Last resort: will Beijing go to dump American papers?

8
The clash between the US and China begins to threaten the stability of the entire world economics. President Donald Trump introduced new duties against Beijing, he answered with a further devaluation of his national currency. The head of the White House called the PRC a “currency manipulator,” which implies the imposition of regular sanctions.





The American television channel CNN warned with obvious caution that from the Celestial Empire one can now expect a "response" in relation to the US public debt. How realistic is the Chinese dumping of "treasurers" in the amount of $ 1,1 trillion, and what will this mean for all parties to the conflict?

Beijing is the largest United States government debt holder in the world. CNN reports:

Beijing has a trump card up its sleeve: China is the largest lender to the US government. Theoretically, China could cause a panic in the US government debt market if it gets rid of part of US Treasury securities.


Obviously, this factor should be taken into account when starting a trade war with the PRC. The channel describes the possible consequences of dumping such a large package of “treasurers”: the value of US government debt bonds will fall sharply, interest rates, on the contrary, will rise, which means that the cost of loans will become more expensive. This, in turn, will lead to a slowdown in the begun growth of the American economy, which President Trump, who has entered the next election campaign, takes credit for himself.

The argument is very weighty. However, a number of experts believe that Beijing will not use this trump card at full capacity. And that's why.

At first, if necessary, the US Federal Reserve will be able to redeem bonds, even 1,1 trillion. This will happen, including if all other holders of the US government debt want to get rid of securities. This will not cause the collapse of the American economy, but there will be other negative consequences that will affect everyone, including China itself. Recall that the American market is the main for China. To bring it down means, in essence, to slice a chicken that lays golden eggs.

Secondly, the question arises, where can Beijing put the freed assets. Financial expert Anton Tabakh comments on possible prospects:

Our Russian Central Bank can withdraw its reserves from US securities and go to yuan and gold, but Chinese entry into the gold market is guaranteed to destabilize the market, and the prospect of investing in ruble securities for China is more speculative than real.


A fall in gold prices will negatively affect the value of the reserves of countries that are rapidly buying it, in particular, in our Russian Federation. Also, this will cause alarming “seething” in the financial markets.

Washington and Beijing are clearly aware of the possible consequences of their “adult” struggle. Their goal is not the collapse of each other, but the search for a compromise. Just, as long as the parties have not yet agreed on the terms of the trade transaction, they will put pressure on each other within the acceptable range.

Most likely, China should not expect the dumping of all the “treasurers,” but the exponential sale of part of its portfolio, as well as a further devaluation of the renminbi.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 August 2019 14: 37
    China has invested too much in the United States, and if pressure continues, China cannot stand it. The Chinese are wise - it’s better to lose a part than all.
  2. +1
    10 August 2019 15: 49
    During the war, the laws of logic do not apply. Beijing, after all, also knows the formula:

    Why do we need a world in which China will not be?

    If it comes to the question of state survival, China will not hesitate.
    The problem is that countries have similar attitudes. Trump wants to "make America great again," and Xin wants to "make China great." Two bullies in one sandbox will not fit.
    As stated by the Prime Minister of the (APEC) Summit of Papua New Guinea, Peter O'Neill,

    Two giants in one room could not agree on a number of issues.
    1. -1
      10 August 2019 20: 26
      - It looks like Shura ... - you still managed to "cut" the right way ... -Hahah ...
      - None of my comments pass ...
      - Well ... - you "feel better" ... - congratulations ...
      1. 0
        10 August 2019 20: 48
        Irina, believe me that I have nothing to do with your comments. I don’t have the habit and ability to ban or blacklist someone. Ask the admins.

        PS My name is displayed normally. I would be nicer to read it correctly. Bakhtiyar is written in Russian. In short - Baht. Translated from Azerbaijani, bəxt is happiness, luck. Foreigners often called me Lucky man.

        http://astroscope.ru/imena/bahtijar.html
        1. -1
          13 August 2019 14: 18
          Ah, how touching ... - tears and a scarf ... a scarf and tears ...
          Nu-nu ... - a kind of "civilized sentimental nobility" ... comes from a man who ... who ... who recently, guided by vulgar "Khachik habits", learned from some unknown "culture", repeatedly and personally on his own behalf - to a lady who was absolutely unfamiliar to him, he poured out such offensive maxims that he even felt ashamed of his family and tribe (where did this little man come from) ... - Therefore, this tribe should not be named, so as not to offend .. - In a word ... "Bakhtiarovskoe" is a tribe ... - And the culture itself ... is also "Bakhtiyarovskoe" ... - Hahah ...
          - Do not try to seem "complex" ... - one "color-nature" still dominates ... - Hahah ...
          1. 0
            13 August 2019 15: 21
            Irina, carefully read your text and try on yourself. I have never personally offended you. The main word is in person. And your clan and your tribe too. I simply point out to you the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in your statements. The lack of logical chains and ignorance of the subject. But this I do not only in relation to you. And unlike you, I never turn to the individual.
            Oh yes, I sometimes call you blonde. Well, with your texts you give full reason for such a conclusion.
            There is nothing valuable in your message except bile and insults. But I do not argue with the ladies. Lermontov is credited with the lines:

            To shame a liar, make fun of a fool
            And argue with a woman.
            All the same as drawing water with a sieve.
            Deliver us from these three, God!
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    11 August 2019 03: 20
    Reducing the share of Treasuries in the portfolio - perhaps, but the point? And what to convert? Gold is already 1500 (there is some kind of record). They keep the yuan for a minute, so what infuriates Trampush (for this an official reserve of 4 trillion dollars). The surplus with amers is growing (something there is 330 in the black). Guys, the Chinese have all zer guts. But what about Donnie? It’s impossible to reduce the green, everything is already under QE (maybe, except for Ozzy). A double reduction in the rate has been laid, but the result has already been partially taken into account by the markets, so Powell should try. So, I would head the article like this:

    Will Trump and Powell play on the same team?
  5. 0
    11 August 2019 09: 36
    A reporter is not an analyst, he does not analyze, does not make forecasts, his function is to present a specific event. Gilyarovsky, as a reporter and his reports reflecting the life picture of his time, has been living in the memory of enlightened people for a century and a half. The author is clearly not a reporter, but a dreamer (in the sense - the speculator of the event).