Р ›РµС‚Р ° Р» Рё РёР »Рё нет: РєР ° РєРЎРЎРЎР РјРѕРі In «РїСЂРѕРіР» ядет »Р» СѓРЅРЅСѓСЋ Р ° С „еру РЎРРРђ
Fifty years ago, American astronauts landed on the surface of the moon and set the US flag on it. But to this day there are great doubts that Aldrin and Armstrong actually made that "big step for all of humanity." In popular culture, this conspiracy theory was called the "Lunar Conspiracy." Its supporters and opponents have been arguing for half a century about whether the Americans have been on an earth satellite. But, perhaps, the main question has so far remained unanswered: it is one thing to fool the townsfolk, but how did the States manage to mislead their main geopolitical adversary, who was supposed to expose the hoax and use it against the USA by the law of the genre?
Among the main arguments of the supporters of the “lunar conspiracy”: a flag waving in a vacuum, the absence of stars in the pictures, astronauts not jumping high enough, the moon’s surface too flat at the landing site and so on. Specialists have long given quite adequate explanations for these phenomena. For example, “star-striped” - could “ripple” not because of the wind in the pavilion, but because of some “damped vibrations”. The Americans did not jump too high on the moon because of the danger of falling and injuring an unreliable spacesuit in an airless space.
Photomontage traces on existing materials are explained by the widespread practice of retouching. In the end, some scenes could really be done in the pavilions to get the best propaganda picture. This in itself does not mean that there was no flight as such. After all, well-wishers put President Putin on the seabed of the amphora, so that he would find them with journalists, right? But this does not mean that real amphoras are not there.
There are doubts about the possibility technical the implementation of such a project. This is a very complex process, consisting of a “damn dozen” operations. First, the booster was supposed to bring the orbital module, then dock it with the lunar. Then they must fly to the moon, slow down in time, land safely on another planet, the crew carry out a certain mission on it. After joining the take-off stage, start, undock it in orbit, and begin returning to Earth. And there you have time to disconnect the descent vehicle, which should return the astronauts home safe and sound.
And that's all on the technologies of 1969-1972. And repeatedly. And without sacrifices. If so, then deserves respect. But still there is a possibility that in reality everything was a little different.
It is necessary to take into account the situation in which during the specified period economics USA and USSR. The space race devoured huge resources. Despite the demonstrative confrontation between the capitalist and socialist systems, on a number of issues Washington and Moscow were forced to cooperate, as a rule, behind the scenes. So, in the sixties, Khrushchev experimented so much in agriculture that the Soviet Union had to start buying grain from its direct adversary, the United States. Interestingly, in return, the States did not disdain to buy Soviet tractors and combines.
In space exploration, two superpowers went nostril to nostril. The first satellite to orbit and cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin launched the USSR. The USA is ahead of us on the moon. And literally a few years later, Soyuz Apollo was launched, symbolizing peaceful cooperation in space between Washington and Moscow. After that, they forgot about the Moon for many decades.
If desired, this can be seen as a “contract”. The Kremlin could hypothetically close its eyes to some of the nuances of the American conquest of the moon in exchange for economic bonuses. All the same, the USSR was in the lead in space exploration, and Moscow was able to “throw a bone” to Washington, while avoiding unnecessary economic overstrain. Note that after the flight of Armstrong and Aldrin, the Soviet program was soon curtailed, despite its high degree of readiness. The reason was its extremely high cost.
If the Soviet leadership needed it, our cosmonauts would still fly to the moon, albeit second. But perhaps in the Kremlin then they themselves decided to “yield” and play along with the Americans? It is interesting that shortly before the start of Apollo 11, cosmonaut Frank Borman, who oversaw the United States, visited the USSRpolitical providing "the lunar program. The American guest visited all Soviet space tracking and long-distance communications stations. If the hypothesis of an “agreement” is true, then the Western partners so wanted to make sure that everything would go according to plan, “without noise and dust.”
Strictly speaking, what is written does not mean that the Americans were not on the moon. Maybe they flew, but not six times, but less. Perhaps the first steps on the moon were nevertheless made by astronauts from the USA, but not on July 20, 1969, but later.
The issue in popular culture remains debatable to this day.
Among the main arguments of the supporters of the “lunar conspiracy”: a flag waving in a vacuum, the absence of stars in the pictures, astronauts not jumping high enough, the moon’s surface too flat at the landing site and so on. Specialists have long given quite adequate explanations for these phenomena. For example, “star-striped” - could “ripple” not because of the wind in the pavilion, but because of some “damped vibrations”. The Americans did not jump too high on the moon because of the danger of falling and injuring an unreliable spacesuit in an airless space.
Photomontage traces on existing materials are explained by the widespread practice of retouching. In the end, some scenes could really be done in the pavilions to get the best propaganda picture. This in itself does not mean that there was no flight as such. After all, well-wishers put President Putin on the seabed of the amphora, so that he would find them with journalists, right? But this does not mean that real amphoras are not there.
There are doubts about the possibility technical the implementation of such a project. This is a very complex process, consisting of a “damn dozen” operations. First, the booster was supposed to bring the orbital module, then dock it with the lunar. Then they must fly to the moon, slow down in time, land safely on another planet, the crew carry out a certain mission on it. After joining the take-off stage, start, undock it in orbit, and begin returning to Earth. And there you have time to disconnect the descent vehicle, which should return the astronauts home safe and sound.
And that's all on the technologies of 1969-1972. And repeatedly. And without sacrifices. If so, then deserves respect. But still there is a possibility that in reality everything was a little different.
It is necessary to take into account the situation in which during the specified period economics USA and USSR. The space race devoured huge resources. Despite the demonstrative confrontation between the capitalist and socialist systems, on a number of issues Washington and Moscow were forced to cooperate, as a rule, behind the scenes. So, in the sixties, Khrushchev experimented so much in agriculture that the Soviet Union had to start buying grain from its direct adversary, the United States. Interestingly, in return, the States did not disdain to buy Soviet tractors and combines.
In space exploration, two superpowers went nostril to nostril. The first satellite to orbit and cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin launched the USSR. The USA is ahead of us on the moon. And literally a few years later, Soyuz Apollo was launched, symbolizing peaceful cooperation in space between Washington and Moscow. After that, they forgot about the Moon for many decades.
If desired, this can be seen as a “contract”. The Kremlin could hypothetically close its eyes to some of the nuances of the American conquest of the moon in exchange for economic bonuses. All the same, the USSR was in the lead in space exploration, and Moscow was able to “throw a bone” to Washington, while avoiding unnecessary economic overstrain. Note that after the flight of Armstrong and Aldrin, the Soviet program was soon curtailed, despite its high degree of readiness. The reason was its extremely high cost.
If the Soviet leadership needed it, our cosmonauts would still fly to the moon, albeit second. But perhaps in the Kremlin then they themselves decided to “yield” and play along with the Americans? It is interesting that shortly before the start of Apollo 11, cosmonaut Frank Borman, who oversaw the United States, visited the USSRpolitical providing "the lunar program. The American guest visited all Soviet space tracking and long-distance communications stations. If the hypothesis of an “agreement” is true, then the Western partners so wanted to make sure that everything would go according to plan, “without noise and dust.”
Strictly speaking, what is written does not mean that the Americans were not on the moon. Maybe they flew, but not six times, but less. Perhaps the first steps on the moon were nevertheless made by astronauts from the USA, but not on July 20, 1969, but later.
The issue in popular culture remains debatable to this day.
Information