Lavrov called the conditions for the transfer of part of the South Kuril Islands to Japan

35
Recently we Reportedhow Russia reacted to the map with the "Japanese" Kuril Islands. And so, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergey Lavrov, said that the transfer of part of the South Kuril Islands to Japan (Shikotan Islands and the Habomai Ridges) is possible only after it recognizes the results of the Second World War and the conclusion of a peace treaty. The corresponding video has already been posted on the YouTube channel “Territory of Senses”.



Lavrov noted that Russia is the legal successor of the USSR, and therefore recognizes the 1956 Joint Declaration, according to which Moscow agreed to transfer the aforementioned part of the South Kuril Islands to Tokyo. But for this, Japan must fulfill the above conditions.

Lavrov called the conditions for the transfer of part of the South Kuril Islands to Japan


So far, everything depends on the unwillingness of our Japanese colleagues to recognize the results of the Second World War, thereby preventing the signing of a peace treaty. I do not think the situation is deadlock.

- stressed Lavrov.


It must be recalled that in 1945, Japan signed an unconditional surrender following the results of World War II. Consequently, the sovereignty of Russia over the South Kuril Islands is not in doubt. That is why Tokyo’s references to the Treaty of Trade and the Border of 1855 are legally worthless. Moreover, for more than 70 years, Japan has been under US occupation, and all this time Tokyo has brazenly "buzzed" one of the winners, i.e. near Moscow, the return of the "northern territories". Moreover, in Japan there is even an appropriate department (Ministry), which has been feeding well on this topic all these years.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor N
    Victor N
    +9
    15 August 2019 15: 12
    He no longer has a place in the Government! Resign!
    1. Alf
      Alf
      +2
      15 August 2019 18: 14
      Quote: Victor N
      He no longer has a place in the Government! Resign!

      To whom? Lavrov? Do you think that at least one decision in the Kremlin can be made without Putin’s consent? Putin has a very convenient position - all victories are from Putin, he is a people's defender, all defeats are from Medvedev and bad ministers.
      1. Oleg RB
        Oleg RB
        0
        15 August 2019 19: 38
        Well, he’s a fabulous non-pride - such a position.
    2. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
      BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
      +5
      15 August 2019 19: 48
      Retired Lavrushka!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sapsan136
        Sapsan136
        +3
        16 August 2019 00: 41
        Rather, in jail, under Article 280 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation!
        1. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
          BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
          0
          18 August 2019 22: 49
          C'mon - senile dementia cannot be treated in prison ...
          1. Sapsan136
            Sapsan136
            +1
            19 August 2019 00: 03
            Well, if the moron refuses hospitalization and begins to harm the state, then ... maybe he will get a tower ... according to the gravity of the crimes, and negligence, which caused huge losses, is a crime.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Valentine
    Valentine
    +4
    15 August 2019 16: 31
    And Russia will remain within the Garden Ring ... From 1953 to 1964, the master of the USSR was Judas Nikita Khrushchev, and then he did a lot of things that we would have to disentangle for more than a hundred years, as with the Crimea.
    1. Adalmar
      Adalmar
      +2
      15 August 2019 22: 39
      In terms of "bells and whistles" Nikita Sergeevich, compared with Boris Nikolaevich, together with Mikhail Sergeevich, is a kindergarten kid.
      1. Valentine
        Valentine
        0
        16 August 2019 13: 45
        This is true, but they have nothing to do with this topic.
        1. Adalmar
          Adalmar
          +1
          17 August 2019 23: 39
          There is no direct evidence, but who knows. There is no smoke without fire.
          These swindlers of such papers wrote to the right and left that the whole post-Soviet space (not only the former USSR) would hiccup for more than a dozen years. This, of course, is my subjective opinion.
        2. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
          BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
          0
          18 August 2019 22: 49
          From Nikitkin seed, these two monsters sprouted!
  3. jack clubs
    jack clubs
    +2
    15 August 2019 20: 17
    And I thought the condition would be the creation of a Russian military base in Okinawa.
  4. steelmaker
    steelmaker
    +6
    15 August 2019 21: 46
    So, it is necessary to reckon with the opinion of Crimeans, but not with the opinion of the Kuril people who collected signatures! Hucksters are insatiable.
  5. sgrabik
    sgrabik
    +7
    15 August 2019 23: 07
    But we really need him, this peace treaty with Japan, we’ve been living without him for seventy years - and nothing, today Japan is an openly hostile country loyal to the United States and NATO, with a huge number of American military bases, and we are our with our hands we want to bring the borders of our opponents close to our territory, well, is this insanity ???
  6. Sapsan136
    Sapsan136
    +3
    16 August 2019 00: 40
    In this case, Japan needs to give Lavrov and the company, because they are people useless for the Russian Federation, and the Kuril Islands and their part will be useful to the Russian Federation itself ... It’s not the Lavrovs who joined the Kuril Islands to Russia, and it’s not for them to give them back!
  7. A.Lex
    A.Lex
    -2
    16 August 2019 07: 27
    I read the comments, and one thing struck me: almost NONE of you took the trouble to CAREFULLY treat Lavrov's words. And the title of the article has nothing to do with the words of the minister.
    Lavrov did not say that it was a transfer. He called the program in the context of a reference to the 1956 declaration.
    To put it bluntly, Lavrov said:

    We would be "happy", but the Japanese themselves do not want to!

    But seriously, it is said bluntly - first the contract, but the transfer (or not) - we will discuss AFTER!
    And more:

    "We draw attention to the fact that any speculation in the spirit of" Lavrov announced the conditions for the transfer of the islands of Japan "is unacceptable and is misinformation," the Foreign Ministry said ....
    1. shinobi
      shinobi
      0
      16 August 2019 08: 08
      Exactly! And, probably, the headline is taken from some opposition newspaper.
    2. Oleg RB
      Oleg RB
      +1
      16 August 2019 09: 09
      Because see the root! Preparations for the transfer have been going on for a year now.
      Gently so formed public opinion of such a need.
      Ay, although to whom I explain ... request
      1. Valentine
        Valentine
        -2
        16 August 2019 13: 48
        Oh, don’t be shy, explain to us, miserable, in which we are neither ear nor snout, you are our genius benefactor.
  8. shinobi
    shinobi
    +6
    16 August 2019 07: 59
    Even if Tokyo signs a peace treaty of the 56th year, and it happens when the cancer on the mountain whistles, then this absolutely does not oblige us to anything. Lavrov made a purely propaganda statement, thereby showing the incompatibility of Tokyo.
    1. A.Lex
      A.Lex
      +2
      16 August 2019 09: 14
      Here I am about the same!
  9. steelmaker
    steelmaker
    +4
    16 August 2019 08: 19
    In order not to blame site visitors for reading inattentively, such questions generally should not be raised now! What Putin and Lavrov - someone pulls the language, they themselves constantly raise this topic! WHAT FOR!!!! Moreover, after the people themselves said in the Kuril Islands - THIS IS RUSSIAN LAND!
    1. A.Lex
      A.Lex
      +3
      16 August 2019 09: 19
      Politics - it is!
      Note one more thing - the leadership of our state is today solving FOREIGN POLICY tasks. But internal problems - not in a hurry !!! And the internal tension is growing - people are more outraged by both the injustice of the partition of the country in the 90s (when a bunch of thieves and deceivers appropriated the Nationwide Dignity of the COUNTRY), and by MODERN LIBERAL PROTESTUNES (who are ready to ruin the country to get to the feeding trough)! !!
      That’s the main minus ...
    2. Joe Cook
      Joe Cook
      -2
      16 August 2019 11: 12
      What kind of people, from which city, village? Have you seen the map? By the ears, of course, you can pull it from Kamchatka. Well, or swim yourself to get there. And why shouldn’t these topics be raised? They were sitting in our government, and let, think, talk on this subject? They did not read at all, however, to whom and to what, Lavrov answered. And, well, yes, street opposition is not necessary, most importantly, to blame Putin and Lavrov. Half of the accusers are from Ukraine and the Baltic states.
  10. Marzhecki
    Marzhecki
    -1
    16 August 2019 10: 11
    Quote: steel maker
    In order not to blame site visitors for reading inattentively, such questions generally should not be raised now! What Putin and Lavrov - someone pulls the language, they themselves constantly raise this topic! WHAT FOR!!!! Moreover, after the people themselves said in the Kuril Islands - THIS IS RUSSIAN LAND!

    What for? For joint economic use. That’s why. And we have housekeeping - it is ...
  11. Marzhecki
    Marzhecki
    +1
    16 August 2019 10: 13
    Quote: A.Lex
    MODERN LIBERAL PROTESTUNES (who are ready to ruin the country to get to the feeding trough) !!!

    This is what has always interested me. These are liberal protesters, liberals in the government. And where then are we not liberals?
    1. sgrabik
      sgrabik
      +1
      16 August 2019 10: 41
      An absurd and provocative question, not liberals - these are all who defend national interests in favor of our country - Russia, and not pro-Western geopolitical interests, or maybe you seriously think that such characters as Navalny, Gudkov and all the like, really defend the interests of our people and the national interests of our country ???
    2. Valentine
      Valentine
      +1
      16 August 2019 13: 59
      And not liberals - this is our people, robbed by these same liberals, under the drunkard Tsar Boriska, who only dreams that each of these thieves and crooks will receive an eternal residence permit on the "Kolyma hectare", together with their families.
  12. Alexey Zhidkov
    Alexey Zhidkov
    +1
    16 August 2019 10: 42
    Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Article 280.1. Public calls for actions aimed at violating the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation.

    Here is the Truth moment for you!
    And after all, hoopoe ...
    What will the President say?
    "... with understanding ... for the people ..."

    AM LIQUIDS. Sincerely.
  13. Brother
    Brother
    -1
    16 August 2019 16: 26
    IDIOCY! Or betrayal!
  14. Anton Dahl
    Anton Dahl
    +1
    16 August 2019 22: 32
    Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov seems to have let slip again. So to speak, blurted out too much. Well, he does not know how, unfortunately, to keep state secrets. Or he acts as a provocateur to probe public opinion about how much we are all ready to plunge into an abomination. One way or another, Lavrov consciously, or by stupidity, dropped the screen in front of the cesspool, which is our entire foreign policy. Well, he himself led her. Although ambition Sergey Lavrov will not refuse. He has already received his order of Friendship of Peoples named after Nikita Khrushchev the First-Called. Now in turn is the rank of Count Lavrov-Kurilsky and Honorary Minister of the Northern Territories from Smolensk Square. Handsome, just handsome!
  15. Awaz
    Awaz
    0
    17 August 2019 07: 23
    Hmm .. Well, you see - they have begun to merge everything in a row .. They are preparing themselves warm places. And in order to transfer the islands to the Japanese, these same Japanese must first withdraw all American troops from their territory, without any possibility of returning them. It was only after this that one could just start talking. And so - pah ... Traitors.
  16. hourly
    hourly
    0
    17 August 2019 09: 52
    The Japanese therefore do not recognize the result of the war and do not sign a peace treaty, because it automatically puts an end to the idea of ​​transferring the islands in general. Recognition of the outcome of the war means recognition of Russia's sovereignty over these islands and, as a result, there can be no talk of any transfer of islands after that. The Japanese understand this very well.

  17. Dmitri Troshev
    Dmitri Troshev
    +1
    17 August 2019 12: 07
    We are at war with Japan, and Putin, Lavrov and company are stealing the country's wealth, withdrawing money abroad, turning a blind eye to corruption, introducing draconian interest rates, opening tori, taxing everyone, genocide of their people, people leaving Russia, natural population decline is breaking records! And are we giving up? Will we give them the islands for which our grandfathers were dying? Will we forgive Japan for the 500 killed in World War II? Why did the cruiser Varyag and the Russian sailors die? Do we Russians want to betray them?