Ukraine from the inside: traitors, curators and those who watch from the Kremlin

From personal correspondence: I don’t know if I will have time to write one article about Ukraine before you leave, from which everything will become clear to you - here there is a war not at all for Ukraine, its territory, and especially not for its people. The war is for access to the trough. And everything that happened to Ukraine, and will happen, is explained only by this. On the basis of all this, we can now conclude how it will end here after the election and on whom the Kremlin put it on them.

Profanity of public opinion. The train started, but no one noticed. And why?

As an explanation of this material, “I’ll tell you one clever thing, but don’t be offended, please.” By the structure of any information field, and not just the Russian one, the majority of readers and listeners receive information from sources that reproduce interpretations of interpretations. Information is looped, it goes in a circle. Both officials and the public all communicate with each other their assessments of what is happening, resulting in a common opinion, which is considered reliable information. Everything that falls out of the usual schemes, as reliable information is not perceived. Thus, there is a significant gap between what is actually happening and what people imagine. The main criterion of reliability is generally known, which may have nothing to do with reality. At the same time, the stuffing of misinformation only enhances disorientation.

In this situation, a cluster of sources has developed and strengthened in Russia that is ahead of the time throwing the most negative assessments into the information field. They are picked up by disorientated groups of active members of social networks and leaders of public opinion, and after two or three cycles of communicating old rumors to each other, these rumors go into the category of obvious and reliable facts. The psychology of such participants is very simple and not burdened with the ability to understand what is happening to them. And what happens to them is the usual triggering of psycho-protection, under which people once developed their opinions.

Since most assessments arise with the help of not rational reflection, but falling under emotional infection, it is not surprising that such a majority have a kind of blind spot that does not allow noticing the obvious things. Especially if they were not directly and unequivocally announced through federal channels in the news... And it was not repeated a hundred times more on any talk shows, mainstream sites and editorials of central newspapers. Profanation does not in the least bother those who disseminate it, for it is a powerful means of manipulating the profane majority, consuming the information flow and responding to it with conditioned reflexes.

So the majority of passionators and subpassionaries of social networks and top sites citing each other overslept the beginning of tectonic shifts in the Russian government. They repeat the old interpretations of what is happening and do not see at all that they no longer have anything to do with what is happening. Largely because they simply don’t know what is happening, largely because they are used to seeing approval of the old interpretations around them.

Meanwhile, a revolution of colossal proportions has begun and is gaining momentum in Russia. And since this is a revolution from above and on the streets there is no picture of the Maidan, people believe that nothing is happening and everything is going on, as it has happened “since the time of the Ochakovs and the conquest of the Crimea,” as Putin said, adding with a smile that this is about the times of Gorchakov , not the Crimean referendum.

Putin says - but they don’t hear him, Putin does, but they don’t see it. Putin was so mesmerized by the whole country with his soft voice that officials and ordinary people were blinded and did not see the changes, even when they buried their nose in them. Everyone is confused by the previous composition of the government and the former position of iconic liberals in power. And this is understandable - these people are lobbyists of those reforms, from which the people have reached the edge of patience. Therefore, they still do not believe in what is happening, although the incredible is obvious, as in the old transfer of Professor Kapitsa.

I will help you and shed light on some of the events that fell out of your attention. They did not become objects of replication in social networks just because all changes occur under the carpet and are equipped with the stamp: “For official use”.

Russia has lost Ukraine. Statement of fact. What to do next?

We all know and understand that something went wrong with Ukraine in 2014. There is a certain category of citizens who shouts that we don’t give a damn about it, that we don’t have enough of our own problems, and that they’ll all be there. A woman with a cart is easier! How much can you feed these parasites and beggars ?! Burn in hell! But, thank God that not everyone thinks so, most understand that their problem creates a huge problem for us and in our interests to solve it for our own benefit, until our dear "partners" have solved it for our own benefit. And, thank God, that among these citizens there is our president. Vladimir Vladimirovich, for those who have forgotten (I think there are none here).

The fact that Moscow once flaunted Ukraine and for the past 5 years has only done that has scooped up troubles from it and because of it, you know well without me. That you didn’t have any real levers of influence on the current elections, except for Yury Boyko, a candidate from the Opposition platform “For Life”, who was shot down by Konditer with the help of his accomplice Akhmetov, you also guess. Therefore, only very short-sighted people can pretend that Ukraine is only one place for them, and they don’t give a damn who they finally choose there. The Kremlin, as a major and self-respecting geopolitical player, must have a plan “A” and a plan “B” for this or that case, if the situation is such that it cannot affect the final election result in Ukraine. You can’t take an ostrich’s position that Ukraine supposedly does not exist. Whether you want it or not, it exists and the next 5 years of your relationship with it depends on what position its pro-American president will take. Moreover, the term of office of the new / old president of Ukraine expires after the termination of the powers of the GDP, therefore, it is in the interests of the GDP not to put off this problem until later, on the shoulders of its future successor.

Therefore, we will consider this problem from the standpoint of the goal-setting of Moscow, excuse me, comrades Ukrainians. The simplest behavior was in the event of a possible victory of Poroshenko. In this case, the regime of complete ignoring was automatically switched on with the refusal to recognize the election results (the benefit of the occasion was more than enough), with the subsequent recognition of the status of LDNR at least on the model of South Ossetia, with instant issuance of Russian passports to everyone there (I think people Once there, over the past 5 years, they have already earned this right and let them try the APU “at least once” to shoot in their direction, this will stop Ukraine’s statehood) and cut off the remaining unfinished goods turnover with the Russian Federation (for the benefit of the Friendship Agreement and their cooperation is already torn by their efforts). I am sure that after that the new / old president would become more accommodating and the problem of Ukraine would be solved even before the expiration of the powers of the GDP in the rank of president of the Russian Federation. This was the so-called “A” plan.

In the case of Zelensky’s victory, everything is much more complicated. You could, of course, scroll through the plan “A” for him, but that would not be far-sighted from the Kremlin. Because nothing can be changed by the fact of recognition or non-recognition of elections, the USSR was not recognized until the 30s of the last century, and so what? The main internal recognition of the legitimacy of the election. And it seems that the Ukrainian people are ready to recognize the humorist’s victory, then the Kremlin’s decision will go against the desire of the Ukrainian people themselves and their hopes for change. You can fight against the regime, but it’s stupid to fight against the people. Moscow itself wanted the Ukrainian people to do something for their salvation. So he did. 20 regions of Ukraine voted for Zelensky already in the 1st round (I write this material when the results of the 2nd are not yet known), thereby Zelensky’s candidacy actually united Ukraine both in the West and in the East, albeit so far only in hatred of the past mode. And here the Kremlin, with the non-recognition of the elections, runs the risk of falling into the position of a non-commissioned officer widow who has carved herself. Therefore, the plan “B”, most likely, will consist in the fact that the Kremlin will take a break and wait for the first steps of the new president on the internal and external track. Poroshenko, too, was not immediately recognized. The pause was about three months. I ran around, looked into my eyes, complained to Grandma Merkel, then they recognized me on my head ...

Now the Kremlin will not repeat such mistakes. Already, he is taking a number of steps ahead of schedule so as not to depend on the actions of the new Kiev authorities, but to influence its decisions by himself. While everything is done under the carpet. Not explicitly. But with the explicit goal of creating a few more elements of pressure on Kiev, and in relations with its sponsors from across the ocean, who are invisibly behind it, raise rates in the inevitable future negotiations on the fate of this territory. A territory that has become a bargaining chip and a stone of discord in the disputes of the powerful of this world, from which the Russian Federation cannot retreat for many reasons (and the fate of the brotherly / non-brotherly people is far from the first there). This text is intended to open the curtain over the Kremlin's covert actions in this direction.

Explicit Kremlin actions

Less than 4 years have passed since Ukraine introduced the first sanctions against the Russian Federation, as the Kremlin decided to respond. The Russian government is introducing retaliatory trade measures after another expansion of the embargo by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. What is it for? According to TASS, from April 18, (without waiting for the election results!), The Cabinet of Ministers of the Russian Federation introduces a ban on the supply of Russian oil and oil products to Ukraine. This was stated by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at a meeting of the Government of the Russian Federation. He also announced the expansion of the ban on the import of certain Ukrainian goods: “I signed a government decree on this subject. We are expanding the ban on the import into Russia of certain types of goods, this measure will affect Ukrainian engineering products, light industry, metal processing, the value of which amounted to almost $ 250 million last year. ” In addition, he noted that from June 1, Moscow will supply coal, oil and oil products to Kiev only under separate permissions (that is, I want, I supply, I want - no! I draw your special attention to this!): “The list of those goods which from June 1 of this year can be exported to Ukraine only on the basis of separate permits. This category includes fuel and energy products, including coal and oil, and oil products. ” To this we can add the embargo on formalin and urea-formaldehyde concentrate introduced earlier, springs for freight cars, electrical equipment for railway automation and communication devices, as well as electrical conductors for voltages exceeding 1000V (a ban on the supply of these goods to Ukraine was adopted a week earlier, on April 10, by the decision of the same Cabinet of Ministers of the Russian Federation). Another decision against the sanction was the import of glass containers, including cans, bottles for food and beverages, containers and so on. The Kremlin, in anticipation of a change in the Kiev leadership, deliberately continues to squeeze the noose around the neck of the territory that has torn off the cutting. Let me remind you that since the end of last year, from December 29, Medvedev limited the supply of a whole series of Ukrainian goods. A wide range of Ukrainian agricultural products, raw materials and food worth $ 510 million was then banned. Now shoes, women's clothing, bulldozers, pipes, paper and other goods were added to them. I have only one question - why did the ban affect only women's clothing? What kind of discrimination is this on the basis of sex? How is Ukrainian men's clothing better than women's?

And although the restrictions affected only 1,2% of all products supplied from the Russian Federation to Ukraine (in monetary terms, this is only $ 118,4 million of the total last year’s export turnover of $ 9,5 billion), but this is not the main thing. The main thing is that now all this will be regulated manually, shipping to Ukraine of a strategically important group of goods for it will now occur only with separate permissions. And in this group, through the efforts of the Cabinet of Ministers, 41% of all Russian exports of evergreen tomatoes to the country turned out to be. There is coal, and coke, and diesel. To understand the importance of these products for Ukraine, I’ll say that last year its share amounted to $ 3,9 billion of the total trade turnover of $ 9,5 billion. And it will now be up to the Ministry of Economic Development to decide whether to deliver or not, and not business entities at its own discretion. And so that the dad would not be tempted to fill this niche, they also screwed the faucet to him (having separately recorded this in the intergovernmental agreements of the Russian Federation-RB). Now the new owner of Ukraine has only one choice - either to buy all this stuff anywhere at world prices, or to negotiate with the Kremlin.

Not explicit undercover actions of the Kremlin. Traitors

I was able to find out about the Kremlin’s non-explicit actions by accident, upon encountering the revelations of one Russian traitor-defector of the former deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, Ilya Ponomarev. Hiding in Ukraine, in them, on the Khvlya channel (Wave in Russian), he rolled another dirty wave to his former homeland.

I was only embarrassed by his awareness and involvement in the affairs of the Russian Federation with a slightly different view of the affairs of the independent from the views of stubborn banderlogs who took power in it 5 years ago and interviewed him in the person of the not-so-stubborn journalist.

At the same time, a fugitive deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation has a common conceptual error for all liberals about the secondary nature of Russia to the West, the insignificance of her and her leader, who sleeps and sees himself in power. I believe that Putin is still a statesman, and power and money are the last thing he thinks about. Note that this scratch also Nazarbayev anointed, they say, grandfather found himself a safe haven. At the same time, all these idiots creep in the West and even in front of the most impoverished European country, mired in poverty and theft, and overestimate the significance for Russia of the sanctions imposed by the West against it. Although in some ways he is right - regarding the towers of the Kremlin, affecting his position in Ukraine. And this is what I turned my attention to and why I highlighted this interview for you. The failure in the position on it in 2014-15, he said, happened only because the great Pu then went on about the occasion of his assistant Vladislav Surkov, who is charged not only with Donbass, but also Zurabov and unfulfilled hopes for Poroshenko. At a time when it was necessary to wet! By the way, and I think so! Further, he gives information about a change of leadership in Surkov’s department (you must agree, you didn’t even know about it). Surkov was not removed, but deprived of his right to make decisions in Ukraine, his department began to rotate personnel who had failed in this direction (the Head of the Department for Cross-Border Cooperation of the AP of the Russian Federation Oleg Govorun was removed from his post, Aleksey Filatov was already appointed to his position, who previously oversaw the direction South Ossetia, and in the management in the autumn on the initiative of Surkov, reorganization began, which ended with the change of not only signs, but also leadership). Only thanks to the fugitive deputy, I was able to find out about this, why he is following this, this is another matter, but after digging there, I found such revelations that I could not even imagine about. Surkov’s department began uniform cleaning, and no one there is trying to maintain the purity of his uniform, all the sisters are given earrings, which is already surprising, given the closed nature of this department. But more about this below in the section: “Curators and Overseers.” Now, the power block headed by Naryshkin, Patrushev and Bortnikov is entering the foreground. And the decisions there will be of a completely different nature. Soon you will see them and be able to appreciate. As a tip, I can only say that the recognition of LDNR in the status of South Ossetia-Abkhazia with the issuance of Russian passports and other consequences arising from this is no longer a matter of desire, but of time. Those. Now the question is being decided not “if”, but “when”.

And to close this topic already with traitors-defectors, I give you one more interview, this time already a traitor on the other hand, the Kiev SBU lieutenant colonel, who supposedly went over to the forces of Good for ideological reasons and gave a sensational interview to MIA Russia Today ". Here I am not going to discuss the facts presented by him, and which he read out on a piece of paper, here I only wanted to make personal observations about the person who defected. Exclusively at the footage level, see for yourself, draw your own conclusions.

I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth, but honestly, looking into his running eyes, looking at his face, which doesn’t fit into the safe, looking at his chubby hands, swollen belly, obviously from malnutrition and severe stress, nothing good to say about him I can not. He was obviously not an agent of the GRU, who had been working undercover all this time and saving the Russians who had fallen into the dungeons of the SBU at the risk of his life, and yet another policeman who smelled of fried and tried to run to the side of the winners in time. Scum, I saw these! He personally communicated and in ranks even higher than him, when asked whether he was afraid that he would have to answer anyway, my acquaintance colonel of the SBU, head of the Kharkov central department, who survived 19 chiefs during the service and changed four cars only after the Maidan, said that he’s not afraid of anything and in his cell, if they do put him in prison, he will have a TV and prostitutes every day. He disappeared a year ago, maybe they killed, (they were periodically passed through all the ATOs), or maybe he changed the room, then he went down with money, that he was deaf and dumb (we trained in the same room, we've known each other for 15 years, even when he was the captain). After all, I personally knew Avakov, I’m talking with his assistant (they’ve been familiar from school), who was left here in Kharkov on analytics, you won’t believe it, but the assistant is for us (he knows where the wind is blowing, but he’s praising his boss, smart, supposedly), I confirm - a very smart reptile, General Wolf of the Ukrainian flood. He will survive under any authority, he will flee, if anything, to Italy, and no one will extradite him from there to anyone.

This Ukrainian defector even read out to his colleagues who remained on the sinking ship and continued to serve the regime, read out a piece of paper - about the army, which only fired the first shot at its people, and then shot at a stranger. I am sure that this one also shot, they are all smeared with blood. He was pierced on the question of why he spent so much time confessing with confessions, as it turned out already from December 2017, he said, he solved household issues, judging by the erysipelas, he decided. The second obvious puncture, undisguised envy of a colleague who participated in the Maidan on the side of Berkut, and then made a dizzying career from lieutenant colonel to colonel general in 5 years, allegedly for participating in the Boeing case. But according to my information, everyone in one way or another involved in this matter from Ukraine is already in the grave, from the pilot Voloshin to the dispatcher of the Dnieper airport, the woman (he forgot his name, drowned in the UAE, swimming in the pool). And so much easier - they know too much. Apparently, the example of Boris Berezovsky taught nothing to anyone.

Conclusion: the scum that came over to our side, guided by the principle: "In time to betray - this is not to betray, but to anticipate!". It is such filth that serves there. Not so long ago, on April 10, the next two traitors, this time from the law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation, fled to the Ukrainian side, asking for political asylum, allegedly because of the prosecution by the internal security bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for a principled stand on combating crime. And the number of such defectors is growing, Ukraine has become a black hole, ready to shelter them and the like. And this problem will only get worse.

Closed Office: Curators and Supervisors

Now I return to the promised topic of curators and looking after Ukraine. There is a complete circus and a change of guard. They themselves give an unpleasant assessment. Fasten your seat belt. There will be quotes. Initially, only the facts.

The first leaks that the changes were coming began in the autumn of last year, when the department of Vladislav Surkov, responsible for Ukraine and completely failed in this area, began reorganizing and rotating personnel, which resulted in a change not only of the signboard, but also of the leadership. The result of this was the removal on April 4, 2019 from the post of Head of the Department for Cross-Border Cooperation of the AP of the Russian Federation Oleg Govorun (supposedly for family reasons), and the appointment of Alexey Filatov, who had previously held the position of chief adviser in this department, who supervised relations with South Ossetia. I especially draw the attention of inattentive readers - with South Ossetia! Draw conclusions, gentlemen!

On April 17, Putin signed a decree. Oleg Govorun has headed the department since 2013. It was formerly called the “Office of the President for Socio-Economic Cooperation with the Member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Republic of Abkhazia and the Republic of South Ossetia,” and received the current name “The Office for Cross-Border Cooperation of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation” in October 2018, after the issuance of the corresponding GDP Decree . At that time, the area of ​​responsibility of the administration also changed - it continued to oversee Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but only Ukraine remained from the CIS countries in its jurisdiction.

The clouds over Surkov began to thicken for a long time. Back in October 2016, the Ukrainian cyberhunt hacker group threw open an array of e-mails (including about the situation in Ukraine and the Donbass) supposedly belonging to Surkov. Then it ended with the resignation of the head of his apparatus, Alexander Pavlov, with the wording of his own free will (supposedly tired for 3 years). In the published array of letters (they were dated in the autumn of 2013 - in the summer of 2014), which, according to Cyberhunt, was in Surkov’s work mailbox with the gov domain (letters were also allegedly from Surkov’s mail on, in particular, there was a letter from the assistant to the founder of the Marshall Capital Partners investment fund, Konstantin Malafeev, dated May 13, 2014, which proposed candidates for leadership positions in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). A number of people from the list, in particular Alexander Zakharchenko, were appointed 4 months after the date of the letter - Zakharchenko was appointed chairman of the DPR government. One of the most resonant documents was the “Shatun” plan to destabilize the situation in Ukraine at the end of 2016–2017. by organizing mass protests involving the Ukrainian opposition, which was proposed to use in vain. All correspondence was conducted on behalf of the staff of the Surkov apparatus. I can only add on my own that everything is very similar to the truth with Malafeev (everyone knows his role in organizing resistance in the Donbass), but with “Shatun”, it seems, like throwing in the SBU, who tried to push their propaganda misrepresentation into the scandal. .

Surkov did not make public comments about the published correspondence attributed to him. Press Secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov twice clarified the published documents. First, he stated that he had known Surkov for more than 10 years and over the years Surkov “has been attributed something to a very talented person” all the time, but most often this does not correspond to reality (RIA Novosti, October 25, 2016). A day later, Peskov said that they had read the published data in the Kremlin, called the document “curious,” but again denied Surkov’s authorship.

I can say this is not him. Moreover, I can add: he does not use e-mail. At all

- then noted Peskov.

Be that as it may, the scandal was hushed up, but the sediment remained. And now new resignations and appointments. Prior to the newly appointed Alexei Filatov, work with Donbass in the Kremlin was supervised by Deputy Govorun Maxim Polyakov. He, like the other deputy. Talker overseeing economic issues of interaction with Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Denis Travin, while remaining at his post. And although the director of the Center close to the AP political The situation, Alexei Chesnakov believes that the reorganization of management has occurred on a regular basis, purely for technical reasons, but, nevertheless, other experts do not think so. Claims to the Surkov department have accumulated more than enough.

There can be any number of complaints about working on the Ukrainian political front, ”said Fedor Biryukov, member of the Bureau of the Presidium of the Rodina Party and Director of the Liberty Institute:

In fact, the Ukrainian direction was completely failed, as in previous times, before the 2014 coup. All work in Ukraine boils down to a variety of television talk shows, where the “Bandera experts” seem to represent an absolute evil, but in reality they simply insult our country and our people in front of a million-strong Russian audience. And all this, by the way, is by no means free, at our expense, as taxpayers. As a result, we are all well aware of how disgusting the Kiev regime is. And it is true. But what Russia does, how to solve this common problem for us, the entire Slavic world and Eastern Europe, is completely incomprehensible to people.

At the official level, Moscow, from the point of view of Biryukov, takes an overly conservative and restrained position with regard to Kiev.

We are laughing more and more at the Kiev aggressive attacks, and about Western sanctions. Over the past five years, the shortcomings of work on the Ukrainian topic have been successfully compensated by the “Crimean consensus”. The return of Crimea, the construction of the Crimean bridge - these, of course, were magnificent, brilliant acts of political will of the modern Russian state, historical events. But Crimea alone cannot pull or set off the entire Ukrainian direction. And there, alas, no particular success was noticed. Donbass also left the political and news agendas; moreover, the situation was complicated by the killings of popular militia commanders. And the Donbass Iliad ended with the death of the leader of the DPR, Alexander Zakharchenko. This became a tragic bloody point in the heroic period of the history of our "Wild West", as I sometimes call the Donbass with hooligan sympathy

- summed up the director of the Institute of Freedom.

He is echoed by the director of the Center for Public and Information Cooperation "Europe" Eduard Popov:

The point is not in this or that official, but in the strategy of work in the Donbass and Ukraine. And it seems to me extremely unsatisfactory. Our Ukrainian policy (and the policy regarding the DPR-LPR) was and is passive defensive and absolutely uncreative. In the republics of Donbass, they are building a little Ukraine without the Nazis. What we want to see in Ukraine is not at all clear. The “bad” Govorun, another slurred Russian official without his own vision and without strategic thinking, left (or rather left). But what in return? Will the old deck of managerial and expert personnel incapable of strategic creative thinking be shuffled? We are wasteless time. The main thing is that on the other side is growing a generation brought up in hatred of us. Water wears away the stone, and Ukrainian propaganda is working at full capacity. Our official Ukraine is in principle not capable of opposing this even in theory, in view of its hopeless archaism.

The result was summed up by the editor-in-chief of the FORUM.msk portal Anatoly Baranov. He thinks that

the results of work in the Donbass are monstrous, there is no time for encouraging personnel growth. But apparently there are no others. The change of Govorun to Filatov will not change much, because initially a flawed paradigm was chosen, in the framework of which the usual Russian thoughtlessness also appeared.

As a result, from his point of view,

The Minsk process has long ended, if at all. What awaits us is not his routine, but degeneration to complete meaninglessness. They will sit, officials receive a salary, and that’s it!

It's hard for me to disagree with him. Well, even in the Kremlin they began to understand this.


To sum up the bleak results. We can’t do anything with the American presence in Georgia, Ukraine, now also in Armenia. At the moment, we have only minimized the risks and set it on a spontaneous combustion mode. But this is a fait accompli, but what have we done to prevent this from happening? Nothing! Now we have to wait for the ruling elites to change as a result of the imminent deterioration in the economic situation of these countries, previously tied to Russia and the Russian market, and now forced to seek new markets. But this is, firstly, a long time, it will take years, if not decades, and during this time there will grow a generation that we lost, who lost our common cultural-historical code (the Americans will try, you can not even doubt it!), Plus torn economic ties that can no longer be restored, and secondly, what will we do if this does not happen?

It is understandable that it will be difficult for the Americans to do this with Ukraine, they have got too big a country, but with Georgia and Armenia it is completely within their power to support them and maintain the degree of Russophobia and anti-Russianism they need (we look at the Baltic states, Moldova, Turkmenistan). This is the result of a completely mediocre, weak-willed and wretched policy of the Russian Federation in these areas in previous years, beginning in 1991. And what do we do now? Maybe it’s worth at least something to be done, if you do not turn this chess table over, then at least mark the edges? Why not ?! How much will we swallow dust from under American hooves and watch them climb under our covers?

As a result, Ukraine over the past 5 years of our inaction has become a hotbed not of Bandera, but of the Zhid-Bandera. This is not about nationality, I treat Jews very well, (even more than), these comrades do not give a damn about Bandera’s ideals, for the most part they don’t even know Mova, they don’t even need it, under this sign they simply wring out what badly lies. As a result, crowds of dressed-up operetny fascists, who are fascists today, will be communists tomorrow, then by whom, even the seventh-day evangelists, run around the country. All these Natsiks are tame, popping up and popping into the box at the command of the puppeteers-oligarchs. True Bandera is not there, not yet, but they will grow up. Generation born 2000 and older have already been lost by us, a nationalist weed has grown up with brainwashed in school. And if parents with badly nailed roofs, then in general there will be a khan. Zelensky is the first product with uncomplicated Soviet ideological brains. Further it will be even worse! Will we wait or what?

Explain to me a foolish idiot why some god-forgotten Hungary, which has neither intercontinental missiles, nor oil, nor gas, which is almost invisible on the world map (only, except through a microscope!), With resources a thousand times smaller than the Russian Federation can fight with Ukraine in the trash because of some unfortunate 250 thousand ethnic Hungarians locally living in the Transcarpathian region, for their right to receive education in their native language. At the same time, blocking and torpedoing all decisions on Ukraine, both in the EU and NATO, creating a special ministry for Transcarpathian affairs and issuing passports of Hungarian citizens to everyone who confirmed their Hungarian origin (and there are already 180 thousand of them!), And the great and invincible Russia is not maybe, silently watching how the rights of 15-20 million Russian and Russian-speaking citizens of a neighboring country are trampled on, connected with the Russian Federation not only by a common language, culture and history, but also by family ties ?! This is such a failure, such a defeat that no success can be closed in Syria, in the Crimea and on the international stage! Moreover, we will reap the consequences of this failure for many, many years to come. Not only do we lose our last supporters and sympathizers in Ukraine, we also lose future generations, and we lose them forever! This is not something that is not imperial, God bless her with this empire! It is simply not state-owned. A politician of the rank of Putin cannot look so narrowly, under his feet. He must have a planning horizon of at least 50 years. What will happen to Ukraine in 50 years? And there will be a black hole that will draw into itself, like any antimatter, everything around. Why does Russia need such problems in the future? I dont know! One hope is that I don’t know Putin’s plans either. I hope for its adequacy to the expected threats. Believe me, this is not about military and terrorist threats (Russia will cope with them, then).

It seems that the Kremlin finally realized the danger of the neutral position they occupied in Ukraine, and they included a regime to force peace and friendship that was torn out of the cutting line. So far, exclusively economic, but tough measures (I talked about them in the 3rd part). It will not help, it will include measures of military-political influence (with recognition of LDNR and other consequences arising from there). But more about that in the next text.
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sergeu2 Offline sergeu2
    sergeu2 (sergeu) April 22 2019 10: 43
    How beautifully written about the non-rational reflection of all passionaries and sub-passionaries, and they have nothing to do with what is happening in Ukraine.
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 17: 18
      I agree. It was an eyeliner. More relevant to domestic Russian graters. Take it as a general trend.
  2. Gunter prereen Offline Gunter prereen
    Gunter prereen (Gunter Preen) April 22 2019 11: 18
    The article is correct. Correct in the sense that Russia should save the neighboring state. But the question is why Russia should save all these "brothers". This, in my opinion, is the main mistake. Should not! It's not time to collect stones yet! The creation of an alternative Ukraine is another mistake! This education should not exist in principle!
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 17: 19
      No need to save anyone already! Save yourself first! You are next!
  3. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) April 22 2019 11: 19
    Much has been written, but the author was afraid to say the main thing: the Kremlin took the path of Russian betrayal in Ukraine by the conclusion of the Minsk agreements. And all this time, the regime was nurturing the cultivating fascism, being its main trading partner and investor, as well as allowing every day to kill citizens of the republic with impunity. And his actions differed little in this matter from the actions of those who are shown by traitors in the article.
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 17: 20
      I agree. This is already in the next text. I'm shocked myself!
    2. beeper Offline beeper
      beeper April 27 2019 01: 51
      hi I was then, in 2014, most of all "finished off" by these conscientious Russian "returns from Crimea" - the supply of serviceable armored vehicles, aviation and other military equipment to the Kiev junta, when the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other banderonazi punishers had already strangled the rest of Eastern Ukraine and ironed out the remnants of Donbass with might and main! Apart from the uninterrupted supply of fuel, equipment and spare parts from Russia and Belarus!
      But then, when I came to the idea of ​​the obvious fright of the Russian oligarchs because of our passionate Russian Spring, and the Belarusian ones because of the Russian "Crimean scenario", then the consolidated, Russian-Belarusian, solidary support of the "Banderozhidov" kleptoligarchy in suppressing the spontaneous popular uprising under the ANTIOLIGARCHIC SLOGANS I began to see logical and understandable. request
  4. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 11: 21
    To begin with, I admit my mistake with the forecast. I bet on Poroshenko. I can explain why. The fact that the majority against Poroshenko was clear. But I did not take into account the opinion of the voters. I thought that there would be massive ballot box stuffing. But Poroshenko did not want to fight for the chair. Could or did not want is no longer important. Apparently, the elections were still relatively fair.
    But this just gives food for thought. The turnout is slightly more than 50%, Zelensky scored 73%. These numbers correlate well with Putin's 2014 rating. We can say that Zelensky has carte blanche for any action. But it can also be argued that after these elections, the Ukrainians may not say that Russia has forgotten or betrayed them. Yesterday was not the Maidan, but the elections. Apparently, fairly fair elections. South-East Ukraine (Russians and Russian-speaking) unambiguously voted for the program of the Servant of the People party. The course towards the EU and NATO is clearly fixed there. And if you can still agree with the EU, then the course towards a military enemy of Russia is a deliberate choice of the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine (in the South-East for Zelensky more than 80%). Zelensky supports the Russophobic law on languages, believes that there is nothing to negotiate with Donbass, and speaks of Russia's aggression.
    If I made a mistake with the forecast, but the situation as a whole has not changed. I always said and I repeat that nothing depends on personalities. Poroshenko, Zelensky, damn bald .... Ukraine as a state is anti-Russia. And the policy towards Ukraine should be the policy towards the enemy. Therefore, there should be only one policy - non-recognition of election results and economic strangulation of Ukraine.
    1. Valentine Offline Valentine
      Valentine (Valentin) April 22 2019 12: 16
      The Ukrainians did not vote personally for Zelensky, who for most of them is a "pig in a poke", but voted only against Poroshenko, which eliminated one main evil from power, but what the new president will be like is complete confusion, after all, he the product of its time, the time of "nezalezhnosti", and that says a lot. And there we will see ...
      1. Bakht Offline Bakht
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 12: 50
        Ukrainians voted for Zelensky. The second round was uncontested. But this shows the result of the first round unambiguously.
        1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
          Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 17: 29
          They said another nonsense! The Ukrainians voted not for Zelensky's program, which no one read at all, not even sure that it exists, but against Petya and his policies. At the same time, Zelya won in all regions. In the second round, the votes are not "for" but "against". Against whoever you like less. Nobody liked Petya anymore!
          1. Bakht Offline Bakht
            Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 18: 10
            How did Zelensky get into the second round? He won in the first round in almost all regions. Or say that in the first round they did not vote for Zelensky?
            The program (in general terms) is set out on the website of the Servant of the People party.
            1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
              Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 18: 16
              In the 1st round, the voters of Boyko and Vilkula also voted for him, not sure what their chosen ones would pass. Always vote for the passing.
              1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 18: 21
                Vladimir, he scored 6 million votes. 35% of the active electorate. And he won in all areas except 4.
                Ukraine voted for Zelensky. Not for Boyko, not for Vilkul. They always vote for their own, and not for the "passing" one. Especially in the first round. This is a fact for me. Not a guess or a prediction. It is a fait accompli.
                1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
                  Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 18: 42
                  not 6 million, but 5,7 million, not 35%, but 30,2%, and not in all but 4, but in all but 5. That's how you have it!
                  1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 18: 53
                    Should I give the exact numbers? 5 714 034 votes. Almost 6 million. 30,24% This is all the data of the Ukrainian Central Election Commission.
                    And besides petty counting, for whom did the Ukrainians vote in the first round? For Vilkul, who scored less than 800 thousand, or for Boyko with 2 votes. Yes, both of them together scored fewer votes than Poroshenko. Maybe all the same for Zelensky?
                    I explain again. In fair elections, Zelensky’s victory was predetermined. Neither Boyko nor Vulkul in modern Ukraine have any chances. And not a single pro-Russian candidate there has the slightest chance. I bet on Poroshenko only in the calculation of mass fraud.
                    It is absolutely clear to me that "Ukraine is not Russia". And these elections only confirmed this.
                    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
                      Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 22: 31
                      And what pro-Russian Vilkul-did not know! That's what his Kremlin blacklisted! If 6 million voted for Zelya, then this is not all of Ukraine. In Ukraine, only 30 million registered voters. Officially. And who were the Ukrainians to vote for? Not for Petya ?! You do not like everything. Were fair elections bad, would not be fair too bad. You already decide what you need!
                      1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
                        Volkonsky (Vladimir) April 22 2019 22: 37
                        Yes, both of them together scored fewer votes than Poroshenko. (from)

                        If summarized, it will turn out just as much as Petya, given that he attributed part of the votes to himself from Julia and given the stat. error
                        Petro Poroshenko - 15,95% (3 014 609)
                        Yulia Tymoshenko - 13,40% (2 532 452)
                        Yuri Boyko - 11,67% (2 206 216)
                        Alexander Vilkul - 4,15% (784 274)
                      2. Bakht Offline Bakht
                        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 23: 08
                        What does it like or dislike? I don’t like anything in Ukraine. You could already notice that my opinion is that nothing depends on the personalities. The state development trend is negative. So nothing good can be expected. I was interested in the mood of people. And nothing else.
                        I do not envy Zelensky. In vain he got into this shit. Sometimes I even think that Poroshenko specially handed him these Augean stables. How he will resolve the situation is not clear. About the same picture was with Pashinyan in Armenia. What can he change? Without a change in the direction of state policy, nothing will come of it. And changing the course of the state is much more difficult than changing the course for a ship. The mass is huge, the inertia gained is incredible.
                        The only plus is Poroshenko is gloomy. Zelensky will be a little more fun.
  5. Oleg RB Offline Oleg RB
    Oleg RB (Oleg) April 22 2019 14: 02
    My prognosis that Zelenich will be hungry is not as fun as in the series, of course, but there are a lot of good ideas in it.
  6. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) April 22 2019 14: 20
    If we talk about the "Shatun" plan, then Mishiko-shatun played pranks at this time. Why did it coincide? Only Masons can explain this.
    But they are not fighting for Ukraine for two reasons - either they wait until they are ripe for partition (as with the Ruin), or some of the responsible comrades can work for Langley.
    But in Russia it is necessary to create an organization like the Comintern (for example, Rusintern, or Slavianinter), and conduct active propaganda against the Anglo-Saxons, recruiting its supporters. It is necessary that in Ukraine everyone heard how the Anglo-Saxons ate Ukrainian lard.
  7. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) April 22 2019 18: 17
    The Kremlin has already responded to the election of a new president of Ukraine.
    There will be no congratulations, there will be no negotiations either. It all depends on the first steps of the new government in Kiev. It would be nice to start withdrawing heavy weapons and stop shelling the Donbass.
  8. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 23 2019 09: 35
    I liked Strelkov’s interview.
    Where he says that Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs nurtured and ruled nationalism there, and not a word about any agents of the State Department or already forgotten Euro-commissars and Euro-dozens of Maidan.

    This explains a lot: both the growth of unspoken trade and investment during the "sanctions", and the actions of the authorities in relations with Ukraine and the republics ....

    And I agree with the article, the advertised "Russian world" and the CIS were profited with blood ...
    1. beeper Offline beeper
      beeper April 27 2019 02: 12
      hi Well, it is well known, even from Lenin's writings, that the petty-bourgeois nationalist parties act as secret police for the middle and large bourgeoisie, which is why the "kleptoligarchs" -kleptoligarchs in Ukraine, from the very first day of the pro-American puppet "independence", intensively nurtured, organized and nourished every marginal cheval, taking her to the authorities!
      This became especially visible with the very "outrageous" Yanek-Azarov and their "inter-factional" nationalist camarilla, from which their "offended", deprived of in the division of stolen goods, colleagues in the razderiban of the post-Soviet public Property, who later became the beneficiaries of the "peremogo" "and together with the remnants of the gold state reserve and priceless Scythian treasures, they completely surrendered Ukraine under the external control of the Fashington governors!
      1. Vladimir T Offline Vladimir T
        Vladimir T (Vladimir T) 10 June 2019 01: 14
        Just like Lenin’s speech from an armored car, with a cap in his hand.
        1. beeper Offline beeper
          beeper 10 June 2019 16: 22
          This is at the Finland Station, well, dear Vladimir T ?! It must be assumed that this is the highest mark, even according to Soviet canons ?! winked
          My great-grandfather, a Little Russian peasant, a Workaholic from the Workaholic-Salt of our Russian Land, after being seriously wounded at the front, underwent further treatment in St. Petersburg. There he was caught by revolutionary events and was on that "memorable day of the meeting of the leader of the world proletariat (as they later wrote in the officialdom)" there, with his rifle, on the guard of honor (the hero of the First World War, a participant in the Brusilov breakthrough, he lived to almost 100 years and until the end of his life he retained clarity of mind, but always spoke a little, listened more, expressed himself in essence and with soldier's directness, regardless of faces and not shying away from "strong words") and told that there were many of those orators who then spoke - all speeches "from the armored car" they said!
          But, supposedly, he did not notice the "fiery throat-leader" himself against the "general background" and then, when Lenin was already "talked about among the broad popular masses," he asked his regiment comrades which of the speakers he was ...
          And now, after all the hardships and misfortunes suffered during the years of the civil war and collectivization, the cruel "smoking cigarettes" and exile to the North (when they, not only my relatives, all our fellow countrymen, when loading into a cracked freight car, in winter ! local "activists" took away almost all the food and warm outerwear !!! Of those who arrived in that train to the North and were unloaded from the train somewhere, in the middle of the snow, not at a station or a half-station, ...., by spring all the numerous small children died, only adults survived, and even then not all, but as a result, only a few people returned from that harsh exile alive!) - already in the 60s, my great-grandfather used to say in his hearts that if then, on Finnish railway station, he knew that from that little, little, lispy, burly cholovich bude of the style of grief and bids to all of us, then in the maine there was a bullet in my hands and I did a good haircut, then I would shoot him (then I would shoot if -Russian)! ", than plunged us, his great-grandchildren into shock, after all," Lenin's grandfather "was supposed to about "love", there was even a rhyme, familiar to all of us from the Soviet nursery - "I'm a little girl, I don't go to school, I haven't seen Lenin, but I love him!"
          And with "speeches (as well as with artistic performances in amateur performances)" I was fine from school, without false modesty I will say this, already summing up, taxing, life results! yes
          Since birth, a leader, the most red and loud in our hospital, and after all, the oldest child in a large family.
          I can "with preparation (independently write a speech on any topic-horizons and good Soviet education allow)" or "impromptu", on the move, speak "with a speech" on the current situation and the world situation! The Soviet government provided such opportunities, and work in leading command positions forced "not to relax" in any situation, because under the leadership of me, then a very young mechanical engineer, and men with a difficult fate were ("repeat offenders" - in the intervals imprisonment and veterans of hostilities, straight from the war, with all the accompanying "show-off" and "kooky", with all their "concepts" and "cockroaches in the head", and with "piercing-cutting on the pocket" request ), "with a penchant for murderous crime and unbridled violence", such bogies came across that when they were drunk or "on infidelity" it seemed that they could not cope with such a "scumbag", especially if there were several of them, as usual - "herd instinct" prevailed! smile
          So, the "training" was good, how to instantly assess the developing situation and, quietly and peacefully, "divide and rule", if possible without assault and hand-to-hand combat (if, of course, it was possible to do without, after all, there are no alternative situations), only intimate In a word, "to penetrate to the marrow of bones and the depths of the Soul" or "to breed demagoguery" - "to ride over the brains" in order to calm down provocateurs and contenders for informal leadership, as well as - "to motivate the collective, its members" and "guide on the true path" and "splinters" of any kind, so that the whole team can do the work, get it done, with all its "terrible power"! wink
          1. Vladimir T Offline Vladimir T
            Vladimir T (Vladimir T) 10 June 2019 17: 34
            Well, there was no point in shooting Lenin then. He did not make the revolution. And for the better, would it have worked. History must be accepted without "if only". Although the idea was interesting.
            1. beeper Offline beeper
              beeper 10 June 2019 17: 38
              But there was a chance to change the course of history (it was only later that our leaders thought of "dismantling the bolts" in the rifles and carbines of the soldiers of the guard of honor), Lenin was very lucky then - in my family they always shot accurately, and not only men! winked