Moscow explained why there were no toilets on the ships returned to Ukraine

18

Recently we Reportedas Moscow handed over to Kiev the Ukrainian Navy ships located in Kerch. And so, on the eve of the 6th anniversary of the Maidan in Kiev, the commander of the Ukrainian Navy, Admiral Igor Voronchenko, decided to raise the "patriotism of the nation" by telling how the "aggressors and invaders" treacherously abused Ukrainian ships.

The Ukrainian admiral provocateur accused Russia of damaging the property of ships that were detained on November 25, 2018 in the Strait of Kerch.

Russians ditched the ships! They even took off shades, sockets and toilets. We will show the world the barbaric attitude of Russians to everything

- said Voronenko.

Russia did not have to wait long for an answer. Senator Federation Council from Smolensk region (member of the Committee on Defense and Security) Franz Klintsevich has already answered Voronchenko.

Rave. Either the toilet bowls were not originally on the Ukrainian ships, or the sailors themselves removed and flooded them, thus trying to hide some material evidence of their weakness during the incident in the Kerch Strait

- the Russian senator considers.

It should be noted that the accusations of the Ukrainian side were expected. Kiev is always ungrateful to come to any kind initiative of Moscow. This is a historical fact, and what happened is an additional confirmation.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Afinogen
    Afinogen
    +4
    21 November 2019 10: 37
    I said, it was necessary, if it was decided to give (it is not clear why), to give the guys from the Donbass along with weapons. They wouldn’t throw tantrums that there are no toilets and that the ships are dirty, not washed. They’d take it as it is. Moreover, Ukraine screams that Donbass is their territory, so I think it would not be against such a transfer, especially ships without toilet bowls. laughing It’s a joke, it would be better if the guns were removed, and the toilet bowls were left.
  2. OXOTHuK Sakha
    OXOTHuK Sakha
    -11
    21 November 2019 11: 12
    The Ministry of Defense explained that they were confiscated for the needs of Russian soldiers.
    So far, that there are not enough toilets in the army ...
  3. Marciz
    Marciz
    +4
    21 November 2019 11: 16
    They surrendered, they stole their ships along with the toilet bowls, now they will go for a "shot" at the stern, the country does not have extra money ... and the cowardly servants ... generally released !!!!!
  4. steelmaker
    steelmaker
    +2
    21 November 2019 12: 38
    It would be better to explain why for free they gave, and did not trade for their own ship? And why did they give them away, are there few provocations?
  5. gorenina91
    gorenina91
    +1
    21 November 2019 14: 21
    - Personally, I absolutely do not understand ... - why Russia is always itself constantly "substituted" ... -And it is substituted literally out of the blue ... -Well, who needs this "humanely-friendly-brotherly-compliant" gesture aside Ukraine ... - After all, as always, it will be interpreted and revised exclusively in favor of Ukraine ...
    - Like this ... - they wanted to make a broad gesture .. but got a "toilet theme" ...
    - And, for sure, this topic will still be pulled out and ... and ... and ... and ... and Russia will have to make excuses that, they say, these toilets did not exist, etc. ... - That's why Is that all of Russia ???
    - Here, personally, I would do so ...:
    - At any demonstration exercises of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, or firing; as well as during the development of attacks by our Aerospace Forces ... - to arrange bombing and launches of anti-ship missiles at these "trophy targets" ... - All would respect Russia at once ... - and even Americans, including ... - And a crowd of investors who want to invest in the Russian Federation ... - would just line up ...
    - But there was a "compliant, sugary-friendly" transfer by Russia to Ukraine of their pirate ships ...
    - Now it becomes absolutely clear that Russia will continue to supply gas to Ukraine after the expiration of the previous supply agreement ... -in 2020 ...
    - The same "yielding, sugary-friendly" gesture will be repeated ...
    - Personally, I now absolutely have no doubt about it ...
    1. Pishenkov
      Pishenkov
      +1
      22 November 2019 00: 53
      Why they gave it, I also don't understand. There are also no targets for missiles or bombing from them - if this "armored boat" was pierced with a lead bullet, not even an armor-piercing one ...
      It would be better indeed, as the comrade recommended above, they transferred to the Donbass - they do not have their own fleet yet, but at the same time, in this case too, they could say that they transferred to Ukraine, they are also considered Ukraine there ... so there’s a return would have taken place in that case.
    2. Persistent
      Persistent
      0
      23 November 2019 10: 33
      Apparently, on purpose! So that Ukraine finally got everyone out with its pig squeal. They screech, and everyone around us grins !!! laughing good
  6. boriz
    boriz
    +3
    21 November 2019 17: 23
    Putin needs to bring to Paris about a dozen toilets and solemnly pass Zelensky to the cameras of enthusiastic reporters. Trolling will be kind.
  7. aries2200
    aries2200
    +1
    21 November 2019 23: 04
    It was necessary to remove the anchors and paint these troughs in the St. George’s side ribbon .....
  8. jack clubs
    jack clubs
    -4
    21 November 2019 23: 34
    They laugh at Zelensky that he does not own the situation in different areas, for example, does not control what is happening on the border with the Donbass. Smart people understand that it’s an achievement for the actor that he will soon be in power for a year and have not yet been eaten. This is Ukraine, cannibals in Africa are more civilized. And not only did he hold on, he retains the rating, he is even trying to fulfill his promises.
    What controls your vaunted Putin? May decrees? Messages to the congregation? Nabiullina? Gref? Gazprom? Well, even with these toilets it’s a mess.
    So who is a good actor and who is the president?
    1. Pishenkov
      Pishenkov
      +3
      22 November 2019 00: 44
      A good (maybe) actor is Zelensky, and the President is Putin. Today, by far the most capable and respected in the world. He governs everything that you have listed, as well as the largest state in the world and its armed forces, he influences world politics, he does it, and therefore his name and surname are never confused anywhere. More precisely, he doesn’t even dare to confuse ... But for Zele / le / li / nskogo / Vla / olo / Oleg / dimir there is still one complete crap, even with toilets / latrine. laughing
  9. savage1976
    savage1976
    +2
    22 November 2019 04: 59
    Does the fleet have toilet bowls? Apparently, Ukrainians really have high-tech boats. It's time to give up.
  10. Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev
    0
    22 November 2019 09: 54
    And ours didn’t make an inventory or video before the transfer? This is a specific omission, it would be possible to play.
  11. Vladimir Kuznetsov_3
    Vladimir Kuznetsov_3
    +2
    22 November 2019 10: 35
    These troughs are the toilet bowls. Let them rejoice that they generally gave ...
  12. meandr51
    meandr51
    +3
    22 November 2019 12: 17
    Russia is not obliged to give them anything. As for their squeals and barking, they will be in any case, with or without toilets. They do not own other weapons. Just ignore it.
  13. Piramidon
    Piramidon
    +2
    22 November 2019 15: 17
    The moronic answer of this pseudo-expert Klintsevich. Which in general, as you can see, is not in the subject. Just to blather and PR.

    Either the toilet bowls were not originally on the Ukrainian ships, or they were removed and flooded by the sailors themselves.

    After all, there is an act of reception and transmission of these ukrov. Even a video on the topic of how it was signed walks for several days on the networks.

    1. Kuzmitsky
      Kuzmitsky
      +2
      22 November 2019 18: 04
      Yes, the FSB is not in vain getting a salary. They guessed to record on video what is inside the boats and the moment of signing the acceptance certificates. It seems that they provided for the option that they would be accused of looting.
  14. Alexander Ii
    Alexander Ii
    0
    23 November 2019 12: 48
    Was the senator during the transfer of the ships? What side is he talking to them at all? Good initiative of Moscow? So I understand that this is a good initiative in the mandatory implementation by Moscow of the verdict of the international tribunal in The Hague.
  15. Alexander Ii
    Alexander Ii
    -1
    23 November 2019 12: 53
    Russian videos prove only one thing. On one of the boats there is 1 (one!) Toilet. They were not shown to others. Whether it is, or not. Without indicating the time of filming. Either immediately after the capture of the boats, or at the time of transfer. More thoroughly necessary ...
  16. Alexander Ii
    Alexander Ii
    -2
    23 November 2019 12: 59
    Stolen and no one is ashamed. Dag scratch. In The Hague, a decision must be made (exclusively for Russia !!!) indicating the return of Ukrainian boats captured in neutral waters, complete with toilets and sailors' panties installed in them.
  17. dimakyiv83
    dimakyiv83
    0
    25 November 2019 22: 46
    Yes...! I used to think that you have more adequate in Russia, but ... :) I apologize! How wrong I was! Well, when you comment, read that your president, etc. signs and on what basis the ships were returned .. :) It’s just that now together with Gazprom they will slap such a fine that we can buy better ships! At your own expense!