"Missing" in Syria, the West realized that he could not cope with Russia

1
The NATO missile attack in Syria showed the very low effectiveness of their weapons, and therefore the Western countries' unpreparedness for a major armed conflict. This opinion was expressed by political analyst Sergei Mikheev at a talk show by Vladimir Solovyov.

The escalation of hysteria and specific actions, especially combat, are tasks of a completely different level, and if the West conditionally succeeded in the first, then in the second their forces were clearly overestimated. Initially, this attack was intended to punish Russia for its actions to preserve the sovereignty of Syria, to which a worthy response should follow, but after its implementation, the need for any answer disappeared by itself. The frank failure of the West, which their media, cleverly learning to immerse their viewers in parallel reality, call great success, frankly mixed the cards themselves.



On the one hand, the "chemical arsenal" of the ATS was destroyed, and therefore by definition there can no longer be any chemical attacks in Syria. On the other hand, without such provocations, it will be extremely difficult for the West to justify its further actions in Syria, and without them, victory in Syria will come about soon. So it turns out that either the West will have to stop any interference in the internal affairs of Syria and admit its final defeat in the Syrian conflict, or be convicted of a daring missile attack in a lie and complete toothlessness.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    1 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      April 17 2018 16: 06
      On the one hand, the "chemical arsenal" of the SAR was destroyed, and therefore no more chemical attacks in Syria can be, by definition.
      Hmm ... and what will prevent the Merikos from "restoring the chemical arsenal of the SAR"? what