Putin and Shoigu walk in the Siberian taiga hit the video

October 7 2019 23

On the eve of his birthday, Russian President Vladimir Putin traveled to Siberia, where he walked through the taiga in the company of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

During a walk through the Siberian forest, the head of state gathered mushrooms, and also climbed to the top of one of the mountains, from where he examined the surroundings and noted how beautiful the Yenisei looked.

When Sergei Shoigu dug up a bush of lingonberries, Vladimir Putin with a smile advised him to plant it in the suburbs. However, the Minister of Defense replied that this berry needed a different climate.

The head of the military department noted the excellent state of ecology in Siberia: "Such air must be made, such water must be made." The walk took place at an altitude of two thousand meters above sea level.

When asked by satellites whether it is possible to achieve such clean air in Moscow, Sergei Shoigu replied that this was a question for the president. In turn, the president noted that this should be sought. As a souvenir, the head of state took a pine cone to Moscow.

As a spokesman for the head of state said earlier, his birthday, October 7, this year Vladimir Putin, who turns 67 years old, will spend in nature surrounded by relatives and friends.

Recall that the President of Russia is a lover of excursions into the wild and has previously repeatedly traveled to Siberia for walks.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

SERGEY SERGEEVICS

-1

7 October 2019 10: 54

On the eve of his birthday, Russian President Vladimir Putin traveled to Siberia, where he walked through the taiga in the company of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Well done, you always need to find time to relax and your hobby.
1. Arkharov
  
  -3
  
  12 October 2019 19: 36
  
  What is their hobby?
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

0

7 October 2019 11: 49

they say that in the 90s, in Tuva, Russians were slaughtered like sheep!
1. gorenina91
  
  0
  
  7 October 2019 12: 11
  
  - Yes, all the local "bakhtiars" slaughtered Russians with impunity ...
  -But in Tuva, in addition to Russians, the locals also slaughtered Caucasians ... -Yes, even today Caucasians are trying to bypass the "tyva" side ...
Igor Pavlovich

-3

7 October 2019 13: 40

What an idyll - just like two doves ...
1. Bitter
  
  +1
  
  7 October 2019 21: 21
  
  Under the photo:
  “Can you eat these berries?”
  - Can, only poison.
  
  Fresh air is, of course, very important.
  Judging by the hat, the gentleman to the left of the forest generally leaves only to wash this hat.
  
  An example will be for everyone - you need to plan on a larger weekend, and birthdays too.
steelmaker

-3

7 October 2019 14: 04

It would be better to go for a walk where the forests burned down or where the Chinese are cutting down. Maybe he would love our nature even more?
1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
  
  -2
  
  7 October 2019 14: 40
  
  ... where the Chinese are cutting down.
  
  And there is a photo for this, where the Chinese personally chop, and not the DPRK, for example. China itself is currently doing nothing, buying ready-made products.
2. Pishenkov
  
  0
  
  8 October 2019 16: 04
  
  ... and you personally celebrate holidays and birthdays at the workplace ???
  And for someone, but for Putin, as the leader of the state, it is definitely hard to reproach the fact that he does not travel around the country and does not visit problem areas. He travels more than any other leader of the state, and even in the world's largest country. So, if you really want to criticize, pick up another reason. This one is definitely "out of the box".
  1. Digital error
    
    -1
    
    8 October 2019 23: 18
    
    Quote: Pyshenkov
    Rides more than any other leader of the state.
    
    Former leader (until October 3, 2018) and current president do you mean? Have you seen the charts of the "leaders" of other states to draw such conclusions? Or does he just often "get on the video" (a hint at the title of the article)? Mushroom pickers and fishermen on the roads have recently come across everyone with professional video cameras (especially in the mountains), no matter where I go, I get everything on the video, well, no personal life ...
    1. Pishenkov
      
      +1
      
      9 October 2019 10: 34
      
      ... these "mushroom pickers and fishermen" are called "presidential pool" (just in case you didn't know). And the president has such a fate that even on vacation he must give the press a couple of hours ...
      As for the other leaders and leaders in general, I have not seen anywhere else a state of this size, and, yes, there is no leader of the state in the world who has moved so much regularly. This is not my invention, but the world media, including European and American, they definitely have more time and opportunities to follow the schedules of state leaders.
      And if Putin is for you
      
      The former leader (until October 3, 2018) and the current president,
      
      then the leader of the state then who? Maybe enlighten? ...
      1. Digital error
        
        0
        
        9 October 2019 10: 43
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        ... then the leader of the state, who?
        
        The president is an objectively existing position, and "leader" is only a subjective characteristic. For me he is not a leader (I am no longer ready to support him), but for you - as you please.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +2
        
        9 October 2019 10: 59
        
        ... well, then you don't have to use phrases like "former leader". Tell me that for me, they say, he is not a leader, I do not respect him, etc. But regardless of your subjective opinion, Putin is still the leader of the country, in the opinion of both the majority of the population of the Russian Federation and even his opponents abroad. It is in him that they personally see a problem that they are not able to solve. It is him, as a leader, that they want to remove. And not as a nominal president - half of the world is like that, and they don't bother anyone ... And here - a real Leader, who are practically gone.
        And the worst thing specifically for Russia is that, firstly, there are no other real candidates for the leader on the horizon yet and are not expected, and secondly, after Putin, unfortunately, someone can be president, but someone comparable to him the country is unlikely to see a leader for many years to come ... And a country like the Russian Federation cannot be without a strong leader. They will ruin to hell and plunder "market democrats" like Gref, Kudrin, Chubais, etc.
        
        Digital error
        
        +1
        
        9 October 2019 12: 02
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        Putin is still the leader of the country, according to the majority of the Russian population ...
        
        Maybe so, or maybe not - they are like polls, remember VTsIOM, how he told him this year, with a difference of either two weeks, or a month, first "drew" 30%, and then 70%. Will you deny? Evening M will definitely be, and then refute if the wind changes.
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        ... they say, not a leader, I do not respect him.
        
        A leader is one who can lead other people along, captivate them with an idea.
        For these people, yes - a leader. The rest of the people (in particular, me and either 70%, or 30% if you believe VTsIOM) can now be "carried away" only by compulsion - and this is no longer any leadership, you must agree.
        Leaders of this scale need to be able to leave on time, but he did not use this "option" in 2018.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +2
        
        9 October 2019 12: 26
        
        You know, I can agree or disagree with anything (just what "evening M" is - I don't know. ) But it's not that. You can say to anyone that it is "time to leave," but every responsible leader, commander, leader - call it what you want - must have a successor who would be able to continue his line. OR, if, for example, this line of his subordinates (or the people in this case) is already considered irrelevant or erroneous. This means that there must be a new candidate for a leader with a new concept. But in Russia now, well, there is neither one nor the other. So where and how to "leave on time". And Putin, precisely as a leader of "such a scale", understands this.
        If you think that everything suits me in the leadership of the Russian Federation and its activities and I personally would vote for everything with both hands, then this is not at all the case. But nowhere do I see not only the best, but even an adequate alternative ... If you are, then let me know. And this I can’t imagine in the form of a mockery ...
        PS ... and more about leadership: and Stalin, in your opinion, was a leader or not? There, after all, most of the "enthusiastic" ones were under duress .. but the result is obvious ... And Peter the First - the leader?
        
        Digital error
        
        +1
        
        9 October 2019 13: 25
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        ... I don't know what "evening M" is.
        
        Please read:
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        ... would be able to continue his line.
        
        This scares - which line? Gorbachev - Yeltsin - Putin - the complete abolition of the social state and the total privatization of any state property, at least somehow profitable?
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        ... there must be a new leader candidate with a new concept.
        
        This niche has already been preemptively occupied by natives of the Leaders of Russia competition. You know the curator of the competition - Kirienko, a terry liberal, globalist and Westernizer. We will not find a new concept among these people - we will only get new faces on TV, who will first collect the protest votes of voters, and then once again they will be explained to them why the funds of the NWF must be invested in foreign assets. Candidates with a different mindset and approach to business will simply not be admitted to the president's "body" - they will suddenly notice and finally want to "slam the door."
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        Do you think Stalin was a leader or not?
        
        I did not find those times, but I know for sure that for someone I was, but for someone not - everything is as always. You shouldn't have remembered him - after the war he had enough money for the Kiev metro (yes, there were irrecoverable "loans", as now the "freeze" of savings), but he did not raise the retirement age even after the war, which claimed only 20 million lives - not counting disabled people who have become disabled.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +2
        
        9 October 2019 13: 44
        
        And where did he (Stalin) have to raise the subscriber, if they went to work at 15 and died at 60?
        Well, Putin, by the way, stopped this "privatization" and headed for what is called a "social state" within the framework of capitalism, to which we came from 91. And this, in general, is very difficult to combine ...
        And the fact that it is the leader, sacrificing his own rating and support of the population, who is taking unpopular, but necessary measures, only emphasizes his leadership, as well as that he knows what he is doing.
        
        And if, in your opinion, the "leaders of Russia", for example,
        
        We will not find a new concept among these people - we will only get new faces on television, who will first collect the protest votes of the voters, and then they will once again be explained to them why the means of the NWF must certainly be invested in foreign assets.
        
        - then where to find it? And about the "leaders" - they are not looked for there for the sake of a new concept, but in order to have someone to continue what they have ... Those who gather the "protest electorate" are not needed there ... And those who propose "to invest in Western assets", I hope, they do not go very far there ... But this is my hope. How is it in practice - I don't know.
        But despite all this dialogue, where is the answer? Well, it’s time for Putin to leave, for example. And who is in his place? Is there such or such? In my opinion, no.
        
        Digital error
        
        +1
        
        9 October 2019 14: 21
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        Nobody needs those who gather the "protest electorate".
        
        Yes, that’s why they are already worried today:
        
        The presidential administration began to search for people who could become candidates for deputies of the State Duma of the next convocation. Proposals on the composition of potential candidates will be prepared by the Kremlin’s internal political bloc, "United Russia", the All-Russian Popular Front and regions, said three sources close to the presidential administration of RBC.
        
        (https://www.rbc.ru/politics/08/10/2019/5d9b70809a794754b6eb28e9)
        
        What do you think - who leads the Kremlin’s internal political bloc?
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        It’s time for Putin to leave, for example. And who is in his place?
        
        I do not know, here you are right. But I know for sure that everyone should be allowed to the elections (including those whom the evening M are trying to portray as city madmen - this is direct democracy, if you don't like a candidate - don't vote) - without any "municipal filters" and other tricks. Otherwise, doubts about legitimacy will arise, which will lead - at best to new actions of "civil disobedience", and at worst - to the new 1991.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +2
        
        9 October 2019 15: 21
        
        ... and at worst for the new 1991.
        
        I’m for almost everything, but not for that. No changes at all costs. Now in Russia it’s definitely better than what it was from 1991 to 2008. And thank God. Yes, not everything is as we would like. But this is not the case in Switzerland as many would like. It will always be so.
        Therefore, I am against protests that are AGAINST something existing, but do not have a ready-made replacement concept. One that can be appreciated and touched.
        
        Land to the peasants, factory workers.
        
        - it was already here, it ended right the opposite. Then there was something like
        
        We will live as there are rich, free and democratic.
        
        - ended about the same as before. Now "against corruption" - and this is the stupidest thing that I've heard ...
        If there is a person or party who will present something new, but together with a plan on how to do it and a calculation, what it will lead to and in what time period, then perhaps this is worth considering. But so far, I repeat, there is nothing like this anywhere. Therefore, in 2018 I voted for Putin.
        
        Digital error
        
        0
        
        9 October 2019 17: 27
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        Therefore, I am against protests that are AGAINST something existing, but do not have a ready-made replacement concept.
        
        At least they (protests) perform one function that is most useful for the preservation of the state - they keep the power "in good shape", preventing it from doing whatever it pleases.
        There is a ready-made concept - to allow "cook's children" to run the state. Naturally, they will first need to gain experience in management in the municipal and regional deputy corps. But then I opened the Charter of the city of N-sk, and it says that in total 25 deputies are elected to the city duma, of which the chairman and his deputy are on the salary. The rest (who have nothing to do, with money and directorships) - on a voluntary basis. Kukharka's children need to work in order to feed their families, so they will not go to parliament. And to go, you have to pay salaries to all deputies without exception. And this is feasible for the state, given that each represents the interests of ~ 5000 taxpayers. Until this happens, the poor will get poorer and the rich will get richer. That is, in order to fight poverty, it is necessary to radically change the electoral system. But here's a surprise - Ellochka Pamfilova said on October 2:
        
        There can be no fundamental reform of the electoral law now.
        
        With this approach, a new 1991 or 1917 becomes inevitable - it is only a matter of time.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +1
        
        9 October 2019 18: 45
        
        ... the poor will get poorer, and the rich will get richer. That is, to combat poverty, the election system must be radically changed.
        
        - just for your information: this is now happening in the United States and practically in all EU countries, with all the diversity of their election systems and state structure, as well as living standards, etc., etc. This is called liberal capitalism. And in the form when there is no "competition" in the face of the USSR, this will continue. Did 1917 and 1991 change something in this situation? In my opinion, quite the opposite. It's just that a small handful of those who were fattening changed to several other faces, and those who were poor became even poorer ... and this is still accompanied by the collapse of the country and bloodshed ... Well, about 1917 - we know this from history, but in 1991 we ourselves remember that, don't we?
        So what will change the election system?
        And about the fact that
        
        ... protests perform one function that is most useful for preserving the state - they keep the power "in good shape", preventing it from doing whatever it pleases.
        
        - are you serious? Well, you are clearly a reasonable and thinking person, do you really think that the various mess, with the participation of even minors, which is organized by "bulk And Co" with the support of "partners" from the West, really serves for something positive? No way! If it would have been like that with at least one hundredth, the Americans would not have given a cent for it! This is just a buildup from within, attempts to replace ideals, ideologically subversive activities, and so on ... These are precisely the very protests for the sake of protest, without any real positive agenda. The main slogan is that everything is bad, the power is bad, down with the power ... But, again, no one offers anything concrete to replace the existing one ... This is a game against Russia of an exclusively external enemy, with the hands of traitors from within ...
        
        Digital error
        
        +1
        
        9 October 2019 20: 35
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        This is a game against Russia exclusively an external enemy, the hands of traitors from the inside.
        
        It is a pity that you are in solidarity with propaganda, even though a thinking and reasonable person. Of course, there are such figures, but their insignificant minority. The main danger for the state lies in its inability to ensure a fair distribution of benefits among citizens and in its ability to "defame" taxpayers who understand this with a "fifth column". And in order to distract those who do not understand from communicating with those who understand - to frighten the first with an external threat, Ukraine and other possible aggressive forms of life on Mars.
        
        Quote: Pyshenkov
        Are you serious?
        
        More than. Well - again we talked with you and again stayed with "our" people. I suggest that you no longer strain the moderator - a good evening for you without evening M.
Arkharov

-3

12 October 2019 19: 35

Very dramatic. To tears.