Russia broke into Libya

13
Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, the eldest son of Muammar Gaddafi, who was brutally murdered in 2011, is going to run for president of Libya. Back in 2017, one of the former officials of the Libyan Jamahiriya, Tahar Dagesh created the Council of Tribes and Cities of Libya, which recognized Saif al-Islam as the official representative of his late father, and the daughter of Muammar, Aisha Gaddafi, as the representative for international affairs. The Council aims to restore the Jamahiriya on the principles proclaimed by the late Colonel Gaddafi.





As you know, after the overthrow and assassination of Gaddafi and a bloody civil war, Libya as a single state actually ceased to exist. Different regions of the country are controlled by different forces, based on armed forces and supported by various forces abroad. In this situation, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi really looks like a figure capable of consolidating a fragmented Libyan society around him. But both the West and the oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf are opposed to the eldest son of the murdered colonel, who played a key role in financing and informational support for the 2011 “Arab Spring” in Libya. For example, the Qatari Al-Jazeera wonders what if the Gaddafi clan returns to power in Libya, then what was the meaning of the Libyan Revolution?

Now in Libya - very difficult политическая situation. In a country divided by war, several “governments” operate at once. The UN recognizes the "Government of National Accord" led by Fais Saraj, which, however, has little control over the situation. In Tobruk, the “House of Representatives” operates, which is nominally led by Salah Issa, and in fact the real fullness of power is in the hands of Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Libyan National Army. Khalifa Haftar - Gaddafi’s former associate in the 1969 revolution, who later studied in the Soviet Union. At one time, it was Haftar who was placed in the State Department and the CIA, but then the field marshal “swung” towards Russia. In 2017, he visited Moscow, where he discussed the supply of Russian weapons for the needs of the Libyan National Army. Now it is very beneficial for Haftar to use Saif al-Islam as an important political ally, having great influence on the Bedouin tribes, who remained faithful to the Gaddafi clan, and on the armed groups of the Gaddafi who retreated after the assassination of their leader in Tunisia and Egypt.

There is no need to talk about Moscow seriously putting Saif al-Islam as an independent figure. The surname of Gaddafi has long become odious, many internal and external forces are opposed to Saif’s candidacy, so Russia is now much more convenient to negotiate with the same Haftar, who has already visited Moscow. Therefore, the accusations against Saif al-Islam that he allegedly expresses the interests of Russia, and not the Libyan people, are more likely connected with the West’s desire to prevent the return of the Gaddafi clan to Libyan politics. Indeed, if Saif suddenly, by virtue of a miracle or accident, leads the Libyan state, this will be a serious reputation blow for the Western powers, declaring almost all members of the family of the deceased colonel to be war criminals and corrupt officials. But if the promotion of Saif al-Islam is beneficial to Khalifa Haftar and his supporters and will play for the benefit of the unification of Libya, then why not Russia support the eldest son of the late Libyan leader?
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 4 2018 10: 08
    Will Russia have the strength and ability to take Libya under its wing? It would not be very bad.
    1. 0
      April 4 2018 13: 49
      What for? Syria is enough for us. And if Libya becomes, at least in some way, an ally of Syria, that's enough for us. And to hang on oneself a territory where there is EVEN no legal leadership, and the country is a "wild field", it would be the height of recklessness. Let the Americans do this - they love picking at poop (as well as producing d-mo in the territory under control). When someone comes to power there (at least as a result of something), then it will be possible to see if it is possible or not to deal with him (if daesha comes to power, then no). Our business is to maintain the LAW and ORDER where there is someone to rely on (as in Syria), but is there something like that in Libya?
      1. +6
        April 4 2018 14: 39
        At one time, Trotsky refused party work, which instead was led by Stalin. The consequences are known. It is necessary not to rest in warm countries belly up, but to work there! In Libya, and Syria, Russia may well grow (at least by order) olives, olive oil and other products that do not grow here. At the same time, a couple of extra bases will not interfere with protecting the crop ...
      2. +3
        April 4 2018 23: 29
        Now, when someone comes to power there (at least as a result of something), then it will be possible to see whether it is possible or not

        Are you serious?
        I don’t want to go into details about how we Ukraine is about ... Your post from the same series. Libya will unite anyway. For this, it is not necessary to send troops, they themselves will put things in order. Now work is going on with all parties. For us, a very favorable moment. We need a loyal Libya and base. And you suggest letting it go.
        1. 0
          April 5 2018 06: 43
          Quote: shura7782
          For this it is not necessary to send troops, they themselves will put things in order

          It’s strange. You said almost the same thing, only after that you added that we should get into a conflict, intervene in hostilities WITHOUT INVITATION? In Syria, we are at the invitation of a legitimate government, and we climb into Libya as pind0sy?
          1. +1
            April 5 2018 16: 11
            Litter!
            Sir, read the post carefully and do not attribute the gag.
    2. 0
      April 8 2018 08: 15
      WILL NOT BE ENOUGH!!!
  2. +3
    April 4 2018 13: 33
    The USSR had a reputation of a reliable ally, and Russia has not had such a reputation since some time and thanks to individual former communist-shifters. Lost trust is not easy to restore.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      April 5 2018 16: 29
      Quote: den-protector
      ........... thanks to individual former communist flip-flops ...........

      Why is it so liberal? Let's go by name. The country must know its "heroes".
      1. +1
        April 5 2018 22: 14
        Exactly! And then this "liberal tolerant" heresy has already got it! In a Bolshevik way! Truth in the eye! wink good
        1. 0
          April 5 2018 23: 51
          Our zomboyaschik will tell you the truth. You can turn on any channel, you can't go wrong. And the traitor-shifters, who sold the USSR with giblets and continue to pour mud on it, constantly flash on the blue screen, calling to unite and look with confidence into tomorrow. By the way, many of them took part in the last elections (played).
          1. +1
            April 6 2018 21: 51
            You know what? Tell me, please, do you really believe that the Yankees are so right in saying that everything was clear in advance in our elections, because of the administrative resource? So you do not believe that such a president is beneficial to the people? Do you refuse him that?
  3. +2
    April 7 2018 09: 02
    If Russia is included in the "league of superpowers", then in all directions, incl. and Libya needs to work and do it, preferably successfully.