The irreplaceable “Union”: why the USA cannot create a safe ship

5
Rivals in the space race, the USSR and the United States, went different ways. The Soviet Union relied on one-time manned flights, in which the spent stages burn up in the atmosphere, and the astronauts return in a special apparatus. The United States has invested tremendous funds in the program of reusable shuttles that can land entirely. Two disasters of the American shuttles, Challenger and Columbia, claimed the lives of 14 people and questioned the feasibility of continuing to use reusable spacecraft. In 2011, the shuttle program in the United States was finally phased out.





Since then, American astronauts fly to the ISS, buying tickets at Roscosmos. One seat on the Soyuz costs Washington $ 83 million. Pleasure is not cheap, and the question of the international prestige of the United States of America as a space power is being called into question. Plus, the sanctions standoff with Russia adds a risk factor to remain without a “cabman” at the most inopportune moment.

Therefore, the United States made a strategic decision to create its own spacecraft, which should surpass such a reliable, but rather aged Russian “Soyuz”. The Americans did not decide to put all their eggs in one basket, so NASA concluded contracts right away with Boeing and SpaceX.

Starliner (CST-100) - This is a project of Boeing Corporation. The spacecraft will have to deliver 4 astronauts and 100 kilograms of payload to the ISS at a time. Starliner will be partially reusable. It was assumed that a partially reusable ship would take off in 2014, but it did not work out. Launches are regularly rescheduled. In 2018, Boeing representatives admitted that when testing the emergency rescue system, a certain “anomaly” was discovered. The terms of the manned launch were again postponed to the end of the summer of 2019.


There are problems with the safety of the crew and its direct competitor from SpaceX.

Crew Dragon (Dragon-2) - the brainchild of "PR genius" of the American billionaire Ilon Mask. The project was presented in 2014. A reusable spacecraft should deliver 7 astronauts to the ISS. SpaceX also intends to use the device for commercial flights of the moon with tourists on board. His first test flight without a crew took place in March of this year and was successful. It seemed that the days of the Russian “Union” were finally numbered.


But then everything went wrong. To obtain a NASA license for manned flights, SpaceX had to introduce a workable crew emergency rescue system, which is activated by shooting a capsule with astronauts. However, during the test tests on April 20, a special liquid engine not only did not separate the descent vehicle, but also exploded with it. Once again, a certain "anomaly" occurred.

The American edition of Florida Today summarized:

The caustic smoke rising from the Air Force base at Cape Canaveral and visible for many kilometers along the “space coast” has overshadowed the prospects of the SpaceX crew launch program and NASA’s optimism that Russia's dependence on flights to the ISS will end soon.


So far, the United States is unable to provide its cosmonauts with safe flights to the ISS. The timing of the manned launch can again be rescheduled. So, in the next year or two, the United States will not succeed in abandoning the obsolete, but such a safe “Union”. Even the recent accident of the Russian ship on October 11, 2018, did not lead to casualties. The system recognized the problems and automatically separated the capsule from the Russian Alexei Ovchinin and the American Nick Haig, who, after a successful landing, did not even need medical attention.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 24 2019 21: 02
    Opponents in the space race

    - the USSR was a rival, Russia has long been no rival
    1. +2
      April 26 2019 19: 32
      You wrote in pure Russian in an article that of the 2 American new ships, not one is currently not suitable for transporting a crew. Unlike the old proven Union.
      Of course they’re not our rivals, we have a ship, they don’t have it yet.
      And then, what is Crew Dragon (Dragon-2) 11 m2 for 7 astronauts, by the way, the toilet is normal in it. There is something behind the curtain, in short, read all 11 boys and girls in diapers for several days. What is the Union of 3 + 5 cubic meters for 3, and the toilet is in the service compartment ..
      And the Americans, in all seriousness, are going to fly to the moon on this ... in diapers ...
      1. +1
        April 27 2019 15: 42
        Already flew. Or not?
      2. +2
        2 May 2019 21: 17
        As I understand it, you often listened to Zadornov (rest in peace to him) about "all Americans are stupid"? I want to disappoint you, they are far from stupid and technically they have gone far ahead. In addition, private business is involved in scientific and technical development there, Elon Musk is an example of this (in contrast to Russia, where they only steal). And about the most important thing for you: they have a toilet and it is much better than on the ISS. An article for "Hurray for the Patriots" to be proud of, but I don't understand why, because since 2010, 13 missile launches have ended in an accident, burying with them a bunch of satellites and equipment worth hundreds of millions, or that for more than 10 years they have not been able to reach mind of the Su-57, which were made as many as 5 pieces, of which 2 crashed, the other three are obsolete. And this is against 3325 American F-35s. I am not a Russophobe and not a liberal, I just know how to think with my head, not TV.
  2. +1
    22 May 2019 22: 19
    The Russian Federation still has every opportunity to reach the moon. And for this, ABSOLUTELY does not require a special lunar ship, which will directly deliver the astronaut to the moon directly from Earth. Has anyone seen a gypsy camp in motion. This is a bunch of carts. And why don't the gypsies ride the whole cart on one cart? So with the moon.
    A special lunar ship that will deliver an astronaut to the moon directly from Earth is a significant limitation of possibilities.
    Russia has a Soyuz for today - that's enough to reach the moon.
    For a flight to the moon, it is necessary that the mass of the device be about 20 tons, and the required carrying capacity of the launch vehicle is 120-130 tons.
    Today, Russia with existing technologies can provide only the removal of 60-70 tons. Therefore, such a mission can be carried out on a two-start scheme. That is, the first launch is a spacecraft plus a booster block that will ensure the return from the orbit of the moon, and a second launch launches a booster block that will ensure the formation of the flight path to the moon.
    Docking in low Earth orbit.
    To date, the methods of docking in space have already been mastered. Several "Soyuz", "Energies" docking in the orbit of the Earth and the Moon are launched. Boost blocks ... There would be a desire.