The US said it would not allow Russia's control over Syria's oil fields

5
The United States continues its efforts to convince the world community that their desire to leave Syria’s oil fields for personal use is dictated solely by concern for world peace.



The US media distributed a transcript of an interview with US Vice President Michael Pence, in which he states that Washington will not allow oil wells in northern Syria to fall under the control of Moscow, Damascus or Tehran.

According to an American official, Trump made it clear that the US military will remain in Syria and will be used to protect oil fields in Northern Syria.

In his statement, Pence also noted that the US military will “work closely with its Kurdish allies,” as it supposedly will guarantee that the proceeds from the sale of oil do not fall into the hands of Russia, Iran, or the Syrian government.

It is unlikely that anyone will be able to mislead the words of the American vice president about cooperation with the Kurds: the Americans will keep them as watchdogs of oil fields and nothing more, providing feeding and weapons by allocating a share of the proceeds from illegal production and the sale of oil belonging to Syria.

Actually, control of oil fields is the main goal of the US stay in the region, and not the fight against terrorists with which they are hiding.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. beeper
    beeper
    +4
    30 October 2019 12: 39
    What is such a "fight against terrorists" if the United States is the main one (subsidiary ones are embassies and consulates in other countries!) A hotbed and a Zakopershchik, Center and Headquarters of global terrorism ?!
    The United States produces Terrorism around the world, and does not fight against it !!!
    World terrorism is completely in the service of Washington and is used by it to achieve its own expansionist goals - only the most politically blind and Washington-aligned people "do not see" and "deny" this!
    The fact that the goal of the "democratic" armed American (NATO) aggression against Syria was oil was clear from the very beginning, and whether Trump, Obama, or anyone else is at the head of a terrorist gang, it makes no difference, because uterine "habits" and cannibalism US "appetites" don't change!
  2. Pacifist
    Pacifist
    +7
    30 October 2019 12: 42
    Those. these geeks continue to think in terms of imperialistic pirate colonialists. And what about Russia? This is the territory of Syria. The United States there, from the point of view of international law, the invaders / bandits / terrorists, any of these terms is correct. By their actions, they clearly show which collider they have run into. They wanted to spit on all this bullshit about the fight against ISIS, especially since they themselves created them for this business, they came to rob resources.
  3. kriten
    kriten
    +2
    30 October 2019 14: 11
    If the Kremlin, for the sake of unknown concessions, allows the United States to rob oil in Syria, it will be a shame that eliminates any victories, turning them into a cowardly loss.
  4. AICO
    AICO
    -2
    31 October 2019 08: 41
    Well then, scoop up sand for new graveyards, otherwise it will be expensive to haul from there !!!
  5. Alexander Churinov
    Alexander Churinov
    +2
    31 October 2019 17: 30
    Initially, the entire US counterterrorism campaign in Syria should have been called "The American Shale Oil Boom."