevchuk’s song?
  1. Oleg Rambover
    
    +4
    
    30 November 2019 11: 31
    
    How to whom? Unspiritual GayEurope. With such lovers of dachshunds receiving a day, like two astronauts a month (interestingly, NASA has the same combination of salaries, astronauts interrupt from bread to water), victory is inevitable.
    1. Arkharov
      
      -2
      
      30 November 2019 11: 36
      
      There is no doubt. True, there, probably, due to the specifics from the burger to the Coke. By the way, dachshunds are very cute animals, though with a complex character. Only negotiating with them, as, indeed, everywhere, is much more preferable than fighting. True, not everyone understands this.
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        +1
        
        30 November 2019 11: 41
        
        Rogozin has a special approach. If the dachshund is slightly drowned, it becomes like a silk.
        
        Arkharov
        
        -1
        
        30 November 2019 12: 07
        
        Yes, with a dachshund, this seems to be his main achievement. I saw the eyes of Vučić, he just caught on and obviously did not know what to think about it.
Ravshan

-2

30 November 2019 12: 56

It became known why Rogozin receives almost 2 times more than the head of NASA.

Such headings cannot cause anything but irritation.
Their authors are trying to compare the warm with the soft. And you just need to remember (or read) the classic political economy.
NASA cannot be compared with Roskosmos simply because there is nothing in common between them.
NASA is a commercial company operating in a capitalist mode of production. What she does there is not much difference.
Roskosmos is a modern feud. Functioning within the neo-feudal mode of production. There are many such feuds in the Russian Federation, a state with a feudal mode of production - some are called RAO, some PAO, but most often, a "state corporation". And it is absolutely unimportant what these feuds do, they function according to the laws of the feudal mode of production, which are absent in the same USA (for NASA in particular).
How then can you compare Roskosmos with NASA?
1. Arkharov
  
  +4
  
  30 November 2019 13: 46
  
  Well, it’s easy to compare the results and, accordingly, the salary. So to say, the end result of activity, regardless of form. After all, the end product of activity is identical. Here you can compare the effectiveness of 2 different systems. It will be immediately clear what each system received for itself, and what it gave to the state. I wonder what will happen in the end?
  1. Ravshan
    
    -6
    
    30 November 2019 14: 25
    
    Quote: Arkharov
    Well, it’s easy to compare the results and, accordingly, the salary.
    
    The results (final product) and the feeding process are two completely different things. One independent of the other.
    
    Quote: Arkharov
    Here you can compare the effectiveness of 2 different systems.
    
    Why compare? Everything has long been compared and described by classical political economy. Many, many, many decades ago.
    But in addition to the mode of production (a secondary thing), there is also society. More precisely, the level of its development.
    It is impossible by means of slaves to carry out production in a feudal or capitalist way. Will not work. Slaves (the population or, if you will, living force) can only be slaveholding and no other.
    The people (any) may already be feudal. But they cannot be capitalist. No matter which of these methods is more cost effective.
    Nations (in bourgeois society) can be capitalistic. But for many nations, becoming a nation is a long time issue. And it’s not a fact that this process will happen to them.
    For example, the population of Russia has not become a nation. Although at the beginning of the 20th century. there were all the prerequisites for this. But two successive reactionary coups (1917-18 and 1927-36) drove society in Russia / the USSR into the Middle Ages. After which, until 1991, the USSR used the slave-owning method of production, of varying degrees of rigidity. And the population of the USSR was the real slaves (who did not know about it, because propaganda worked).
    28 years of feudalism in Russia (including the transition period), this, by historical standards, is a moment. Another feudal society in Russia to develop and develop. But bourgeois society (capitalism) in Russia should be forgotten for now. Step by step.
OXOTHuK Sakha

-3

30 November 2019 16: 48

It’s cool that ours gets more than Americans. So we are power!
1. Arkharov
  
  +2
  
  30 November 2019 18: 55
  
  This is what you specifically "yours" are so sincerely happy about?
musorg

+5

1 December 2019 11: 44

It would be less than the salary, he would not be stuck in the hatch of the tank!
Oleg Kalugin

+1

1 December 2019 16: 10

If Russia does not understand the mind, then how can you understand these?)))
Rather, they can be understood, but what they explain is better not to try))
I correctly understood that Rogozin is modest and should he be added?))
fevralsk.morev.75

0

4 December 2019 03: 00

Pay extra for the title "friend of Putin".
vik669

0

4 December 2019 13: 29

The head of the internal audit service of Roscosmos, Artem Melnikov, explained - well, what else are you stupid to say - money and ... there is never much!