The British took up the Black Sea

11
Disturbing news come from the Black Sea. The United Kingdom sent its fighters to Romania to participate in the mission of the air police to prevent "potential aggression" in the Black Sea. The Ambassador of the United Kingdom stated:

Such airspace protection missions ensure that we are able to quickly and effectively deal with any potential aggression or threat to the Alliance or its members






The problem is this. The reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with the Russian Federation is not recognized by any country in the Western world. Moreover, the events of 2014 on the peninsula are considered in the West as military annexation. Independent adopted the law "On temporarily occupied territories", in which the Crimea and Sevastopol are recognized as integral parts of Ukraine, temporarily occupied by the Russian Federation.

Under this law, Ukrainian border guards have already arrested two Russian courts. The fishing trawler "Nord" was registered in the Crimea, and the Trans Services Maritime company vessel, according to Ukrainian law enforcers, illegally mined sand in a Crimean reserve for the construction of the Crimean bridge.

The Russian side recognized the actions of Independent State Piracy. It was announced that the Black Sea Fleet was ready to clear the waters of the Azov and Black Seas from "Ukrainian privateers". In this situation, there is a great potential for dangerous escalation. Ukraine is on the brink of NATO, if necessary, Independent can be recognized as an ally of the North Atlantic Alliance or associate it with it in one form or another. Ukrainian border guards can re-capture the Russian ship, acting within the framework of their national legislation. The Russian Navy may in response do what NATO may consider the alliance or its member to be “potential aggression or threat”. The British Air Force may be able to carry out aggression against the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which will fit into the framework of the current external policy United Kingdom.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    2 May 2018 11: 30
    We, too, can get the hell out of the British Tornado if even the slightest attempt is made to force a solution on their part, today on our southern borders and in the Crimea itself there are enough forces and means for this, so let’s just try, it’s certainly not enough will seem.
    1. +2
      2 May 2018 12: 38
      Quote: sgrabik
      certainly not enough.

      That's for sure when you consider that the Typhoons and Tornadoes of the Royal Air Force are carriers of tactical nuclear weapons, AWACS in Turkey and British fighters in Romania, what could be better ...
      Typically, the Anglo-Saxons deploy the duty forces of their Air Force before deploying their ground components of the troops (the example of the Baltic countries and Poland), so that you can expect the deployment of botanical tactical groups in Romania and Bulgaria, and then brigade ..., in the Balkans joint AK of NATO countries ...

      However, the above NATO actions are in response to the actions of the Russian Federation to deploy AK as part of the KChF and units of the 12th State Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation in Crimea ...
  2. +2
    2 May 2018 12: 30
    The problem is this. The reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with the Russian Federation is not recognized by any country in the Western world.

    Well, this is the problem of the "Western world", not the Russian Federation, as well as the problem of Georgia's independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia recognized by the Russian Federation ...

    Moreover, the events of 2014 on the peninsula are considered in the West as military annexation.

    Can the source be? Which country, besides Ukraine, recognized Crimea as annexed territory?

    Ukraine is on the brink of NATO, if necessary, Independent can be recognized as an ally of the North Atlantic Alliance or associate it with it in one form or another. Ukrainian border guards can re-capture the Russian ship, acting within the framework of their national legislation. The Russian Navy may in response do what NATO may consider the alliance or its member to be “potential aggression or threat”.

    Hello, please ... Where did you read this in the NATO Charter? There, and Article 5 of the NATO Charter does not always apply when attacking a participating country ...
    The author apparently proposes to give Crimea the Sumerian-Ukram, only because Ukraine can become a member of NATO, no one argues that someday it will become, the question is what is its territorial composition?
    1. +2
      2 May 2018 12: 54
      Crimea will never be given to anyone, this is a matter of principle and national pride, no sanctions will help it, it’s not even patriotism, but a fact that cannot be doubted.
  3. -2
    2 May 2018 13: 20
    Quote: commbatant
    The author apparently suggests giving Crimea to Sumero-ukra, only because Ukraine can become a member of NATO

    No need to attribute your fantasies to the author
    1. +1
      2 May 2018 15: 23
      Quote: UralRep
      Ukraine is on the brink of NATO, if necessary, Independent can be recognized as an ally of the North Atlantic Alliance or associate it with it in one form or another.

      Reading the text, I make a mockery that the author of the article wants to convey to me, you just read ....
      They started to persecute hack, don’t come to the cashier tomorrow, the next time you’ll be more competent ....
  4. -2
    2 May 2018 13: 21
    Quote: commbatant
    Well, this is the problem of the "Western world", not the Russian Federation,

    Yes, say it to Russian companies suffering from Western sanctions
    1. +1
      2 May 2018 15: 24
      Quote: UralRep
      Quote: commbatant
      Well, this is the problem of the "Western world", not the Russian Federation,

      Yes, say it to Russian companies suffering from Western sanctions

      Russian companies have a business plan such as suffering, not working ...
  5. -3
    2 May 2018 13: 22
    Quote: commbatant
    Which country, besides Ukraine, recognized Crimea as annexed territory?

    This is more than enough
    1. +1
      2 May 2018 15: 19
      Quote: UralRep
      Quote: commbatant
      Which country, besides Ukraine, recognized Crimea as annexed territory?

      This is more than enough

      More than enough for Sumera Ukram and more than anyone ...
  6. +1
    3 May 2018 18: 59
    As long as we write in our pants nothing good will be. The West recognizes only a good fist in front of its face.